| === nobawk|away is now known as nobawk | ||
| imbrandon | evening all | 02:19 |
|---|---|---|
| === keffie_jayx is now known as effie_jayx | ||
| === effie_jayx is now known as keffie_jayx | ||
| === nigelbabu is now known as nigelb | ||
| MTecknology | lfaraone: hi, how's it going? | 05:39 |
| MTecknology | lfaraone: I had a question about your pianobar ppa - It won't install - pianobar: Depends: libfaad0 (>= 2.6.1) which is a virtual package. | 05:42 |
| jetienne | q. is there a way to prevent dh_make from interative prompting ? | 06:42 |
| === CieD is now known as Ciemon | ||
| === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant | ||
| suji | hi | 08:29 |
| nigelb | I'm getting a build failure, can someone take a look? http://paste.ubuntu.com/437710/ | 08:29 |
| suji | In ttf-indic-fonts some fonts has bugs, i cleared that, now how can update that package? | 08:29 |
| fabrice_sp | suji, open a bug report, generate a debdiff, attach it to the bug report and subscribe sponsors | 08:30 |
| suji | fabrice_sp: where to do the things? | 08:31 |
| fabrice_sp | suji, bug report: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ttf-indic-fonts/+bugs | 08:32 |
| nigelb | suji: is your package in debian? | 08:33 |
| nigelb | suji: if so, fix it there and it will get synced | 08:34 |
| suji | nigelb: Already the ttf-indic-fonts debian package in ubuntu upstream, i just download the tar.gz and clear the bug in 2 fonts from that | 08:34 |
| fabrice_sp | you can check http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=ttf-indic-fonts | 08:34 |
| fabrice_sp | the package has been modified in Ubuntu | 08:34 |
| nigelb | suji: the bug is fixed in debian? | 08:35 |
| fabrice_sp | !info ttf-indic-fonts | 08:35 |
| ubottu | ttf-indic-fonts (source: ttf-indic-fonts): Metapackage for free Indian language fonts. In component main, is optional. Version 1:0.5.8ubuntu2 (lucid), package size 8 kB, installed size 36 kB | 08:35 |
| fabrice_sp | debian is at 1:0.5.8, so older | 08:36 |
| nigelb | fabrice_sp: shouldn't we be giving the delta back to debian about now? | 08:37 |
| suji | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=441901 this bug i thought to say. | 08:37 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 441901 in ttf-tamil-fonts "TAMu fonts use wrong encoding" [Normal,Open] | 08:37 |
| nigelb | suji: so, fix in debain first I'd say | 08:38 |
| nigelb | and you can send the ubuntu changes back, make it 1:0.5.9 and just sync it | 08:39 |
| fabrice_sp | nigelb, yes: we should forward the patch to Debian, if it has not already been done | 08:39 |
| suji | but i cleared that, i correct the encoding. | 08:39 |
| nigelb | suji: where did you clear it? in ubuntu or in debian? | 08:39 |
| suji | just i bring the font and map the characters to their proper unicode, now am having that fonts only, from that what i do next? | 08:40 |
| fabrice_sp | the diff between Ubuntu and Debian is quite huge | 08:40 |
| suji | i got the source tarball from ubuntu | 08:41 |
| fabrice_sp | and it's in main, so only a core dev can sponsor it | 08:41 |
| nigelb | suji: right now, I'd say, get the ubuntu specific patches that are not in debian and open a bug in debian bts and send them there | 08:42 |
| nigelb | and if you have more fixes, open in debian bts | 08:42 |
| nigelb | once it has been fixed there, you can request a sync | 08:42 |
| nigelb | fabrice_sp: do we have documentation for this sort of thing? If not, its high time we wrote one | 08:43 |
| fabrice_sp | nigelb, you mean about what to do with patches? | 08:43 |
| nigelb | fabrice_sp: yeah, sending to debian, how, when, etc | 08:44 |
| fabrice_sp | I remember some wiki page on how to contribute to Debian for Ubuntu dev | 08:44 |
| fabrice_sp | let me check | 08:44 |
| nigelb | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian/ForUbuntuDevelopers | 08:44 |
| nigelb | got it! | 08:44 |
| fabrice_sp | this one, yes :-) | 08:45 |
| fabrice_sp | in this case, the bug has been opened in 2007, and not fixed since then.... | 08:46 |
| fabrice_sp | so sending the patch to Debian may not have the effect we expect :-) | 08:47 |
| nigelb | im pretty sure if we give them a patch will have an effect + I know the debian maintainer | 08:47 |
| fabrice_sp | in this case, ok :-) | 08:47 |
| fabrice_sp | I still have some patch I forwarded some month/year ago that haven't been adopted | 08:48 |
| fabrice_sp | so I generally report to Debian and if no news in one or 2 weeks => I upload in Ubuntu | 08:48 |
| nigelb | You could mail the maintainer or take permission to do nmu | 08:48 |
| nigelb | fabrice_sp: around? | 09:08 |
| nigelb | if someone can take a look at this build failure to figure out whats going wrong, would be much appeeciated | 09:09 |
| nigelb | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48910943/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-amd64.cdrdao_1%3A1.2.3-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 09:09 |
| === mcl0vin_ is now known as mcl0vin | ||
| fabrice_sp | nigelb, I'll check | 09:35 |
| fabrice_sp | TocParser.cpp is generated from TocParser.g, so it's not so easy | 09:57 |
| fabrice_sp | you can check in the upstream cvs, if the problem is solved or not | 09:59 |
| geser | fabrice_sp: partly solved in #ubuntu-packaging | 10:07 |
| geser | upstream included a patch to TocParser.cpp yet patch managed to apply it a second time (at a wrong location) breaking TocParser.g | 10:08 |
| fabrice_sp | ok | 10:21 |
| fabrice_sp | byt the way geser, did you my message on vtk? | 10:22 |
| fabrice_sp | see | 10:22 |
| geser | yes, I saw it | 10:23 |
| fabrice_sp | ok. I have a working package in my ppa, if you want to test something | 10:23 |
| geser | is the fixed boost-defaults package independent from the vtk merge or would it also work with the current vtk (and make it installable again)? | 10:23 |
| fabrice_sp | it would work with current one | 10:24 |
| fabrice_sp | boost-defaults is broken in lucid also | 10:24 |
| fabrice_sp | and I'm waiting for the upload to Maverick to follow the sru process | 10:24 |
| nigelb | "dh_install --fail-missing --sourcedir=debian/tmp" in rules causes the build to fail. | 12:19 |
| nigelb | I should be investigating it or just remove --fail-missing? | 12:19 |
| carstenh | nigelb: investigate of course | 12:23 |
| G | nigelb: check for *.dirs files | 12:31 |
| G | nigelb: you may have entries surplus to requirements | 12:32 |
| nigelb | G: looks like I didn't add the required entires | 12:32 |
| arand | Would anyone mind sponsoring hardy..lucid in Bug #581331 ? | 12:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 581331 in bitlbee (Ubuntu Karmic) "error message while trying to use my MSN account in bitlbee" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/581331 | 12:41 |
| nigelb | Is there a reason why a package cannot be 'debuild -S -sa' a second time? | 12:48 |
| G | nigelb: what error message do you get? | 12:56 |
| nigelb | G: hold on, let me debuild again | 12:56 |
| nigelb | http://paste.ubuntu.com/437747/ | 12:57 |
| G | nigelb: does conf/config.sub still exist? | 13:01 |
| nigelb | G: inside the package? | 13:02 |
| G | nigelb: also, you are patching configure.ac, are you rerunning autoreconf.sh somehow? | 13:03 |
| G | nigelb: inside the exploded tree, yeah | 13:03 |
| nigelb | I dont see a conf/config.sub anywhere | 13:03 |
| nigelb | G: No autoreconf.sh file anywhere either | 13:05 |
| nigelb | There is a configure.ac file in the main package tree | 13:06 |
| G | oh sorry, autogen.sh | 13:07 |
| nigelb | no autogen.sh either | 13:07 |
| nigelb | btw, I'm not patching configure.ac, at least not that I know | 13:08 |
| G | Line 29 | 13:08 |
| nigelb | oh | 13:09 |
| G | nigelb: is a copy of the current source .deb/.dsc file etc available somewhere that I can maybe take a look at, I can't guarrantee anything but I might be able to work it out | 13:10 |
| G | nigelb: I had similar issues | 13:10 |
| nigelb | I can put it up somwhere and you can take a look at the whole tree | 13:10 |
| nigelb | Now, it works once and built the package, but I expect debuild to work second time too | 13:11 |
| G | agreed, so would I :) | 13:11 |
| nigelb | copying, should get copied in a few minutes | 13:12 |
| nigelb | great, its going to take 35 minutes :/ | 13:17 |
| G | eek | 13:17 |
| nigelb | people.ubuntu.come is slow | 13:17 |
| G | nigelb: do you have a copy of the debian.tar.gz file somewhere (or diff.gz)? | 13:17 |
| nigelb | I wonder if I should put it up on mentors.debian.org | 13:18 |
| nigelb | I do, but its a new upstream version | 13:18 |
| nigelb | so you want the whole thing anyway | 13:18 |
| G | I can grab the upstream tarball myself | 13:18 |
| nigelb | so what do you want? the new diff.gz? | 13:19 |
| G | yeah | 13:19 |
| nigelb | http://people.ubuntu.com/~nigelbabu/cdrdao_1.2.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | 13:20 |
| nigelb | G: ^ | 13:20 |
| G | nigelb: giving it a ago now | 13:27 |
| nigelb | G: debuiild works first time | 13:28 |
| nigelb | give it a second go and it gives you trouble | 13:28 |
| G | hmmmm that is odd | 13:32 |
| G | I've got a feeling I know why | 13:32 |
| nigelb | ooh, why? | 13:34 |
| G | nigelb: there is a 'make -C' statement in the clean stuff | 13:34 |
| G | going to give something a go | 13:34 |
| nigelb | oh | 13:34 |
| nigelb | ah, that is changing things post build! | 13:35 |
| G | and prebuild | 13:37 |
| nigelb | so those lines have to go right? | 13:38 |
| G | nigelb: I think so, but just looking at something now | 13:38 |
| G | nigelb: I've got a feeling, that you could replace the whole debian/rules with the new standard simplified version | 13:44 |
| nigelb | G: where do I find that? | 13:45 |
| === mcl0vin_ is now known as mcl0vin | ||
| G | nigelb: http://stats.nigelj.com/debian.rules | 13:49 |
| G | can't believe I had to shuffle the file around about 5 times because all the subdomains i use either have funky rewrite rules or I forgot to change the DNS records :S | 13:50 |
| nigelb | heh | 13:50 |
| G | nigelb: hmmm, it doesn't fully work it seems, it may need an override :S | 13:51 |
| nigelb | hm :( | 13:51 |
| G | nigelb: I think you could get away with removing those make rules in clean | 13:52 |
| nigelb | G: the ones we thought were problematic? | 13:53 |
| G | yeah | 13:53 |
| nigelb | lemme try | 13:53 |
| G | yeah, seems to work for me | 13:54 |
| G | nigelb: looks like you'll need to replace it with several manual rms in the clean part though | 13:56 |
| G | based on diff.gz after the second build | 13:56 |
| nigelb | well, now it debuild -S -sa works twice | 13:57 |
| bilalakhtar | bdrung: EMERGENCY! The package gnome-media-player which you sponsored failed to build due to chroot problem in powerpc. see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-media-player/0.1.2-0ubuntu1/+build/1744204/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-powerpc.gnome-media-player_0.1.2-0ubuntu1_CHROOTWAIT.txt.gz | 13:58 |
| maco | bilalakhtar: there should be a "try again" button if a build fails i think | 13:58 |
| bilalakhtar | maco: Ohk | 13:58 |
| nigelb | G: several rms? how do I figure which ones? | 13:59 |
| bilalakhtar | But this was my very first package that I got into Ubuntu. A disappointment for me,though it is a problem with the buildd machines | 13:59 |
| bilalakhtar | maco: Its not there | 13:59 |
| G | nigelb: hold on... something is weird here | 13:59 |
| G | nigelb: there is: clean: clean-patched unpatch, cleaned-patch is: clean-patched: patch .... | 14:00 |
| bilalakhtar | Wierd. The same package built properly on amd64, armel and i386 architectures | 14:00 |
| maco | bilalakhtar: in maverick? | 14:00 |
| bilalakhtar | maco: Yes | 14:00 |
| nigelb | G: that definitely wierd | 14:00 |
| maco | the weirder architectures sometimes do that ;-) | 14:00 |
| bilalakhtar | Can a MOTU get the package gnome-media-player built? | 14:01 |
| bilalakhtar | I mean rebuilt? | 14:01 |
| bilalakhtar | maco: See this. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48903998/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-powerpc.gnome-media-player_0.1.2-0ubuntu1_CHROOTWAIT.txt.gz | 14:01 |
| maco | thats what im trying | 14:01 |
| G | nigelb: also, it looks like some files have been modified outside of the patch system | 14:01 |
| maco | ive hit the try again button on packages in the kubuntu ppas. trying to find where it is in non-ppas because im pretty sure we have access to that too | 14:01 |
| nigelb | G: thats strange. that happens during build time? | 14:02 |
| G | nigelb: remove the patch part out of clean-patched, and then examine diff.gz | 14:02 |
| G | nigelb: ahhh maybe | 14:02 |
| G | let me see | 14:02 |
| ScottK | maco: If you can upload the package, you should have a rety button. | 14:02 |
| maco | there was one day when every amd64 build for like an hour just fell over with a chroot problem. that was interesting | 14:02 |
| maco | ScottK: how do i find it in non-ppas? | 14:03 |
| bilalakhtar | maco: I think 3 months ago. I faced that problem as well. | 14:03 |
| maco | i am getting lost in launchpad | 14:03 |
| G | nigelb: oh wait, my mistake | 14:03 |
| maco | oh im dumb | 14:04 |
| maco | im not logged in | 14:04 |
| nigelb | hah | 14:04 |
| ScottK | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-media-player/0.1.2-0ubuntu1/+build/1744204 | 14:04 |
| nigelb | G: /me bows to DMs and DDs. | 14:05 |
| maco | its before breakfast time! i have an excuse! | 14:05 |
| bilalakhtar | ScottK: Yeah that ine | 14:05 |
| geser | bilalakhtar: it's a known bug that some powerpc builds fail with a chroot error | 14:05 |
| bilalakhtar | *one | 14:05 |
| G | nigelb: debian/rules for me now looks like: http://stats.nigelj.com/cdrdao.rules | 14:05 |
| bilalakhtar | Thanks! maybe maco or ScottK did it | 14:05 |
| G | nigelb: I'm neither :P | 14:06 |
| maco | i clicked it after i logged in | 14:06 |
| bilalakhtar | geser: Why does Ubuntu build packages for PowerPC, anyway? | 14:06 |
| bilalakhtar | I think its unsupported | 14:06 |
| ScottK | bilalakhtar: It's community supported. | 14:07 |
| ScottK | It works pretty well and has a significant user base. | 14:07 |
| nigelb | G: neither am I, but I understand the daunting task | 14:07 |
| nigelb | G: my rules file looks the same too | 14:07 |
| * bilalakhtar understands why PowerPC is important | 14:07 | |
| xelister | hi guys, I would like to provide recent compcache for ubuntu. Anyone want to lead me? | 14:08 |
| xelister | compcache (compressing swap in ram) exists in lucid, but a bit older version and without the userspace tool | 14:09 |
| xelister | the package does not yet exist in debian (but work is in progress afaik) | 14:09 |
| nigelb | in that case, I'd guide you to be a DM for that package | 14:10 |
| xelister | ok, so what to do? | 14:11 |
| nigelb | xelister: http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-first.en.html#s-choose | 14:12 |
| carstenh | xelister: is the name of the package compcache-tools? | 14:14 |
| xelister | yes | 14:14 |
| xelister | so far I build that program from source (trivial) and it works, in creates an .ko to be loaded and user space tool | 14:15 |
| carstenh | xelister: tomorrow the last response from daniel to this bug ( http://bugs.debian.org/495386 ) is five month ago and the bug itelf is nearly two years old ... | 14:18 |
| carstenh | xelister: I didn't find information about how to handle this situation, just to point to when you highjack the itp | 14:19 |
| nigelb | the package compcache-tools? | 14:19 |
| nigelb | 09:14 < xelister> yes | 14:19 |
| xelister | btw Im not any "debian developer" or something yet | 14:20 |
| nigelb | xelister: you can be a maintainer | 14:20 |
| carstenh | xelister: that a two years old itp bug is old enough to be highjacked seems to be obvious | 14:20 |
| carstenh | nigelb: not that fast if you think about "Debian maintainer" | 14:20 |
| nigelb | well, not that fast, but you can start maintaining it and then later be a DM officially | 14:21 |
| carstenh | xelister: not being a DD or DM doesn'T prevent you from maintaining a package, you just need to find sponsors | 14:21 |
| carstenh | and if your sponsor begins to hate you you become DM | 14:22 |
| nigelb | lol | 14:22 |
| nigelb | same way you become MOTU | 14:22 |
| carstenh | xelister: the first step seems to search for ITP in the developers reference manual and hope that there are some rules you can point to | 14:23 |
| ScottK | The usual way to take over an ITP is to email the bug and the submitter asking if it's OK and then going ahead in a week or two if you don't hear back. | 14:23 |
| carstenh | xelister: you should do what ScottK suggests :) | 14:24 |
| xelister | hmm but that was debian's bug not ubuntu | 14:29 |
| carstenh | xelister: if you get the package into debian you need to maintain it there as you are responsible for it. if it is in debian it gets synced to ubuntu automatically. | 14:29 |
| carstenh | xelister: maintaining it in ubuntu when debian possibly has its own version doesn't sound that efficient since everything must be done twice | 14:30 |
| carstenh | xelister: if you don't like to get reach more people with the same amount of work you could also just prepare a new version for ubuntu and ask for a sponsor | 14:40 |
| carstenh | s/get // | 14:40 |
| arand | Would anyone mind sponsoring hardy..lucid in Bug #581331 ? | 14:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 581331 in bitlbee (Ubuntu Karmic) "error message while trying to use my MSN account in bitlbee" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/581331 | 14:40 |
| xelister | hmm actually, that ramzswap did not work perfectly | 14:50 |
| xelister | perhaps this is because it is supposed to be rather used with .33 kernel | 14:50 |
| xelister | can I easly upgrade Lucid to .33 kernel? | 14:50 |
| xelister | and if it turns out it works with .33 kernels only, then does it make sense | 14:52 |
| carstenh | you can't get a new upstream version to lucid anyway | 14:53 |
| carstenh | but getting it into maverick is easy | 14:53 |
| xelister | overall.. it was not so good tu use .32 in lucid.. things like btrfs suck on .32 | 14:54 |
| arand | xelister: You can get mainline build of the kernel for ubuntu for testing purposes: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/MainlineBuilds?action=show&redirect=KernelMainlineBuilds | 14:56 |
| xelister | yeah I just ofund that... would be nice to have ppa of kernels like .33 but WITH ubutnu specyfic stuff (drivers) | 14:56 |
| fabrice_sp | Hi. A small question: where should be installed the .egg-info file in a python package? A patch I sent changed it from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-package to /usr/lib/python2.5/site-pacakge/vtk (it's for python-vtk pacakge) | 15:22 |
| geser | fabrice_sp: try asking the python packaging experts in #debian-python@OFTC | 15:27 |
| fabrice_sp | ok. Thanks geser | 15:28 |
| === nobawk is now known as nobawk|away | ||
| === nobawk|away is now known as nobawk | ||
| === nobawk is now known as nobawk|away | ||
| === nobawk|away is now known as nobawk | ||
| ScottL | it appears that i found the problem with the ardour mute buttons bug #581786 | 19:57 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 581786 in Ubuntu Studio "Mute button not enabled by default in Ardour 2.8.6 Lucid AM64" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/581786 | 19:57 |
| ScottL | sorry, wrong channel :P | 19:58 |
| === kmdm is now known as Guest54370 | ||
| === kmdm is now known as Guest62013 | ||
| === nobawk is now known as nobawk|away | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!