=== txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger [00:57] guys, what do with #577627 ? it could warrant a SRU, but I'm not familiar with the process [01:01] oho wow, I really need to go to bed, there's one from 2 months ago already >.> [01:04] bug 577627 [01:04] Launchpad bug 577627 in php-mcrypt "Shipped config file uses deprecated "#" comment" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/577627 [01:05] Bachstelze: Warnings like that probably do not meet the SRU criteria. Will the problem cause applications to fail? [01:06] nope, I wonder why it's still there, though [01:06] given it was reported before the release [01:07] Bachstelze: nobody found it, and the user did not subscribe ubuntu-sponsors. [01:08] Bachstelze: can you provide a command that demostrates the issue? [01:08] anything with php-cli [01:08] like php --version [01:08] with mcrypt installed [01:09] there's also a bunch of other extensions with the same problem [01:10] Bachstelze: I see. [01:11] Bachstelze: It might be useful to report the problems when they occur to the upstream maintainers, as well as Debian. Carrying an ubuntu delta for a bunch of packages just to fix deprecation warnings seems a bit overkill if you can get upstream or Debian to cooperate. [01:11] *as to Debian [01:12] it's fiit was fixed in Debian in 5.3.2-1 [01:14] Bachstelze: Okay. The reason it was not fixed in Ubuntu was because the patch provided by the original reporter did not fix the problem. [01:14] (Reading bug 540208, from what I can tell) [01:14] Launchpad bug 540208 in php-mcrypt "deprecated comment in mcrypt.ini" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/540208 [01:23] lfaraone: you can also mark #577591 as a duplicate (or Invalid) [01:24] Bachstelze: already done. [01:27] no, you did 577627 ;) === jrib1 is now known as jrib [08:04] * hyperair wonders when the debian autosync begins [08:05] hyperair: i'd assume sometime monday durring UDS when someone has time to turn the bits on [08:05] oh cool [08:05] maybe later today if someone is stuck in transit or got there early [08:06] but again this is just my guess , from prior cycles [08:06] but its normaly very very soon after the "archive open" email comes [08:07] they also may be waiting for the default gcc discussion too [08:08] i see. === JanC_ is now known as JanC [10:38] how do I know which package is synced from debian and which is not?. after packaging a newer version if I get 'we sync this from debian' thats not good. [10:54] om26er: packages without ubuntu specific changes are synced from debian [10:55] nigelbabu, that would make it more than 80%packages? [10:55] om26er: yup [10:55] thanks nigelbabu [12:01] if there are bugs in some files of the debian package which I'm packaging from scratch, is it better to apply a patch for the files or modify the files instead? (license: GPL3 +) [12:02] s/debian package/source [12:06] BlackZ: From what I understand, you should be patching, as you're not upstream, are you? [12:08] astraljava: no [12:11] astraljava: OK, I've patched it. Thanks ;) [12:12] ScottK: can you prod a package through binary NEW ? [12:13] the source package is the same as before, it just builds a few more binarys now ( from a debian sync ) [12:14] btw hopefully your flight(s) were uneventful :) [12:14] i saw crimsun and a few others wernt so lucky [12:57] imbrandon: I made it. What package? [13:11] ScottK: opensync [13:11] is the source package [13:11] * ScottK looks [13:14] Love the debian/changelog entry. [13:14] yeah [13:15] one of my favourite messups! [13:18] heh what part? [13:18] http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/opensync/news/20100206T230242Z.html [13:20] ahh [13:20] oh what a messup indeed! [13:20] and what is 'unreleased'! [13:22] it's a secret Debian distribution which will reclaim victory from Ubuntu [13:22] got accidently leaked through this upload [13:23] yes, and they tend to not have changelog entires to confuse us :D [13:23] imbrandon: Done. [13:24] ScottK: ty [13:26] azeem: I wonder, isn't lintian supposed to catch such type of mistakes? [13:27] the guy probably didn't run lintian [14:03] imbrandon, ScottK: http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/opensync/news/20100509T130257Z.html [14:05] Revisonism ... [14:05] We'll get it on the next autosync run. [14:06] ScottK: there was a subversion tag of -3 with those changes already, so... [14:06] plus it fixes an RC bug [14:06] It will come in the next autosync run. [14:06] sure === CieD is now known as Ciemon === yofel_ is now known as yofel === nobawk is now known as nobawk|away [19:49] Hi, I need to get a dependency packaged for a piece of software that I work on. The dependency I need is very similar to another package that is already in universe. What is the best way to get in contact with the packager? The package in question is pyclutter-gtk. [19:49] laymansterms: look at changelog and get in touch with last updater [19:50] especially if that person has @ubuntu or @debian email ID [19:51] nigelbabu, the ChangeLog for pyclutter-gtk says it was generated by 'configure.' Does that matter? [19:51] or should I still try to contact that person? [19:51] ChangeLog? no, look at debian/changelog [19:51] um, yeah debian/changelog [19:52] oh, oops. Sorry, I forget about the debian changelog. [19:52] * laymansterms has very little packaging experience. [19:54] nigelbabu, the email in the changelog is a debian email address. Do you know of a good channel to ask in? Something equivalent to #ubuntu-motu for Debian? [19:54] #debian-mentors on oftc [19:54] someone with a notebook with one battery please tell me what battery number you have (/sys/class/power_supply/BATN) [19:54] laymansterms: If the package comes straight from Debian unmodified, I'd email the maintainer [19:54] apparently mine's BAT1, but conky hardcodes BAT0 [19:55] ScottK, okay, I'll give that a shot. [19:55] hyperair: BAT1 on a Dell mini 10v. [19:55] nigelbabu, thanks. [19:55] ScottK: thanks. [19:55] anyone else? [19:56] hyperair: one sec [19:56] ScottK: so, what country are you in? [19:56] hyperair: BAT0 [19:56] maco: Belgium. [19:56] nigelbabu: interesting. [19:57] nigelbabu: so only some computers are affected. whee. [19:57] ScottK: ok so you made it then. dan's plane got a flat tire last night and wasnt allowed to cross the ocean. i think he's hanging out at the airport on standby right now [19:57] could a MOTU review/advocate http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/autotrash ? thanks [19:57] maco: oh, dan still doesn't have flight? [19:58] nigelbabu: well he came home last night and was still here when i went out this morning [19:58] maco: Ouch. [19:58] but he's gone now, so i assume at airport [20:04] hyperair: mine also is BAT1 [20:04] hyperair: toshiba , old intel celeron m based laptop [20:06] ScottK: are autosyncs on/running now ? [20:06] I think it was run the first time earlier toda. [20:06] y [20:07] Not sure how it worked out. [20:07] k [20:07] how often does merges.u.c update ? [20:07] imbrandon: cjwatson started one [20:07] geser: great [20:09] imbrandon: I think /6 hoours [20:09] k [20:09] trying to plan for my next 2 days, gonna be offline for 4 hours chunks 3x over the next 2 days [20:09] so i'm trying to stack a bit of "offline" stuff to do [20:10] the buildds are busy the next three days at least [20:10] oh i'm sure [20:11] i got some "real" work to do also ( as in my day job ) so i'll likely do some of that too [20:12] ScottK: i tell you i switched companies ? [20:13] imbrandon: I thought you started your own store, or is that just a side job? [20:13] ScottK: thats just a side thing , online only [20:14] ScottK: i went to work for the company BenC is working at now, actualy working on the same project ;) [20:14] Ah. [20:14] I see. [20:14] No, you hadn't mentioned it. [20:15] yes, its really a quite cool project, and its based on Ubuntu LTS , woot [20:16] its mostly a 4 to 5 guy team, he is doing the drive/kernel stuff, i got the front end, and there there is some SA and QA guys [20:16] driver* [20:25] hello again, is there a Ubuntu meta package that is helpful for installing helpful packaging tools? I feel like there is but I can't remember the name of it. devscripts or something. [20:26] laymansterms: correct, http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/devscripts [20:27] c_korn, I just did an apt-cache search for "packaging" and saw ubuntu-dev-tools. Do you know the difference between devscripts and ubuntu-dev-tools? [20:27] laymansterms: and ubuntu-dev-tools [20:28] laymansterms: devscripts originates from debian. [20:28] I'd like to use bzr builddeb... is that plugin in one of those packages? [20:28] laymansterms: ubuntu-dev-tools is ubuntu-specific. [20:28] bzr builddeb is a package of its own afaik [20:28] laymansterms: use both, devscripts is more generic but required and u-d-t makes your life easier ;) [20:30] imbrandon, ubuntu-dev-tools says it replaces devscripts [20:30] laymansterms: yea it probably has some of the updated scripts , it used to depend on it [20:30] now probably encompases it [20:31] it's weird: Depends: devscripts Conflicts: devscripts Replaces: devscripts [20:31] (lines from apt-cache depends ubuntu-dev-tools) [20:46] hum [20:58] imbrandon: congrats. Good to be able to hook people up [20:58] crimsun: ty ty [20:59] crimsun: i already got some of the hardware in hand to install monday, looks like its going to be a fun project [20:59] nice [21:02] crimsun: did you finaly make it , or still waiting somewhere in-between [21:09] imbrandon: I'm still at the origin; our rebooked flight is scheduled for 1715 departure from Dulles [21:10] four of us are going to be dragging at the opening meeting [21:10] heh i bet, that sucks === Philip6 is now known as Philip5 === nobawk|away is now known as nobawk