| cjwatson | ev: I dunno. I do sort of agree with Joey, and I hate the idea of keeping a patch like that against debconf forever. Is there a strong reason for us to push it? | 08:18 |
|---|---|---|
| ev | cjwatson: we could enable debug mode by default during development and not have to ask people to run through the installer a second time (especially when they've since completed a successful install). | 11:00 |
| ev | is there a reason why it's considered a hack? Other than the regex on "SET " it seems quite clean, and I can't see why the aforementioned bit is that bad. | 11:03 |
| ev | err rather, "why do you consider it a hack" | 11:03 |
| cjwatson | ev: having to parse the command twice is pretty ugly, but the really ugly bit is having to figure out the question type right at the start like that | 12:51 |
| cjwatson | ev: maybe we could have that hack in debconf just during development, not sure | 12:51 |
| cjwatson | I think I would strongly prefer it not to be present for release | 12:52 |
| ev | that sounds like a reasonable compromise if we cannot come up with anything better. | 12:52 |
| CIA-3 | partman-base: cjwatson * r210 ubuntu/ (68 files in 3 dirs): merge from Debian 141 | 14:14 |
| ubottu | Error: Debian bug 141 could not be found | 14:14 |
| CIA-3 | partman-base: cjwatson * r211 ubuntu/debian/changelog: releasing version 141ubuntu1 | 14:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!