| sproaty | I'm trying to add my project to revu, and am getting "The Maintainer field is invalid. It has to contain an @ubuntu.com address (usually the Ubuntu Developer Team's)" errors. what address should I put? | 00:15 |
|---|---|---|
| jpds | sproaty: (Better place would probably be #ubuntu-motu), but: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/FAQ#What%20does%20XSBC-Original-Maintainer%20mean? | 00:18 |
| sproaty | cheers | 00:34 |
| rCX | Can someone mark bug #403698 as won't fix? | 01:53 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 403698 in vegastrike-data "Please sync with upstream 0.5" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/403698 | 01:53 |
| rCX | The vegastrike package has been removed from lucid meaning that the game's data won't be updated. | 01:53 |
| rCX | See Bug #495203 for info on removal... | 01:54 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 495203 in vegastrike "[Lucid] Can't install many games (unresolved dependancies)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/495203 | 01:54 |
| rm200910 | hi. can i upload a "b-package" to a launchpad ppa ? | 03:51 |
| rm200910 | it's a "deb" file that I created using an old guide | 03:52 |
| === sebi_` is now known as sebi` | ||
| sproaty | my PPA that was building fine in January is now having xdg-icon-resource issues, when nothing's changed in terms of icon names/location/the command to install them -- http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48522693/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.whyteboard_0.40_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 13:33 |
| sproaty | saying it can't find the icon to write | 13:33 |
| sproaty | If I've uploaded a PPA as version 0.40 which failed, and then failed with versions 0.40-ppa1; -ppa2; -ppa3...how can I delete the 0.40 one so that a package I'm ulpoading that I know will work can have the "best" name? | 14:52 |
| sproaty | e.g. have my release as 0.40.deb and not 0.40-ppa4.deb | 14:52 |
| crimsun | why not delete them all and just reupload 0.40? | 14:56 |
| sproaty | just trying that :) | 15:13 |
| sproaty | was getting errors before about the same tar existing with the same contents, but it wasn't in the package list | 15:13 |
| Kruptein | is it possible to show a download for every release on your projects home page? | 15:39 |
| BigWhale | Greetings | 15:59 |
| Kruptein | BigWhale: do you know if it's possible? | 15:59 |
| BigWhale | Possible? What exactly? | 16:00 |
| Kruptein | to show a download for every release on your projects home page? | 16:00 |
| BigWhale | I have no idea. :) | 16:00 |
| BigWhale | Unfortunately I came here with my own problem. :)) | 16:00 |
| Kruptein | okay but you are the first that said something since I posted my question an half our ago :s | 16:01 |
| BigWhale | Oh, yeah, that usually happens all around here. :) | 16:03 |
| lwh | I think it only shows the latest one by default | 16:03 |
| BigWhale | I build my own ppa for gwibber and when I use Lucid source everything is up I was able to upload and package was built. Then I decided to use gwibber-daily sources now launchpad is complaining that there is .orig.tar.gz missing. :/ | 16:04 |
| Kruptein | lwh but is it possible to change this? | 16:06 |
| lwh | I can't see a way but I'm no expert | 16:27 |
| BigWhale | Hmm, my ppa was build, but it doesn't want to supersede the default one in lucid if I add the necessary ppa to my sources. | 18:15 |
| geser | BigWhale: what version is used in lucid and what version did you use in your PPA? | 18:29 |
| BigWhale | geser, the version number? or the sources? I did apt-get source gwibber, patched it, then changed changelog and I added bigw1 to the version number. | 18:38 |
| BigWhale | it was successfully built | 18:38 |
| BigWhale | hmmm, I see here now, that only i386 version was built. I am running 64bit ubuntu, perhaps this could be the reason? | 18:39 |
| maxb | That would explain it | 18:41 |
| maxb | On thing you can do is to run 'apt-cache policy package-name' to see information on which versions of a binary package apt knows about | 18:42 |
| maxb | *One | 18:42 |
| BigWhale | I only see the official build | 18:43 |
| maxb | That's consistent with yours not existing yet | 18:44 |
| BigWhale | So it seems. I wonder why launchpad didn't build amd64 versions ... | 18:46 |
| maxb | Oh, wait, it's an arch-all package | 18:47 |
| BigWhale | makes sense, since it is a python app ... | 18:47 |
| maxb | It only says i386 in some places in Launchpad because Launchpad arbitrarily assigns the i386 builders to build arch-all packages | 18:47 |
| maxb | However, if you go to https://edge.launchpad.net/~bigwhale/+archive/gwibber-dm/+packages, you can see that it says "Newer version available" | 18:48 |
| maxb | i.e. your package is superseded by a newer version in Lucid itself | 18:49 |
| BigWhale | That I noticed yes, but I couldn't figure out why apt-get source gwibber would fetch older source | 18:49 |
| BigWhale | I did try building from gwibber-daily ppa, but then launchpad was complaining that it couldn't finde .orig.tar.gz file | 18:50 |
| maxb | oh, hang on, the newer version mentioned is in lucid-proposed | 18:52 |
| BigWhale | funny if I do apt-get source gwibber it will fetch my source ... | 18:52 |
| maxb | Mismatched deb and deb-src lines in sources.list perhaps? | 18:52 |
| maxb | Or a failure to 'apt-get update' ? | 18:52 |
| BigWhale | yeah I am checking both now :) | 18:53 |
| BigWhale | I am using a mirror ... perhaps it is outdated ... | 18:53 |
| BigWhale | ah I see my version now | 18:58 |
| BigWhale | silly local mirror | 18:58 |
| BigWhale | Thanks for the insight. | 19:00 |
| joh | Hi, what determines who is listed as the Last-Translator if exported .po files? | 20:10 |
| joh | Cause I'm currently listed as the Last-Translator for the Arabic translation, but I haven't touched it... | 20:10 |
| nopedia | There seem to be problem reaching the source code repository through http at the moment. Anyone knows more about it? | 23:09 |
| wgrant | nopedia: Do you have a particular URL that is giving you trouble? | 23:09 |
| nopedia | For example this: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/emacs/trunk/files | 23:10 |
| rmujica | hello | 23:25 |
| rmujica | hello | 23:27 |
| rmujica | I've got a problem | 23:27 |
| rmujica | i cant access http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~parabola-project/parabola/parabola-base/files | 23:27 |
| spiv | rmujica: hmm | 23:32 |
| spiv | losa ping: codebrowse seems to giving "please try again" errors even for small branches | 23:32 |
| Neo-- | hey guys - I'm trying to access duplicity's source files and keep getting an error... http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~duplicity-team/duplicity/0.7-series/files | 23:56 |
| nopedia | Yes, a couple of us has seen this and I have heard that some people have had trouble with this often. | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!