[00:00] <lfaraone> ajmitch: I spent 5 minutes talking in the DMB meeting today about how I have been working to ensure I don't forget little things before upload, and then I proceed to forget to update-maintainer on my first upload :)
[00:00] <ajmitch> awesome :)
[00:00] <ajmitch> but it's the first one, you have to make at least some mistake :)
[00:00] <lfaraone> ajmitch: no harm no foul, I uploaded a .2 that lacks that error.
[00:02] <ajmitch> which has shown up in the queue now
[00:13] <easter_egg> thumper, what?
[00:14] <thumper> easter_egg: http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community/mailinglists
[00:14] <thumper> easter_egg: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
[00:15] <easter_egg> thumper, and the launchpad mailing lists is not working?
[00:15] <thumper> easter_egg: not sure who disabled it, but the why is probably referenced in one of those links
[00:18] <easter_egg> thumper, can you tell for someone answer my question in launchpad with this reason?
[00:18] <thumper> easter_egg: about as much as you can
[00:20] <easter_egg> but I don't know what is happening
[00:20] <easter_egg> why I should to happen the question?
[00:20] <easter_egg> but that's ok
[05:25] <MTecknology> how do I unstack a branch?
[05:28] <spm> bzr reconfigure --unstacked, I believe
[05:28] <MTecknology> thanks
[05:38] <thumper> MTecknology: it mostly works
[05:38] <thumper> IIRC
[05:39] <thumper> MTecknology: it may give an error at the end as I believe something isn't being locked properly
[05:39] <MTecknology> thumper: oh
[05:39] <MTecknology> thumper: I just had on branch stacked wrong - it worked :)
[05:40] <thumper> MTecknology: works ok?
[05:40] <MTecknology> thumper: yup :)
[05:41] <thumper> cool
[05:41] <thumper> must be fixed then
[05:42] <MTecknology> seems to be - unless I'm lucky
[05:43] <thumper> MTecknology: bug probably fixed
[08:20] <Piotras> Hi, any help wrt PPA package builder ?
[08:21] <Piotras> or should I subsribe to some list and post there ?
[08:22] <wgrant> Piotras: What is your issue?
[08:25] <Piotras> wgrant, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48223470/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-amd64.midgard-libgda4_4.0.8-5_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[08:26] <jpds> Piotras: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgda-4.0
[08:26] <Piotras> wgrant, basically I try to build libgda4 package, but for some unknown reason it fails because can not find gda library which is passed as g-ir-scanner argument
[08:26] <Piotras> jpds, it's not installed yet
[08:27] <StevenK> Then you can't call it like that during your build
[08:27] <Piotras> jpds, wgrant: question is: why it builds on lucid system and @OBS, and why doesn't on launchpad builder?
[08:28] <Piotras> StevenK, it works everywhere but launchpad
[08:28] <StevenK> Why do I have this feeling your lucd system already has libgda4 installed?
[08:28] <Piotras> StevenK, doesn't ?
[08:39] <Piotras> StevenK, it builds fine on *clean* Karmic without any older gda4 installed
[08:39] <StevenK> You can't compare a build on Karmic to a Lucid build in a PPA
[08:39] <Piotras> StevenK, on my system `ldconfig -v | grep gda` returns nothing
[08:40] <Piotras> jpds, wgrant: should I add some specific path or anything during launchpad build ?
[08:40] <wgrant> Have you tried to build it on Lucid locally?
[08:40] <wgrant> Or in pbuilder or sbuild?
[08:41] <wgrant> Launchpad builds every package in Ubuntu -- if your package fails to build there, it's probably your package's problem.
[08:42] <Piotras> wgrant, it just built locally
[08:42] <wgrant> In pbuilder or sbuild?
[08:42] <Piotras> ldconfig -V | grep gda returns nothing
[08:43] <Piotras> wgrant, no sbuilder or pbuilder
[08:43] <wgrant> Please try it in sbuild or pbuilder.
[08:43] <wgrant> Otherwise you are not using a clean environment, so it is not a valid test.
[08:43] <Piotras> wgrant, it builds fine @OBS and with Maemo builders
[08:43] <wgrant> Yes, but Launchpad comes very close to being the definition of what should build.
[08:44] <wgrant> It has built literally millions of Ubuntu packages.
[08:44] <Piotras> wgrant, there are two possibilities:
[08:45] <Piotras> 1. it builds fine in sbuilder or pbuilder - something wrong with launchpad
[08:45] <Piotras> 2. it fails in sbuilder or pbuilder - launchapd is ok - hwo can I fix it?
[08:45] <wgrant> Success in sbuild or pbuilder is not a definite indicator that Launchpad is at fault, but it would hint at it.
[08:46] <Piotras> wgrant, so any hint for fixing this build?
[08:47] <wgrant> Um. I just looked at your PPA, and it worked on i386.
[08:47] <wgrant> Are you building on i386 locally?
[08:47] <Piotras> amd64
[08:47] <wgrant> I suspect your package does not support amd64.
[08:47] <Piotras> wgrant, builds fine @OBS amd64
[08:48] <wgrant> Try sbuild or pbuilder.
[08:50] <Piotras> wgrant, ok, will do, there's log from amd64 build @OBS: http://pastebin.com/LJDRPvvP
[08:51] <erichammond> FYI, still getting this when I try to copy binaries to a different series in a PPA: (Error ID: OOPS-1593E769)
[08:51] <bigjools> the fix is not landed yet
[09:40] <Piotras> wgrant, package builds fine in pbuilder
[09:40] <Piotras> wgrant, lucid of course
[09:46] <wgrant> Piotras: In an amd64 pbuilder (not just the kernel)?
[09:54] <geser> I've tried building this package in my amd64 lucid pbuilder and it builds there
[09:56] <geser> crap, I just noticed I took the wrong revision of the package :( retesting
[10:02] <Piotras> wgrant, not sure, though all packages built are amd64
[10:23] <Piotras> wgrant, all packages installed in pbuilder's target are amd64
[10:25] <wgrant> Piotras: Have you tried diffing the logs? Chances are good that something goes wrong well before the actual error.
[10:25] <Piotras> wgrant, what logs?
[10:25] <wgrant> Piotras: The build log from Launchpad and the build log from pbuilder.
[10:27] <Piotras> wgrant, where pbuilder saves log?
[10:27] <wgrant> Piotras: I haven't used pbuilder in many years. I don't know if it even stores it at all.
[10:29] <Piotras> wgrant, ok, I'll try to build some log then
[11:37] <slytherin> gmb: ping. This is about answer ticket 103283 (bug import for gnusim8085).
[11:48] <gmb> slytherin, Hi
[11:48] <slytherin> gmb: Looks like you were referring to old copy of XML. I have updated the link in question description to latest XML.
[11:50] <gmb> slytherin, So the XML I should grab is http://people.ubuntu.com/~onkarshinde/gnusim8085_bugs_20100409.xml.gz, right?
[11:50] <slytherin> yes
[11:51] <gmb> Okay, let me give that a shot...
[11:54] <gmb> slytherin, That worked, thanks. I'll get that on staging for your shortly.
[11:54] <slytherin> I am here for some time. ping me if there is any other problem.
[12:32] <slytherin> gmb: Going away for some time. Let me know when you are done importing the bugs in staging.
[12:34] <gmb> slytherin, Will do.
[12:54] <gmb> slytherin, Import to staging complete.
[13:10] <slytherin> gmb: Checked a few bugs. Look fine to me.
[14:29] <ilyak> Why ask people to create f-ing account when they want to fill a bug instead of using a f-ing openid?
[14:30] <ilyak> This is a sure way to get ten times less bug reports
[14:33] <ilyak> And then confirmation letter won't arrive
[14:36] <mars> Hi ilyak, how long has it been since you registered?
[14:41] <ilyak> Well, maybe ten minutes since I tried
[14:45] <wgrant> ilyak: Work is being done at the moment to enable use of external OpenIDs.
[14:46] <wgrant> A lot of refactoring is done, but lots is still to go.
[14:48] <ilyak> :-/
[14:49] <achilles> hello guys, I'm trying to join the open source and start coding, I got the source code of an opensource package but don't know how to start debugging it, any help please ?
[15:38] <geser> does somebody know why the powerpc buildds have occasionally hickups (leading to CHROOTWAIT) like in http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48176728/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-powerpc.build-essential_11.5_CHROOTWAIT.txt.gz
[15:39] <geser> it happened around 10 times in the last two days
[15:44] <wgrant> lamont: ^^ (you ran away at just the wrong time!)
[15:44] <wgrant> It hit gvfs a couple of days ago too.
[16:02] <lamont> geser: thanks for the report.  known bug that is being worked on. :(
[16:03] <lamont> wgrant: ^^
[16:03] <mars>    ?
[16:03] <mars> wrong window
[16:53] <_Josh_> hi, I have this error when I try to copy some packages since 2 days ago:
[16:53] <_Josh_>  Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad.
[16:53] <_Josh_> We’ve recorded what happened, and we’ll fix it as soon as possible. Apologies for the inconvenience.
[16:53] <_Josh_> (Error ID: OOPS-1593H1956)
[16:53] <_Josh_> (from a ppa to another)
[16:53] <_Josh_> anyone can help?
[16:54] <_Josh_> with other similar packages it works, and I don't see the difference between them
[16:55] <mars> matsubara, I can't find the OOPS that _Josh_ and ubottu are linking to.  Any idea what's going on?
[16:56] <matsubara> mars, looking
[16:59] <wgrant> _Josh_, mars: The fix is in production-devel, and should almost be in production-stable. So it could be cherrypicked tonight.
[16:59] <_Josh_> ok, thanks :)
[17:01] <mars> thanks wgrant
[17:01] <matsubara> mars, it's either that the oops isn't synced yet or it's the bug I'm working atm
[17:01] <mars> matsubara, ok, thank you.
[17:02] <matsubara> mars, just confirmed, the oops has been synced. so it's the bug I'm working on :-)
[17:07] <jtimberman> what is the bug # for the OOPS problem?
[17:08] <mars> matsubara, ^ ?
[17:08] <jtimberman> i see two potential Soyuz bugs as relevant, and I'm subscribed to both but I'm not getting any updates.
[17:08] <jtimberman> been waiting as patiently as i can to copy packages in my PPA since Friday. :/
[17:08] <matsubara> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/575426
[17:08] <matsubara> mars, jtimberman ^
[17:08] <jtimberman> thanks
[17:09] <wgrant> The fix is undergoing testing right now.
[17:09] <wgrant> It's landed.
[17:31] <bigjools> mars: hi
[17:31] <bigjools> matsubara-lunch: did you figure out why the oopses are missing?
[17:59] <_kb9vqf> wgrant: Status of bug 575426?
[17:59] <_kb9vqf> I still can't copy packages... :-(
[18:02] <ahasenack> hey guys, is the bug driver also by default signed up to receive merge proposals?
[18:02] <ahasenack> I'm getting two emails per merge proposal or comment, but just one per actual merge made
[18:03] <ahasenack> I'm subscribed to the branch, and I'm also in the list that receives bugs
[18:03] <tsimpson> it's the team/person that owns the branch that gets merge proposals, I think
[18:04] <ahasenack> hmm, this is the branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~landscape/landscape-client/trunk
[18:04] <ahasenack> I'm subscribed to it,
[18:04] <ahasenack> but I'm also getting those proposals and comments via landscape-bugs, which is the list that used to get only bug notifications about the project
[18:05] <daker> hi
[18:05] <cperrin881> Can anyone help me with the Apache HTTP Commons lib and the OAuth signing process of launcpad
[18:05] <cperrin881> I can't gat it working
[18:05] <cperrin881> *get
[18:11] <cperrin881> so many .....
[18:12] <cperrin881> that's a lot ...
[18:12] <cperrin881> well I will think about all this new information, thanks
[18:15] <tsimpson> cperrin88: maybe #launchpad-dev knows more about the OAuth signing process
[18:15] <cperrin88> tsimpson: I just tried that
[18:15] <cperrin88> But they are very talkative as well
[18:16] <tsimpson> it's also UDS time right now, so many LP people are in Belgium this week
[18:16] <cperrin88> Allah damnit -_-
[18:17] <tsimpson> cperrin88: you may consider asking a question on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[18:17] <tsimpson> or on the mailing list
[18:17] <cperrin88> *sighs*
[18:20] <daker> my turn now
[18:20] <cperrin88> HI daker
[18:20] <daker> hi cperrin88
[18:21] <daker> so i want to import po files form a project to another project
[18:21] <daker> i tried but it doesn't work
[18:24] <daker> from this tempate https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual/lucid-e1/+pots/ubu-man-website-translations
[18:24] <daker> to this template https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-website/trunk/+pots/ubuntu-manual-website
[18:26] <daker> any one ?
[18:27] <danilos> daker, what is it exactly that you are trying to do? (I am a bit  busy, but might have a few minutes to help out)
[18:27] <daker> i want to import the po files from here from this tempate https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual/lucid-e1/+pots/ubu-man-website-translations
[18:27] <daker> to here https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-website/trunk/+pots/ubuntu-manual-website
[18:27] <danilos> daker, ok, I heard that, the question is why do you want to do that?
[18:28] <danilos> daker, (i.e. if you are moving templates around, we can move it from one project to another for you)
[18:28] <daker> https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-website/trunk/+imports
[18:29] <daker> all the translations are marked "Needs Review"
[18:29] <daker> but i can't approve them
[18:30] <danilos> daker, you are probably using wrong paths, you should use identical paths you used on original import of the ubuntu-manual-website template
[18:30] <daker> how ?
[18:30] <danilos> daker, but it totally sounds as if you are doing something wrong: why do you have to manually upload translations from one template to another?
[18:31] <daker> not manually
[18:31] <mars> _kb9vqf, the bugfix has been deployed, and is in testing.  Shouldn't be much longer.
[18:31] <daker> i put them in a folder named as the template name and launchpad import them from the branch
[18:33] <daker> any idea ?
[18:34] <danilos> daker, there is no .pot file in there at all
[18:35] <danilos> daker, btw, why don't you want to move the existing template from ubuntu-manual project into this new project instead? that'll keep a better record of submissions and history (PO files can't contain all the data that's in the DB)
[18:37] <daker> i want to separate the website from the manual
[18:38] <daker> that's why
[18:38] <danilos> daker, right, and I am asking why do you not want us to move the existing translation template from one project (ubuntu-manual) to the new project (ubuntu-manual-website)
[18:38] <danilos> daker, it's not possible for anybody to do it, but we as admins can do that for you
[18:39] <danilos> daker, you'll get all existing translations, they'll be removed from the manual project and will exist only in the website project
[18:39] <daker> yes if you can that would great
[18:39] <daker> :D
[18:41] <danilos> daker, sure
[18:41] <daker> Great
[18:42] <danilos> daker, just to authorise the request from a logged in user, can you please file a question on https://answers.launchpad.net/rosetta (that will let me know that you are the authorised user, where IRC is not really a safe mechanism :)
[18:44] <daker> what should i write ?
[18:49] <danilos> daker, just that you want template XX moved to project ubuntu-manual-website: I'll take care of it right away, I'll know what's it about :)
[18:49] <daker> oki
[18:50] <danilos> daker, just give me a link to the question once you file it
[18:50] <danilos> daker, and thanks
[18:50] <daker> sure )
[18:50] <daker> :)
[18:53] <daker> danilos, https://answers.launchpad.net/rosetta/+question/110759
[18:57] <danilos> daker, ok, all done, you should now have a new template which you can rename once you deactivate the old one
[19:07] <daker> danilos,  can i merge two template ?
[19:12] <daker> danilos, back
[19:12] <daker> sorry that was a bug
[19:12] <daker> danilos, how can i merge two template
[19:12] <danilos> daker, you can't merge them easily
[19:19] <daker> danilos, :s
[19:23] <danilos> daker, I guess I dropped out now :)
[19:24] <danilos> daker, anyway, did you see my last answer? you'll have to re-upload translations if you have had contributions in both, but in general, if you didn't, it should be fine to just deactivate the new template and keep the old one with more translations
[19:26] <daker> oki
[19:26] <daker> thanks
[20:48] <Penguin_Guy> What do I put in my changelog to make the package available across all Ubuntu versions?
[20:48] <beuno> Penguin_Guy, you need to re-upload it for each series
[20:48] <beuno> or copy it over if they are binary-compatible
[20:48] <Penguin_Guy> beuno: Is this a joke?
[20:48] <beuno> I don't think it is, no
[20:49] <Penguin_Guy> beuno: 'copy it over'?
[20:49] <beuno> Penguin_Guy, yes, there's a copy link somewhere
[20:49] <beuno> that will let you copy it to different PPAs or series
[20:49] <Penguin_Guy> beuno: Oh, thank god for that.
[20:50] <Penguin_Guy> beuno: So that will automatically change the changelog?
[20:50] <beuno> Penguin_Guy, no
[20:50] <beuno> just make it available for that series
[20:51] <Penguin_Guy> beuno: But it's still available on all series?
[20:51] <Penguin_Guy> beuno: Ok, thanks!
[20:53] <Penguin_Guy> I'm quite new to packaging, so just to make sure I've got it right: '0.0a1-0ubuntu1' is a suitable version number for a new project?