[00:06] <jfroy> Is there a way to change bugs in batch on Launchpad?
[00:45] <dcoles> jfroy: The best way we've found for our project was with the LP API
[00:47] <dcoles> We used it to flip a whole series of bugs from "Fixed Commited" to "Fixed Released" on release.
[02:58] <nigelbabu> wgrant: yeah, that happens first, but the script would still be running
[02:58] <nigelbabu> wgrant: thanks for doing this even on transit :)
[04:01] <jtimberman> ticket for broken ppa.launchpad.net?
[04:07] <nigelbabu> jtimberman: see topic
[04:08] <jtimberman> Yes, I see it is broken.
[04:32] <_habnabit> I think I might still be doing something wrong with my translations. All of my .po files still say 'needs review'.
[04:32] <_habnabit> https://translations.launchpad.net/infobat/infobob/+imports
[04:32] <_habnabit> Is there something I'm still doing wrong, or do I just have to wait?
[04:39] <_habnabit> Oh, never mind, they're all approved now.
[05:38] <Sarvatt> ftp down? can't upload at the moment - Connection failed, aborting. Check your network [Errno 111] Connection refused
[05:38] <ekilfoil> * Topic for #launchpad is: ppa.launchpad.net upload server down -- use upload.ubuntu.com
[05:39] <ekilfoil> still trying to figure out how one uses upload.ubuntu.com though...
[05:39]  * Sarvatt completely didn't see that
[05:39] <Sarvatt> sorry!
[05:40] <ekilfoil> would that be the "old" method with the dput.cf file and whatnot?
[05:42] <ekilfoil> ah... good old host files works
[06:14] <ekilfoil> what's the best method for versioning in a PPA?  For example, if I fix a small bug in an existing package, and want to put that in my PPA, what is standard practice for making the updater recongnize it as new without breaking the real version?
[06:16] <jpds> ekilfoil: Append ~ppaN to the Debian version and keep incrementing N?
[06:18] <ekilfoil> so if "package_1.0-1ubuntu1" is the official version, i just make mine "package_1.0-1ubuntu1~ppa1"?
[06:19] <ekilfoil> it didn't seem to like that idea... but I may have messed it up with a previous attempt: xorg-server_1.7.6-2ubuntu7.1~ppa1.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7.1~ppa1 <= 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7.1
[06:19] <jpds> Hmm, that won't make it pick it up as a newer version...
[06:30] <ekilfoil> it's kinda nice with the normal upload servers down... my builds starts so much faster :)
[06:46] <goli> How can I add a download package to my project main page before release?
[06:59] <thumper> goli: downloads are attached to releases
[06:59] <thumper> (or milestones?)
[07:01] <Sarvatt> ekilfoil: increment and add the ~ which will make it lower than without ~. 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7.2~ppa1 < 2:1.7.6-2ubuntu7.2
[07:02] <ekilfoil> Sarvatt: i see... thanks
[07:03] <thumper> goli: once a milestone is turned into a release (it can be a future release), you can add download files
[07:20] <goli> thumper: I did so and registered a future release for my project, but it only lets me to upload download files.
[07:20] <goli> thumper: how can I choose a package from my ppa for a release?
[07:50] <quentusrex> Anyone know of the apport bug: Error connecting to Launchpad: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'makefile'
[07:50] <quentusrex> I can't seem to get more debug info out of apport.
[07:51] <quentusrex> and a quick google returns a few people in the last couple weeks with the same issue, but no responses to their questions.
[13:06] <godbyk> I've had some reports recently from our translators that a number of strings have been flagged as 'needs review'.  It seems this change happened overnight.  Do you know what's happened?  (See http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/05/08/%23ubuntu-manual.html#t10:14 and https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual/msg01692.html for two such reports.)
[13:11] <mtaylor> lifeless: here yet?
[13:21] <TresEquis> Just reported a problem with SVN imports on the 'pear' host:  https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/577810
[13:46] <lifeless> mtaylor: yes
[13:47] <lifeless> mtaylor: where are you ?
[15:58] <lifeless> mtaylor: yo
[16:44] <masmullin> hello.  I have a quick question for any launchpad superusers
[16:44] <masmullin> anyone avail?
[16:45] <nigelbabu> !ask
[16:46] <masmullin> I have branches that have been merged into the main project's trunk branch.  Should I delete these branches?
[17:21] <mtaylor> lifeless: hey. trying to decide if I'm going to come out to the hotel tonight or just come in the morning
[17:22] <mtaylor> lifeless: anything exciting going on?
[17:38] <lifeless> mtaylor: kindof
[17:38] <lifeless> mtaylor: theres a canonical prep meeting @7
[17:38] <lifeless> and stuff after that I guess. But hey we could always hack or whatever. Where are you staying?
[17:43] <mtaylor> lifeless: I'm at the le meridian in brussels for tonight and tomorrow (I waited to long to book at the dolce) and then I move to the dolce on tuesday
[17:44] <lifeless> there are people, come say hi; or not - all good ;)
[17:45] <mtaylor> cool
[18:07] <popey> guessing someone has pointed out that the certificate on login.launchpad.net has expired?
[18:08] <popey> hello TREllis :)
[18:08] <TREllis> evening :-)
[18:09] <nigelbabu> popey: dont think so
[18:09] <nigelbabu> I mean you're the first person to say it
[18:09] <popey> wondering who to report it to..
[18:09] <popey> will mail someone
[18:10] <nigelbabu> jml, wgrant, thumper: ^
[18:10]  * nigelbabu pokes people he knows are associated with LP
[18:11] <Penguin_Guy> Bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/374325
[18:11] <popey> ah ok
[18:12] <popey> bit old that :)
[18:12] <popey> deja vu :)
[18:22] <Penguin_Guy> Changing the subject, how do I release a package for all distributions?
[19:17] <x3464> Anyone having problems logging into launchpad.net?  It says the security certificate expired.
[19:30] <Penguin_Guy> Yeah, the certificate has expired, bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/577915
[19:30] <Penguin_Guy> I think you'll be fine just ignoring the warning for now.
[19:37] <Penguin_Guy> x3464
[19:37] <nigelbabu> wgrant: well, can you inform whoever hsa to be informed that lp has an expirced certificate?
[19:37] <x3464> Thanks Penguin_Guy!  :)
[19:38] <wgrant> LOSAs: ^^
[19:39] <wgrant> (login.launchpad.net isn't actually really that related to Launchpad, so it probably didn't get its certificate updated at the same time)
[19:42] <Penguin_Guy> wgrant: lists.launchpad.net and lists.edge.launchpad.net were also late in being updated.
[19:42] <Penguin_Guy> wgrant: 'LOSAs'?
[19:43] <wgrant> Penguin_Guy: Launchpad (and other stuff) Operational System Administrators, I believe.
[19:43] <Penguin_Guy> Thanks
[20:00] <geser> wgrant, Penguin_Guy: https://edge.launchpad.net/~canonical-losas agrees with it
[20:01] <mtaylor> lifeless: I unintentionally attempted to crash the canonical party - but there were way too many people in the room :)
[20:19] <wgrant> Penguin_Guy: It should be fixed now. Can you confirm?
[20:19] <Penguin_Guy> wgrant: Yep, everything works fine.
[20:25] <bigjools> maverick PPAs are open, enjoy
[20:28] <munckfish> Hi, I just reported a bug on a broken machine using ubuntu-bug, got as far as logging into LP then the machine did it's crash (unexpectedly). Is there a way I can retrieve that bug report and complete it?
[20:36] <Penguin_Guy> munckfish: Probably not.
[20:37] <munckfish> Penguin_Guy: ok thx
[20:38] <Penguin_Guy> Anyone know how I make my package available on all versions of Ubuntu?
[20:45] <ubuntujenkins> I have just put it a package deletion request, how do i know when it is done?
[20:48] <Penguin_Guy> ubuntujenkins: I presume you'd get an email, although I've never done it myself.
[20:50] <ubuntujenkins> Penguin_Guy: i requested a deletion a few days ago for a package in another ppa and have not had anything.
[20:50] <ubuntujenkins> I would like to get this ppa sorted soon
[20:51] <nigelbabu> wgrant: got a minute before you turn into a pumpkin?
[20:52] <nigelbabu> that try catch we wrote to catch 410 the other day fails :(
[20:52] <Penguin_Guy> ubuntujenkins: Which package? Which PPA?
[20:54] <JanC> ubuntujenkins: I'd say you should be able to see when you look at the PPA's contents?
[20:55] <rektide> where do i get the source code for a project
[20:55] <rektide> i'd like the source for https://launchpad.net/~gwibber-daily/+archive/ppa
[20:55] <rektide> alternatively, if there is no such thing
[20:55] <rektide> i'd like the source for https://launchpad.net/gwibber
[20:56] <ubuntujenkins> Penguin_Guy: and JanC this is the ppa i have just requested the deletion for https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual/+archive/ubuntu-manual/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter= and they are suppose to be deleted but the size of the ppa has not gone down
[20:56] <nigelbabu> rektide: the first link about code.edge.launchpad you see is the source
[20:57] <nigelbabu> you should see that in the ppa link you ust put in here
[20:57] <ubuntujenkins> rektide: have a look at https://code.edge.launchpad.net/gwibber and choose which branch you would like
[20:59] <rektide> how can i merge two branches?  i need https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gwibber-committers/gwibber/trunk and https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gwibber-team/gwibber/packaging
[21:01] <JanC> ubuntujenkins: in that case you probably need a LP admin to answer your question (or maybe wait a little bit longer)
[21:01] <ubuntujenkins> ok thanks I will keep waiting
[21:01] <Penguin_Guy> ubuntujenkins: It says status:deleted on half of those packages.
[21:02] <ubuntujenkins> Penguin_Guy: yep but the space in the ppa has not gone down
[21:03] <Penguin_Guy> ubuntujenkins: Yeah, that's quite confusing. Maybe you should submit a bug.
[21:03] <ubuntujenkins> Penguin_Guy: I think I might wait, I get the feeling the deletion is not instant
[23:06] <godbyk> I've had some reports recently from our translators that a number of strings have been flagged as 'needs review'.  It seems this change happened overnight.  Do you know what's happened?  (See http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/05/08/%23ubuntu-manual.html#t10:14 and https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual/msg01692.html for two such reports.)