[14:20] <stas> newz2000: hi, today is the meetup?
[14:20] <cjohnston> stas: yes...
[14:21] <stas> cjohnston: thanks
[14:22] <cjohnston> np
[14:36] <newz2000> yep, meeting in about 2.5 hours
[14:41] <cjohnston> newz2000: i have the day off today
[14:41] <cjohnston> just for you
[14:41] <cjohnston> :-P
[14:41] <newz2000> I know you're too excited to wait to hear what's going on
[14:41] <newz2000> :-)
[14:41] <cjohnston> youd better call me and make sure im awake
[14:41] <cjohnston> ok maybe i was told to take the day off by the wife
[14:42] <cjohnston> and this just happened to be a benifit
[14:42] <cjohnston> but still
[14:42] <newz2000> turn your speakers up loud and I'll ping you
[14:42] <newz2000> :-)
[14:48] <cjohnston> hah
[14:49] <stas> :)
[14:51] <stas> btw will it be held here or on #ubuntu-meeting ?
[14:55] <cjohnston> good point
[14:55] <cjohnston> meeting
[15:26] <newz2000> #ubuntu-meeting
[16:02] <MTecknology> echowarp: how's it going?
[16:07] <echowarp> MTecknology: great. I gave newz a heads up on our work on ubuntu-drupal
[16:07] <echowarp> remember that the meeting is in ubuntu-meeting, not here
[16:07] <MTecknology> echowarp: cool, yup - i'm there
[18:37] <thorwil> newz2000: actually brand is not just more than a logo. some define brand as the outcome, how an entity is perceived by the audience/public. sabdfl stated that he shouldn't have called it brand, but rather visual identity, so that looks like a decision to follow that definition
[18:38] <thorwil> i admit it can be quite bothersome to avoid the use of "branding" to mean the application of a visual identity :/
[18:46] <stas> guys, the wordpress theme handles attachments ugly http://design.canonical.com/2010/05/talk-type/4601841187_273f368008_o/