=== rockstar changed the topic of #launchpad-reviews to: On call: - || reviewing: - || queue: [] || This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ || https://code.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+activereviews | ||
=== noodles775 changed the topic of #launchpad-reviews to: On call: - || reviewing: - || queue: [noodles775] || This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ || https://code.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+activereviews | ||
=== wgrant changed the topic of #launchpad-reviews to: On call: - || reviewing: - || queue: [noodles775,wgrant] || This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ || https://code.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+activereviews | ||
=== wgrant changed the topic of #launchpad-reviews to: On call: - || reviewing: - || queue: [noodles775,wgrant,wgrant] || This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ || https://code.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+activereviews | ||
wgrant | 07:55:29 < wgrant> rockstar: Hm, why was I dropped from the queue? | 09:15 |
---|---|---|
wgrant | Er. | 09:15 |
wgrant | Didn't mean to paste that bit. | 09:15 |
=== noodles775 changed the topic of #launchpad-reviews to: On call: - || reviewing: - || queue: [noodles775,wgrant,wgrant, noodles775] || This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ || https://code.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+activereviews | ||
=== matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== sinzui changed the topic of #launchpad-reviews to: On call: - || reviewing: - || queue: [noodles775,wgrant,wgrant, noodles775, sinzui, sinzui] || This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ || https://code.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+activereviews | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch | ||
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
=== gary_poster is now known as gary-lunch | ||
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
=== Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== gary-lunch is now known as gary_poster | ||
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
rockstar | sinzui, might you be around for a quick review? | 22:27 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, maybe you? | 22:30 |
EdwinGrubbs | rockstar, sure | 22:30 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, cool, sending your way now. | 22:30 |
rockstar | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rockstar/launchpad/no-arm-recipe-build/+merge/25364 | 22:35 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, ^^ | 22:35 |
EdwinGrubbs | rockstar, what code looks at the SourcePackageRecipeBuild.processor and decides whether to use the ARM builder | 22:43 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, it happens when creating the BuildQueue. One sec. | 22:43 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, see lp.buildmaster.models.buildbase:422 | 22:44 |
rockstar | It creates the BuildQueue with processor=specific_job.processor | 22:45 |
rockstar | So what I do is make sure that specific_job.processor points to an actual processor for the distroseries, and is not None. | 22:45 |
rockstar | Using None means "use whatever's available" | 22:45 |
rockstar | Which was safe until we got an ARM builder. | 22:46 |
EdwinGrubbs | rockstar, I guess there are other tests to ensure that the Builder actually checks the processor in the BuildQueue. | 22:48 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, well, I'd assume that as well. If the builders weren't honoring processor, we'd have a lot more other problems. | 22:49 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, I'm almost sure there are tests, because I remember working on some of them at our Wellington sprint with the soyuz folk. | 22:50 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
wgrant | See lp.buildmaster.tests.test_builder. There's quite a bit of it there. | 22:51 |
wgrant | And yes, if it didn't work then the build farm would explode even more than it did yesterday. | 22:51 |
rockstar | wgrant, :) | 22:51 |
EdwinGrubbs | rockstar, wgrant: how do we know that the distroseries.nominatedarchindep attribute will have x86 as its processor family? | 22:55 |
wgrant | EdwinGrubbs: This whole thing is a hack. | 22:56 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, we don't really, but if the distroseries isn't set up properly, more things would break than just this. | 22:56 |
wgrant | It will be superseded by proper restrictedness checks later. | 22:57 |
rockstar | wgrant, right. The real solution is in Soyuz's hands. | 22:57 |
wgrant | And yes, I don't think we've worked that out yet. We've discussed a few possibilities. | 22:57 |
EdwinGrubbs | rockstar, wgrant: I guess I don't understand why you don't just return Processor.select(id=1) if it's a hack anyway. | 22:58 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, because we want to make sure we're honoring the distroseries. | 22:59 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, bigjools said I should use it this way. | 22:59 |
rockstar | (And it made sense to use the data already available) | 22:59 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, here's danilo's CP candidate that fixes a similar issue: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~danilo/launchpad/bug-580016/+merge/25293 | 22:59 |
EdwinGrubbs | rockstar, so we have different distroseries for ARM?' | 22:59 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, I don't think so, but it's not the default_processor - Also, ARM is really only for OEM ATM. | 23:00 |
EdwinGrubbs | rockstar, well, since it's temporary it should be fine. If we don't have different distroseries for ARM, then I think the property is misleading, because it will always choose x86. My understanding of the problem is that some of the archindep packages really are dependent on the architecture. So, r=me ambivalently. | 23:04 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, we want it to always choose x86 for SourcePackageRecipeBuildJobs | 23:05 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, yeah, it's not really as "archindep" as we say. | 23:05 |
rockstar | EdwinGrubbs, thanks. | 23:05 |
=== flacoste is now known as flacoste_afk | ||
wgrant | EdwinGrubbs: So, we have an armel distro*arch*series in multiple distroseries. | 23:07 |
wgrant | Each distroseries has a set of architectures. These are generally inherited from the series' parent, resulting in the creation of a set of new DASes. | 23:08 |
wgrant | So there are generally several distroarchseries for any particular architecture. | 23:08 |
wgrant | nominatedarchindep is the architecture on which we will build architecture independent package components. | 23:08 |
wgrant | (and we now reuse it for truly architecture-independent builds. but we should probably stop that now that armel is in the picture) | 23:09 |
rockstar | In the case of Lucid, there's no lpia arch series, but there is an ARM arch series | 23:09 |
wgrant | Right. | 23:13 |
wgrant | We occasionally drop or gain an arch, but they are largely preserved betwen series. | 23:13 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!