=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [08:30] i've tried to dget linux_2.6.24-27.69.dsc from lp several times and always orig.tar.gz files on file size, could be corrupted there ? [08:34] bencer: Which link were you using? [08:34] wgrant: dget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/linux_2.6.24-27.69.dsc [08:35] bencer: That's... slightly concerning. [08:36] Let's see. [08:36] dpkg-source: error: File ./linux_2.6.24.orig.tar.gz has size 59078927 instead of expected 59085601 [08:36] Yeah, I get the same. [08:46] wgrant: any idea on what's wrong ? who could fix that ? [08:48] bencer: I'm digging around, but I suspect I need someone with more access. [08:49] bigjools: There appear to be two linux_2.6.24.orig.tar.gzs in the primary archive. This is probably bad. [08:49] Oo [08:49] different md5? [08:49] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/search?digest=ccccdc4759fd780a028000a1b7b15dbd9c60363b and http://launchpadlibrarian.net/search?digest=b7b63f52551f9e4bf2e5ba902f8385fbefc5d80c [08:50] fuck sake [08:50] ccccdc4759fd780a028000a1b7b15dbd9c60363b is in the a.u.c pool. [08:50] But the first one returned by getFileByName is b7b63[...] [08:51] Can you tell which SPRs reference the latter one? [08:51] * bigjools does some sql fu [08:51] All updates seem to use the former, and it's in the pool, which suggests that the latter was present early on and then deleted. [08:52] bigjools: Thanks. [08:52] StevenK: This is why we need your fixes! [08:52] Also, the data model sucks. [08:52] * StevenK is investigating so he can do some QA with and without his branch [08:53] How'd that go last night? [08:53] wgrant: I faceplanted after I got tests passing and pushed [08:53] Heh, good policy. [08:53] * wgrant looks. [09:04] Is loggerhead dead? [09:07] yup [09:07] wgrant: give it a whirl now? [09:07] Still sucks, but that might be the UDS proxy... [09:07] Yes, works now. [09:08] Thanks. [09:09] wgrant: b7b63f52551f9e4bf2e5ba902f8385fbefc5d80c is referenced by a superseded package [09:10] bigjools: That should still be impossible :/ [09:10] not entirely sure how we managed to do that [09:10] It's easy to do. [09:10] Even after StevenK's work. [09:10] my point :) [09:11] 2.6.24-5.9 is the superseded version of linux [09:12] I guess it was deleted before the followupWas it deletHm. It wasn't deleted? [09:12] and now I need to stop typing until my pain meds kick in [09:12] Er, what. [09:12] Ctrl+U did not work :( [09:12] So, I wouldn't have expected the different orig.tar.gz to be accepted unless all the old ones had been Deleted. [09:16] wgrant: could you ping me back when you fix the linux source package thing ? [09:17] bencer: I can't fix it. It's not compeletely possible to fix. Try http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux/linux_2.6.24.orig.tar.gz instead. [09:47] Hi! Anyone willing to help with signing PPA CoC ? [09:51] nigelbabu, popey: the login cert looks just fine to me [09:51] jml: was fixed earlier :) [09:52] jml: wgrant popped in and asked the good folks at #canonical-sysadmin :) [09:52] nigelbabu, good good :) [09:52] jml: can you remind jcastro I mailed him stuff he might want to look at before the Lp patch session? [09:52] (or i'll have to say tht through IRC) [09:55] nigelbabu, if I see him, I will [09:56] jml: thanks :) === barry` is now known as barry_ [10:21] henninge, good morning o/ [10:21] buenos dias \o [10:22] bonne journée \o/ [10:22] buongiorno /o/ [10:22] ohaio gossaimassay! [10:23] Zao Chen Hao \o\ [10:27] who can I ask to reactivate CoC signature? [10:29] stub, can you reactivate CoC signature? [10:35] henninge, XD [10:36] easter_egg: Hi! ;) [10:36] you lost my happy good morning ;~ [10:36] henninge, hi =] [10:36] easter_egg: I am busy right now, sorry. :/ [10:37] you readed my e-mail? [10:37] read* === komputes_ubuntu is now known as komputes [11:05] hi all. is this the right channel for ppa packaging related questions? [11:06] rdz, it depends on the question (ie. if it's specific to ppas), but shoot :) ). [11:07] noodles775, thanks [11:08] how can a src package be published in many series? do i have to upload several times, while each time changing the package name and adapting debian/changelog? [11:09] copy it between series [11:09] bigjools, yeah, but then it says, that package with the same name already exists [11:09] upload to the oldest series and promote it upwards, assuming the code still works [11:09] copy with binaries? [11:10] bigjools, sorry, but i still don't get it: when i copy from myppa to myppa, i will always trigger that error.. no? [11:11] rdz: as long as the same version doesn't exist it should work [11:12] intra-archive copying that is [11:12] but you need to specify which series to copy to of course [11:12] yeah, of course... [11:12] bigjools, so you say that this should work, when i start at the lowest series.... [11:12] and copy it upwards [11:12] * bigjools wonders if you're hitting StevenK's bug :) [11:13] i don't know about StevenK's bug [11:13] he does :D [11:13] what i don't get: is copy mechanism supposed to rename packaga sources, when they're copied intra-ppa? [11:14] no, it just re-publishes the sources and binaries in the new series [11:14] but the changelog will still mention only the original series? [11:15] yes [11:15] and the effect of StevenK's bug is that copying is basically broken right now, in all but a few edge cases [11:15] hm..ok thanks [11:16] maxb, good to know.... so i am happy now, that i came ask here..:-) [11:18] henninge, I created a new account and requested to merge again [11:18] Something is strange [11:18] I received two of tree e-mail confirmations [11:18] then i have another problem: the package i want to publish in my ppa depends on a version of another package, that is only available in lucid upwards. however, i would like to provide my package also for karmic and downwards. is there a way to simply copy the package src of that package from ubuntu lucid to myppa karmic etc? [11:18] three* [11:19] henninge, the three e-mail is the @googlemail.com [11:19] is my account? Or today the launchpad is getting some trouble to send emails to gmail? [11:20] easter_egg: the problem is not in the Launchpad accounts but in the openID authentication. I have been trying to get somedoy who can help with that. [11:20] rdz: you can, yes, but there's no guarantee it will work [11:20] backporting is a bit of an art [11:20] bigjools, what you mean? and how can i do it? the 'copy package' site doesn't let me choose from ubuntu [11:21] bigjools, you mean , when this package has itself other depencencies as well? [11:21] yes, it's not supported really since the web UI will time out [11:21] there's a hidden URL, you can use it if you can find it :) [11:22] i mean, the not so nice/smart way is to download the sources to my box and make a src package myself.. [11:22] for this sort of question you're better off talking to a MOTU [11:22] bigjools, ok. thanks [11:22] np [11:22] hope it works out for you [11:27] henninge, I hope it will be work now. I will tell you later... [11:37] I have another problem now [11:38] I can't activate the mailing list of the team: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-br.am/+mailinglist [11:39] why? [11:40] easter_egg: Whta does it do when you try? [11:40] rdz: Actually, downloading the source package and editing it *is* the nice way [11:40] This team's mailing list is being deactivated. [11:40] First, you really really should use a unique version when you backport something [11:40] wgrant, this [11:40] To distinguish it from the real lucid build [11:41] I'm not the team owner, but I have admin permissions... [11:41] maybe it can be the cause? [11:41] Second, it's quite possible you may have to tweak things to make it build in older distroseries [11:46] wgrant, ? [11:50] easter_egg: It sounds like one of the backend processes isn't working at the moment. [11:50] lol [11:50] wgrant, I will try later [11:53] maxb, i see. thanks! [11:55] maxb, would it be correct, when the original lucid package's version still supersedes the version of my ppa's pacakge? [11:55] henninge, my account is working now after the new merging.. [11:55] I don't understand that question [11:55] but I need two things to totally fix this [11:56] in fact, just one thing =] [11:56] someone from login.ubuntu.com here? [12:06] easter_egg: No, those people are never on IRC. Which rather sucks. [12:06] ;P [12:06] I need that someone delete two thinks to me [12:13] " First, you really really should use a unique version when you backport something". I got the version should differ, but what would be better? if the backported version is lower or higher than the original lucid package's version? [12:14] It should most definitely be lower. This is so that when someone with your backport installed upgrades to lucid, it is properly replaced by the lucid version [12:15] This is usually accomplished via the useful feature that ~ in a version string is special, being less than 'end of string' [12:15] i.e. if lucid carries 1.0-1, a typical backport looks like 1.0-1~hardy1 [12:16] The fact that ubuntu releases are named in alphabetic order ensures that upgrades between backports targetted at different series works [12:22] maxb, many thanks.. that makes a lot of sense to me [13:21] barry: http://gems.github.com/ - follow both links === gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak === herb__ is now known as herb [14:53] when I be activate the mailing list of this team? https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-br.am/+mailinglist [14:53] its look like strange [14:54] henninge, thanks for help... I sended an email to you with the question answered [14:55] easter_egg: I saw that. Glad it finally works for you! I am sorry for the trouble. :) [14:56] henninge, no problem.. I will try to contribute to launchpad for help with problems like that [14:56] somehow, the bug still exists, so I still have work ahead [14:58] for now, I got joined in all the groups that the brazilian council suggests and joined and another teams like launchpad-beta-testers =] [15:00] henninge, I'll sleep a little. Later I will work and then come back to study the launchpad [15:01] have a nice day [15:01] good bye === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer [15:28] timeing out :) [15:31] anyone else getting a timeout on bug report comments using edge [15:31] or without edge [15:37] hi [15:38] I recently received the task, at work, to get "alfresco" to work on linux [15:38] to compile it I need sun-java [15:39] so I copied partner's jave to the PPA [15:39] https://launchpad.net/~falk-t-j/+archive/alfresco/ [15:39] is this ok? [15:40] falktx: use the java that is not in partner [15:40] falktx: Are you aware of the alfresco packages that are already in partner? [15:40] didnt we remove java from partner? [15:41] gnomefreak: No, multiverse. [15:41] Sun Java was moved from multiverse to partner. [15:41] jpds: ah thanks [15:41] thanks wgrant [15:42] still timing out [15:42] gnomefreak: Which bug? [15:42] wgrant: bug 576072 [15:42] Launchpad bug 576072 in firefox "Hidden files are saved as non-hidden files after downloading" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/576072 [15:43] tring to add comment [15:44] What was the text of the comment? And do you have an OOPS code? [15:45] for enterprise work, sun-java is required [15:45] wgrant: it didnt give a code. hold on 1 sec [15:45] and alfredo is available only for Karmic, not Lucid [15:45] Why do you need Sun Java? [15:45] wgrant: the text is at bug#576072_info_to_add [15:46] gnomefreak: Huh? [15:46] And it should have given you an OOPS code. [15:46] oops [15:46] wgrant: text is here http://paste.ubuntu.com/431141/ [15:47] gnomefreak: What's the text of the timeout page? [15:47] wgrant: and as for OOPS it just poped up a dialog saysing that it timed out and to try again later [15:47] wgrant: thats what im trying to add to bug report [15:47] A Firefox error? [15:48] Or a Launchpad thing with a title of "Timeout error"? [15:48] Or with a title of "Please try again"? [15:48] its working now [15:48] win 3 [15:49] wgrant: little LP dialog with red text. i dont recall the exact error text but it is working now for some reason [15:49] gnomefreak: that had an OOPS IS. [15:49] Er, OOPS ID. [15:49] i didnt see one [15:49] There was one down the bottom. [15:50] wgrant: if it happens again ill copy it. i must have overlooked it [15:50] sorry [15:54] I need help resetting the password on a Launchpad utility account. [15:54] https://launchpad.net/~economist-bender [15:54] I'm happy to prove ownership by possession of the public key [15:54] Is there another way I could port users? [15:54] i mean private key [15:55] How many tables are involved in defining a user? [15:55] unfortunately, i have no idea what the email is set to [15:55] mok0: Huh? [15:55] gnomefreak, wgrant: error popups generated by AJAX don't show you the OOPS id [15:55] Porting users? [15:56] andrea-bs: Ah, an AJAX error, I see. [15:56] wgrant: oops wrong channel :-) Thought I was in django [15:56] I'm trying to copy packages in my PPA from lucid to karmic and I'm getting an OOPS. [15:57] Ooh, I see OOPS mentioned in my scrollback.. [15:57] jtimberman: Known -- fix is reviewed and in testing. [15:57] wgrant: thanks [15:58] wrt sun-java, some "enterprise" type shops are quite particular about that sort of thing for their apps.. but they should probably bundle their own jvm anyway :) [15:59] i'll need it at least to compile it [15:59] i can delete it later [15:59] andrea-bs: thanks [15:59] or does a PPA can use partner packages? [16:00] that would be cool... but I'm not sure if can be done [16:00] A PPA can't use partner packages directly. [16:01] you have to build them for PPA [16:03] what bug # can i look at for the OOPS fix? [16:37] lamont: http://paste.ubuntu.com/431174/ [16:41] is it just me or is http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/db-devel/changes having trouble? [16:42] poolie: mostly just you, but then codebrowse isn't really a strong component of LP [16:42] poolie: try abusing the F5 key [16:44] mm, thanks [16:45] hello, I need a word of advice: I debianized a pecl package, uploaded it, it compiles, but then launchpad complains that it has 2 files with timestamps too far in the past (they actually are set to 01-01-1970 in the original archive from pecl.php.net) [16:47] so, I deleted the packages, did a touch on the source files and repacked the source, but now it gets rejected because the orig archive is already in the ppa [16:47] what can I do? [16:47] bump the version [16:48] eg: 1.2.3a or 1.2.3rebuild [16:56] bigjools: [16:56] lychee will see. === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch [16:59] <_kb9vqf> Any progress on the bug causing these: OOPS-1591K1678 [16:59] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1591K1678 [16:59] <_kb9vqf> ? [17:00] poolie: Any chance you can help me with a user access issue? [17:00] _kb9vqf: what is the context? [17:01] <_kb9vqf> bigjools: Trying to copy packages from a staging PPA to a distribution PPA [17:01] _kb9vqf: we have code that's fixing it, it'll be rolled out tomorrow [17:01] <_kb9vqf> Sounds good, thanks! === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [17:01] _kb9vqf: sorry for the trouble [17:03] _kb9vqf: Is it a timeout error? [17:03] <_kb9vqf> StevenK: No [17:04] Right, then ignore me, bigjools has the answer [17:04] <_kb9vqf> :-) [17:04] davidstrauss: what is it? [17:05] poolie: I need to get the email address or a password reset for this account: https://launchpad.net/~economist-bender [17:05] poolie: I'm not sure what email I put on it. [17:05] wait please [17:05] ok [17:14] bigjools: WE WIN! [17:14] lamont: where do I collect my $1m? [17:14] afk === ubott2 is now known as ubottu === Philip6 is now known as Philip5 === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [18:11] Hey, I'm having a problem with the Launchpad API [18:11] more exactly requesting a request token [18:11] You should be more detailed about your problem [18:12] okay [18:12] well I am sending my requst as described in https://help.launchpad.net/API/SigningRequests [18:13] but my Client (Apach HTTP Commons) does not understand the response [18:13] I'm unsure weather it's my fault, the lib's fault or the server's fault [18:14] let me search the error [18:15] DefaultRequestDirector(257): Authentication error: Unable to respond to any of these challenges: {oauth=WWW-Authenticate: OAuth realm="https://api.launchpad.net"} [18:16] cperrin88, are you using launchpadlib or another lib? [18:16] I'm hacking the raw api [18:17] cperrin88, leonardr is probably your man then [18:18] doesn't seem to be online [18:18] I want to write a launchpad Android client [18:19] cperrin88, I've actually endeavored to do that. Lemme see if I can find the code. === yofel_ is now known as yofel === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno [18:52] rockstar: Got some code? === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk === mithrandi is now known as idnaria === gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak [21:17] * Penguin_Guy has just pushed his first bazaar branch. === barry` is now known as barry_