[02:57] <Chazz> How do you add a download for a project?
[03:10] <tsimpson> Chazz: https://help.launchpad.net/Projects/FileDownloads should help
[03:10] <Chazz> thanks tsimpson! =)
[06:14] <Damascene> hi,
[06:14] <Damascene> who is the responsible fore mail list system?
[06:14] <Damascene> *for
[06:33] <spm> Usama: in what sense? ie what is the problem you wish resolved?
[06:34] <Usama> message get killed by spam assassin if it sent by evolution
[06:34] <Usama> I've tried many different ubuntu mail list and it seems it general thing
[06:34] <Usama> if I sent it by gmail there is no problem
[06:35] <spm> hrm. I use evolution for all my emailing and have no such problems at all with any of the lists
[06:36] <Usama> so?
[06:37] <spm> Usama: can you raise a question https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion with as much detail as possible. ie which lists; which from email address and so on. if you can narrow it to date/times of when you've sent the messages that would also help. And how you know it's been rejected by spamassasin as well. ??
[06:38] <Usama> wait a second
[06:41] <Usama> spm, http://ubuntu.pastebin.com/AcucHxNN
[06:41] <Usama> you really should have short url like fpaste one
[06:41] <Usama> upaste.*
[06:46] <spm> Usama: righto. In that case; I'd suggest you create an RT via rt@ubuntu.com with pretty much the same set of info I asked for above. but specifially date/times to help in tracking down. It may be possible to tweak values away from those that are causing that message to get trapped
[06:46] <spm> is that the only one so far? or others?
[06:46] <Usama> many other
[06:47] <Usama> *s
[06:47] <spm> heh. painful. either way, as much detail as possible. full headers. etc.
[06:48] <Usama> so I should send the problem to rt@ubuntu.com. right?
[06:48] <spm> right. it's a ubuntu lists problem; not a launchpad one. I recognise that the distinction isn't obvious, but it is real.
[06:51] <Usama> ok thanks
[07:11] <Usama> spm, done
[07:11] <spm> Usama: thanks
[07:12] <Usama> it's my pleasure
[11:02] <Durazil> hello
[11:05] <Durazil> On https://shipit.ubuntu.com/, I can't log out. And I can't ask for a CD's Ubuntu 10.04. Have you got a solution for me ?
[11:07] <Durazil> ?
[11:11] <Durazil> Please
[11:13] <soren> What happens if you click the "log out" button?
[11:13] <Durazil> I have an error
[11:13] <Durazil> I must go. I come back in 1 hour.
[12:09] <Durazil> hello
[12:09] <Durazil> On https://shipit.ubuntu.com/, I can't log out. And I can't ask for a CD's Ubuntu 10.04. Have you got a solution for me ?
[12:11] <Durazil> ?
[12:14] <Durazil> I need your help please.
[12:20] <spiv> Durazil: what error do you get?
[12:23] <Durazil> No REFERER Header
[12:31] <Durazil> A idea ?
[12:34] <spiv> Durazil: restore your browser settings back to their defaults (possibly removing an add-on), or try a different browser.
[12:35] <Durazil> I go to test
[12:38] <Durazil> It's ok
[12:38] <Durazil> Thanks
[12:40] <spiv> Durazil: you're welcome.  Next time include more details in your initial question, it makes it more likely someone will know how to help.
[12:40] <Durazil> Ok
[13:13] <juris> can i send from gmail with witch is one is added in LP as my account email will LP recognize that if i send to bugnumber@bugs.launchpad.net email even if im not subscribed to that bug?
[13:16] <intellectronica> juris: yes, you can send comments to bugs from gmail. you can't, however, file new bugs, because to do that you need to sign your email and you can't do that with gmail (unless you're using an extension like firegpg).
[13:18] <juris> intellectronica, so to exising bug to witch i have not subscribed. also from email witch is one of my LP account emails email will be associated to my account? and if i send 19 files they will be added as one comment?
[13:19] <intellectronica> juris: i must admit that i don't know about attachment. i think that should work. give it a try.
[13:19] <juris> i could also add 19 files in LP but that will couse 19 emails to all subscribers so to make one comment will email help make 1 19file attachment?
[13:21] <juris> ok intellectronica im now
[13:21] <juris> i just sent but still not showing up. waybe waiting is needed?
[13:22] <juris> WOW it worked like a charm https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/53897
[13:47] <kfogel> lifeless: ayt?
[17:11] <nigelb> do we have an option to subscribe to a tag in malone?
[17:13] <deryck> nigelb, not currently.  coming soon (i.e. next 2-3 months likely)
[17:14] <nigelb> deryck: awesome, thanks :)
[17:29] <assem> trying to access http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~benlau/prsnotereader/trunk/files over the past 15minutes; it keeps giving me the Please try again page; it said i should notify this channel :)
[17:38] <maxb> losas: loggerhead needs you! ^^^
[17:38] <mbarnett> thanks maxb, taking a look
[17:41] <dmitchell> There seems to be an issue with the launchpad server - see http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openerp/openobject-addons/trunk/files anyone else having trouble?
[17:42] <mbarnett> codebrowse should be happy again.
[17:52] <dmitchell> Thanks - its works now.
[17:59] <fta> uh?? http://paste.ubuntu.com/436262/
[18:48] <squisher> Hi, I want to supply a package in my ppa for lucid, right now I onl yhave it for karmic. Can I do this without a separate changelog?
[18:49] <bigjools> squisher: use the copy function
[18:49] <squisher> bigjools: and when I upload a new version? I have to wait until it's uploaded and then copy it on the website?
[18:50] <bigjools> assuming the same binary works on lucid, yes
[18:53] <squisher> the copy function doesn't recompile? That seems a bit strange. In this particular case I don't expect issues, but still...
[19:14] <geser> squisher: "copy" doesn't recompile, it only publishes it in the other release too (a recompile doesn't work with the archive layout (pool-directory))
[19:26] <squisher> geser, hmm, say for example if the gtk2->gtk3 transition happens between releases, then this simple copy would fail
[19:26] <squisher> but I guess otherwise it's fine
[19:31] <geser> squisher: depends, if gtk2 is still available it might still work
[19:32] <geser> if the former version vanishes after a library transition a rebuild (and therefore a new upload) is necessary
[19:36] <squisher> geser: right true that. I forgot that the dependency name always changes when it becomes incompatible
[19:38] <squisher> geser: thanks for the explanations btw
[19:46] <soren> What's the process for getting a project imported from Sourceforge these days? Who to talk to?
[19:53] <thumper> soren: which one?
[19:53] <thumper> soren: and project, do you mean code, or bugs as well?
[19:58] <soren> thumper: Actually, just bugs.
[19:59] <soren> thumper: It's not one of my own projects. I'm just doing a bit of leg work for someone else so that I can offer them the path of least resistance :)
[20:03] <soren> thumper: They don't want to import all bugs, by the way. Is it possible to do a selective bug history import?
[20:12] <aliguori> Hi, is it possible to subscribe a mailing list to a project so that all bug traffic for that project goes to, say, the development mailing list?
[20:16] <soren> aliguori: Yes.
[20:16] <aliguori> soren, does it require any magic?
[20:17] <aliguori> i don't see an obvious way
[20:18] <soren> aliguori: Create a team for it, subscribe the team to the project's bugs, and set a contact address for the team.
[20:19] <soren> aliguori: That's what we do for Ubuntu Server bugs.
[20:29] <aliguori> soren, thanks, let's see if this will work..
[20:38] <lifeless> kfogel: hi
[20:44] <kfogel> lifeless: about documenting this recommendation of doing Launchpad development in a VM (you discussed with jml I think at UDS?): I've never done it, but do you know the name of a good VM package to refer to?
[20:45] <kfogel> lifeless: or if you want to document it on https://dev.launchpad.net/Running, that's fine.  I'm happy to doc it, I just might need a couple of pointers.
[20:48] <aliguori> soren, yeah, it's working nicely.  thanks!
[20:51] <lifeless> kfogel: system tools -> virtual machine manager :)
[20:52] <lifeless> ah, apt-get install virt-manager, its not installed by default
[20:59] <soren> aliguori: Sure thing, man.
[21:08] <lifeless> kfogel: and I'll answer any questions you have
[23:54] <lamont> wgrant: does filecache-default/builddlog srsly get removed when the build finishes?
[23:54] <wgrant> lamont: I was looking at that diff myself and thinking that it didn't.
[23:54] <wgrant> But I imagined that you approved it.
[23:54] <wgrant> But since you seem to doubt it, I might check the code.
[23:55] <lamont> first I've seen of it
[23:55] <wgrant> Hm, yeah, it does get removed on clean.
[23:55] <lamont> and the lack of a /etc/cron.d file to remove it on reboot tells me that it's patently flawed
[23:55] <wgrant> Indeed.
[23:56] <lamont> then again, I did tell them that it was a blocker for any rollout, so I see they at least got a bit down the path
[23:56] <lamont> I wonder - could I query the buildd over xmlrpc on localhost? or does it only accept one master?
[23:57] <lamont> what I really want is just a "is there a build running _RIGHT_NOW_' check
[23:57] <wgrant> I considered suggesting that when we were discussing it at UDS... but that implies parsing config files and stuff.
[23:58] <wgrant> It would probably get pretty messy, although it is a good idea.
[23:58] <lamont> -            extra_info = "%s not in %r" % (builder, self._builders.keys())
[23:58] <lamont> -            return (BuilderStatus.UNKNOWNBUILDER, extra_info)
[23:58] <lamont> +            return (BuilderStatus.UNKNOWNBUILDER, None)
[23:58] <lamont> does that diff matter?
[23:59] <lamont> what I just dumped on dogfood is the '-' case, his package is the + case
[23:59] <wgrant> Er. That should be the opposite.
[23:59] <lamont> oh right.
[23:59] <lamont> reverse that. :D