/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/05/10/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

=== BUGabundo is now known as MrBoobs
=== MrBoobs is now known as BUGaboobs
=== Kangarooo1 is now known as Kangarooo
=== BUGaboobs is now known as BUGabundo
Damascenehi,03:43
Damascenetop is showing different memory use than system monitor03:43
Damascene900M, 300M respectfully03:43
Damascenehttp://www.linuxatemyram.com/ :)03:57
aciculathey have different definitions of what constitutes ram use04:10
Damasceneyeah I found that. thanks04:25
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn
=== qense_ is now known as qense
=== rackIT is now known as rackIT_AFK
BUGabundo_remoteyes,yes, Sleep is overrated08:46
kermiacddecator: you around mate?09:54
ddecatorkermiac: hey mate, just got done listening to the beginning of UDS =), what's up?09:54
kermiacyou mind taking a look at bug 576072 - I'm about to re-assign to firefox. Just wondering if you've seen any dupes09:55
ubot4Launchpad bug 576072 in ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu) "ubuntuone hidden files are stored as non-hidden after downloading (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/57607209:55
ddecatorkermiac: sure, just one sec, trying to find another firefox bug09:56
kermiacok, np thanks mate09:56
ddecatorbtw, i'm surprised you haven't just gone ahead and adopted ubuntuone =p10:01
kermiacwell... a few of us have unofficially adopted it, lol10:02
ddecatorsounds like it. yah, i think i saw a firefox report for this. once sec10:02
kermiacawesome, then I can just re-assign & dupe it10:03
ddecatorif i can find the report, haha10:03
ddecatorcan't remember if i subscribed or not..10:03
=== ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara
=== qense_ is now known as qense
=== komputes_ubuntu is now known as komputes
=== Kangarooo1 is now known as Kangarooo
=== Kangarooo is now known as Kangaroooick
=== Kangaroooick is now known as Kangarooo
=== Kangarooo is now known as Kangaroooick
=== Kangaroooick is now known as Kangarooo
kermiacis there a known bug for firefox & chromium not saving hidden files correctly? e.g. when using firefox or chromium to download a file named ".bashrc" it is saved as "bashrc". When using Opera to download the same ".bashrc" it is saved correctly as ".basrc". I have tried this from multiple file hosts & the result is always the same13:00
kermiactypo above - should read:13:01
kermiacis there a known bug for firefox & chromium not saving hidden files correctly? e.g. when using firefox or chromium to download a file named ".bashrc" it is saved as "bashrc". When using Opera to download the same ".bashrc" it is saved correctly as ".bashrc". I have tried this from multiple file hosts & the result is always the same13:01
Kangaroookermiac: if that is happening then that's really bad couse its wasting time to rename as they were named- hidden13:06
kermiacKangarooo: it seems to be happening here. I've tried 3 diff file hosts + the u1 web interface & 4 diff pc's running karmic & lucid13:07
* yofel tries...13:07
kermiachttp://www.mediafire.com/?njnywyh5jox13:08
kermiachttp://www.filedropper.com/bashrc_113:08
kermiachttp://rapidshare.com/files/385623472/.bashrc.html13:08
kermiacsorry for multiple paste! - they're 3 identical .bashrc files13:09
kermiacbit of history - this started as a u1 bug & I'm trying to re-assign it as it does not appear to be specific to the u1 web interface. I *was* going to simply re-assign to firefox, but chromium does the same thing. Funny thing is that Opera works fine13:10
yofelhm, indeed, if you open a dot file and use save page as... it's properly saved as .file, but if you use the download file dialog the . is missing13:11
kermiacyup... I was thinking about re-assigning the bug to firefox & marking as "also affects" chromium13:12
kermiacwould you do it differently?13:12
nigelbabuit might we webkit then?13:13
nigelbabudoesn't firefox and chrome base on webkit? /me is not sure13:13
yofelI don't think firefox is webkit based, and the download dialog acually says '.bashrc', but the filename on disk is bashrc13:15
nigelbabumm13:15
kermiachi nigelbabu I'm not sure, this is one of those "weird" bugs & I don't honestly know what is at fault13:16
nigelbabuput it on the main cluprit, they'll identify the right one13:17
yofelmaybe ask in #ubuntu-mozillateam13:17
=== qense_ is now known as qense
kermiacthanks yofel, I'll ask in there & hopefully get a response. otherwise I'll just assign to firefox tomorrow13:20
Kangaroooyofel: I tryd clicking method and also left click save as method and both saved without .so not hidden but with save as it regocnized this is being wanted to save corectly and asked do I want to overwrite if I say yes then its saved without . and the real file is deleted. but if I renamame file saving with . it still save without .13:27
yofelhm13:28
Kangarooobut actually I think this maybe a security issue and that's why its not allowed to save with . but in that case its not working corectly couse replacing with saving made file without . and real file was deleted13:29
Kangarooohmm I have someking bug. videos reocrded with gtc-reocrdmydesktop in YT are fuzzy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DA8b8DStsTE third time changed some settings and nothing changed13:35
=== gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak
Kangarooobut before upgrade I was able to put them on YT13:37
=== radoe_ is now known as radoe
simarwhat to remove in synaptic package manager for removing old ubuntu kernel images???14:22
Kangarooosimar first check witch kernel you have latest with uname -a14:25
Kangaroooor uname -are both shows kernel14:26
=== qense_ is now known as qense
Kangarooosimar: then in synaptic search linux-image- and remove all but the version witch was in uname -r14:27
Kangaroooum better search linux-image-214:29
Kangarooosimar: on upgrade all old kernels are removed btw fyi :)14:30
thekornpedro_, bdmurray, hi, I know you are very busy this week, but my bugcontrol membership is about to expire, can one of you please renew it?14:38
pedro_thekorn, yep, give me a sec14:39
thekornthank you14:39
pedro_thekorn, renewed, thanks!14:40
=== qense_ is now known as qense
=== plars_ is now known as plars
=== om26er_ is now known as om26er
jbichahi, I submitted a bug control team application 4 days ago but it needs to be approved to show up on the mailing list15:37
jbichais bdmurray the only one who can do this?15:40
grapzHi. I'm trying to update a bug I have by running 'ubuntu-bug -u 576601', and each time, ubuntu-bug crashes with the following info: http://ubuntu.pastebin.com/UcMR1U9f15:54
bdmurrayjbicha: it's been un-moderated16:40
jbichabdmurray: thank you very much16:40
bibinouhi17:14
bibinouif a bug is already fixed upstream, but the fixed package version isn't in ubuntu yet, should I change the bug status of the ubuntu package to confirmed ? triaged ?17:16
micahgbibinou: depends on the team and the package17:17
bibinouok, thank you17:18
MrKanisterbibinou: Usually "triaged" is appropriate, but for a lot of GNOME packages, "fix committed" is used in that case (although that is theoretically wrong, since "fix committed" is for something else)17:20
MrKanisterBut since the bugwatches are working again, "fix committed" seems to be out of question17:21
bibinouyes, but bugwatches doesn't work for google code yet.17:22
bibinouso confirmed it is.17:22
bibinouI can't set triaged17:22
nigelbabubug number?17:22
phillipsjkThis moring I came to the conclusion that the latest realse was a buggy peice of crap; then came accross this patch commited ~20 hours ago for a bug I was following (546992) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47986334/do_not_check_hal_on_bus.patch  -- I am wondering coudl that fix something like 567899 as well (installer quits with error on live Cd) as well? how would I check? Are there standard tools for building a new CD image?17:23
MrKanisterbibinou: You can only set bugs to "triaged" if you are in the ubuntu-bugcontrol team (in case you didn't know)17:23
bibinouhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quodlibet/+bug/57543617:24
ubot4Launchpad bug 575436 in quodlibet (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Quod Libet's volume level slider does not work (affects: 3) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed]17:24
nigelbabubibinou: done17:25
bibinouthank you :)17:26
phillipsjkFound the CD twaeking instructions: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCDCustomization17:31
phillipsjkActually, this more closely describe what I would want to do: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=936582 "HOWTO: Create a custom LiveCD of your system (distributable) Ubuntu 8.04 LTS" (but looks slightly out of date (other page says: "squashfs-tools will need to be updated to version 4.0."))17:34
JabLuszkoHey! I got *strange* problem and I have no idea it is worth reporting or not. The 10.04 is rebooting it self (more like cutting power) without any trace in logs. It happends only if I pick up/move the laptop (like moving from desk to bed). It is happening at amd64/XFS and i386/ext4. It is *not* happening and Windows XP/Windows 7. If I remeber correctly it was not happening at the 9.10 CD clean install.17:51
JabLuszkoIf it is worth reporting what do I need to include? syslog, lspci, what more? :-) / I am going to find the 9.10 CD and reinstall the system to check it out, but first I wish to provide all things are nessecary from 10.04 :-)17:52
JabLuszkoThere is nothing in the system logs, looks like 'emergency restart'. It goes straight to BIOS :-)17:53
JabLuszkos/and Windows/on Windows/17:59
phillipsjkJabLuszko: I think you are supposed to use #ubuntu untill you can reproduce the bug. If it does not happen in Windows; it may be related to the accelarometer designed to shut-down the hard-drisk during free-fall http://www.dimensionengineering.com/accelerometers.htm18:01
JabLuszkophillipsjk: Really on #ubuntu? That would be mess, but if you suggest so.18:04
JabLuszkophillipsjk: I can reproduce this bug, every time when I pick up laptop :D18:04
phillipsjkJabLuszko: to be honest, I wouldn't has noticed your question if you asked there; but there are more people there.18:06
phillipsjkJabLuszko: does it happen when you pick up the laptop or put it down?18:08
phillipsjkI am assuming Windows I currently installed so that you can confirm it still does not happen under Windows.18:09
JabLuszkophillipsjk: pick up,  can't test it with 'put it down' cuz it it already rebooted :D18:09
JabLuszkoYeah, Dualboot, GRUB18:09
JabLuszkoOk, gonna join all these msg into one and asking at #ubuntu18:10
phillipsjkProbably not an accelerometer problem then. sounds like a loose wire, but you claim it does not happen under Windows.18:10
JabLuszkoThat is the most funny thing :-) If I would happend on both system I will guess that there is something wrong inside  :-)18:11
JabLuszkoBut I can't blame it currenty to 'mechanical issue'.18:11
JabLuszkoand I am pretty sure that while I was using 9.10 i've tried Arch... and it was happing on Arch too18:12
JabLuszkoBut not on 9.10 :-)18:12
phillipsjkTry asking in #ubuntu . your problem sounds interesting enough that you should get a few bites :)18:14
JabLuszkophillipsjk: I guess I will don't get any infos there, just too many people :-)18:20
JabLuszkophillipsjk: should I go to ubuntu forum or bugs and report it to (kernel/power managment?)18:21
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
phillipsjkJabLuszko: sometimes it can take a few minutes to get a response. I don't see what reporting it as a power management bug will do without good reason to suspect that is the culprit.18:23
JabLuszkophillipsjk: I thinks the same.. but I guess it is closest to this?;-)18:23
phillipsjkit is possible, this could describe the same probelm, or it may not: it is hard to tell with an unanswered post: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=103893018:25
yofel. . . - the folks that attended the UDS session about launchpad upstream bugs might remember the discussion about linux bugs and information adding / duplicate filing. Now see bug 577916 *sigh*18:27
ubot4Launchpad bug 577916 in ubuntu "lucid regression: does not resume from hibernation, restarts fresh (affects: 2) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/57791618:27
=== Kangarooo1 is now known as Kangarooo
=== gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak
sfstikkunHi.  I'm getting a strange message when I attempt to open new browser pages.  It reads : ASSERT: node must have _DOMElement set19:53
sfstikkunStack Trace:19:53
sfstikkun0:TV_V_nodeIconChanged([object ResultNodeClassInfo])19:53
sfstikkunI have no idea what it means and I have no idea where to report it besides here.19:54
yofelsfstikkun: can you please run 'sudo start apport force_start=1' and try to reproduce your issue? you should get a crash notification20:11
sfstikkunO20:12
sfstikkunI'll try.  I'm a complete newbie.20:12
yofelsfstikkun: what application by the way? What effect has it on what you're doing?20:13
sfstikkunIt has no real affect on what i'm doing.  It shows up whether I'm using Firefox or Epiphany browsers20:14
sfstikkunor Facebook20:14
yofelthen feel free to report it, we disable crash reporting once a release is out so users don't get interrupted too much20:15
sfstikkunok20:16
trinikronohey guys, any mentors online?21:14
arandtrinikrono: If it's a general question, fire away, likely a lot of people are off at uds, atm.21:39
grapzHi. I have bug 576601, and I've installed kernel 2.6.34-rc7 from the MainLine PPA, but when I try do to ubuntu-bugs -u 576601 to update the bug, it doesn't upload any logs (UnreportableReason: The running kernel is not an Ubuntu kernel). Is there a way I can have ubuntu-bug upload the log files for me when testing a new kernel?23:21
ubot4Launchpad bug 576601 in linux (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "mcp89 sata not detected (affects: 4) (heat: 34)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/57660123:22

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!