[08:46] <BUGabundo_remote> yes,yes, Sleep is overrated
[08:47] <ddecator> BUGabundo_remote: why yes it is
[09:32] <Dimmuxx> is anyone else having problem with videos using the video tag in firefox 3.6.4 build3 64bit from the security ppa? They play for less than a second and then just stops with no way to start them again.
[09:33] <Dimmuxx> the 32bit build seems to work
[09:46] <ddecator> do you have an example?
[09:46] <Dimmuxx> air.mozilla.com
[09:50] <ddecator> the .ogg stream on the left isn't loading for me, is that what you're talking about?
[09:51] <Dimmuxx> select one of the old recordings in the list
[09:52] <ddecator> ah, now it's working. it's fine for me with the 3.7 daily on 64-bit. let me try the 3.6.5 daily
[09:53] <ddecator> huh...yah, doesn't work on 3.6.5, starts for a second then freezes
[09:53] <Dimmuxx> okay good then it's not just broken here
[09:54] <ddecator> nope, and i haven't seen a bug report for it. let me look real quick to make sure
[09:54] <BUGabundo_remote> which ppa has TB3 ?
[09:55] <ddecator> only the daily-build does atm
[09:56] <ddecator> Dimmuxx: you said it's working on 32-bit?
[09:56] <BUGabundo_remote> shame
[09:56] <Dimmuxx> ddecator: yes
[09:58] <ddecator> might be bug 450684, if it's pausing at the beginning to buffer, although that shows it happening for 32-bit as well
[09:59] <ddecator> huh, now this video is playing fine
[10:00] <ddecator> ah, yup, the bug is that if it pauses, you can't play it. the timing is probably due to buffering
[10:00] <ddecator> fixed in 3.7 though (for me at least)
[10:00] <ddecator> Dimmuxx: does that sound right?
[10:01] <Dimmuxx> ddecator: yeah more or less but it doesn't stop because of buffering here
[10:01] <Dimmuxx> i've got 100mbit so it fills up quickly but still stops directly
[10:02] <ddecator> for any of them you try?
[10:02] <chrisccoulson> has anyone seen micahg online recently?
[10:02] <ddecator> chrisccoulson: yesterday. he might be heading to uds right now (if he isn't already there)
[10:02] <chrisccoulson> thats what i'm wondering
[10:02] <chrisccoulson> i don't know if he is here already
[10:03] <ddecator> not sure, idk when he left, but he was on last night
[10:03] <Dimmuxx> ddecator: none of them seems to work, I tried some other html5 videos yesterday and they didn't work either but now I found some that do work
[10:04] <Dimmuxx> the i386 build seems to work all the time
[10:04] <ddecator> Dimmuxx: yah, that's what i had too, not sure if it was just because it paused for a sec to start buffering at the beginning (i have a fast connection too, but even with 3.7 a lot of times it pauses for a fraction of a second to buffer)
[10:04] <ddecator> i don't have a 32-bit system, so i can't test on there
[10:05] <ddecator> BUGabundo_remote: micah plans to start a thunderbird stable ppa like the firefox one i believe
[10:06] <Dimmuxx> hmm one of the videos didn't work now on i386
[10:06] <Dimmuxx> so I guess they are both broken
[10:06] <BUGabundo_remote> great
[10:07] <BUGabundo_remote> I hate recommending daily ppas to ppl
[10:07] <ddecator> Dimmuxx: my guess is that it's that bug i found. i'll comment that it's fixed on 3.7 in a bit and try to find an upstream report
[10:13] <Dimmuxx> ddecator: yeah, 3.7 seems to work for me too
[10:14] <ddecator> good deal
[10:16] <BUGabundo_remote> fta: MAUUAUAU
[10:17] <BUGabundo_remote> restarting chromium just restart X again :(
[10:18] <BUGabundo_remote> "You have been signed out of this account.
[10:18] <BUGabundo_remote> This may have happened automatically because another user signed in from the same browser. To continue using this account, you will need to sign in again. This is done to protect your account and to ensure the privacy of your information."
[10:35] <fta> http://twitpic.com/1mn13e
[10:45] <fta> BUGabundo_remote, too bad for you ;)
[10:47]  * BUGabundo_remote stabs fta
[11:10] <BUGabundo_remote> Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
[11:10] <BUGabundo_remote> pthread_cond_wait@@GLIBC_2.3.2 () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S:261
[11:10] <BUGabundo_remote> 261	../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S: No such file or directory.
[11:10] <BUGabundo_remote> 	in ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/pthread_cond_wait.S
[11:10] <BUGabundo_remote> fta: ^^^^^^^^^^still there !!!!!!
[11:11] <fta> was the bug marked as fixed?
[11:12] <BUGabundo_remote> don't recall
[11:12] <BUGabundo_remote> they made a patch, and your bot build it
[11:14] <BUGabundo_remote> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=40803
[11:14] <BUGabundo_remote> Status: 	Fixed
[11:14] <BUGabundo_remote> should I reopen?
[11:17] <fta> yep, with a good backtrace
[11:18] <BUGabundo_remote> I filed a new one
[11:18] <BUGabundo_remote> will try to get a good bt
[11:19] <BUGabundo_remote> its not that easy... it won't crash... just freeze
[11:27] <BUGabundo_remote> eheh Light... boot in 7 secs... browsing the web in 10...
[11:27] <BUGabundo_remote> heck I can't make FF open in under 10 secs :)
[12:02] <fta> http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/android-powered-lego-robot-solves-rubiks-cube-in-24-seconds-06-05-2010/
[12:12] <gnomefreak> ah fixed ;)
[12:19] <gnomefreak> bug 578210
[13:21] <BUGabundo_remote> fta: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=43741
[13:21] <gnomefreak> gobby is really sucking atm i cant get rid of lucid meetings
[13:22] <gnomefreak> sorry s/meetings/docs
[13:22]  * gnomefreak goes for smoke maybe it will come to me
[13:23] <kermiac> Hi. I'm trying to re-assign what was originally reported as a ubuntuone bug - bug 576072. when using firefox or chromium to download a file named ".bashrc" it is saved as "bashrc". When using Opera to download the same ".bashrc" it is saved correctly as ".bashrc". I have tried this from multiple file hosts & the result is always the same
 hm, indeed, if you open a dot file and use save page as... it's properly saved as .file, but if you use the download file dialog the . is missing
[13:26] <kermiac> the download dialogue acually says ".bashrc", but the filename when it is save on the disk is "bashrc". I have uploaded 3 example .bashrc's to 3 different hosts - sorry in advance for 3 line post
[13:27] <kermiac> http://www.mediafire.com/?njnywyh5jox
[13:27] <kermiac> http://www.filedropper.com/bashrc_1
[13:27] <kermiac> http://rapidshare.com/files/385623472/.bashrc.html
[13:30] <gnomefreak> i havent tried ubuntuone in a while, once i figure gobby out maybe ill play with it again
[13:30] <Kangarooo> kermiac: you asked here?
[13:32] <kermiac> gnomefreak: I uploaded the same file to 3 other file hosts. It's not a u1 web interface issue
[13:32] <Kangarooo> why its not possible to save hidden files? in linux hiden files are files with point in from of name .name
[13:32] <kermiac> Kangarooo: yes, I posted the question before you joined
[13:33] <Kangarooo> and why if I save hiden file and want to overwrite it its not overwriten but made filename but .filename is deleted.
[13:36] <kermiac> gnomefreak: just in case you missed my last comment due to connection issues - I uploaded the same file to 3 other file hosts. It's not a u1 web interface issue
[13:38] <gnomefreak> kermiac: i did miss it. did you try using the dile dir in ~/? but i havent played with it since it first came out
[13:39] <Kangarooo> kermiac: can you give link to bug ? I want to add comment about that my .bashrc file is now deltedet :)
[13:40] <Kangarooo> that's a security issue
[13:40] <kermiac> gnomefreak: sorry, I don't understand what do you mean by "dile dir"?
[13:41] <gnomefreak> file dir. you can add files to the ubuntuone dir.  but im not real sure what you are asking. im if i understand you. you can not upload a .file to ubuntuone using firefox only?
[13:42] <gnomefreak> sorry i have a crap load of things going on at one time
[13:42] <kermiac> sorry, I obviously didn't explain myself properly
[13:42] <kermiac> I can upload the ".bashrc" file fine
[13:42] <kermiac> but when I try to download it
[13:42] <kermiac> the "save as" dialogue shows ".bashrc"
[13:42] <kermiac> but the file is actually saved as "bashrc"
[13:43] <kermiac> gnomefreak: does that make more sense?
[13:43] <Kangarooo> from where here came ubuntuone ?
[13:43] <gnomefreak> kermiac: maybe because it already exsits. and not real sure what FF has to do with it
[13:43] <Kangarooo> I understand problem is in FF and Chrome and Opera . how ubuntuone is related to that?
[13:43] <gnomefreak> change name to .bashrc.old and than try to save the .bashrc
[13:44] <gnomefreak> ff chrome are on gecko but opera is not
[13:44] <kermiac> ok, if the file ".bashrc" already exists, it deletes the original ".bashrc" but saves the file as "bashrc"
[13:44] <Kangarooo> omg. I think ill make a video. words are real easy to misunderstand but first kermiac can you give bug link?
[13:45] <Kangarooo> yes kermiac understood corect
[13:45] <gnomefreak> ok give me the bug # and ill look at it in a few minutes. i have to figure this gobby shit out and than restart updates
[13:45] <kermiac> if the file ".bashrc" does not exist in the directory you are downloading it to the file is still saved as "bashrc" instead of ".bashrc"
[13:45] <kermiac> ok bug 576072
[13:45] <Kangarooo> and also deleted the original file strangely
[13:45] <kermiac> thanks gnomefreak
[13:45] <gnomefreak> kermiac: np
[13:46] <gnomefreak> kermiac: Kangarooo most of us (except me are at UDS so it may not be fast)
[13:47] <kermiac> gnomefreak: yes,np - I understand :) I've been following UDS remotely
[13:47] <Kangarooo> what's uds? !uds
[13:48] <Kangarooo> ah found.
[13:49] <gnomefreak> ok commenting on bug
[13:50] <gnomefreak> kermiac: atm i have a couple of hundred packages upgrading so it may be an hour or so
[13:51] <gnomefreak> kermiac: are you seeing same bug and Kangarooo are you seeing same bug as the one listed above?
[13:51] <kermiac> I was discussing this bug in #ubuntu-bugs
[13:51] <gnomefreak> if so please add your confirm comments
[13:51] <Kangarooo> gnomefreak: I am having in ff that yes. have only tried in ff jet
[13:51] <Kangarooo> im writing already
[13:52] <kermiac> ok, np gnomefreak :) from the rather basic description I gave you, do you think it should be filed against "gecko"? I just want to re-assign it to the correct package so the u1 team isn't spammed with unrelated bugmail
[13:52] <gnomefreak> i will check back when upgrades are done.
[13:53] <Kangarooo> kermiac: you should post thouse 3 links to bug report
[13:53] <kermiac> Kangarooo: I will
[13:53] <Kangarooo> couse what im writing whould be after thouse links :)
[13:53] <gnomefreak> kermiac: no it is likely a xulrunner bug BUT i want to test it first. kermiac can you reproduce this bug as filed?
[13:54] <kermiac> yes, I am "Mitch Towner" in the bug report
[13:56] <gnomefreak> yep
[13:58] <gnomefreak> i would prefer having people confirm it before i change the package. ok i updated bug with latest round of questions. that should hold it off for a few hours once i am fully up to date on my packages. i will save bug and revist it when done
[13:59] <kermiac> ok, thanks. I'll add the requested info. Thanks for looking into this gnomefreak, I appreciate it :)
[13:59] <gnomefreak> happy to help. im sorry it will take a while for me to get back to it.
[14:00] <kermiac> not a problem gnomefreak - it's understandable with most of the team being at UDS :) Hope you have a great day/night
[14:00] <kermiac> I will add more info to the report. I have also subscribed to the report if you need more info
[14:01] <gnomefreak> ok thanks
[14:01] <gnomefreak> be back in a little while
[14:06] <gnomefreak> sorry if i typed apt-get policy please change that to apt-cache policy. also kermiac always tell reporters to use ubuntu-bug to report bugs :)
[14:06] <gnomefreak> ok still not here
[14:06] <gnomefreak> change that i am here for the most part
[14:09] <kermiac> gnomefreak: I didn't even notice "apt-get", I just automatically read apt-cache", lol. Also, I do usually tell reporters to uses ubuntu-bug & apport-collect, but I was waiting until the reports is assigned to the correct package else it apport will u/l logs that aren't required (i.e. u1 logs when firefox/ xulrunner logs are required)
[14:09] <gnomefreak> kermiac: works for me :)
[14:09] <kermiac> :)
[14:10] <kermiac> oh, hang on - what works for you? you can't reproduce the bug? or my explanation?
[14:11] <gnomefreak> kermiac: i need to know who it works for on what browsers (also try using the ubuntuone dir to see if you it will save .bashrc as it should
[14:11] <gnomefreak> )
[14:12] <gnomefreak> crap screen is blinking already
[14:14] <gnomefreak> kermiac: please add policy xulrunner-1.9.1 xulrunner-1.9.2
[14:14] <kermiac> gnomefreak: will do - this is turning into a *very* long comment hehe
[14:14] <Kangarooo> I ve tryd FF and chromium-browser and chormium saved if save as is used and renaming to .name is used check out my comment in bug
[14:16] <gnomefreak> kermiac: sorry
[14:16] <gnomefreak> your not conehead are you?
[14:17] <gnomefreak> btw sorry im in 32 channels atm so i may be slow to respond. gobby is pissing me off something bad
[14:17] <Kangarooo> gnomefreak: CoC?
[14:18] <gnomefreak> no. are you the reporter of the bug?
[14:18] <kermiac> gnomefreak: no, I'm not conehead or the original reporter. I saw the bug as I'm subscribed to u1 bugs
[14:19] <Kangarooo> ah conehead as the reporter user name :D
[14:19] <gnomefreak> kermiac: yeah i knew that but i was asking Kangarooo of his status in bug report
[14:20] <gnomefreak> anyone who is not conehead please add info requested if you can reproduce this bug
[14:20] <Kangarooo> :D
[14:20] <gnomefreak> s/who/whomever
[14:20] <kermiac> ah, np gnomefreak :) I think he just followed me in here from #ubuntu-bugs. I was discussing this in that chan with a few ppl
[14:20] <gnomefreak> ok
[14:20] <Kangarooo> yes
[14:22] <gnomefreak> ok need coffee refill and smoke and may throw gobby right the hell out the highest windo i can find
[14:23] <gnomefreak> its not gobby as much as it is people :)
[14:26] <kermiac> ok, I'm off to bed. I have updated bug 576072 with (i think) all of the requested info. gnomefreak feel free to ping me in #ubuntu-bugs or #ubunutone if you need more info :)
[14:27] <gnomefreak> ok you are going to hate me :(
[14:28] <kermiac> gnomefreak: why? hate is *such* a stong word hehe
[14:28] <gnomefreak> kermiac: i forgot a few things on bug report. adding now
[14:30] <kermiac> gnomefreak: no probs :) if it's something I can do quickly I'll add them now otherwise I'll just add it in the morning
[14:30] <kermiac> BTW - I don't hate you, lol.... I said to ping me if you need more info ;)
[14:31] <gnomefreak> kermiac: apt-cache policy firefox-gnome-support python-ubuntuone-client ubuntuone-client-gnome python-ubuntuone-storageprotocol is what i added
[14:31] <gnomefreak> its not needed now since reporter hasnt added his info
[14:31] <kermiac> any reason you want the u1 versions?
[14:32] <kermiac> I know it's reported against u1 - but I can reproduce even if u1 is totally taken out of the equation
[14:32] <kermiac> gnomefreak: ^^
[14:33] <gnomefreak> oh
[14:33] <gnomefreak> ok than forget those but it was first thing that came to mind when i lit my smoke
[14:34] <kermiac> gnomefreak: no probs, that's why I upoloaded the files to 3 other free file hosts. To rule out u1 as being the cause of the problem :)
[14:34]  * gnomefreak more interested in gnome-support packages
[14:35]  * gnomefreak has a feeling i know the problem :) but i havent had time to test yet
[14:36] <kermiac> ok, I'll add the firefox-gnome-support version info after I finish my smoke - the lucid testing machine is in another room that i don't smoke in ;)
[14:37] <kermiac> poor u1 team are getting spammed by bugmail in that report though - I'll have to apologise hehe
[14:37] <gnomefreak> Kangarooo: you didnt get google-crome from our repos
[14:37] <gnomefreak> kermiac: ill fix it in a bit
[14:37] <gnomefreak> same reason why opera gives no info. ah ha
[14:38] <kermiac> np gnomefreak :) most of the u1 team are at UDS too
[14:39]  * gnomefreak changed to firefox
[14:40] <Kangarooo> but also problem is about chormium
[14:40] <kermiac> gnomefreak: is opera in the repo's?
[14:40] <Kangarooo> save dialog doesn't show (.) but if (.) is added then its saves .name
[14:41] <gnomefreak> kermiac: no
[14:41] <gnomefreak> it was removed from partner repo IIRC
[14:41] <kermiac> gnomefreak: ah, good... I'm not going crazy hehe
[14:42] <gnomefreak> ok added my last comments for (mostlikely) the rest of the day
[14:43] <gnomefreak> again not important enough to keep you from going to sleep
[14:43]  * gnomefreak gets a strange feeling it is extension related but i wont know for a while. working out bugs in the upgrade Lucid->Maverick
[14:45] <kermiac> ok, thanks again for the help gnomefreak :) I'll add the gnome-support info quickly before bed but then I've gotta try to get some sleep hehe. If it helps - the only extension I've got installed in firefox on my test lucid machine (that i used to verify the bug) is adblock plus
[14:45] <kermiac> gnomefreak: ^^
[14:47] <gnomefreak> kermiac: use new profile that should start without adblock-plus. it has been known to cause issues but info needed anyway please. did you get it from repos or from add-ons site
[14:47] <gnomefreak> but go to bed :)
[14:47] <kermiac> haha
[14:48] <gnomefreak> oh micah is going to love this ;)
[14:48] <kermiac> I got adblock from the addons site (through firefox)
[14:48] <kermiac> would apport-collect get anything that might help the bug report?
[14:49] <gnomefreak> kermiac: yes it should try it
[14:49] <gnomefreak> maybe ill get lucky and get extension.txt :)
[14:49] <kermiac> ok, I'll do that too :)
[14:50] <gnomefreak> it wont for chromium sinc eyou ar enot using stable version
[14:57] <kermiac> gnomefreak: ok apport collected (including extension.txt hehe). Also tried with new profile & I can still reproduce.
[14:58] <gnomefreak> kermiac: yeah i know sorry
[14:58] <kermiac> hey, no probs mate :)
[14:59] <kermiac> gnomefreak: ok, I really have to stop getting suckered in with triaging bugs & get some sleep... damn this stuff is addictive, lol
[14:59] <kermiac> good night :)
[14:59] <gnomefreak> :) night
[15:27] <gnomefreak> holy shit that is long
[15:33] <gnomefreak> anyone else timing out on bug report?
[15:33]  * gnomefreak has important info for a bug and i cant add it
[15:34] <gnomefreak> rather not lose it
[15:51] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: are you here? i am leaning towards bug 576072 being xulrunner related.  this goes for anyone  :)
[16:10] <chrisccoulson> gnomefreak, that would be a firefox issue, as it uses its bundled xulrunner
[16:19] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: ok but SM doesnt as i recall
[16:20] <chrisccoulson> gnomefreak, isn't SM based on xul191 still?
[16:20] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: yes
[16:20] <chrisccoulson> i could be wrong there though
[17:04] <fta> I hope this will land in ubuntu: http://lucidfox.org/posts/view/573
[17:04] <fta> chrisccoulson, ^^
[17:09] <micahg> fta: those seem to be the plans for future Ubuntus
[17:16] <micahg> fta: we have a patch to add thunderbird to the messaging menu ATM, just needs to be reviewed
[17:16] <gnomefreak> micahg: fun for you if you want it ;)
[17:16]  * micahg is worried
[17:17] <gnomefreak> bug 576072 i got as far as i could so far
[17:17] <gnomefreak> micahg: no worries im not sure if its xul or browser
[17:17] <eagles0513875> is it a known bug that firefox refuses to open any downlaods be it word documents or installer files if you tell it to just open the document or software
[17:18] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: its not the opening of them that is the problem
[17:18] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: ya
[17:18] <gnomefreak> its the hidden files that dont download right
[17:18] <eagles0513875> it asks you to specify what program to use
[17:19] <gnomefreak> i tested with more than enough browsers to help :)
[17:19] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: not here it doesnt
[17:19] <micahg> gnomefreak: it's chromium too
[17:19] <gnomefreak> it asks you how to save it
[17:19] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: strange
[17:19] <eagles0513875> maybe my install was super bugged :(
[17:20] <gnomefreak> micahg: yeah it is, i think i screwed up but hey that was hours ago. it did name it differently than all others
[17:20] <gnomefreak> acpi ;)
[17:20] <micahg> gnomefreak: maybe a GTK bug
[17:20]  * micahg searches recent bugs
[17:21] <gnomefreak> micahg: its possible since oprea doesnt have the issue
[17:21]  * gnomefreak hasnt found an easy way to search bugs yet
[17:21]  * eagles0513875 has an idea for a lil plasma widget to search launch pad from ones desktop
[17:21] <eagles0513875> hehe
[17:22] <gnomefreak> between that bug and gobby i havent had a chance to do anything yet
[17:23] <gnomefreak> gtk bug would be great :)
[17:24] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: can you test that with konq. since you are on that kde thing
[17:25] <gnomefreak> oh this cant be good :(
[17:25] <gnomefreak> bug 308605
[17:26] <micahg> old bug
[17:26] <gnomefreak> yes i know but i cant open it
[17:26] <micahg> I can open it
[17:26] <micahg> weird
[17:26] <micahg> k, I have to go
[17:26] <gnomefreak> clikcing on the link told me i needed to choose an app to open it from email here i open it fine
[17:27] <micahg> ?
[17:28] <micahg> I might be back on later
[17:29] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: waiting for reinstall to finish not to mention konqueror for some reason wants to save the html file of facebook and doesnt even load the website
[17:29] <eagles0513875> lol
[17:29] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: will test when i get it back on kubuntu
[17:29] <gnomefreak> ok thanks
[17:29] <eagles0513875> no problem
[17:29] <eagles0513875> god willing i can get back on
[17:33] <gnomefreak> i am unablet o reproduce the bug above in 3.6 or 3.7
[17:35] <gnomefreak> it seems to be thunderbird that is causing the opening probem
[17:35] <gnomefreak> problem
[17:35] <gnomefreak> i cant open any links in tb it gives same dialog
[17:40] <gnomefreak> someone fix thunderbird 3
[17:44] <gnomefreak> sorry i meant SOON ;)
[17:46] <gnomefreak> left or right clicking on a link in tb3 causes "Launch Application" dialog to open and wont let me open any link
[17:46] <gnomefreak> ^^^ regresstion
[17:56] <gnomefreak> micahg: the opening of links is due to tb3. its only there that i cant opena  link.
[17:56] <gnomefreak> bug 414795
[17:57] <eagles0513875> O_
[17:57] <eagles0513875> O_o
[17:57]  * eagles0513875 ponders
[18:40] <gnomefreak> ha found out how these damn people i havent talked to in years are finding me on facebook
[18:42] <eagles0513875> lol
[18:44] <gnomefreak> out of all the requests i only added one :)
[18:48] <gnomefreak> ha im not the only one seeing it, tb is broken stable or daily it seemshttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/136303/comments/28
[18:49] <gnomefreak> the comment #28. he needs to file a separate bug than i will add info. since he is using stable version he should be able to use ubuntu-bug
[19:06] <gnomefreak> bug 381160
[19:12] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: im happy to report the 64bit flashplugin works nicely
[19:14] <gnomefreak> eagles0513875: we dont use 64flash yet, i really hate people going outside of our repos for it since they file bugs on it in our bug tracker and we have no way to do much of anything with flash bugs anyway.
[19:14] <eagles0513875> !flahs
[19:14] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: its linked to in the wiki
[19:14]  * gnomefreak personall i say we drop it from repos and have people go to adobe to get it. 
[19:14] <eagles0513875> !flash
[19:14] <eagles0513875> its in a ppa
[19:15] <gnomefreak> its no stable yet
[19:15] <gnomefreak> not
[19:15] <eagles0513875> well i have been testing it prior to retrying the install and it does just fine
[19:15] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: also isolated my issue with ubiquity
[19:16] <eagles0513875> turns out there is an issue with kde packages somewhere
[20:06] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: any chance we can get the gnome-support package fixed for tb3 in the daily builds? cant launch links it opens the app dialog
[20:06] <chrisccoulson> gnomefreak - ok, but not right now ;)
[20:06] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: thanks
[20:07] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: will check that i mentioned earlier
[20:07] <gnomefreak> k
[20:08]  * gnomefreak been here >8 hours
[20:10] <eagles0513875> i have on and off while studying
[20:21]  * gnomefreak would like to wait for 1 email but its not comming
[20:22] <eagles0513875> you never know gnomefreak
[20:22] <eagles0513875> gnomefreak: what did you want me to test
[20:22] <eagles0513875> to see if konquer still wants me to download the facebook html file
[20:22]  * gnomefreak doesnt recall it was a bug i mentioned >6 hours ago
[20:23] <eagles0513875> well when i got to facebook .com it still wants me to save as or open with
[20:23] <eagles0513875> the type is application/vnd.wap.xhtml+html
[23:23] <fta> the dailies will build for maverick starting from now
[23:23] <BUGabundo> YAY
[23:24]  * BUGabundo seds sources.list