[01:17] <RAOF> Hm.  Why is mesa_7.8.1.orig.tar.gz different to what's on freedesktop.org?
[04:57] <tjaalton> RAOF: it's built from the upstream tarballs
[04:57] <tjaalton> there is no single released tarball
[05:08] <tjaalton> RAOF: got my msg?
[05:22] <RAOF> tjaalton: No.
[05:23] <RAOF> (Sorry, lunch)
[05:23] <RAOF> As in: was having lunch.
[05:25] <tjaalton> 06:57 < tjaalton> RAOF: it's built from the upstream tarballs
[05:25] <tjaalton> 06:57 < tjaalton> there is no single released tarball
[05:26] <tjaalton> though git has
[05:26] <tjaalton> the tagged tarball
[05:26] <tjaalton> but it's not the same thing
[05:27] <RAOF> Where in git has the tagged tarball?
[05:29] <tjaalton> cgit shows it
[05:29] <tjaalton> it's probably just a dump of the tagged contents
[05:29] <RAOF> On alioth, or on freedesktop?
[05:29] <tjaalton> freedesktop
[05:30] <tjaalton> as in, the web frontend shows it ;)
[05:30] <RAOF> Ah, right.
[05:36] <RAOF> Sweet.  Mesa builds now.
[05:36] <tjaalton> nice
[05:36] <tjaalton> it's the next one to go in?
[05:36] <RAOF> I might just update debian/watch so that in future I don't get confused about where to grab the tarball from :)
[05:37] <tjaalton> yeah
[05:38] <tjaalton> i use the versions_current -page links to get to the debian package page, but it could be easier.. :)
[05:44] <hyperair> Sarvatt: seems that 2:2.11.0+git20100518.5e04a813-0ubuntu0sarvatt~lucid makes X unstartable.
[06:11] <Bernardo> good morning
[06:12] <RAOF> Bernardo: Good morning.  How is our intrepid psb adventurer?
[06:12] <Bernardo> lol
[06:12] <Bernardo> Haven't looked at it since the weekend
[06:13] <Bernardo> Lucazade seems to have done a good job on the packages, tying up a couple of loose ends so things now install and work (without 3d and video) directly from the ppa without the need for any tuning (except for kernel options for a couple of specific models)
[06:14] <Bernardo> I've looked at tseliot's test patch for xorg-core this weekend, but didn't advance there
[06:18] <Bernardo> RAOF: we need some X expert to look at the code, I haven't done any significant coding in more than 10 years, and even though I can still read code, I'm very much lost when looking at X source, I need to learn everything and don't have the time
[06:19] <Bernardo> maybe tseliot will be able to do more work on his patch one of his days
[06:19] <Bernardo> one of "these" days
[06:26] <RAOF> Where's that patch?
[06:26] <RAOF> And what is it meant to do?  I haven't been following the psb saga closely - you all seemed to have it well in hand :)
[06:29] <Bernardo> it's in tseliot ppa - albertomilone
[06:29] <Bernardo> It just stops the crashes if a null pointer is passed to fbcopynton, from what I saw
[06:30] <Bernardo> but the side effect is that it breaks bitmaps, and scrolling in firefox and console
[06:30] <RAOF> Oh.  So to test anything I'd need actual hardware.  Yay.
[06:33] <Bernardo> I'd lent you my 1101HA, but I do need it avary day
[06:33] <Bernardo> every
[06:35] <Bernardo> of course, if I'm online, you can always ask me to test any patch
[06:35] <Bernardo> I've already built xorg-core a few times here
[06:56] <tjaalton> RAOF: umm, we _don't_ use the cgit tarball of mesa
[06:57] <tjaalton> but build it from the three released tarballs
[06:58] <tjaalton> maybe I was unclear about that, sorry
[07:37] <RAOF> tjaalton: Aah, ok.
[07:38] <RAOF> get-orig-source it is, then.
[07:40] <tjaalton> yeah it could also do the cleanup of the extracted tarballs before building it
[07:40] <tjaalton> unless you mean only to fetch from debian
[07:41] <RAOF> That wouldn't be very useful for debian now, would it? :)
[07:41] <tjaalton> no :)
[07:41] <tjaalton> can't remember what was deleted from the extracted tree before building the tarball, but it's easy to check
[07:49] <RAOF> Hm.  This seems like something for source-format 3.0 was designed for...
[08:55] <jcristau> RAOF: hopefully anholt's demos repository will land soon, then we'll just need the MesaLib tarball, instead of MesaLib+MesaDemos
[09:00] <RAOF> jcristau: And, in the mean time, this get-orig-source target can document what to do :)
[09:02] <jcristau> yeah
[10:16] <lucazade> hi tseliot I would like to know if you have found a solution for PSB glx?
[10:17] <chrisccoulson> hey RAOF - did you see the scrollback on monday between me and Sarvatt?
[10:17] <chrisccoulson> (sorry, i'd fallen asleep by the time you replied) ;)
[10:18] <tseliot> lucazade: no but there's an upstream bug open: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28077
[10:18] <tseliot> also Sarvatt mentioned the fact that a new psb driver has been released
[10:19] <lucazade> ok thanks.. gma500 ppa now set also xorg.conf with shadowfb enabled, so should works without hacks
[10:20] <lucazade> new psb or iegd ?
[10:20] <jcristau> why set it in xorg.conf when you can just make it the default in the driver?
[10:21] <lucazade> because i don't know where to change jcristau :) lol
[10:21] <lucazade> poulsbo.conf ?
[10:21] <jcristau> no.  the driver.
[10:21] <lucazade> or permanent like ignoreacpi?
[10:21] <lucazade> ok
[10:22] <lucazade> i hope this is only a temp workaround btw
[10:22] <jcristau> just switch the default around
[10:22] <lucazade> ok i'll look into
[10:29] <RAOF> chrisccoulson: The stuff about gnome-screensaver and xrandr gamma fade?
[10:29] <chrisccoulson> RAOF - yeah, that's right
[10:30] <RAOF> Let me get back into the context…
[10:31] <RAOF> Ok.
[10:33] <RAOF> So, it looked like disabling fade was a safe work-around.
[10:38] <RAOF> chrisccoulson: Oh, someone reported that it didn't work?
[10:38] <chrisccoulson> RAOF, the SRU i uploaded has several fixes in, but one of the crasher fixes doesn't work
[10:38] <chrisccoulson> so, it's an unrelated issue
[10:38] <RAOF> Ah, ok.
[10:39] <RAOF> We just need to ensure that Maverick doesn't require the same workaround.
[17:17] <Sarvatt> hyperair: got any logs or more info?
[17:19] <hyperair> http://paste.debian.net/73968/
[17:19] <hyperair> Sarvatt: ^
[17:20] <Sarvatt> thats it?
[17:21] <Sarvatt> gdm log say anything?
[17:21] <Sarvatt> err guess its just that too
[17:21] <jcristau> it probably says 'undefined symbol'
[17:22] <hyperair> hmm? undefined symbol?
[17:22] <jcristau> Sarvatt: fdo 28166
[17:22] <hyperair> i dunno, gdm just terminates immediately, from what i can tell when i can actually switch to a tty
[17:22] <Sarvatt> someone else emailed me about that happening with kdm too
[17:22] <Sarvatt> fdo #28166
[17:22] <Sarvatt> (just getting the link)
[17:22] <Sarvatt> bah lol
[17:23] <jcristau> bugs.freedesktop.orog/28166
[17:23] <jcristau> argh
[17:23] <jcristau> bugs.freedesktop.org/28166
[17:23] <jcristau> there, you have your link
[17:24] <Sarvatt> yeah i got it.was just being lazy, thanks jcristau
[17:25] <Sarvatt> i'm confused about it though, maybe because I just woke up :
[17:26] <Sarvatt> we have that commit in xorg-edgers
[17:28]  * Sarvatt just reverts that commit for now
[17:29] <Sarvatt> AH i see the problem
[17:29] <Sarvatt> ./debian/patches/copy-fb.patch:+	intel_sync(scrn);
[17:30] <hyperair>  O_o
[17:31] <hyperair> just that?
[17:31] <jcristau> hyperair: it turns out calling a function that doesn't exist ends badly :)
[17:31] <Sarvatt> yep
[17:31] <hyperair> heh
[17:31] <hyperair> i see =p
[17:31] <Sarvatt> thats the plymouth-X transition patch
[17:31] <hyperair> i see.
[17:31] <Sarvatt> intel is the only one that doesn't have it upstream
[17:32] <hyperair> i see.
[17:32] <Sarvatt> uploading it with the patch dropped for now, i'll fix it up but want to make it at least not broken asap :)
[17:34] <Sarvatt> sorry about that, wasn't around yesterday and didn't catch that
[17:39] <hyperair> np
[17:39]  * hyperair always has a few xxvi debs to revert
[18:34] <Bernardo> hi
[19:26] <LaMs> Hi 
[19:39] <ripps> I'm pretty impressed by how stable xorg-edgers is, I was expecting constant crashes all the time. The only issue I'm getting is problem I'm getting is resuming from suspend, and I've already figured out that it's being caused by my mainline 2.6.34 kernel, not xorg.