=== islington_ is now known as islington
[12:39] <ejat> hi all .. can i know where can i get ubuntu new brand banner artwork ?
[12:43] <zniavre> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/VisualIdentity
[12:43] <zniavre> mmm 1mn too late ....
[12:44] <zniavre> :o)
[12:44] <darkmatter> anyone have a medium sized fluffy dog I could use as a sponge mop?
[12:45] <zniavre> mine is quite big ...
[12:46] <darkmatter> night sweats are starting again, so I barely slept. the bed looks like it was hit by a monsoon. lol
[12:51] <zniavre> :o)
[19:38] <SKL_Makay> hi all
[19:41] <SKL_Makay> http://skl-projekt.hu/readarticle.php?article_id=57
[19:43] <thorwil> hungarian?
[19:44] <SKL_Makay> yes, sorry
[19:44] <thorwil> i suspect there are not many people who can read that here ;)
[19:44] <SKL_Makay> the image is important
[19:44] <SKL_Makay> http://lh6.ggpht.com/_774SilF-FO8/S-_1HXk579I/AAAAAAAABvw/U-DojZF_pGA/s800/ubuntu-fail.png
[19:48] <dashua> SKL_Makay, What are you demonstrating?  That the image on the left looks better?
[19:49] <vish> SKL_Makay: more importantly , is that a mockup or a real theme ;)
[19:50] <SKL_Makay> it's a mockup
[19:51] <dashua> vish, http://www.ubuntu-pics.de/bild/67585/selection_010_kV05BR.png
[19:51] <vish> SKL_Makay: mockups are easier , getting it to actually work is the tough part , if you can code that to a theme engine it would be awesome
[19:51] <dashua> Have you seen this?
[19:52] <vish> dashua: the small battery icon ?
[19:52] <dashua> Yeah
[19:52] <dashua> Two icons
[19:53] <vish> dashua: oh , there is already bug about that.. there was a problem where the fallback notification area icon also shows up
[19:53] <vish> s/was/is
[19:53] <dashua> Ah ok
[19:53] <dashua> Yeah, it''s not the AppIndicator
[19:54] <SKL_Makay> do you develop the themes or that's a simple download from gnome-look.org?
[19:58] <vish> SKL_Makay: the lighting for the metacity buttons is a bit over done in your mockups though ;)
[20:02] <vish> SKL_Makay: the red "x" button well has been solved before the release , are you still noticing the broken well?
[20:11] <SKL_Makay> a question: why is gnome the default desktop environment?
[20:21] <coz_> SKL_Makay,  well  in my opinion Gnome is the most stable of the available DE's
[20:22] <coz_> SKL_Makay, you dont like gnome?
[20:22] <coz_> SKL_Makay,  because ubuntu can come with  kde or xfce  by default also
[20:25] <SKL_Makay> yes, I dont like
[20:26] <SKL_Makay> but I'm a Debian user and a little bit developer
[20:28] <SKL_Makay> in my opinion KDE is the most advanced DE, but this is only my opinion
[20:28] <SKL_Makay> i've made a plama theme (isnt' mockup)
[20:28] <SKL_Makay> http://kde-look.org/content/show.php/Arezzo2+by+Makay?content=123524
[21:30] <]grimm[> Perhaps this is the wrong place to ask this, but could someone explain how the fancy Ubuntu tooltips were implemented?  I've got one box here that's not running Ubuntu which still has old style tooltips despite using an Ubuntu theme that ordinarily does not.  I tried applying the lucid diff to gtk+, have the same gtk2-engines, and have notify-OSD setup as in Ubuntu, but no luck with the tooltips
[21:42] <zniavre_> isn't into gtkrc ? new-tooltip-style ?or somethinh around ?
[21:53] <dashua> It's a gtk+2.0 patch
[21:53] <dashua> Not sure if it's upstream yet.
[22:41] <]grimm[> zniavre_: The theme I'm using has new-tooltip-style set
[22:42] <]grimm[> dashua: I grabbed a gtk+2.0 patch that was apparently what was being applied to the package in lucid (the patch made reference to the new rounded corner tooltips), but even after patching and recompiling gtk+, for some reason, I've still got the old tooltips
[22:42] <]grimm[> Not sure why...
[22:58] <dashua> Did you specify them in your gtkrc?
[22:58] <dashua> GtkWidget::new-tooltip-style = 1
[23:11] <]grimm[> dashua: yup, it's that's specified in the gtkrc
[23:17] <dashua> ]grimm[, Hrm, not really sure.  Sounds like you did everything.
[23:17] <dashua> What distro?
[23:22] <dashua> bbl
[23:22] <]grimm[> dashua: gentoo
[23:22] <]grimm[> k