[08:30] <bencer> i've tried to dget linux_2.6.24-27.69.dsc from lp several times and always orig.tar.gz files on file size, could be corrupted there ?
[08:34] <wgrant> bencer: Which link were you using?
[08:34] <bencer> wgrant: dget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/linux_2.6.24-27.69.dsc
[08:35] <wgrant> bencer: That's... slightly concerning.
[08:36] <wgrant> Let's see.
[08:36] <bencer> dpkg-source: error: File ./linux_2.6.24.orig.tar.gz has size 59078927 instead of expected 59085601
[08:36] <wgrant> Yeah, I get the same.
[08:46] <bencer> wgrant: any idea on what's wrong ? who could fix that ?
[08:48] <wgrant> bencer: I'm digging around, but I suspect I need someone with more access.
[08:49] <wgrant> bigjools: There appear to be two linux_2.6.24.orig.tar.gzs in the primary archive. This is probably bad.
[08:49] <bigjools> Oo
[08:49] <bigjools> different md5?
[08:49] <wgrant> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/search?digest=ccccdc4759fd780a028000a1b7b15dbd9c60363b and http://launchpadlibrarian.net/search?digest=b7b63f52551f9e4bf2e5ba902f8385fbefc5d80c
[08:50] <bigjools> fuck sake
[08:50] <wgrant> ccccdc4759fd780a028000a1b7b15dbd9c60363b is in the a.u.c pool.
[08:50] <wgrant> But the first one returned by getFileByName is b7b63[...]
[08:51] <wgrant> Can you tell which SPRs reference the latter one?
[08:51]  * bigjools does some sql fu
[08:51] <wgrant> All updates seem to use the former, and it's in the pool, which suggests that the latter was present early on and then deleted.
[08:52] <wgrant> bigjools: Thanks.
[08:52] <wgrant> StevenK: This is why we need your fixes!
[08:52] <wgrant> Also, the data model sucks.
[08:52]  * StevenK is investigating so he can do some QA with and without his branch
[08:53] <wgrant> How'd that go last night?
[08:53] <StevenK> wgrant: I faceplanted after I got tests passing and pushed
[08:53] <wgrant> Heh, good policy.
[08:53]  * wgrant looks.
[09:04] <wgrant> Is loggerhead dead?
[09:07] <spm> yup
[09:07] <spm> wgrant: give it a whirl now?
[09:07] <wgrant> Still sucks, but that might be the UDS proxy...
[09:07] <wgrant> Yes, works now.
[09:08] <wgrant> Thanks.
[09:09] <bigjools> wgrant: b7b63f52551f9e4bf2e5ba902f8385fbefc5d80c is referenced by a superseded package
[09:10] <wgrant> bigjools: That should still be impossible :/
[09:10] <bigjools> not entirely sure how we managed to do that
[09:10] <wgrant> It's easy to do.
[09:10] <wgrant> Even after StevenK's work.
[09:10] <bigjools> my point :)
[09:11] <bigjools> 2.6.24-5.9 is the superseded version of linux
[09:12] <wgrant> I guess it was deleted before the followupWas it deletHm. It wasn't deleted?
[09:12] <bigjools> and now I need to stop typing until my pain meds kick in
[09:12] <wgrant> Er, what.
[09:12] <wgrant> Ctrl+U did not work :(
[09:12] <wgrant> So, I wouldn't have expected the different orig.tar.gz to be accepted unless all the old ones had been Deleted.
[09:16] <bencer> wgrant: could you ping me back when you fix the linux source package thing ?
[09:17] <wgrant> bencer: I can't fix it. It's not compeletely possible to fix. Try http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux/linux_2.6.24.orig.tar.gz instead.
[09:47] <Piotras> Hi! Anyone willing to help with signing PPA CoC ?
[09:51] <jml> nigelbabu, popey: the login cert looks just fine to me
[09:51] <nigelbabu> jml: was fixed earlier :)
[09:52] <nigelbabu> jml: wgrant popped in and asked the good folks at #canonical-sysadmin :)
[09:52] <jml> nigelbabu, good good :)
[09:52] <nigelbabu> jml: can you remind jcastro I mailed him stuff he might want to look at before the Lp patch session?
[09:52] <nigelbabu> (or i'll have to say tht through IRC)
[09:55] <jml> nigelbabu, if I see him, I will
[09:56] <nigelbabu> jml: thanks :)
[10:21] <easter_egg> henninge, good morning o/
[10:21] <easter_egg> buenos dias \o
[10:22] <easter_egg> bonne journée \o/
[10:22] <easter_egg> buongiorno /o/
[10:22] <easter_egg> ohaio gossaimassay!
[10:23] <easter_egg> Zao Chen Hao \o\
[10:27] <Piotras> who can I ask to reactivate CoC signature?
[10:29] <Piotras> stub, can you reactivate CoC signature?
[10:35] <easter_egg> henninge, XD
[10:36] <henninge> easter_egg: Hi! ;)
[10:36] <easter_egg> you lost my happy good morning ;~
[10:36] <easter_egg> henninge, hi =]
[10:36] <henninge> easter_egg: I am busy right now, sorry. :/
[10:37] <easter_egg> you readed my e-mail?
[10:37] <easter_egg> read*
[11:05] <rdz> hi all. is this the right channel for ppa packaging related questions?
[11:06] <noodles775> rdz, it depends on the question (ie. if it's specific to ppas), but shoot :) ).
[11:07] <rdz> noodles775, thanks
[11:08] <rdz> how can a src package be published in many series? do i have to upload several times, while each time changing the package name and adapting debian/changelog?
[11:09] <bigjools> copy it between series
[11:09] <rdz> bigjools, yeah, but then it says, that package with the same name already exists
[11:09] <bigjools> upload to the oldest series and promote it upwards, assuming the code still works
[11:09] <bigjools> copy with binaries?
[11:10] <rdz> bigjools, sorry, but i still don't get it: when i copy from myppa to myppa, i will always trigger that error.. no?
[11:11] <bigjools> rdz: as long as the same version doesn't exist it should work
[11:12] <bigjools> intra-archive copying that is
[11:12] <bigjools> but you need to specify which series to copy to of course
[11:12] <rdz> yeah, of course...
[11:12] <rdz> bigjools, so you say that this should work, when i start at the lowest series....
[11:12] <rdz> and copy it upwards
[11:12]  * bigjools wonders if you're hitting StevenK's bug :)
[11:13] <rdz> i don't know about StevenK's bug
[11:13] <bigjools> he does :D
[11:13] <rdz> what i don't get: is copy mechanism supposed to rename packaga sources, when they're copied intra-ppa?
[11:14] <bigjools> no, it just re-publishes the sources and binaries in the new series
[11:14] <rdz> but the changelog will still mention only the original series?
[11:15] <maxb> yes
[11:15] <maxb> and the effect of StevenK's bug is that copying is basically broken right now, in all but a few edge cases
[11:15] <rdz> hm..ok thanks
[11:16] <rdz> maxb, good to know.... so i am happy now, that i came ask here..:-)
[11:18] <easter_egg> henninge, I created a new account and requested to merge again
[11:18] <easter_egg> Something is strange
[11:18] <easter_egg> I received two of tree e-mail confirmations
[11:18] <rdz> then i have another problem: the package i want to publish in my ppa depends on a version of another package, that is only available in lucid upwards. however, i would like to provide my package also for karmic and downwards. is there a way to simply copy the package src of that package from ubuntu lucid to myppa karmic etc?
[11:18] <easter_egg> three*
[11:19] <easter_egg> henninge, the three e-mail is the @googlemail.com
[11:19] <easter_egg> is my account? Or today the launchpad is getting some trouble to send emails to gmail?
[11:20] <henninge> easter_egg: the problem is not in the Launchpad accounts but in the openID authentication. I have been trying to get somedoy who can help with that.
[11:20] <bigjools> rdz: you can, yes, but there's no guarantee it will work
[11:20] <bigjools> backporting is a bit of an art
[11:20] <rdz> bigjools, what you mean? and how can i do it? the 'copy package' site doesn't let me choose from ubuntu
[11:21] <rdz> bigjools, you mean , when this package has itself other depencencies as well?
[11:21] <bigjools> yes, it's not supported really since the web UI will time out
[11:21] <bigjools> there's a hidden URL, you can use it if you can find it :)
[11:22] <rdz> i mean, the not so nice/smart way is to download the sources to my box and make a src package myself..
[11:22] <bigjools> for this sort of question you're better off talking to a MOTU
[11:22] <rdz> bigjools, ok. thanks
[11:22] <bigjools> np
[11:22] <bigjools> hope it works out for you
[11:27] <easter_egg> henninge, I hope it will be work now. I will tell you later...
[11:37] <easter_egg> I have another problem now
[11:38] <easter_egg> I can't activate the mailing list of the team: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-br.am/+mailinglist
[11:39] <easter_egg> why?
[11:40] <wgrant> easter_egg: Whta does it do when you try?
[11:40] <maxb> rdz: Actually, downloading the source package and editing it *is* the nice way
[11:40] <easter_egg> This team's mailing list is being deactivated.
[11:40] <maxb> First, you really really should use a unique version when you backport something
[11:40] <easter_egg> wgrant, this
[11:40] <maxb> To distinguish it from the real lucid build
[11:41] <easter_egg> I'm not the team owner, but I have admin permissions...
[11:41] <easter_egg> maybe it can be the cause?
[11:41] <maxb> Second, it's quite possible you may have to tweak things to make it build in older distroseries
[11:46] <easter_egg> wgrant, ?
[11:50] <wgrant> easter_egg: It sounds like one of the backend processes isn't working at the moment.
[11:50] <easter_egg> lol
[11:50] <easter_egg> wgrant, I will try later
[11:53] <rdz> maxb, i see. thanks!
[11:55] <rdz> maxb, would it be correct, when the original lucid package's version still supersedes the version of my ppa's pacakge?
[11:55] <easter_egg> henninge, my account is working now after the new merging..
[11:55] <maxb> I don't understand that question
[11:55] <easter_egg> but I need two things to totally fix this
[11:56] <easter_egg> in fact, just one thing =]
[11:56] <easter_egg> someone from login.ubuntu.com here?
[12:06] <maxb> easter_egg: No, those people are never on IRC. Which rather sucks.
[12:06] <easter_egg> ;P
[12:06] <easter_egg> I need that someone delete two thinks to me
[12:13] <rdz> "<maxb> First, you really really should use a unique version when you backport something". I got the version should differ, but what would be better? if the backported version is lower or higher than the original lucid package's version?
[12:14] <maxb> It should most definitely be lower. This is so that when someone with your backport installed upgrades to lucid, it is properly replaced by the lucid version
[12:15] <maxb> This is usually accomplished via the useful feature that ~ in a version string is special, being less than 'end of string'
[12:15] <maxb> i.e. if lucid carries 1.0-1, a typical backport looks like 1.0-1~hardy1
[12:16] <maxb> The fact that ubuntu releases are named in alphabetic order ensures that upgrades between backports targetted at different series works
[12:22] <rdz> maxb, many thanks.. that makes a lot of sense to me
[13:21] <lifeless> barry: http://gems.github.com/ - follow both links
[14:53] <easter_egg> when I be activate the mailing list of this team? https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-br.am/+mailinglist
[14:53] <easter_egg> its look like strange
[14:54] <easter_egg> henninge, thanks for help... I sended an email to you with the question answered
[14:55] <henninge> easter_egg: I saw that. Glad it finally works for you! I am sorry for the trouble. :)
[14:56] <easter_egg> henninge, no problem.. I will try to contribute to launchpad for help with problems like that
[14:56] <easter_egg> somehow, the bug still exists, so I still have work ahead
[14:58] <easter_egg> for now, I got joined in all the groups that the brazilian council suggests and joined and another teams like launchpad-beta-testers =]
[15:00] <easter_egg> henninge, I'll sleep a little. Later I will work and then come back to study the launchpad
[15:01] <easter_egg> have a nice day
[15:01] <easter_egg> good bye
[15:28] <gnomefreak> timeing out :)
[15:31] <gnomefreak> anyone else getting a timeout on bug report comments using edge
[15:31] <gnomefreak> or without edge
[15:37] <falktx> hi
[15:38] <falktx> I recently received the task, at work, to get "alfresco" to work on linux
[15:38] <falktx> to compile it I need sun-java
[15:39] <falktx> so I copied partner's jave to the PPA
[15:39] <falktx> https://launchpad.net/~falk-t-j/+archive/alfresco/
[15:39] <falktx> is this ok?
[15:40] <gnomefreak> falktx: use the java that is not in partner
[15:40] <wgrant> falktx: Are you aware of the alfresco packages that are already in partner?
[15:40] <gnomefreak> didnt we remove java from partner?
[15:41] <jpds> gnomefreak: No, multiverse.
[15:41] <wgrant> Sun Java was moved from multiverse to partner.
[15:41] <gnomefreak> jpds: ah thanks
[15:41] <gnomefreak> thanks wgrant
[15:42] <gnomefreak> still timing out
[15:42] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Which bug?
[15:42] <gnomefreak> wgrant: bug 576072
[15:43] <gnomefreak> tring to add comment
[15:44] <wgrant> What was the text of the comment? And do you have an OOPS code?
[15:45] <falktx> for enterprise work, sun-java is required
[15:45] <gnomefreak> wgrant: it didnt give a code. hold on 1 sec
[15:45] <falktx> and alfredo is available only for Karmic, not Lucid
[15:45] <wgrant> Why do you need Sun Java?
[15:45] <gnomefreak> wgrant: the text is at bug#576072_info_to_add
[15:46] <wgrant> gnomefreak: Huh?
[15:46] <wgrant> And it should have given you an OOPS code.
[15:46] <gnomefreak> oops
[15:46] <gnomefreak> wgrant: text is here http://paste.ubuntu.com/431141/
[15:47] <wgrant> gnomefreak: What's the text of the timeout page?
[15:47] <gnomefreak> wgrant: and as for OOPS it just poped up a dialog saysing that it timed out and to try again later
[15:47] <gnomefreak> wgrant: thats what im trying to add to bug report
[15:47] <wgrant> A Firefox error?
[15:48] <wgrant> Or a Launchpad thing with a title of "Timeout error"?
[15:48] <wgrant> Or with a title of "Please try again"?
[15:48] <gnomefreak> its working now
[15:48] <wgrant> win 3
[15:49] <gnomefreak> wgrant: little LP dialog with red text. i dont recall the exact error text but it is working now for some reason
[15:49] <wgrant> gnomefreak: that had an OOPS IS.
[15:49] <wgrant> Er, OOPS ID.
[15:49] <gnomefreak> i didnt see one
[15:49] <wgrant> There was one down the bottom.
[15:50] <gnomefreak> wgrant: if it happens again ill copy it. i must have overlooked it
[15:50] <gnomefreak> sorry
[15:54] <davidstrauss> I need help resetting the password on a Launchpad utility account.
[15:54] <davidstrauss> https://launchpad.net/~economist-bender
[15:54] <davidstrauss> I'm happy to prove ownership by possession of the public key
[15:54] <mok0> Is there another way I could port users?
[15:54] <davidstrauss> i mean private key
[15:55] <mok0> How many tables are involved in defining a user?
[15:55] <davidstrauss> unfortunately, i have no idea what the email is set to
[15:55] <wgrant> mok0: Huh?
[15:55] <andrea-bs> gnomefreak, wgrant: error popups generated by AJAX don't show you the OOPS id
[15:55] <wgrant> Porting users?
[15:56] <wgrant> andrea-bs: Ah, an AJAX error, I see.
[15:56] <mok0> wgrant: oops wrong channel :-) Thought I was in django
[15:56] <jtimberman> I'm trying to copy packages in my PPA from lucid to karmic and I'm getting an OOPS.
[15:57] <jtimberman> Ooh, I see OOPS mentioned in my scrollback..
[15:57] <wgrant> jtimberman: Known -- fix is reviewed and in testing.
[15:57] <jtimberman> wgrant: thanks
[15:58] <jtimberman> wrt sun-java, some "enterprise" type shops are quite particular about that sort of thing for their apps.. but they should probably bundle their own jvm anyway :)
[15:59] <falktx> i'll need it at least to compile it
[15:59] <falktx> i can delete it later
[15:59] <gnomefreak> andrea-bs: thanks
[15:59] <falktx> or does a PPA can use partner packages?
[16:00] <falktx> that would be cool... but I'm not sure if can be done
[16:00] <wgrant> A PPA can't use partner packages directly.
[16:01] <gnomefreak> you have to build them for PPA
[16:03] <jtimberman> what bug # can i look at for the OOPS fix?
[16:37] <wgrant> lamont: http://paste.ubuntu.com/431174/
[16:41] <poolie> is it just me or is http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/db-devel/changes having trouble?
[16:42] <nigelbabu> poolie: mostly just you, but then codebrowse isn't really a strong component of LP
[16:42] <nigelbabu> poolie: try abusing the F5 key
[16:44] <poolie> mm, thanks
[16:45] <m0n5t3r> hello, I need a word of advice: I debianized a pecl package, uploaded it, it compiles, but then launchpad complains that it has 2 files with timestamps too far in the past (they actually are set to 01-01-1970 in the original archive from pecl.php.net)
[16:47] <m0n5t3r> so, I deleted the packages, did a touch on the source files and repacked the source, but now it gets rejected because the orig archive is already in the ppa
[16:47] <m0n5t3r> what can I do?
[16:47] <tsimpson> bump the version
[16:48] <tsimpson> eg: 1.2.3a or 1.2.3rebuild
[16:56] <lamont> bigjools:
[16:56] <lamont> lychee will see.
[16:59] <_kb9vqf> Any progress on the bug causing these: OOPS-1591K1678
[16:59] <_kb9vqf> ?
[17:00] <davidstrauss> poolie: Any chance you can help me with a user access issue?
[17:00] <bigjools> _kb9vqf: what is the context?
[17:01] <_kb9vqf> bigjools: Trying to copy packages from a staging PPA to a distribution PPA
[17:01] <bigjools> _kb9vqf: we have code that's fixing it, it'll be rolled out tomorrow
[17:01] <_kb9vqf> Sounds good, thanks!
[17:01] <bigjools> _kb9vqf: sorry for the trouble
[17:03] <StevenK> _kb9vqf: Is it a timeout error?
[17:03] <_kb9vqf> StevenK: No
[17:04] <StevenK> Right, then ignore me, bigjools has the answer
[17:04] <_kb9vqf> :-)
[17:04] <poolie> davidstrauss: what is it?
[17:05] <davidstrauss> poolie: I need to get the email address or a password reset for this account: https://launchpad.net/~economist-bender
[17:05] <davidstrauss> poolie: I'm not sure what email I put on it.
[17:05] <poolie> wait please
[17:05] <davidstrauss> ok
[17:14] <lamont> bigjools: WE WIN!
[17:14] <bigjools> lamont: where do I collect my $1m?
[17:14] <lamont> afk
[18:11] <cperrin88> Hey, I'm having a problem with the Launchpad API
[18:11] <cperrin88> more exactly requesting a request token
[18:11] <maxb> You should be more detailed about your problem
[18:12] <cperrin88> okay
[18:12] <cperrin88> well I am sending my requst as described in https://help.launchpad.net/API/SigningRequests
[18:13] <cperrin88> but my Client (Apach HTTP Commons) does not understand the response
[18:13] <cperrin88> I'm unsure weather it's my fault, the lib's fault or the server's fault
[18:14] <cperrin88> let me search the error
[18:15] <cperrin88> DefaultRequestDirector(257): Authentication error: Unable to respond to any of these challenges: {oauth=WWW-Authenticate: OAuth realm="https://api.launchpad.net"}
[18:16] <rockstar> cperrin88, are you using launchpadlib or another lib?
[18:16] <cperrin88> I'm hacking the raw api
[18:17] <rockstar> cperrin88, leonardr is probably your man then
[18:18] <cperrin88> doesn't seem to be online
[18:18] <cperrin88> I want to write a launchpad Android client
[18:19] <rockstar> cperrin88, I've actually endeavored to do that.  Lemme see if I can find the code.
[18:52] <cperrin88> rockstar: Got some code?
[21:17]  * Penguin_Guy has just pushed his first bazaar branch.