/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/05/15/#ubuntu-motu.txt

arandWhat does actually XSBC mean? (c.f. XSBC-Original-Maintainer: in ubuntu packages).00:17
geser X=user-defined field, S=include in source, B=include in binary, C=include in .changes00:19
arandgeser: Ah, ok... Completely not what I expected then, I though it just was a wierd acronym :)00:22
bdrungarand: i sponsored your pastebinit patch00:27
arandbdrung: Yea, I noticed, cheers. Sorry about the maintainer miss. Just a happy amateur so far :/00:28
bdrungarand: if you want to get other things sponsored, just drop me a note and i will work on that instead of grabbing a random item from http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/00:28
ari-tczewwhat is rc bugs?00:29
bdrungrc = release candidate00:29
kklimondaand not release critical? I guess it depends on a context :)00:30
ari-tczew+1 ^^00:30
kklimondaari-tczew: release critical bug (in debian) is a bug that has to be fixed before releasing stable00:31
bdrungyeah, release critical is probably the correct one ;)00:31
ari-tczewmerge/sync is enough to fix?00:31
kklimondawhat do you mean?00:32
ari-tczewhttp://qa.ubuntuwire.com/bugs/rcbugs/maverick/00:32
ari-tczewrow Fixed Version00:32
ari-tczewso merging latest debian version is enough to fix rc bug?00:33
ari-tczewif fix was published in debian revision00:33
kklimondaUbuntu doesn't have concept of release critical bugs AFAIK00:33
arandbdrung: Well there's Bug #510571 , but if I understand things correctly that'd need an SRU-ack first..?00:33
ubottuLaunchpad bug 510571 in virtualbox-ose "Lucid guest won't boot with acpi in virtualbox" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/51057100:33
kklimondathe closest thing to RC bugs is targeting a bug to some milestone00:34
ari-tczewo-O00:34
bdrungarand: no, we don't need it. the common way is to upload the package to -proposed and then a ubuntu-sru member either approves the package or declines it00:35
bdrungarand: the next sponsored bug will be yours.00:36
=== Philip6 is now known as Philip5
arandbdrung: cheers :) Just hoping my debdiffs are all in order...00:37
bdrungarand: they look fine00:38
=== traveller_ is now known as traveller
=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away
bdrungarand: did you build the packages in pbuilder?01:25
arandbdrung: Yes.01:26
bdrungarand: my root partition went out of space. therefore i build only one of both debdiffs.01:27
=== PyObjectPtr is now known as static_name
bdrungarand: uploaded01:29
arandbdrung: I've also built them in my ppa: https://edge.launchpad.net/~arand/+archive/virtualbox/+packages, (there's a newer unrelated patch for karmic there as well) So I hope they should be fine... Cheers :)01:29
=== static_name is now known as apachelogger
=== gospch_ is now known as gospch
=== lfaraone_ is now known as lfaraone
lfaraonejames_w: with bzr merge-upstream, can I specify an upstream revision with with to merge with? (I want to get a specific tag, but using "-r TAG_NAME" gets me "bzr: ERROR: --revision is not allowed when merging a tarball                                                                                                                                                  ")04:10
=== nobawk|away is now known as nobawk
lifelesslfaraone: please file a bug on that06:27
=== piju is now known as piju[QRT]
Breaking_PittI'm getting this error someone knows?12:46
Breaking_Pittdpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${python:Provides}12:47
ari-tczewbdrung: have you got time for sponsoring other 3 my syncs?12:55
ari-tczewLaney: ping13:02
bdrungari-tczew: yes, i will process all sync requests13:16
ari-tczewok13:16
ari-tczewbdrung: btw. do you will process sync requests subscribed to ~ubuntu-archive ?13:18
bdrungari-tczew: not planned13:18
ari-tczewwho is responsible to site http://packages.ubuntu.com ?14:02
bdrungari-tczew: To report a problem with the web site, e-mail frank@lichtenheld.de.14:11
ari-tczewok, mail sent14:13
Breaking_Pitthow can i avoid this error..I can't find info quilt-series-but-no-build-dep14:23
bdrungBreaking_Pitt: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/quilt-series-but-no-build-dep.html14:25
bdrungYou should either remove the series file if it's effectively not useful or add quilt to the build-dependencies if quilt is used during the build process.14:26
Breaking_Pittwhere is the series file?14:26
Breaking_Pitti don't create any series file14:27
carstenhBreaking_Pitt: which dpkg source format do you use?14:27
bdrungdebian/patches/series14:27
Breaking_Pitthi carstenh!14:28
Breaking_PittI'm still figthing with my package14:28
carstenhhi :) yes, i see14:28
carstenhtest -d debian && cat debian/source/format14:28
carstenhwhat does this command tell you?14:29
Breaking_Pittlet me see14:32
Breaking_Pittnothing! :)14:33
Breaking_Pittfixed.. now I only have this one native-package-with-dash-version14:37
carstenhBreaking_Pitt: then you need to cd into the package directory and run it again14:39
Breaking_Pittno way of avoidint the error :(14:44
carstenhcorrect, no way to avoid errors without either reading documentation nor answering questions ;)14:44
Breaking_Pitti know14:45
Breaking_Pittbut seems that i have no file called bicho_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz14:46
carstenhBreaking_Pitt: you could try man mv and man dpkg-source instead of answering my question14:50
bdrungari-tczew: you keep me working. ;)14:50
ari-tczewbdrung: someone must :-)14:51
Breaking_Pittfixed ;)14:51
bdrungari-tczew: this list is already too long: http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/14:51
Breaking_Pittthanks carstenh14:51
ari-tczewbdrung: for this problem I want to join MOTU and help14:53
ari-tczewbut someone do not understand this14:54
bdrungwho?14:55
ari-tczewbdrung: Laney don't want see my in MOTU: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArturRona/MOTUApplication#Comments14:57
ari-tczews/my/me14:57
carstenhari-tczew: you do syncs to remove ubuntu diffs ... topgit would be easy, you just need to grep for a single line to verify14:59
ari-tczewcarstenh: propably you don't know what I'm working15:00
ari-tczewI just interested more in security bug fixing instead FTBFS. is it wrong? lol :-D15:01
carstenhari-tczew: i read what Laney wrote, so maybe he doesn't know it too15:01
ari-tczewcarstenh: so please be quiet, if you don't know15:02
carstenhari-tczew: if you want me to be quiet, why to you tell me to be and don't just ignore waht I said?15:03
ari-tczewbdrung: hmm, I guess that sync requests requested manually is not show in http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ is it true?15:03
bdrungcarstenh: i don't understand the connection between syncs and topgit15:03
bdrungari-tczew: if you subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to your sync request bug, it will15:04
carstenhbdrung: there is a ubuntu specific diff that could be dropped15:04
bdrungcarstenh: are you talking about a specific package?15:05
ari-tczewcarstenh: just I don't like people who are saying a lot, but don't know the wole situation (in this context - my work structure)15:05
carstenhbdrung: yes, the package topgit15:06
ari-tczewand second: you wrote this to me, so I just answered to you15:07
ari-tczewnothing abnormal15:07
bdrungcarstenh: aha - i thought he should use topgit to make syncing easier :D15:07
bdrungari-tczew: you sounded a little bit offending15:07
bdrung(probably just the wording)15:08
carstenhbdrung: indeed the concept of topgit could help with syncing if it would use bzr instead of git ;)15:08
carstenhso, yes, the wording was suboptimal15:09
bdrungcarstenh: i'll sync topgit15:09
carstenhfine, thanks :)15:09
carstenhbdrung: if you have questions please ask, I wrote the upstream patch, did the debian upload and told persia to to the ubuntu upload15:10
ari-tczewcarstenh: so what's your conclusion: my work is unnecessary and not enough for MOTU?15:11
ari-tczewif you want (you, Laney, and others) I can leave channel and launchpad, I'll leave more work for you! cheers :-D15:12
ari-tczewand sponsoring list will be smaller, same benefits15:13
ari-tczewand quantity of security bugs will be higher15:13
ari-tczewwhat else?15:13
bdrungcarstenh: uploaded - no question15:14
kklimondaari-tczew: the problem is that MOTU is more than syncing, merging and backporting. It's also performing library transitions, packaging from scratch etc.15:15
ari-tczewkklimonda: so or you are doing all, or you are too small for MOTU, right?15:17
carstenhari-tczew: i did not judge your work in any way until, but since you ask me: i have the impression that MOTOs should work more on sync request and collaboration with debian, it the only critic on your work is that you to too much work on collaboration with debian by taking care of syncing then it is more a reason to make you a MOTO than to veto. the packaging from scratch is IMHO useless if you could do the same or less work to get ...15:17
carstenh... packages into both debian and ubuntu15:17
carstenhs/packaging from scratch/packaging from scratch for ubuntu/15:18
ari-tczeweverybody from this channel: please give me a comment on my wiki page that I'm not welcome in MOTU - please!!!!15:18
carstenhari-tczew: I don't know anything about your other work so I can't comment on this15:19
ari-tczewjust give15:19
bdrungari-tczew: you are overreacting15:19
ari-tczewbdrung: no15:19
bdrungari-tczew: noone said that you are not welcome in MOTU15:20
=== piju[QRT] is now known as piju
ari-tczewbdrung: but I see opinions15:21
ari-tczewthat I said: just give me a comment masters :-D15:21
ari-tczewyou are the best15:22
bdrung?15:22
ari-tczewnote: sarcasm is not the same as flamewar15:22
bdrungi didn't use sarcasm15:23
ari-tczewbdrung: I use15:23
bdrungi use sarcasm only in face to face discussions to avoid misunderstandings15:23
bdrungari-tczew: please mark sarcasm as such in IRC discussions15:24
ari-tczewcarstenh: FYI yesterday I've looked all packages which were rebuilt for fakesync. tiring and time consuming.15:34
ari-tczewbut propably you and other (Laney) thinks that this is not enough15:35
ari-tczewyeaa15:35
carstenhari-tczew: you don't need to convince me, my comment on 16:17:50 was clearly on favor for you becoming a motu, but I don't have any influence on this15:36
ari-tczewcarstenh: if you're with me, I'm glad, sorry for attacks15:40
bdrungari-tczew: i think nobody is against you. at most they want you to gain more experience.15:41
ari-tczewlooking at the fresh MOTU members, I don't think that they are doing these things (also performing library transitions, packaging from scratch etc.)15:42
om26erI restored my gnupg dir and now dh_make shows om26er@unknown.com in changelog file :(15:44
bdrungari-tczew: yeah, library transitions are not the usual thing a newcomer does15:44
bdrungari-tczew: did you update a package to a new upstream version? do you maintain a package in debian? do you triage bugs?15:45
bdrungthat are thing that are not covered by syncs/merges15:46
ari-tczewbdrung: I've packages a few packages manually, but when I met sync, I don't doing this. Not maintain packages in Debian. Only requests for new upstream releases, or sending delta from Ubuntu. Triages - when I'm looking on package for syncs or merge, I'll check what bugs are exist.15:47
carstenhom26er: setting DEBEMAIL and DEBFULLNAME would fix this15:48
ari-tczewbdrung: syncs/merges not covered to new upstream release? o_O15:48
bdrungari-tczew: they do not cover updating the package by yourself.15:48
ari-tczewbdrung: what for me? packages in Debian have a maintainers15:49
bdrunglet me rephrase it: it's a difference if you sync/merge a new upstream release from debian or if you update the package by yourself15:50
om26ercarstenh, thanks alot it worked :)15:51
ari-tczewbdrung: I know what's the difference, but what's going on?15:53
carstenhari-tczew: if you want to do a debian upload to be able to tell people about it when they ask such questions you could prepare cuneiform, i would sponsor it. there is a new upstream version and possibly there are some lintian warnings to be fixed. preparing the new version includess recreating the orig.tar.gz since there are non-distributable files in upstreams version.15:54
carstenhsince QA maintains the package there is no need to take care of this package in future15:55
ari-tczewsorry, I must go, see you15:55
carstenhok15:55
ari-tczewI'm late15:55
=== piju is now known as piju[QRT]
=== nigelbabu is now known as nigelb
funkyHatCan I use bzr to check out a branch of any ubuntu package, and what's the form of the URL I can use?16:39
funkyHatCan't find anything for this on the wiki and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Packaging/Training/Logs/2009-04-09 seems to be out of date16:40
funkyHatI've tried bzr checkout lp:~ubuntu/fglrx-installer and a few other variations ⢁)16:40
funkyHatAha. bzr branch lp:ubuntu/maverick/fglrx-installer16:41
=== piju[QRT] is now known as piju
funkyHathm. This branch seems pretty heavy... is it possible to make a lighter branch?16:52
funkyHatPerhaps I'd be better of just working with apt-get source and submitting a debdiff ⢁ D16:53
astraljavafunkyHat: Isn't the bzr way how it's supposed to be worked, in the future, however?17:00
bdrungfunkyHat: the normal way is "bzr branch lp:ubuntu/fglrx-installer"17:01
bdrungor "lp:ubuntu/<series>/<package>" for a specific series17:01
funkyHatastraljava: yes I think so...17:01
kklimondahmm.. I need to run setup.py configure, how can I do it using debhelper 7 in a nice and clean way?17:03
funkyHatbdrung: ah thanks17:04
AnAnt /q bdrung17:04
funkyHatI was going to try and make a package which included these patches https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/573748 but that looks more complicated than I thought it would17:09
ubottuLaunchpad bug 573748 in fglrx-installer "fglrx does not build on 2.6.34 kernel (Patch files available)" [Undecided,New]17:09
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away
AcePreshaw!caps18:43
ubottuPLEASE DON'T SHOUT! We can read lowercase too.18:43
kklimondahmm, pull-debian-source is broken?19:37
kklimondaah, no - my bad (noty to myself: pull-*-source work on source packages ;))19:37
nigelbsigh, bugs like 'ubuntu wallpaper made in mac!' make be laugh and cry at the same time20:28
nigelbs/be/me20:29
* JontheEchidna waits for "the font was made in windows" to become public knowledge.20:30
nigelbmeh.  I liked the response to it :)20:30
arandNot even just made in windows, but made bu MS tools :D20:30
nigelbthese are the stuff that are used to make fonts, can't run away from it.20:30
JontheEchidnayeah20:31
JontheEchidnaheh20:31
nigelbsame goes for the wallpaper made in mac bug.  I closed the bug and I'm wiating for the flood to hit my mailbox20:31
nigelbthere is also a bug about an upstream change and users complaining in lp about it.  seb and I've reached breaking point explaining that its an upstream change20:32
arandHmm, those kinds are numerous.20:32
nigelbwe've adopted a middle patch by setting to triage and reporting upstream :D20:33
nigelbs/patch/path20:33
nigelbI wish there was someway that noone could mess with a Fix Released bug.20:34
BlackZhey nigelb20:34
nigelboh, yeah, the mail20:34
* nigelb gets to it20:34
* micr0spell Discounts!! Our Special Limited Time Offers Up To May,22!!! Notebooks,Plasma and LCD TV's.Buy your electronic needs at our unique prices. Laptop Sony VAIO® VGN-FW590FFD-575,57$!!!Apple MacBook® Air MC234LL/A-695,27$!!! http://www.elplace.com/21:27
nigelbwhat the...21:28
astraljavaOh dear.21:29
imbrandonJontheEchidna: what font/bug ?23:07
JontheEchidnaimbrandon: Oh, the guy making the new Ubuntu font did a presentation/plenary at UDS. He admitted to using a windows font tool because none of the Linux ones were really up to snuff23:12
JontheEchidnaThough I think I did hear that somebody wanted to use the python fontforge bindings and Quickly to make a GUI for what he needed :P23:13
=== piju is now known as piju[QRT]
imbrandonahh23:45
=== nobawk|away is now known as nobawk
=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!