| === BUGabundo_DrWho is now known as BUGabundo_Naruto | ||
| BUGabundo_Naruto | nite | 00:26 |
|---|---|---|
| crimsun | fta: I'm not convinced it's actually _caused_ by pulse, but I think it's a bug that pulse is falling over so readily. | 01:09 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| ddecator | micahg: when i get a chance, i'll create a draft of what the mozilla bug reporting wiki page can include, but i'll have you look it over before i put it on the site (if that's alright with you) | 08:04 |
| micahg | ddecator: k | 08:04 |
| cwillu_at_work | ever see a firefox profile that just silently exits when launched, with no errors or anything? | 09:03 |
| BUGabundo_remote | One more hole in the street,and I join Alice in Wonderland.Join us for tea! | 09:13 |
| BUGabundo_remote | me me me I saw that | 09:13 |
| BUGabundo_remote | remove the lock file | 09:13 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: ping | 15:34 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - pong | 15:59 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: so, I have the TB3.0.5.head changelog ready, but we seem to have diverged from Lucid's changelog, should I just add the changelog entry for Lucid (3.0.4+nobinonly-0ubuntu4) or merge the changes in from .lucid? | 16:00 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - do we need to merge any changes from .lucid at all? | 16:08 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I think all the changes are in there, just not the proper closed changelog | 16:09 |
| chrisccoulson | that's ok. we branched lucid before the last release, so it doesn't matter if they diverge really | 16:10 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: ok, is there any harm in cleaning up the changelog, the version that's currently in Maverick isn't in there :) | 16:11 |
| chrisccoulson | you mean the version in maverick isn't in the changelog for .head? | 16:12 |
| micahg | right :)( | 16:12 |
| micahg | because it was just copied from Lucid, not uploaded | 16:12 |
| chrisccoulson | i think that's ok really, as we haven't done a maverick version yet (it's only the version copied from lucid) | 16:12 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah ;) | 16:12 |
| micahg | so, can I just add a changelog cleanup entry to .head then and not worry about a tag? | 16:13 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: ^^ | 16:14 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: also, do you have time to push FF3.6.4+build5? | 16:15 |
| chrisccoulson | i'm not sure we need to do anything with the changelog other than add the new changes to the currently open changelog entry and change the version from 3.0.5~hg20100414r4813+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 to 3.0.5+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 | 16:16 |
| chrisccoulson | then tag and i can upload that to maverick | 16:16 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, i will do +build5 for FF in a bit | 16:16 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I have 2 bugs that will be closed by upstream fixes | 16:18 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: well currently the top changelog has some of the changes that are already in Maverick, that's why I wanted to clean it up | 16:19 |
| chrisccoulson | ah, ok. i don't mind either way really. if it's easy to clean up, then feel free | 16:21 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k, you should have it in about 2 hrs | 16:29 |
| jcastro | chrisccoulson: you'll have a developer badge on the forum soon so people can identify you for your awesomeness | 16:40 |
| chrisccoulson | jcastro - thanks :) | 16:49 |
| === \vish is now known as vish | ||
| micahg | chrisccoulson: good news, miro will no longer be a xul rdepend starting with miro 3.0.2 :) | 17:17 |
| fta | debian 582029 | 17:20 |
| ubot4 | Debian bug 582029 in libecal1.2-7 "libecal1.2-7: include fix for e_source_get_uri() warning "called on source with no absolute URI!"" [Normal,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/582029 | 17:20 |
| fta | hm | 17:20 |
| fta | micahg, what will it use then? | 17:22 |
| micahg | fta: webkit :) | 17:22 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - that's good then | 17:22 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: yep :) | 17:23 |
| chrisccoulson | now, i just wish that everybody else would do the same ;) | 17:23 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: let's go file bugs upstream :) | 17:23 |
| micahg | j/k | 17:23 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - do you think there's anything else worth dropping from the archive this cycle? or do you think people will just get upset? | 17:23 |
| chrisccoulson | i'm trying to make blam work on hardy with xulrunner 1.9.2, it has the same issue that xiphos had though | 17:24 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: idk, I have to review the list, I'm still focusing on hardy right now :) | 17:24 |
| chrisccoulson | time to use my mono skillz | 17:24 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: ah, maybe you can fix gluezilla too when hardy's done :) | 17:25 |
| chrisccoulson | heh, i'm not that familar with C# yet. i just typed my first line of C# code ;) | 17:25 |
| chrisccoulson | hoping it will fix blam | 17:25 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I hope to get back to the backporting tonight | 17:25 |
| chrisccoulson | that's all i'm working on right now. epiphany, epiphany-extensions are done | 17:26 |
| chrisccoulson | (along with all the things that needs - webkit, libsoup and libproxy) | 17:26 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k, well I've got kazekhase mostly done | 17:26 |
| chrisccoulson | gecko-sharp2 is done | 17:26 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: have you uploaded to the transition PPA? | 17:26 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - isn't kazekhase using xulrunner 1.8? | 17:26 |
| chrisccoulson | is it really worth us porting those, seeing as that's been unmaintained for a long time now | 17:27 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: idr, but either way, needs to be ported | 17:27 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: no, most of the fixes were already made upstream for that | 17:27 |
| chrisccoulson | i'll get stuff in to the PPA later | 17:28 |
| * micahg was tempted to throw the 0.5.8 version in, but it seems to be going ok | 17:28 | |
| chrisccoulson | i've got xulrunner-1.9.2 in bzr for hardy and jaunty | 17:28 |
| chrisccoulson | is also got ff3.6.4 packaged and working too, using the firefox-3.0 source package name | 17:29 |
| chrisccoulson | i wasn't sure if that was the best thing to do | 17:29 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: can you update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxNewSupportModel/xulrunner-list with what you've done? we should focus on the apps at the bottom | 17:29 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, can do | 17:29 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: thanks, I just want to make sure we're not duplicating efforts | 17:29 |
| chrisccoulson | ok, the only thing i've done on the bottom is epiphany | 17:30 |
| chrisccoulson | which was a pain ;) | 17:30 |
| micahg | k, and you're working on blam | 17:30 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: the rest of the rdepends not on the bottom I don't think we have to worry about | 17:30 |
| chrisccoulson | i'm happy with that | 17:31 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: we're not dropping the xul-1.9 source AFAIK | 17:33 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson: you just wish everyone moved to webkit because you haven't seen the massive amounts of CVEs to be fixed in webkit yet :) | 18:56 |
| chrisccoulson | mdeslaur, that doesn't sound good :( | 19:00 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson: hehe :) | 19:00 |
| DASPRiD | by the way, can you still tell thunderbird 3 to just filter within the current view, instead of opening such a nasty search tab? | 19:06 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| micahg | is there any trick if xrandr is showing the wrong resolution for an external monitor aside from restarting x/reboot? | 19:57 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: micahg: hey ... how are things going? | 20:08 |
| asac | is 3.6 rooll out coming soon? :) | 20:08 |
| micahg | asac: I'm hoping by next week we can have everything staged, 3.6.4 release is scheduled for June 1 | 20:08 |
| asac | hmm | 20:10 |
| micahg | asac: chrisccoulson got epiphany done | 20:10 |
| chrisccoulson | finally ;) | 20:10 |
| asac | did you already start getting feedback on the ffox 3.6? | 20:10 |
| asac | imo that shouldnt wait for the rest of the staging | 20:10 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: rock on | 20:11 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: so what we need to do is to change soname for the libs we want to use new versions for | 20:11 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - i can push firefox and xulrunner for hardy and jaunty later, i got those done last week | 20:11 |
| micahg | asac: chrisccoulson: hmmm, good point, maybe we should focus on the FF rdepends before finishing the xul rdepends | 20:11 |
| asac | like libsoup ... we need to ship that in a package that isinstalled side by side with the hardy soup | 20:11 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - i already changed the soname for libsoup | 20:11 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: great | 20:11 |
| chrisccoulson | and it's parallel installable | 20:11 |
| asac | and yes ... focus on ffox ... its really important to not fall behind wrt open security issues | 20:12 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - i wasn't sure whether to do the same for webkit - there's currently only one thing in the archive using webkit in hardy | 20:12 |
| asac | i would get all ffox done first, then epiphany | 20:12 |
| asac | then the whole xulrunner stuff | 20:12 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: so, maybe let's get the extensions done for Firefox that are in hardy archive and get them staged in transition PPA | 20:12 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: i would do the same as you can then do the same for jaunty/karmic | 20:12 |
| asac | where the rdepends probably grew | 20:13 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, extensions are pretty important to get done, as the firefox update probably breaks most of those | 20:13 |
| asac | ack | 20:13 |
| chrisccoulson | i'm looking forward to getting this finished though and starting on maverick ;) | 20:14 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: right, so do you want to divide the list and tell me which ones to take? | 20:14 |
| mdeslaur | whoa...we don't want _two_ webkits in main in jaunty and karmic... | 20:14 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: epiphany I thought was in univers | 20:14 |
| chrisccoulson | it's in main in hardy | 20:14 |
| micahg | ugh, main in Jaunty, universe for karmic | 20:14 |
| asac | mdeslaur: you rather want an insecure epiphany? | 20:14 |
| chrisccoulson | well, epiphany needs the newer webkit anyway | 20:15 |
| asac | mdeslaur: also the webkit will have no rdepends besides epiphany so it doesnt require backports/patches | 20:15 |
| micahg | karmic is already webkit anyways | 20:15 |
| asac | mdeslaur: you can also allow new libwebkit in everywhere and eat the regressions ... its security team choice :) | 20:15 |
| mdeslaur | asac: so the new webkit is going to universe in jaunty and karmic, just for epiphany? | 20:15 |
| asac | mdeslaur: it goes to main where epiphany is in main | 20:16 |
| asac | i think ephy is in main for hardy, jaunty | 20:16 |
| micahg | asac: yep | 20:16 |
| asac | mdeslaur: but more or less right. we can think about shipping it in-source | 20:17 |
| asac | not sure how much less effort that would mean though | 20:17 |
| mdeslaur | hmm... | 20:17 |
| micahg | asac: I would think in source backporting patches for webkit would be harder | 20:17 |
| mdeslaur | so, new webkit in main for hardy and jaunty, parallel to the existing webkit, and new webkit in universe for karmic? | 20:18 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: epiphany is already webkit based in karmic | 20:18 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: so we're just talking about hardy and jaunty? | 20:19 |
| asac | yeah i think its really just hardy+jauntt | 20:19 |
| asac | yep | 20:19 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: for epiphany yes | 20:19 |
| asac | unless ephy is still gecko in kiarmic | 20:19 |
| asac | which i think it isnt | 20:19 |
| micahg | asac: no, you took care of that ;) | 20:19 |
| chrisccoulson | so, you want me to change the soname of webkit too, and make those parallel installable? | 20:19 |
| asac | chrisccoulson: that was my idea ... ytes. | 20:20 |
| chrisccoulson | ok, i can do that | 20:20 |
| chrisccoulson | asac - i got the backport working without any changes to glib and gtk btw | 20:21 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: so, I can get the list of hardy extensions tonight, if there's not too many, maybe I should just update them and you can focus on porting if that's ok? | 20:21 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, that's ok with me | 20:21 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k, except for kazekhase as I have already done about half of it ;) | 20:22 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: anything else that I partially worked on will be in the transition PPA with a build failure | 20:22 |
| chrisccoulson | mdeslaur, do we require a USN for rolling out ff3.6.4 in hardy and jaunty? | 20:22 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson: will 3.6.4 fix security issues? | 20:23 |
| chrisccoulson | mdeslaur - i suspect so (seeing as 3.0 in hardy currently doesn't get security fixes by mozilla anymore). howver, upgrading also allows us to support it to fix security issues in the future | 20:25 |
| chrisccoulson | bbiab, food has arrived ;) | 20:25 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson: yes, we need a USN then | 20:25 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson: what version of webkit have you backported? | 20:25 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: asac: chrisccoulson: I would think there should be a USN explaining the move to FF36 and xul192 in hardy/jaunty | 20:25 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: I agree | 20:26 |
| fta | crimsun, desperate measures.. http://paste.ubuntu.com/440068/ | 22:04 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: so, I pushed up the TB.head changelog/tag, do you want me to do the .lucid one too | 22:05 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: could you also take a look at bug 584758, I thought I was clear, but the reporter doesn't seem to understand | 22:07 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 584758 in ubuntu (and 3 other projects) "Ubuntu web browsers do not properly identify host (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Wishlist,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/584758 | 22:07 |
| BUGabundo | fta: chromium codec no build for maverick? | 22:34 |
| fta | uh? | 22:35 |
| fta | https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa/+packages | 22:35 |
| fta | or maverick/universe? | 22:35 |
| fta | BUGabundo, ^^? | 22:35 |
| BUGabundo | https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/stable/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=lucid | 22:36 |
| BUGabundo | sorry, mav | 22:36 |
| BUGabundo | https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/stable/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=maverick | 22:36 |
| BUGabundo | stable | 22:36 |
| fta | oh | 22:36 |
| fta | i wonder what happens if i copy for the ppa to the same ppa just changing the dist... | 22:37 |
| fta | hm.. seems possible with the UI | 22:38 |
| micahg | fta: yep, as long as nothing needs to be compiled against the version specific libs | 22:38 |
| fta | it lets me choose between copy and rebuild.. i wonder what happens for each | 22:39 |
| fta | i mean, if i rebuild, it will have the same version so i'm puzzled | 22:39 |
| fta | if i copy, i don't understand either.. there's no need to copy, just to add an entry in the dist file | 22:40 |
| fta | micahg, ^^ | 22:40 |
| micahg | fta: well, rebuild I don't think will work, copy will work, but you should only use it if it doesn't need to be compiled against different system lib versions | 22:40 |
| fta | it doesn't | 22:40 |
| fta | trying.. | 22:41 |
| fta | something happened.. somehow | 22:42 |
| BUGabundo | the power o #LZMA | 23:16 |
| BUGabundo | 61M /tmp/valgrind22584.log | 23:16 |
| BUGabundo | 1.8M /tmp/valgrind22584.log.zip | 23:16 |
| BUGabundo | 368K /tmp/valgrind22584.log.tar.lzma | 23:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!