| lvh | Hello! | 00:08 |
|---|---|---|
| lvh | Why do Blueprint names start with their project? | 00:09 |
| lvh | Why aren't blueprints project-local in the first place? | 00:09 |
| wgrant | lvh: They are project-local. | 00:10 |
| lvh | Huh. I must be misremembering behavior I thought I saw then :-) | 00:11 |
| wgrant | I just created two with the same name in different projects on staging. | 00:12 |
| lvh | I guess it was because I was looking for blueprints to link to a branch and the keyword was a common english word | 00:14 |
| lvh | then again, a branch being linked to someone elses blueprint could make sense | 00:14 |
| MTecknology | Is there any way to easily make a kernel in a PPA? only one version of the kernel, only one .config? | 00:26 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: You should probably ask the kernel maintainers. | 00:28 |
| bitmonk1 | MTecknology: look at kernel-package in debian / ubuntu, provides make-kpkg command for creating kernel debs. | 00:30 |
| bitmonk1 | then, you should be able to jam that into a ppa just as any other deb. not sure if there is a more specialized tool for straight LP | 00:31 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: oh.. nifty - I'll have to try it :) | 00:32 |
| wgrant | You'd probably be better off using the normal kernel packaging in PPA mode. | 00:33 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: I was trying to find some idiot proof wiki for it | 00:37 |
| bitmonk1 | MTecknology: ubuntu wiki should have something on building a deb in general | 01:08 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: I'm trying with make-kpkg - removed some bloat - make clean && rm -R .git - then put it out to my dev system and ran make-kpkg clean and now I'm trying fakeroot make-kpkg--append-to-version=-foo kernel-image kernel-headers | 01:10 |
| bitmonk1 | sounds like you're on the right track .. | 01:12 |
| bitmonk1 | don't forget to hit /etc/kernel-package.conf and put your info in as maintainer | 01:12 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: thanks | 01:13 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: just realized I haven't run make oldconfig yet :P | 01:14 |
| bitmonk1 | MTecknology: have you created a ppa yet? | 02:03 |
| bitmonk1 | and, in general: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading | 02:03 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: ya, I have one | 02:03 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: I've used it for some apps - never a kernel though | 02:03 |
| bitmonk1 | should be no different. | 02:04 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: I suppose once make-kpkg runs it makes everything needed for debuild | 02:04 |
| bitmonk1 | if it is then, i'm interested to know how. i have been meaning to package some xen kernels for a while.. | 02:04 |
| bitmonk1 | make-kpkg should give you a .deb | 02:04 |
| bitmonk1 | or three | 02:04 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: yup - but I can't just run dput on a .deb? | 02:05 |
| bitmonk1 | what distro are you on? | 02:06 |
| doctormo_ | [19:56] *** The topic was set by noodles775!~michael@canonical/launchpad/noodles775 on 20/05/2010 11:32. | 02:06 |
| doctormo_ | [19:56] *** Channel URL: https://launchpad.net | 02:06 |
| doctormo_ | [19:57] *** Channel modes: no colors allowed, no messages from outside | 02:06 |
| doctormo_ | [19:57] *** This channel was created on 26/11/2006 01:42. | 02:06 |
| doctormo_ | [20:08] <bitmonk1> MTecknology: ubuntu wiki should have something on building a deb in general | 02:07 |
| doctormo_ | [20:10] <MTecknology> bitmonk1: I'm trying with make-kpkg - removed some bloat - make clean && rm -R .git - then put it out to my dev system and ran make-kpkg clean and now I'm trying fakeroot make-kpkg--append-to-version=-foo kernel-image kernel-headers | 02:07 |
| doctormo_ | [20:12] <bitmonk1> sounds like you're on the right track .. | 02:07 |
| doctormo_ | [20:13] <bitmonk1> don't forget to hit /etc/kernel-package.conf and put your info in as maintainer | 02:07 |
| doctormo_ | [20:13] <MTecknology> bitmonk1: thanks | 02:07 |
| doctormo_ | [20:14] <MTecknology> bitmonk1: just realized I haven't run make oldconfig yet :P | 02:07 |
| doctormo_ | [21:03] <bitmonk1> MTecknology: have you created a ppa yet? | 02:07 |
| doctormo_ | [21:03] <bitmonk1> and, in general: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading | 02:07 |
| doctormo_ | [21:03] <MTecknology> bitmonk1: ya, I have one | 02:07 |
| doctormo_ | [21:03] <MTecknology> bitmonk1: I've used it for some apps - never a kernel though | 02:07 |
| bitmonk1 | whee | 02:07 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: lucid | 02:07 |
| MTecknology | doctormo_: have a little accident? | 02:07 |
| bitmonk1 | so, yah, i dunno why i thought you could send a deb. anyway, i believe make-kpkg debianizes your source tree | 02:09 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: ya, thatt's what I meant with "everything needed for debuild" :) | 02:09 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: works for me :) | 02:09 |
| bitmonk1 | give it a shot, let me know if it doesn't work and i'll throw something together in my local env | 02:10 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: alrighty - I'm fixing up changelog and control - I require another package in mine :P | 02:10 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: debuild -S -sa failed - and ./debian/ went away :( | 02:17 |
| bitmonk1 | O.o | 02:17 |
| bitmonk1 | read the kernel-package documentation, there are a number of ways it can be used. the default is just to build the entire packages for you, but i suspect it can be used to prepare a package for debuild. | 02:18 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: I guess I get to do that again - and then I won't touch anything except for the changlog sig line for signing | 02:19 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: I have always been using make all modules_install install for my kernel :P | 02:19 |
| bitmonk1 | sure, that's the quickest path usually, until you want reproducibility ;d | 02:20 |
| MTecknology | :P | 02:21 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: that's my goal eventually | 02:22 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: actually... I'd like to eventually add a patch to include vbox modules in the kernel and then have a completely monolithic kernel :P | 02:22 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: deletes the debian/ again | 02:23 |
| bitmonk1 | i thought ubu was shipping vbox support in -generic, or at least an enabled kernel, since karmic or prior. no? | 02:27 |
| bitmonk1 | oh, okay, modules, sure. | 02:28 |
| bitmonk1 | i haven't worried about having a fully monolithic kernel in ages, i forget what exactly the costs of modules are, except having to configure them to load properly. | 02:29 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: i don't think it's that high - but right now I only have my vbox kernels - everything else fits in a 3.9mb lzo image | 02:30 |
| bitmonk1 | interesting, what are you netbooting? | 02:31 |
| bitmonk1 | some kind of specialized system? sounds interesting . | 02:32 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: just my laptop :P | 02:32 |
| bitmonk1 | why the focus on compactness? | 02:33 |
| MTecknology | i'm psychotic :P | 02:33 |
| bitmonk1 | just, sort of curious. it's always an interesting challenge to take on. | 02:33 |
| bitmonk1 | hah | 02:33 |
| bitmonk1 | fair enough | 02:33 |
| MTecknology | my whole system is like this | 02:33 |
| bitmonk1 | masochistic ;d | 02:33 |
| MTecknology | :P | 02:34 |
| MTecknology | I've been called that a few times | 02:34 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: I ran just 'make-kpkg debian' which builds debian/ but it gets deleted when running debuild -S -sa | 02:37 |
| * bitmonk1 is more familiar with make-kpkg than debuild, sadly | 02:38 | |
| bitmonk1 | something i need to strengthen | 02:38 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: I have been using my own kernel al ong time - but now all I want is to put it into a ppa | 02:38 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: maybe I need to add the buildpackage target.. | 02:46 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: yuppers... - that's what I needed - now we'll see about making my kernel publicly available :) | 02:52 |
| bitmonk1 | so, what did you have to do? | 02:53 |
| bitmonk1 | change, file-wise, that is? | 02:53 |
| bitmonk1 | i'd just like to note it, as i said, i have been meaning to ppa some kernels myself. | 02:55 |
| bitmonk1 | perhaps there is even a wiki somewhere we could contribute to.. | 02:55 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: I'd enjoy reading one about this :P | 02:57 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: I'll grab the command when this finishes | 02:57 |
| bitmonk1 | well, i'm just asking, what did you have to change to get it to work? could you give me a paste of the commands you ran or something? i may turn it into documentation. | 02:57 |
| bitmonk1 | yah pls do :) | 02:57 |
| MTecknology | just one line actually | 02:57 |
| bitmonk1 | sweet. | 02:58 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: apparenlty make-kpkg also compiles it on the system :P | 03:12 |
| MTecknology | make-kpkg buildpackage * | 03:12 |
| bitmonk1 | i believe you may be able to pass it options that don't, however. | 03:12 |
| MTecknology | oh | 03:12 |
| bitmonk1 | yeah it will for sure | 03:12 |
| bitmonk1 | that's its' typical usage, outside of ppa-land, where you make some debs and put them in an apache folder or something.. | 03:13 |
| MTecknology | i like ppa-land | 03:13 |
| bitmonk1 | sure, just saying, make-kpkg far predates ppa-land. i'm not 100% sure, but i suspect you can tell it not to build. | 03:14 |
| bitmonk1 | another option is, you can apt-get source the kernel you want to modify, and just touch the .config and Changelog and such | 03:14 |
| bitmonk1 | maybe rename it kernel-mteck-mono-vbox or something | 03:14 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: if this works you should take a peak :) | 03:20 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: so far it's built 2 .debs and a xxxx_source.build | 03:26 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: i'm assuming the other parts are coming that are needed for a ppa build :P | 03:26 |
| bitmonk1 | MTecknology: url? | 03:57 |
| bitmonk1 | oh i thought you meant the farm, your box | 03:57 |
| bitmonk1 | absolutely i would like to take a look. | 03:57 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: farm? my farm is one box :P | 04:00 |
| bitmonk1 | no i meant, i thought like, launchpad was building them.. | 04:00 |
| MTecknology | oh | 04:01 |
| MTecknology | not yet :( | 04:01 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: :S - i keep seeming to find that make-kpkg isn't designed for making a package that can be uploaded to ppa | 04:08 |
| bitmonk1 | perhaps, and if so, i apologize, but it should produce a source deb, and it seems that you should be able to modify a source deb for ppa upload. | 04:09 |
| bitmonk1 | i'm not quite a ppa upload expert, to be fair. just trying to help. | 04:09 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: I appreciate the help - and I hear make-kpkg used a lot - just haven't seen it used for this - I've been searching online for a while | 04:10 |
| MTecknology | bitmonk1: it seems only smart people that hate docs do this :P | 05:09 |
| FloSoft | hi, i've got following bug: i upgraded my repository from format 6 to 7, now i upgraded my bzr from 1.3 to 2.1 (from launchpad ubuntu ppa) and I've got a lock on the branch (now for 80 hours) i broke that lock now, otherwise i was not able to upload anymore | 12:43 |
| FloSoft | perhaps the upgrade process finished, but did not removed the lock? | 12:43 |
| magcius | Loggerhead is down? | 14:28 |
| thopiekar | hi | 15:06 |
| thopiekar | is it possible to change the projects "root name"? like of this one? https://launchpad.net/mopedix | 15:06 |
| beuno | thopiekar, you need to file a question in Launchpad | 15:22 |
| thopiekar | here, beuno ? https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | 15:23 |
| nigelb | thopiekar: yes, there | 15:24 |
| thopiekar | thanks, nigelb, beuno | 15:24 |
| humphreybc | How can I unsubscribe our team's mailing list from our project bug mail? | 22:56 |
| thumper | humphreybc: the team is probably the bug contact | 23:01 |
| thumper | if it is, it | 23:01 |
| thumper | will get email | 23:02 |
| humphreybc | ah | 23:02 |
| humphreybc | where do I change that? | 23:02 |
| humphreybc | bug supervisor is set to none | 23:02 |
| thumper | is the team subscribed to the bugs of the project? | 23:02 |
| * thumper wonders where that is set | 23:02 | |
| * thumper thinks | 23:03 | |
| thumper | the email contact falls back to the project owner if there is no bug supervisor set | 23:03 |
| thumper | so the project owner will get the bug mail | 23:03 |
| thumper | there isn't a setting for turning this off right now | 23:03 |
| humphreybc | oh | 23:03 |
| thumper | one thing to do | 23:04 |
| thumper | is to set up a different bug contact | 23:04 |
| humphreybc | so project owner = maintainer? | 23:04 |
| thumper | mostly | 23:04 |
| humphreybc | so do I have to set up some special account or mailing list? | 23:04 |
| thumper | if you don't want the email, yes | 23:05 |
| humphreybc | right | 23:05 |
| thumper | humphreybc: for ubuntu-manual? | 23:05 |
| humphreybc | yep | 23:05 |
| thumper | set up a team called ubuntu-manual-bugs | 23:05 |
| thumper | get a mailing list | 23:05 |
| thumper | make it the contact address for the team (somehow) | 23:06 |
| humphreybc | lol | 23:06 |
| thumper | and don't subscribe to the mailing list | 23:06 |
| thumper | at least then | 23:06 |
| thumper | there are archives if you want to check | 23:06 |
| thumper | and those who do want the mail | 23:06 |
| humphreybc | ah ha | 23:06 |
| humphreybc | okay | 23:06 |
| thumper | can subscribe | 23:06 |
| humphreybc | who approves the mailing lists? | 23:08 |
| bitmonk1 | it's up to you, i think, it can be approval based subscription or no. | 23:09 |
| humphreybc | I just "applied" for a mailing list and it says a Launchpad administrator will review and approve it | 23:09 |
| humphreybc | I was wondering who does that | 23:09 |
| humphreybc | thumper: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual-bugs | 23:20 |
| thumper | humphreybc: they used to be manually approved | 23:20 |
| thumper | but no longer | 23:20 |
| humphreybc | I've set it up correctly, and ubuntu-manual-bugs is set to the bug supervisor for our project, but we're still getting bug mail in the main list | 23:20 |
| * thumper pokes LP | 23:21 | |
| humphreybc | Weird, the main list just got some bug mail from this bug, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual/+bug/584627 | 23:22 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 584627 in Ubuntu Manual "On page 9, a dash should not appear at the beginning of a line (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,In progress] | 23:22 |
| thumper | humphreybc: take a look at https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual/+subscribe | 23:22 |
| humphreybc | but then ubuntu-manual-bugs is apparently getting bug mail too, https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-manual-bugs/ | 23:22 |
| thumper | humphreybc: are their any team checkboxes? | 23:23 |
| humphreybc | thumper: http://humphreybc.homeip.net/files/bugs.png | 23:23 |
| humphreybc | tis what I have | 23:23 |
| thumper | humphreybc: I'm out of suggestions | 23:24 |
| thumper | humphreybc: ask a question on the launchpad bugs project | 23:24 |
| humphreybc | blast! Well I guess we'll wait and see if it gets better | 23:24 |
| humphreybc | okay, i'll give it a couple of days | 23:24 |
| humphreybc | maybe it's something to do with old bugs that the main team was originally subscribed to | 23:25 |
| thumper | wait | 23:25 |
| thumper | humphreybc: for one of the bugs you didn't want on the main list | 23:25 |
| thumper | humphreybc: pastebin the raw email | 23:25 |
| thumper | there are a bunch of email headers that'll help | 23:25 |
| humphreybc | http://paste.ubuntu.com/438526/ | 23:26 |
| thumper | humphreybc: that isn't all the email | 23:26 |
| thumper | humphreybc: I want to see all the headers | 23:26 |
| humphreybc | how can I do that in gmail? | 23:27 |
| humphreybc | ah | 23:27 |
| humphreybc | show original | 23:27 |
| humphreybc | http://paste.ubuntu.com/438527/ | 23:27 |
| thumper | X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Registrant (Ubuntu Manual) @ubuntu-manual | 23:29 |
| thumper | that is the reason you got the mail | 23:29 |
| thumper | now the question is why it does that | 23:30 |
| wgrant | That really suggests that the bug supervisor was unset for a little while. | 23:34 |
| thumper | wgrant: it was | 23:34 |
| thumper | wgrant: but if the bug supervisor is now set, why is the team still getting emails? | 23:34 |
| wgrant | Is it? | 23:35 |
| wgrant | The last email on the list is from just around the time of the original discussion. | 23:36 |
| wgrant | # Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 22:05:35 -0000 | 23:36 |
| wgrant | Which seems like 31 minutes ago. | 23:37 |
| wgrant | Note the notifications could take up to 5 minutes after the bug supervisor change to take effect. | 23:37 |
| humphreybc | they've stopped now... fingers crossed :) | 23:38 |
| wgrant | (and Launchpad will sometimes lie that emails have been sent an hour in the future, so that may be throwing things off slightly) | 23:39 |
| bitmonk1 | heh.. it's always great when a log of email delivery is created sometime other than when the email is delivered ;d | 23:44 |
| poolie | hi wgrant | 23:46 |
| wgrant | Morning poolie. | 23:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
