/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/05/21/#kubuntu-devel.txt

=== gorgonizer_ is now known as gorgonizer
=== jjesse-netbook_ is now known as jjesse-netbook
JontheEchidnaRiddell: The libphonon version from the phonon source package still appears to be lower than that from the qt4-x11 package :(03:56
shtylmanheh03:57
shtylmantaco... you know where the network manager plasmoid source code lives?03:57
ScottKshtylman: I think it's in playground03:57
shtylmanI thought it got moved out of playground?03:58
shtylmanah... kdereview!04:02
JontheEchidnaThe only way I can see to fix the phonon version without adding to the epoch is to make it 4.7really4.4.104:09
ScottKWhat's the issue?04:14
ScottKOh04:14
ScottKI think Debian did something like that.04:14
ScottKJontheEchidna: phonon | 4:4.6.0really4.4.1-2 |      unstable | source, all04:14
JontheEchidnaScottK: yeah, we did that too, but we already had 4:4.6.2 when we switched over to 4:4.6.2really4.4.104:15
JontheEchidnaDebian got lucky and was doing it at the same time they were upgrading from 4.5 to 4.604:15
ScottKSo we do it when we switch to 4.7....04:16
JontheEchidnabut since we're already using a different version since we're bumping it later, it doesn't matter too much04:16
JontheEchidnaright04:16
* JontheEchidna goes off to do that04:16
JontheEchidnawell, after the Qt tarball finishes downloading04:17
JontheEchidnawait, phonon is in it's own separate tarball now \o/04:17
JontheEchidnawow, the Qt tarball grew. 192 MB04:17
JontheEchidnaOk, phonon with a bumped version uploaded04:21
JontheEchidnaalready building on some archs, neat04:22
ScottKWorking in Main is a lot more immediately satisfying than Universe in that respect.04:22
SandGorgonhey guys.. could someone tell me what happens to KFileMetaInfoPrivate::init if Strigi is disabled - cos StreamAnalyzer is still being initialized04:39
shtylmanSandGorgon: a better place to ask might be #kde-devel04:41
shtylmanhere is more specific to kubuntu things04:42
SandGorgonahh..ok04:42
apacheloggerso, I didnt follow up on it, but did anyone create a snapshot of knm from trunk?07:53
jussiapachelogger: I dont think so, I didnt see any mention of it. But then agin, I may have missed something08:15
Riddellhappy Friday Kubuntu10:03
apacheloggerhappy friday Riddell \o/10:14
jussihey apachelogger, how did the me menu go?10:19
apacheloggerdidnt I tell you10:25
jussiapachelogger: no...10:34
apacheloggerdarn it 10:34
jussior maybe I missed it if you did...10:34
apacheloggeryou just blingd into helio talking about himself!10:34
apacheloggergood job there10:34
* jussi hides...10:35
amichairRiddell: happy friday :-)11:19
Sputjussi: yeah, we shouldn't *bling* apachelogger all the time, it's very annoying11:22
jussiSput: yeah, *blinging* apachelogger wouldnt be nice11:22
jussi:P11:22
Sputhe finally turned off the volume11:22
Sputthat took him only half a day11:22
jussimustve been really annoying11:22
Sputyeah, for everybody around him11:26
apachelogger:P11:27
emonkeyapachelogger, *bling* ouw .. sorry ... tried to do not ...  ^ ^11:43
Sputemonkey: yeah, it's very tempting to *bling* apachelogger, though it lost on coolness when he muted his laptop :/11:46
emonkeySput, yeah I read it, but I think there's something visual notification on apachelogger notebook ... :-)11:47
jussipoor apachelogger11:47
Riddell"DO NOT CONVERT DIRECT DEBIAN CHANGES TO PATCHES!"  apachelogger did you have some issues with qtcreator by any chance?11:56
apacheloggerRiddell: someone converted direct source changes to patches obviously ;)11:57
Riddellapachelogger: why were there direct source changes?11:58
apacheloggerJontheEchidna: did you not push that strigi-not-only-with-less-than-one-gig-ram?12:02
apacheloggerRiddell: debian maintains it in a full-source packaging branch12:02
apacheloggeri.e. they carry the delta via git itself and not patches12:02
JontheEchidnaapachelogger: It's in the final version of lucid12:04
apacheloggerstrange, KRF from amarok just installed in a vbox and nepomuk was doing indexing12:05
JontheEchidnahmm, I did have to fix it because it was doing its job a bit too well12:05
JontheEchidnaperhaps I fixed it too much :P12:05
Riddellapachelogger: hmm that is quite some changes they make to qtcreator12:17
jussiargh... nepomuk is evil to me... says it isnt running when I try to add stuff to my address book... 12:18
* jussi hrms12:18
RiddellI do believe qtcreator confirms the brokenness of qmake12:46
Tm_TRiddell: trying to build it?12:47
Riddellit's built but it installs to / not /usr and the changes needed to make it install to /usr are fiddly12:48
Tm_Tand undocumented, I recall12:48
Tm_Tit was quite a mess when I tried to build it last time12:49
Riddelland if I convert those changes to a patch I'm afraid that apachelogger will eat me12:51
apacheloggeronly converting debian changes to patches ;)12:52
Riddellapachelogger: well I need to update the debian changes for the new version12:53
apacheloggerRiddell: patch on top of them12:53
Riddellwibble, patches on patches12:54
Sputapachelogger: so how's the *blinging* now?12:57
jussiSput: dont be nasty!12:57
jussi:P12:57
Sputjussi: na gut12:57
apacheloggerRiddell: technically the debian changes are not patches12:57
Riddellapachelogger: maybe but they won't apply to the updated version12:58
apacheloggerwell, you could clone the debian git and change the stuff there, then request a merge back into the debian git repo12:58
Riddellwibble13:01
rgreening"they wibble and wobble but don't fall down"13:10
* txwikinger wonders if there is something that needs to be merged13:35
shadeslayeroh btw you cant chroot into a 10.04 install from a 9.10 CD :P13:38
persiaWhy not?  What doesn't work?  filesystem support?13:38
shadeslayerpersia: it gives me a error which something on the lines of bad binary format of /bin/bash13:39
shadeslayer-which13:39
Riddelltxwikinger: take your pick https://merges.ubuntu.com/main.html https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html :)13:39
txwikingerRiddell: anything with priority?13:39
persiashadeslayer: Something else has gone wrong then.  The execution binary format did not change between those two releases.13:39
shadeslayerpersia: i followed the wiki line by line.. was trying to restore grub :P13:40
shadeslayerhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/Grub2#Recover Grub 2 via LiveCD 13:40
Riddelltxwikinger: everything in main is a priority.  how about kaffeine to start you off?13:41
txwikingerok13:41
Riddell(everything in universe is a priority to all upstanding MOTUs of course :)13:41
shadeslayerRiddell: whats the procedure to get a package merged?13:42
shadeslayerpersia: i really dont know if i did anything wrong... i tried twice,reading the wiki and doing exactly as it said :P13:43
persiashadeslayer: I believe you.13:44
shadeslayerpersia: hehe.. 13:44
shadeslayertxwikinger: do you have a idea for the procedure to merge packages?13:47
txwikingerits on the merge wiki page13:47
Riddellshadeslayer: grab the old package, grab the newer packge in debian, work out what changes need to be kept from our previous debian fork, put them into the new package13:47
shadeslayerah found the wiki page.. need to provide specific arguments to google for a perfect search :P13:49
txwikingerRiddell: Sorry.. I had to change the wiki page :)13:50
Riddellug, 20 hours later qt on arm fails13:56
jjessetook 20 hours to  compile on arm?13:57
Riddell"Session terminated, killing shell...make: *** [binary-arch] Terminated"13:57
Riddellout of memory?13:57
JontheEchidnaGet:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main libqt4-webkit-dbg 4:4.7~beta1-0ubuntu1 [170MB]13:59
JontheEchidna:(13:59
shadeslayerJontheEchidna: o/13:59
Riddellwhy so sad?13:59
JontheEchidna170 MB13:59
shadeslayerthe pain of downloading 170 MB :P14:00
JontheEchidnaprojected to take half an hour14:00
Riddellwebkit is no small beast14:00
shadeslayerRiddell: btw will the Alpha 1 have a live image or just a alternate CD?14:00
JontheEchidnaYou know, I believe that the sync blacklist has a note on kde-l10n about Kubuntu not liking 250 MB tarballs. The irony is that Qt's is now 190 MB14:01
Riddellwhatever is working at the time14:01
shadeslayerRiddell: oh ok :)14:01
* shadeslayer is planning to move to BTRFS14:01
shadeslayertxwikinger: Grab the Merge-O-Matic output. You can do this using grab-merge.sh.14:07
shadeslayertxwikinger: what does that mean?14:07
shadeslayeri have grab-merge.sh .. what do i do with it? :P14:07
txwikingerthat is what the automatic merge tool creates by itself14:07
shadeslayertxwikinger: i just ran it and it asked if i want to clear my local merge dir,and i said yes and then nothing 14:08
shadeslayertxwikinger: do i have to provide a argument as well?14:10
txwikingershadeslayer: sorry.. not sure what you are doing atm... and I have to do some paid work ;)14:12
shadeslayertxwikinger: oh sure.. go ahead ill just read more on MoM :)14:13
txwikingershadeslayer: yes do that14:13
ScottKshadeslayer: Use grab-merge is ubuntu-dev-tools, not the one off the site.14:32
shadeslayerScottK: yeah i installed ubuntu-dev-tools :)14:33
txwikingerRiddell: kaffeine builds on lucid, but not on maverick.. I think libqt4-webkit is broken on maverick14:37
Riddelltxwikinger: you need libqt4-webkit-dev now14:38
txwikingerAh.. that would do it :)14:38
JontheEchidnaTime to reboot for that sweet, sweet Qt-minor-version-upgrade speedup placebo14:40
txwikingerRiddell: I am not sure that is the problem... I get an apt-get error in pbuilder that libqt4-webkit is broken14:47
Riddelltxwikinger: make a chroot see if you can recreate it14:50
txwikingeryeah.. I probably have to do that14:51
* shtylman is gonna start writing up a list of my kde annoyances (things I see in trunk right now)14:54
shtylmanwhere is agateau when you need him...14:54
JontheEchidnaLooks like favicons are working in Qt 4.7: http://simplest-image-hosting.net/i0-plasma-desktopbg1818-jpg.jpg14:58
shtylmancool14:59
shtylmanchromium is still faster :p14:59
shadeslayershtylman: meh.. chromium has javascript errors on gitorious.org15:00
JontheEchidnayeah...15:00
JontheEchidnait is faster15:00
shtylmanshadeslayer: I use it for gitorious all the time15:00
shtylmanhaven't really noticed a problem... might have missed it tho15:00
shadeslayershtylman: weird... i cant click on the ?15:01
shadeslayermaybe because of the new site?15:01
shtylmanshadeslayer: works for me15:03
shadeslayershtylman: well.. idk ..it isnt working for me right now and i do have a chromium update in the pipeline :P15:03
shtylmansounds like you need to update15:04
shadeslayershtylman: 236 MB of updates... id rather download another episode of Lost :P15:05
shtylmanif you say so15:05
shtylmanon further thought... a systray with a hide/show toggle is a horrible usability idea15:10
shtylmanthe systray should be smarter about which icons it autoshows... if I don't need to see an icon (i.e. not active) I don't need to see it ...15:11
shtylman\/rant15:11
shtylman:)15:11
apacheloggerRiddell: ping15:14
ScottKshtylman: Once it's smart enough I never want to unhide stuff by hand, then remove the toggle, not before.15:14
apacheloggershtylman: nhn from amarok says the installers english version is filled with typos and stuff?15:15
shtylmanapachelogger: hmm15:15
apacheloggerScottK: you attended the Qt 4.7 session at uds?15:15
shtylmanthats no good15:15
shtylmanexample typo?15:15
apacheloggershtylman: didnt tell me :)15:15
shtylmanScottK: yes... but if we don't disable the hide/unhide there is never incentive to make it smart enough15:15
shtylmanlooks like another thing to add to my todo list :)15:15
ScottKapachelogger: I did.15:15
apacheloggerScottK: any precise information that came up about phonons future in Qt?15:16
apacheloggerwill it be removed at some point in favor of qtmultimedia?15:16
ScottKshtylman: That's Gnomish thinking.  If we make it broken enough, someone will fix it.15:16
ScottKapachelogger: No.15:16
shtylmanScottK: :)15:16
shtylmanheh15:16
shtylmanbut imho it is "broken" right now15:16
apacheloggerScottK: kthx15:16
apacheloggerRiddell: unping :)15:17
ScottKshtylman: Yes, but it's better than the user not being able to control it.15:17
shtylman_ScottK: I don't mean to say we should ship it broken... I just mean to say that the feature itself is a problem... imho it goes back to the whole rant about my desktop not being what I want to interact with15:19
ScottKshtylman_: I understand.  Personally I was quite glad when it arrived because it let me hide stuff I almost never want to see.15:20
ScottKI agree it would be better if the system were smarter.15:20
shtylman_ScottK: the problem is... if you don't want to see it ... why does it have an icon in the first place?15:20
ScottKIt's the "almost never" part that's the trick.15:21
shtylman_heh15:21
=== rdieter_ is now known as rdieter
Riddellapachelogger: unpong15:23
* apachelogger hugs Riddell15:24
JontheEchidnabtw, KDE 4.5 beta tarballs are up in ktown15:25
shtylman_ktown eh... heh15:25
shtylman_yea... I got kde trunk going last night again15:25
shtylman_thus my ranting about things :)15:25
JontheEchidnaWe're almost done merging. All that's left after I sponsor lex's merges are base-runtime, base-workspace and bindings15:26
shtylman_ScottK: oh yea... window title bars are also on the choping block... 1/4 inch of wasted vertical space in every window 15:26
shtylman_imho we need a list of kde "papercuts" :)15:27
jjessewe don't have any for maverick yet?  i thought we had some for lucid15:27
shtylman_not sure15:27
shadeslayershtylman_: we can just use a tag in the exsisting papercuts... like kde or something15:28
ScottKI'll try to do workspace tonight.15:28
RiddellJontheEchidna: I was quietly ignoring them until merges are done15:30
JontheEchidna;)15:30
JontheEchidnaQuintasan had started to do kdebase-runtime, but I he didn't quite get it merged all the way. I'll have to ping him next time he appears15:30
RiddellI'd like to go onto kdebindings shortly15:31
shtylman_do we have alot to merge?15:31
shadeslayerhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhReQgyprLg << Face authentication in kubuntu 10.0415:31
Riddellshtylman_: not too much now (well lots of wee bits I'm sure)15:31
shadeslayerdo you think we can get this in mav?15:31
RiddellSime! long time no irc15:31
txwikingerRiddell: I can build and install it in chroot15:31
txwikingerI think the problem might be with my pbuilder.. not sure why though15:31
shtylman_shadeslayer: is it worth it?15:31
SimeRiddell: oh, Hi. I was on vacation for the last month.15:31
shtylman_iirc those face things don't work all that well15:32
shadeslayershtylman_: well yeah.. i can type faster....15:32
shtylman_a picture of the person also works15:32
shtylman_so it isn't very secure15:32
SimeRiddell: I dropped in to say that I upgraded a couple of machines the other day and except for pulseaudio sneeking in there, it was the smoothest upgrade so far.15:32
shadeslayershtylman_: \o/15:32
SimeWell done to all!15:32
shtylman_Riddell: I dunno if it is on your todo list... but the "install firefox" should probly go15:33
shtylman_I think we decided that at UDS?15:33
shtylman_or was there still some contention on that?15:33
Riddellshtylman_: I think that's in the WebBrowser spec15:34
shtylman_k15:34
shtylman_coo15:34
Riddellthe firefox fanboys weren't around to object though15:34
shtylman_haha15:34
shtylman_thats cause they all run chrome now15:34
ScottKFirefox is still the most recognizable brand in FOSS.  I think we should keep it.15:35
jjesseat least the installer?15:35
shtylman_if we keep it... I highly suggest that we do away with the fullscreen ..etc.. and just popup a dialog asking the user to confirm install and then do what it does now with packagekit install15:36
shtylman_the fullscreen is too much15:36
jjessei agree15:36
shtylman_BUT... I would highly recommend removing it as we decided at UDS :)15:36
macoyeah the fullscreen reminds me of those annoying installers on windows that block you from doing your work15:46
shtylman_indeed...I don't really like it for app installers15:50
shtylman_for a system installer I could understand... app not so much15:50
txwikingerRiddell: I found the problem.. the mirror I used was out of sync :)16:01
rgreeningok, ninjas page for 4.4.80 is updated and ready. 16:05
rgreeningI'm getting maverick pbuilder ready and I'll look at getting kdelibs going while you are all finishing the merges16:06
shadeslayerrgreening: wheee!!!! thanks :D ... ( i wont be packaging,just that i can expect 4.4.80 soonish )16:14
shadeslayermaybe then i can finally connect to WEP :P16:14
rgreeninganyone know a way from within lucid to apt-get a maverick source package?16:15
nigelbrgreening: yes16:15
rgreeningnigelb: I tried this: apt-get source kde4libs/maverick but that seems to pull down lucid16:16
nigelbadded maverick deb-src line?16:16
rgreeningright... forgot to do that16:16
rgreeningty16:17
nigelb:)16:17
* Riddell cheers as qtcreator compiles with fancy Qt Quick designer integration16:37
Riddelltakes a full copy of the Qt headers to be included though :(16:37
rgreeningheh16:38
rgreeningkdelibs 4.4.80 building locally...16:39
txwikingerRiddell: bug #58388416:42
ubottuLaunchpad bug 583884 in kaffeine (Ubuntu) "kaffeine 1.0~pre3-3: new changes from Debian (kaffeine_1.0~pre3-3) require merging " [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/58388416:42
Riddelltxwikinger: lovely, uploading16:55
txwikingerthanks Riddell16:55
* ScottK is wrestling with workspace merge17:10
debfxany idea why some builds failed on amd64 with:17:27
debfxThe following packages have unmet dependencies:17:27
debfx  kdelibs5-dev: Depends: libkhtml5 (= 4:4.4.3a-2ubuntu2) but it is not going to be installed17:27
ScottKProbably archive skew.17:30
txwikingerRiddell: anything else that needs to be done?17:30
ScottKIs the current kde4libs build and published on amd64?17:30
debfxyes17:31
txwikingerI think all the packages on the merge page are done17:31
debfxScottK: can you trigger a rebuild?17:32
debfxfor example https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-tvprogramme/1.2.0-0ubuntu617:33
ScottKdebfx: It's built, so it's not simple archive skew.  Not sure what's up.17:34
Riddelltxwikinger: you coudl check if kdevplatform and kdevelop in debian are up to date and if they need anything done to them (compare to kubuntu-ppa/backports versions)17:36
txwikingerok will do17:36
debfxScottK: this has built fine 3 hours ago: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-widget-translatoid/1.12-0ubuntu1/+build/174642117:37
debfxso whatever caused the builds to fail seems to be fixed17:38
ScottKAt this point in the development cycle transient failures like this aren't rare.17:43
debfxyeah but do the buildds automatically retry failed builds?17:57
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
shadeslayerQuestion for anyone who uploaded the 4.7 packages,are they ok? like any upgrades broken?18:02
rgreeningRiddell: where do I get the source for attica? I see it tagged in KDE svn for 0.1.4. but it isn't on ktown. Kdelibs requires it to build18:23
rgreeningRiddell: nvm.. found it18:25
ScottKdebfx: They don't automatically retry failed builds, so they need to be watched.18:28
rgreeningScottK: for maverick, we allowing .bz2 uploads of sources?18:30
* ScottK looks at Riddell.18:31
ScottKI think we said source format v3 was OK, but don't recall for sure.18:31
rgreeningIm just looking at the attica package which is a .bz218:31
rgreeninglooks to have come from debian this way18:33
Riddellyes .bz2 is fine18:40
rgreeningRiddell: so, for Kde packages, are we switching to bz2 or continuing with gz? I assume gz for now..18:44
rgreeningif thats what debian does18:44
ScottKrgreening: Stick with Debian for now.18:44
Riddellwhatever upstream has18:44
rgreeningyeah18:44
rgreeningok18:44
Riddellif upstream has .bz2 we should use that18:44
Riddellwe don't share .orig files with Debian for KDE SC18:44
ScottKRiddell: I think for 4.5ish packages that's great.18:44
rgreeningwell, for 4.4.3 its gz... but Im starting 4.4.8018:45
ScottKFor the 4.4 merge we should stick with tar.gz18:45
ScottKrgreening: I think for 4.4.80, .bz2 is fine.18:45
rgreeningso, should we package 4.4.8 as bz2 original packaging?18:45
rgreeningya18:45
rgreeningok18:45
ScottKYes.18:45
ScottKDebian won't get to a newer upstream than 4.4 until squeeze+1, so we're on our own for 4.5.18:46
rgreeningcoolios18:49
rgreeningok, attica package, test building now :)18:50
* rgreening grumbles at attica19:07
JontheEchidnargreening: debian just uploaded the new version. It should sync by tomorrow.19:20
rgreeningJontheEchidna: oh... hrmmm... guess I shouldn't worry about it then huh19:20
JontheEchidnargreening: yeah, if you need it you could probably slup the package off of incoming.debian.org19:20
rgreeningI may upload to ninjas just so I can proceed with kdelibs19:21
JontheEchidnaI'll be back tomorrow night to start helping19:22
JontheEchidnabbl19:22
debfxJontheEchidna: could you please push kdegraphics to bzr?19:22
JontheEchidnaoh, sure19:22
JontheEchidnaif this crappy net connection will let me19:22
JontheEchidnapushed19:25
debfxthanks19:25
JontheEchidnathanks for reminding me19:25
debfxJontheEchidna: https://code.launchpad.net/~debfx/kdegraphics/ubuntu/+merge/2579619:39
JontheEchidnahmm, yes. My mistake there. It should be just replaces, not conflicts19:41
debfxwhy should it replace them?19:42
JontheEchidnabecause data files moved from those libraries to kdegraphics-libs-data in the merge19:43
debfxoh right19:43
JontheEchidnawell, if the graphics guys do like they have been doing, we'll have an .so version bump in 4.5 anyways ;)19:52
JontheEchidnathey'll probably never settle for a solid ABI19:54
JontheEchidnaso I've pushed a fix to bzr but I can't upload since the net connection is so crappy here19:54
JontheEchidnaI'll be back Sunday though19:55
rgreeningRiddell: is there anything special I need to do when using the bz2 format?19:59
ScottKrgreening: You need to use source format v3.  Other than that, no.20:02
rgreeningScottK: by creating debian/source/format and putting 3.0 in it? is that everything?20:03
shadeslayerScottK: when will  4.4.80 packages be up?20:03
rgreeningshadeslayer: not for a couple of days at least20:03
shadeslayerrgreening: well ok...20:03
rgreeningshadeslayer: Im working on kdelibs now20:03
ScottKrgreening: IIRC it's 3.0 (quilt).  Google will know.20:03
shadeslayeri know you guys are hard at work packaging it :P20:04
rgreeningScottK: ?20:04
shadeslayerScottK: yeah its 3.0(quilt)20:04
ScottKrgreening: Put what shadeslayer said, not just 3.0.20:04
rgreeningoh, in that format file20:04
rgreeningok20:04
ScottKYes20:04
shadeslayeri had a page bookmarked about this... lemme find it20:05
shadeslayerrgreening: http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 20:07
rgreeningthis is a pain20:08
rgreeninghaha20:08
shadeslayerhttp://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0#Howtoconvertasourcepackage.3F  << Shows how to do it :P20:08
shadeslayerrgreening: actually its much more easier onces you learn it :P20:08
shadeslayerjust dh_make --kde :P20:08
rgreeningno, I mean I added that, and the package which debuild -S -sa fine, now does not20:08
shadeslayerof course other than that i dont know a thing :P20:08
shadeslayerdoes not what?20:09
rgreeningnow, does not20:09
rgreeningas in 'debuild fails'20:09
QuintasanHiho20:09
shadeslayeroh :)20:09
shadeslayerrgreening: whats the error?20:10
rgreeningone of the patchs now fails for some reason20:10
shadeslayercant help there... dont know a thing :P20:10
rgreeningwtf... the rej actually was generated and save to the pristine source dir20:11
rgreeningoh cr&p20:11
rgreeningScottK, Riddell: not so sure about this deb src 3.020:12
ScottKrgreening: It takes a bit of getting used to.20:13
shadeslayerrgreening: you might want to read the wiki first before getting started.. i found that it cleared loads of doubts :P20:15
rgreeningyeah. reading it now20:15
shadeslayerrgreening: theres a part about patching too... dont know if itll help 20:15
* shadeslayer prods HTML5 promo of Lost....20:18
rgreeninghrmm... Im not liking this so far20:20
rgreeningok, so, do you package with the patches applied or unapplied? Reading through I am confused20:28
rgreeningthis is going to be a real mess I fear :(20:28
rgreeningnvm.. apparantly the system is smart enough to remove the patches if applied already. cool20:29
debfxrgreening: dpkg automatically applies the patches when you build the source package20:30
rgreeningdebfx: the issue I had was it modified the pristine dir with a reject file, never had that happen before. Anyway, kdelibs is now in source format 3.0... time to build and then upload20:31
shadeslayerrgreening: cool :)20:40
shadeslayerrgreening: oh btw you might see from the output it says, Applying hunk xx ...20:40
rgreeningshadeslayer: yeah, had to hit my head against the wall a few times for it to sink in20:40
shadeslayerthats the patching part :P20:40
rgreening:)20:41
shadeslayerrgreening: welcome to the 3.0 gang :P20:41
rgreeningI thought it was complementing me on my physique :)20:41
rgreeninghehe20:41
shadeslayerhehe :P20:41
shadeslayerrgreening: bye.. gtg, exams :P20:42
rgreeningkk20:43
ScottKtxwikinger: If you want to provide php 5.2, why don't you make it a php5.2 package that conflicts with (and provides) php.  That way no pinning is needed.20:50
txwikingerScottK: Well.. because when I want to eventually upgrade, I can just remove the pinning and don't have to create a new package?20:52
ScottKtxwikinger: As you prefer.  I'd find installing/removing a single package easier than messing with pinning.20:54
txwikingerwell.. it is not a single package20:54
txwikingerit is like almost 2020:54
txwikingerand the pinning is all in one file20:55
txwikingerand you don't need to mess with it, because I created the pinning declarations :D20:55
* txwikinger finds pinning very interesting.. I think you can even downgrade packages by using pinning20:56
txwikingerand you can use puppet or chef to apply the pinning on a server farm20:57
QuintasanRiddell: as for debian/control in kdebase-runtime, wouldn't it be fine if I just copy & paste the conflicts and replaces lines?20:59
ScottKQuintasan: No.  You should understand them and keep what's needed.21:02
rgreeningRiddell: Do we wish to bump Qt requirements in kdelibs to 4.7? or leave at 4.6? Just thinking about the phonon/webkit/qt split and whether we want/need to set a minimum bar of 4.721:05
QuintasanScottK: okay, just wondering whether I should keep conflicts on kdebase-bin-kde321:05
Quintasanor replaces on this21:05
* ScottK guesses not, but you need to check.21:05
Quintasanit's the only difference except for version bumps21:05
Quintasanour packages have those conflicts21:06
=== |mendred| is now known as mendred
QuintasanScottK: mind reviewing? http://dl.dropbox.com/u/69524/diffs.tar.bz221:32
QuintasanRiddell: is it possible to update to maverick right now? I'd like to test upgrading via KPK if it's even possible21:36
rgreeningI've got a ftbfs on new kdelibs 4.4.80 ... http://paste.ubuntu.com/437505/ any suggestions?21:42
ScottKQuintasan: I'm unlikely to have time today.21:46
QuintasanScottK: Okay, I'll just wait for Jonathan to show up21:46
ScottKrgreening: Does kshareddatacache.cpp have #include <pthread.h>21:52
* rgreening will check21:52
ScottKQuintasan: It's possible to upgrade, but really not recommended (kernel is in major flux).  I'd do it in a VM if at all.21:52
rgreeningScottK: yep21:54
* ScottK thinks gcc or eglibc then. Not sure.21:55
QuintasanScottK: okay, I'll wait some time I guess, I just set up a lucid VM.21:55
rgreeninghmmm21:56
debfxrgreening: does it link with -lpthread?22:04
rgreeningdoesn't look like it appears in the output22:07
debfxthen it's a bug in kdelibs22:13
debfxis it linked with --no-add-needed or are you using binutils-gold?22:13
rgreeningdebfx: I'm running this build in maverick pbuilder22:14
rgreeningand I have no idea about no-add-needed22:15
debfxcoudl you paste the command that fails?22:18
rgreeningfsck fsck fsck22:21
rgreeningmy terminal locked up22:21
rgreeningdebfx: I have to restart the build ot get the error again... dang thing locked up22:25
debfx:/22:25
rgreeningya22:29
debfxsomething like http://paste.debian.net/74280/ should fix it22:37
effie_jayxhey all, this bug in kubuntu looks like a support request, though I can't mark it as triaged https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/56408622:44
ubottuUbuntu bug 564086 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Kubuntu 9.10 failed to upgrade to 10.04" [Undecided,New]22:44
rgreeningdebfx: ty. ill try it22:52
rgreeningbuilding...lets see what happens23:03
rgreeningdebfx: it didn't like kdecore in the target line23:20
debfxrgreening: oops, kdecore is defined after the these lines23:25
debfxrgreening: http://paste.debian.net/74282/23:25
lex79rgreening: funny with kdelibs beta eh? :D23:33
rgreeningya23:37
rgreeningand switching to deb src 3.0 at the same time23:38
rgreeningmakes for lots of fun23:38
rgreeningI just want to get kdelibs done tonight sometime!23:39
lex79good luck :)23:39
rgreeninglex79: want to see if soprano update is available?23:39
lex79ok23:39
rgreeningI see kdelibs may need a newer one 23:39
lex79rgreening: no new version is available for now, the last one is 2.4.323:41
rgreeningthe notes in cmake said I had 2.4.62 and it wanted newer (2.4.63). But it didnt fail on it23:41
rgreeningstrange23:41
lex79http://soprano.sourceforge.net/23:41
rgreeningunless it needs a svn snapshot23:41
lex79do you need a new version then? I can grab from svn if you need23:42
lex79rgreening: 2.4.63 is in svn, I can do the package and upload to ninja shortly23:46
rgreeningawesome23:46
rgreeningty lex23:46
rgreeningdebfx: that last fix seems to have worked, it past that part at least23:55
rgreeningdebfx: grr... I spoke too soon... hahaha23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!