/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/05/27/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

ftai wonder if i should try to build chromium-os00:03
BUGabundoYYYYYYYYYYEEESSSSSSS00:04
BUGabundoI would run it00:04
BUGabundoI'm waiting for a build that works on my laptop, so I can have a dualboot00:05
ftathe thing is, i'm just curious about it, i'm quite sure i have no real use for it00:07
BUGabundountil unity grows, I do00:09
BUGabundospecially now with the app Market00:09
ftawell, the place i see it useful is on netbooks, but i mostly use mine offline00:11
BUGabundoI see it for really quick boot for web usage00:12
ftain the middle of nowhere, no wifi, and 3G is too expensive here00:12
BUGabundolike those moments you need to quick check email and maps or something00:12
BUGabundoI can tether from my android00:12
BUGabundousb and wifi00:12
ftai can't, with my old phone00:13
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_TBBT
BUGabundo_TBBTget a Nexus00:14
BUGabundo_TBBTyou won't regret it00:14
BUGabundo_TBBTbut then, we may loose your focus here00:14
ftayep, i'd like a nexus or its htc equivalent but as i said, unlimited internet on the phone is a fraud here00:17
BUGabundo_TBBThere too00:19
BUGabundo_TBBT500-600 MBs for 15€00:19
ftajcastro, "a more responsible oil company that cares about the environment", is there such as thing?00:22
BUGabundo_TBBTahahah00:22
ftasold my car nearly 4y ago00:23
BUGabundo_TBBT"beyond pretolem " they say.... so they are just making it _go_ away00:23
micahgchrisccoulson: you're working Monday, right?01:04
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i won't be working on monday ;)01:05
micahgchrisccoulson: oh...holiday in UK also?01:05
chrisccoulsoni'll probably hang around occasionally, but i'll be away for most of the day01:05
chrisccoulsonyeah, we've got a holiday :)01:05
micahgchrisccoulson: k, maybe we should make sure to touch base on Friday to make sure everything we can get ready is ready for Tuesday01:06
micahgchrisccoulson: did you get my earlier pings?01:06
chrisccoulsonjust checking the scrollback01:06
chrisccoulsonyeah, feel free to do .lucid for thunderbird too01:07
micahgchrisccoulson: k, will push up tonight so you can push to security PPA first thing in the morning01:07
chrisccoulsonthanks01:11
=== nikolam_ is now known as nikolam
micahgDASPRiD: have you used the new Seamonkey?05:06
BUGabundo_remotehumm...the smell of metal breakdown!does tap water fix that? /o\08:53
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
ftaBUGabundo_remote, http://www.aboutcolonblank.com/2010/05/21/what-would-you-do-if-you-saw-a-google-street-view-car-coming/11:00
=== fta_ is now known as fta
a2wariki have ubuntu 8.04 desktop edition. earlier adobe flash plugin used to work well with mozilla firefox 3 beta 5. but now it doesn't seem to work. even though during installation of the latest flash i don't encounter any problem. will some one help?13:46
ddecatora2warik: doesn't work how?13:54
a2warikmozilla asks me again to install it whenever i  come across a video that requires flash13:57
a2warikas if i haven't installed it in the first place13:58
ddecatorwhat version of ubuntu, what version of firefox, how did you install firefox, how are you installing flash, and does flash show up in Tools > Add-ons > Plugins?13:58
ddecatoroh, 8.0413:58
ddecatorhaha, sorry13:58
ddecatorstill helpful to know the answers to the rest though :)13:58
a2warikmozilla that come with in the package 3rd 5th beta version. and installed it by clicking the adobe flash software14:00
ddecatorso you installed it using a PPA? and you're installing Flash from online and not from the package, yes?14:01
a2warikyes14:01
ddecatorwhat PPA are you using?14:02
a2warikintall-flash-player-10linux.deb14:03
a2wariksorry install14:04
a2warikopps14:04
ddecatori'm guessing that's from the adobe site?14:04
a2warikright14:04
ddecatorok, and what PPA for firefox?14:04
a2warikwhat is ppa.i thought its was inverse of some application. not a geek14:06
ddecatorPPA is a Personal Package Archive. i thought since you had a beta version you were using one, but just realized hardy has b5 by default14:07
ddecatordoes flash appear in Tools > Add-ons > Plugins?14:08
a2warik the package managers that ubuntu provides pops up when i double clip on the application14:08
a2warikNo14:08
ddecatortry installing flashplugin-nonfree14:09
a2warikbut when i install it doesn't creat any problen and the installation manager confirms that the package is installed by asking whether i want to reinstall it14:10
ddecatoror ubuntu-restricted-extras (but that comes with a bunch of extra stuff)14:10
a2warikis flashplugin-nonfree comes in the repository that synaptic package manager shows14:11
ddecatoryes, flashplugin-nonfree is in the default repo14:11
a2warikno. i installed, mozilla still asks me to install the missing plugin. and even in the addons flash doesn't show up14:19
ddecatorstrange..14:20
a2warikthanks anyway.14:20
ddecatoryou can manually install it if you have to14:21
ddecatornot the deb, but actually placing the .so in the proper folder14:21
a2warikhow. will you explain me in simple way.14:23
ddecatorwell first, are you using 32-bit or 64-bit ubuntu?14:25
a2warik32-bit14:25
ddecatorgood, that makes things easier14:25
a2warikthank god14:26
ddecatordownload the .tar.gz from the adobe site, then place the .so in ~/.mozilla/firefox/blah.default/plugins/14:27
ddecatordefinitely not the ideal way...but if nothing else is working14:27
ddecatoroh, you get the .so after extracting the tar.gz :)14:27
a2warikwhere are most of the installed softwares  kept in ubuntu. because this will give me (~/.) right14:30
a2wariktheir are many mozilla folder if i clicked seach in the nautilus window14:31
ddecatorjust use Ctrl+H to show hidden folders, then find .mozilla14:32
a2warikin /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins i have flashplugin-alternative.so14:41
ddecatorhuh...14:41
a2wariki have ubuntu 9.10 but i like 8.04. may be i need to install it just for flash14:43
ddecatorshouldn't need to14:43
ddecatoris there an .so in /var/lib/flashplugin-installer/ ?14:44
a2warikno. but their in the empty directory flashplugin-nonfree14:46
ddecatornot sure why it isn't working...sounds like a link isn't being made properly or something. you can copy the .so into that folder in your home directory though and it should work fine14:50
a2wariki tried to copy that flashplugin-alternative.so in this but the folder doesnt allow me to paste their14:51
a2warikthere14:51
ddecatorin .mozilla/blah?14:52
a2wariki had a this problem always with ubuntu not giving me the rights to open the system files. is their any way that i can get rid of the root  passward14:56
ddecatorthe only way to have complete access is to log in as root, which isn't recommended. you can use sudo to do this. either use the cp command with sudo, or you can launch sudo nautilus14:57
a2wariki tried  copying the flashplugin alternative .so file in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins and paste it in /var/lib/flashplugin-nonfree14:58
ddecatorah, just try to put it in the .mozilla folder14:59
a2wariki didn't find any ""  .mozilla "" folder i did clicked view to show me the hidden folders15:01
ddecatorin your home folder there is no .mozilla?15:01
a2warikohh, i was searhing in the file systems directory15:04
a2warikthre isn't any blah folder in mozilla. i have only two folders extensions and firefox and within firefox there is only "  mh2dc8i7  " folder15:12
ddecatorhaha, right, worry, i just said 'blah' meaning 'whatever is in there'15:13
ddecatorso ~/.mozilla/firefox/blah.default/plugins/15:14
ddecatorthe characters before .default varies for everyone, so whatever yours is15:14
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand
a2warikwithin Firefox folder there is .default folder. i pasted the .so file in it should now  the plugin work. or is there something else much more specific folder do i need to paste the .so file into15:20
a2warik i here have opened several windows to catch up with your instructions. how do you see throgh my eyes man. you must be smart with the computers15:23
ddecatorhaha, we work a lot with firefox. is it working now? the .so should be in the /plugins/ folder inside the .default folder15:26
a2warikhtere isn't anythere isn't any plugins folder in in only 6 foldersthey  are searchplugin, extensions, chrome, cache, offlinecache and bookmarks15:32
a2wariksorry. there isnt any plugins folder only the above mentioned six folders and several files15:33
ddecatoryou can create one then15:34
a2wariki did create that folder copied that .so file in it restarted the mozilla and it still asks me to search for a plugin15:37
gnomefreakflash?15:41
a2warikyou did helped me a lot man. Thanks.may be i need to work hard in learning computers on my end. there isnt problem with the computer or the instructions that you gave. the problem lies in me.15:41
ddecatorno problem. sorry you ran into issues, it should have just worked for you.15:42
ddecatorgnomefreak: yah15:42
gnomefreakddecator: give me 1 minute, i know a page that will help15:43
ddecatorgnomefreak: sounds good, thanks15:43
gnomefreakthere is no plugin dir. as i recall15:43
ddecatornot be default15:43
ddecatorby*15:46
gnomefreak:) found it just waiting for page to load. sorry i have alot of file changes im making so its a bit slow15:46
gnomefreakddecator: a2warik http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/flashplugin-nonfree/download15:47
gnomefreakyes i know its debian but it works15:47
gnomefreakassuming it is 64bit15:47
ddecator32-bit15:47
gnomefreak32 is in repos15:47
ddecatortried from the adobe site and flashplugin-nonfree already15:47
gnomefreakflashplugin-installer doesnt work?15:48
a2warikno15:48
gnomefreaka2warik: try debians package. http://packages.debian.org/sid/i386/flashplugin-nonfree/download15:49
ddecatorwait..15:49
gnomefreakfor some reason /default/plugins15:49
ddecatora2warik: you said you're on karmic now?15:50
a2warikwhats karmic15:51
gnomefreakwhat version of ubuntu are you using?15:51
a2warik8.04 desktop ed15:52
gnomefreakalso are you behind a proxy?15:52
gnomefreakhardy15:52
gnomefreaka2warik: can you please copy and post it to paste bin. go to firefox and type about:plugins in the address bar and post that to pastebin15:53
gnomefreakthere is a wiki on how to install it in konq. and chromium IIRC using the .so15:55
a2warikdo you mean in the seearch bar and what is pastebin15:56
ddecatorpaste.ubuntu.com15:56
gnomefreakddecator: a2warik try http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/255251/how_to_install_the_adobe_flash_plugin.html15:58
gnomefreakno need to paste it at this time15:58
gnomefreakjust follow instructions on the above link15:58
gnomefreakall you really need to do is use the installer script in the tarball/dir16:00
ddecatoralright, time for class16:00
ddecatorgood luck a2warik16:00
gnomefreakit finishes on http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/255251/how_to_install_the_adobe_flash_plugin_pg2.html?cat=1516:00
a2warikthank you ddeactor:-D16:00
gnomefreakddecator: have fun ;)16:00
ddecatorgnomefreak: oh i will...16:01
* gnomefreak just waiting for moving dir. than i have alot of work to do16:01
gnomefreakoh it is done :) a2warik ill wait and see if it worked for you16:01
a2warikpast few minutes went so fast for me evryhting started flashing in my head. i couldnt understand what you wanted me to paste in the pastebin.now i am reading  the article if i have any problems  i would let you know16:06
gnomefreaka2warik: no need to paste anything for me at this time. just try the artical for now.16:07
a2warikok thank you16:07
micahgflashplugin-nonfree should work thorough jaunty16:07
gnomefreaknp16:08
* gnomefreak thought same thing16:08
micahgif not, we should fix it16:08
micahga2warik: what version of firefox?16:08
gnomefreaki think i screwed up :( formating a USB stick and i chose compatible with all systems (fat32) not sure if that means ext* and fat*16:09
chrisccoulsonhey micahg16:10
a2warikversion 3.0 beta 516:10
micahghi chrisccoulson16:10
micahga2warik: try upgrading to 3.0.1916:10
gnomefreakbeta? didnt we p[ush the final16:10
micahggnomefreak: that's the version in a base hardy install16:10
gnomefreakand we have 3.5 in hardy IIRC16:10
micahggnomefreak: no16:10
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i started work on updating extensions today. i've done adblock, all-in-one-sidebar, firebug and greasemonkey so far16:10
micahggnomefreak: we will be pushing 3.616:10
chrisccoulsoni suppose i should make a wiki for this really16:11
micahgchrisccoulson: I thought you were going to do backporting and I was going to do extensions?16:11
gnomefreakyeah i am thring to figue out whta release we pushed 3.5 to (not default version)16:11
micahggnomefreak: jaunty16:11
chrisccoulsonmicahg - when i looked at the list of extensions, i thought it might be better to share it ;)16:11
gnomefreakmicahg: ah thanks16:11
chrisccoulsonthere's quite a lot16:11
micahgchrisccoulson: k, np, so, if you have a list, divide it and tell me what I need to do16:11
chrisccoulsonok, i'll do that in a bit16:12
micahgor if you need me to make the list, I didn't do it last night, since I thought it was all me16:12
micahgchrisccoulson: BTW, could you please push TB3.0.5build2 to the security PPA so we can get a little pre testing :)16:12
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i've got a list, compiled with the same method as the lucid list16:12
chrisccoulsonyep, i'll do that now16:13
micahgchrisccoulson: thanks, maverick and lucid are ready16:13
micahgchrisccoulson: I can't prepare the backports because I don't have the CVE info yet :)16:13
chrisccoulsonfor thunderbird?16:13
micahgchrisccoulson: yep16:13
chrisccoulsonah, of course, you need the CVE's to figure out which security patches to backport16:14
micahgand 3.7 daily keeps breaking :(16:14
* gnomefreak will be gone for most of today but if everything goes good i should be here tomorrow :)16:14
* gnomefreak reinstalling to fix thunderbird :/16:14
gnomefreakbut it will fix other issues i have16:15
micahggnomefreak: sorry, I'm just not sure what's causing your issues16:15
gnomefreakmicahg: me niether but i will find the issue and let you know16:15
micahgchrisccoulson: BTW, I'm going to try to make a minimal patch for the Seamonkey crash issue, if we can get it landed on 1.9.1 branch, we can include in 2.0.516:16
micahgbut we could really use a test case...16:16
* micahg will dig up some emails of people who asked about it and try to get one16:16
jdstrandchrisccoulson, micahg: hi!16:17
micahghi jdstrand16:17
chrisccoulsonhi jdstrand16:17
jdstrandchrisccoulson, micahg: I was curious about the status and rollout plans for ff 3.6.4 to hardy, et al16:17
micahgjdstrand: well, we're working on firefox rdepends (extensions) right now, trying for as close to the June 1 release as possible16:18
chrisccoulsonjdstrand - i've got ff3.6.4 and xul1.9.2 packaged and working on hardy and jaunty (i just need to push that to PPA later)16:18
chrisccoulsonand yeah, we hope to have all the extensions done pretty quickly, as they're the only thing that blocks the roll-out really16:19
jdstrandso the goal is to release 3.6.4 with all fixed rdepends on Tuesday16:19
jdstrand?16:19
* gnomefreak 90% sure this is java related (nonfree or free) i am fairly sure it started after i made changes to java in update-alternatives but since i have grub and other issues i am going to reinstall.16:20
chrisccoulsonyeah, hopefully we can do that. most of the extensions updates are trivial, but it's just that there's a lot to do16:20
gnomefreak^^ the blinking crap16:20
micahgchrisccoulson: BTW, I'll be working Sun and Mon on this to try to finish up anything left16:21
chrisccoulsonmicahg - excellent :)16:21
jdstrandchrisccoulson: ok. I'm not pushing for Tuesday-- to me the most important thing with this update is testing16:21
chrisccoulsonjdstrand - yeah, that's the bit which worries me ;)16:21
* gnomefreak hates to ask but we should have a separate PPA for stable thunderbird16:21
jdstrandwhich is in conflict with the us holiday on monday16:21
chrisccoulsonit's easy to find testers for the latest releases, but i don't know how we do that for hardy16:22
jdstrandyes, that is always tricky16:22
jdstrandit falls on us then16:22
jdstrandI plan to help test once packages are available16:22
chrisccoulsonjdstrand - so, ff3.6.x, xul1.9.2 and the extensions will all need to go through *-security (i think we agreed that at UDS), but i'm not sure whether we want to handle the other updates separately16:23
chrisccoulsoneg,16:23
micahggnomefreak: I did that :)16:23
jdstrandI think we should be plan to have good packages ready on tuesday, with the understanding that our testing may not be complete until the end of the week16:23
chrisccoulsonwith the epiphany webkit backport, the xulrunner update doesn't break the existing epiphany version, but we're still porting it to webkit16:24
micahgjdstrand: sounds good, I remember you saying if we get it up within a week that we're ok16:24
chrisccoulsoni'm still not clear how we handle those updates16:24
jdstrandchrisccoulson: yes, ff36 and xul19 need to go through security, but so does everything else, since people running with only -security could get hit by bugs16:24
gnomefreakmicahg: where is the PPA (mozilla team PPA)?16:24
chrisccoulsonjdstrand - so, that also applies to things like epiphany and the other xulrunner rdepends?16:24
micahggnomefreak: yes, I pushed to hardy, jaunty, karmic16:25
jdstrandchrisccoulson: yes. there is a USN precedent for that... let me find it16:25
chrisccoulsonthanks16:25
gnomefreakmicahg: ok cool thanks16:26
mdeslaurchrisccoulson: quick question: what version of webkit did you backport?16:26
chrisccoulsonmdeslaur, the one from karmic16:26
gnomefreakwha tis wrong with the webkit PPA?16:27
chrisccoulson(i can't remember the version off the top of my head)16:27
gnomefreaks/wha t/what is16:27
micahggnomefreak: epiphany's xul version is EOL, so instead of porting it fwd to xul 192, we backported epiphany webkit 2.28 from karmic16:27
gnomefreakoh ok16:28
* micahg thinks this will be the record for most SRUs in one shot16:28
micahgchrisccoulson: BTW, I've been pushing with pre-release versions to the transition PPA (~ffox36~ppa1) vs 0.10.04.1 since I didn't do any testing yet, do you want me to change that?16:30
mdeslaurchrisccoulson: ok, I was asking as I will probably need to backport webkit 1.2 to previous releases, so at least the karmic version should have the same API/ABI16:34
mdeslaurchrisccoulson: except for dependency hell, but that's another problem :)16:34
nxvlchrisccoulson: did you have a list off all the rdepdens and the packages that are going to be updated?16:34
chrisccoulsonsorry, just on a call right now16:35
nxvlsure, i can wait16:36
nxvl:D16:36
gnomefreakdoes the live ISO offer a text based install?16:44
micahggnomefreak: I think so, select alternate installer16:46
* micahg hasn't tried it though16:46
nxvlthe alternate one does16:46
gnomefreakmicahg: ok thanks.16:47
nxvlnot sure about the normal live CD16:47
nxvlthe alternate installer has the debian installer basically16:47
gnomefreaknxvl: yeah but i dont have enough time to grab it and burn it. at the rate im going i will be done with everything ~5pm and its ~11:45 now16:47
nxvljust a bunch of debconf questions16:48
nxvloh, then i think you need to use the graphical one16:48
nxvlbut i'm not 100% sure tough16:48
gnomefreaknxvl: yeah i have the final 10.04 disk but im not sure if my system will handle the GUI16:49
nxvlmaybe somewhere in the options you have text based16:49
gnomefreaki have a feeling the server installer installs extra server apps16:49
nxvlnope it doesn't16:50
gnomefreakhmmm16:50
nxvlit's just a base system, BUT it does install the server kernel16:50
* gnomefreak can live with that 16:51
gnomefreaknxvl: thanks16:51
gnomefreakjust 5 more gigs than i can install16:51
chrisccoulsonnxvl - for the xulrunner rdepends, the priority packages are in the table at the bottom of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxNewSupportModel/xulrunner-list16:55
chrisccoulsonfor the extensions, i haven't created a wiki page just yet, but the list looks something like http://paste.ubuntu.com/440456/16:56
chrisccoulsonalthough, the ones that are thunderbird specific won't be updated16:56
micahgchrisccoulson: did you do 3.5.10 yet?16:56
chrisccoulsonmicahg - not yet, just doing 3.6.4+build6 ;)16:56
micahgbuild 6?16:57
chrisccoulsonyeah, there's another one now ;)16:57
nxvlchrisccoulson: ok, because i will need to do the work for oems, si basically take all you work and re-do it in oem images16:57
micahgI see :)16:57
chrisccoulsonnxvl - heh, you don't know what you're letting yourself in for ;)16:58
chrisccoulsonj/k16:58
nxvlchrisccoulson: actually i do, i don't want to, but i know16:58
nxvl:P16:58
nxvli just need to sync/merge your work, so is not that hard16:58
nxvlbut i need to know what exactly you did to be able to reproduce it in the oem archives16:58
mdeslaurnxvl: the oems shipped epiphany?16:59
nxvlmdeslaur: define shipped16:59
nxvlmdeslaur: if shipped as in is in the archive, then yes16:59
nxvlif shipped as in is installed in the system, no16:59
mdeslaurnxvl: oh, you security patch the whole archive?16:59
mdeslaurnxvl: or just "main"?16:59
mdeslauror just "shipped pre-loaded"16:59
nxvlmdeslaur: mmm, i sync all the archive17:00
nxvlmdeslaur: so yeah i update the whole archive17:00
mdeslaurI see17:00
chrisccoulsonmdeslaur / jdstrand - for the firefox update, i reused the current source package name in hardy and jaunty (firefox-3.0). does this make sense to you to do this (rather than introducing a whole new source package)?17:02
mdeslaurchrisccoulson: I don't personally have a preference, as long as the upgrade path still works17:03
chrisccoulsonmdeslaur, yeah, that's the bit that's going to need some good testing17:04
chrisccoulsonthat was the only real challenge in updating the package really17:04
chrisccoulsonwe need new langpacks too17:07
mdeslauroh, hrm17:08
micahgchrisccoulson: arnegoetje said he'd work on those17:08
chrisccoulsonmdeslaur - ArneGoetje is already aware of that though17:08
chrisccoulsonyeah, i just pinged him now17:09
mdeslauroh, good17:09
mdeslaurI just wonder if we need to push langpacks through -security...17:09
chrisccoulsonmdeslaur, good point. we probably do, as the current langpacks don't work at all in ff3.617:10
mdeslaurchrisccoulson: what happens when you open ff3.6 with an old langpack?17:10
mdeslaurchrisccoulson: fire? :)17:10
chrisccoulsonmdeslaur, no, just english ;)17:11
chrisccoulsonbut that's probably just as bad as fire for some people17:11
mdeslaurah, yes :)17:11
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i trust that you built and tested thunderbird before i upload ;)17:12
micahgchrisccoulson: built yes :)17:12
micahgwill test in PPA17:12
chrisccoulsonthanks17:12
nxvlchrisccoulson: btw, did you have a work plan or a document on how to proceed?17:22
chrisccoulsonnxvl - not yet, i store too much information in my head atm ;)17:23
chrisccoulsonmicahg - you need to set the distroseries to lucid-security for the tb update ;)17:24
micahgchrisccoulson: oops :-/17:24
nxvlchrisccoulson: can you write at least a draft on what needs to be done17:24
chrisccoulsonheh, no worries, i can do that17:24
nxvl?17:24
micahgchrisccoulson: it's been a little while17:24
chrisccoulsonnxvl - i can, but not today17:24
nxvlchrisccoulson: sure, not in a rush17:25
ftawho's fluent in python here?17:39
ftawhat's the best way to cache a huge dict on disk? such as compute it once, store it and reuse it for the next iterations.17:40
kylehufffta: which dialect? good code or fast code?17:40
nxvlfta: pickle17:41
nxvlfta: http://docs.python.org/library/pickle.html17:41
ftait's just to speed up the development of the rest of the code. i'm done with the data collection part17:41
ftareading..17:41
nxvlfta: it's basically a python-data database17:42
ftagood enough, thanks17:42
nxvlfta: you store varibales and what you want on it, and then call it and get into the app17:42
nxvlthat's what is used for the USN database17:42
ftai come from Perl, and Data::Dumper is often the answer17:42
nxvlit's about the same17:44
nxvlsame idea basically17:44
nxvlget the state of the varibales, store it into disk, call them later in other scripts17:44
chrisccoulsonmicahg - did you need to make the DMB owner of ubuntu-mozilla-uploaders, or is that something they take care of? (i didn't follow the whole meeting)18:01
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i'd already done ff3.5.10 for karmic btw18:05
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
ftanxvl, for some reason, pickle is not able to read its own dumps18:19
nxvlfta: you might be doing something wrong18:19
nxvlfta: i remember i had that problem18:20
nxvlfta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/440481/18:22
ftanxvl, mine looks something like this http://paste.ubuntu.com/440482/18:23
ftaremember i'm a py noob18:23
nxvlthe problem is in the open18:23
nxvltry using open(os.path.dirname(sys.argv[0])+"/data.dump")18:24
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
ftanxvl, whatever i try, it fails with http://paste.ubuntu.com/440486/18:30
nxvlohh, i think i pointed you to thw wrong library18:30
nxvlone sec18:30
nxvlhttp://docs.python.org/release/2.5/lib/module-cPickle.html18:31
nxvlit's basically the same, just different library18:31
nxvljdstrand: where does usn_lib lives? i can't find it18:32
jdstrandnxvl: usn_lib?18:34
nxvljdstrand: i've a usn_lib written by you and kees18:35
jdstrandoh in uct18:35
jdstrandin scripts/usn_lib.py18:35
nxvlfta: there you have, branch lp:ubuntu-cve-tracker and in that file you can see how cPickle works18:42
chrisccoulsongrrrr, i can't get on to addons.mozilla.org19:05
chrisccoulsonnot what i need right now19:05
ftanxvl, same problem, but the error gives me a hint... TypeError: ('__init__() takes exactly 2 arguments (1 given)', <class 'wadllib.iso_strptime.TimeZone'>, ())19:16
ftanxvl, fixed it. in my object, i have some dates, a few of those were stored as code instead of string19:25
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
nxvlfta: :D19:50
asacho21:00
BUGabundooh21:00
asac;)21:00
BUGabundo(:21:00
asacchrisccoulson: all fine?21:01
micahgasac: how's so. california?21:02
asacgood ... tough i have to work today and tomorrow :/21:03
asacso not much time to go to SF et al21:03
asacs/tough/though/21:03
ftais anyone good in css?21:10
ftaI need help to style this: http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/21:10
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_fewd
ftamicahg, btw, the "copy" feature of LP breaks the API, ^^21:11
micahgfta: what do you mean?21:13
ftathe LP API doesn't report copied packages21:13
micahgfta: ah, I'd say you should file a bug :)21:13
micahgfta: probably against soyuz21:14
chrisccoulsonhey asac - i'm all good thanks. how are you?21:16
asacchrisccoulson: jet lagged ;)21:17
asacsitting in a hotel room trying to work ;)21:17
chrisccoulsonasac - where are you now?21:18
chrisccoulsonyou're not in the bar? ;)21:18
asachehe21:18
asacits 1300 now here in CA21:18
asacdont want to start drińking that early ;)21:19
chrisccoulsonyeah, 1300 is a little early for drinking ;)21:19
chrisccoulsonmdeslaur - we're probably going to get updated langpacks for hardy and jaunty tomorrow :)21:21
mdeslaurchrisccoulson: cool21:22
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i've not created a wiki page for tracking extensions yet, but i just dumped my list in to a gobby document (mozillateam-hardy-extensions). i've trimmed out the thunderbird-specific ones, and also the ones i could find which aren't currently installable anyway (we don't need to worry about those)21:41
micahgchrisccoulson: k21:41
chrisccoulsoni've marked the ones i've already updated, so feel free to take whichever ones you want21:41
chrisccoulsonwhen you take off the currently broken ones and thunderbird specific extensions, then the list really isn't that bad21:42
micahgchrisccoulson: that list isn't too bad21:42
=== BUGabundo_fewd is now known as BUGabundo
chrisccoulsoni don't know if i missed any though - i just searched for packages with an install.rdf21:42
micahgchrisccoulson: I think we eventually need ubufox to be release neutral, but that's a project for later21:43
micahgchrisccoulson: midbrowser is an app, not an extension21:43
chrisccoulsongood spot - feel free to remove ;)21:43
chrisccoulsoni just removed kompozer too, which appeared in the list21:43
micahgit's on the list at the bottom of the xul page21:43
micahgk, so I'll work on whatever is left this weekend21:44
chrisccoulsoni haven't done the list for jaunty yet ;)21:45
chrisccoulsoni'll do that in a bit though21:45
micahgchrisccoulson: well, let's try to finish hardy for Tuesday and while testing on hardy is taking place we can do Jaunty21:45
micahgbut I guess the list is good to have anyways :)21:46
chrisccoulsonmdeslaur, did you say you already had a USN for the hardy / jaunty updates? i'm going to start getting things in to the PPA in the next few minutes22:19
ftachrisccoulson, micahg: let me know if you have ideas to improve this: http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/ (just made it clickable)22:32
mdeslaurchrisccoulson: no, I didn't get one...please ask jdstrand or kees for one, I'll be on vacation for the next week22:47
jdstrandchrisccoulson: I didn't already give you one?22:48
jdstrandwell, I can't find it22:50
jdstrandchrisccoulson: 946-122:50
jdstrandchrisccoulson: use that for all the ff364 builds22:51
chrisccoulsonjdstrand - i have 930-1 for the ff364 update for lucid, but i wasn't sure whether we would have a separate one for the hardy + jaunty backports22:53
chrisccoulsonfta - that's pretty nice :)22:53
jdstrandchrisccoulson: ah, then use 930-1 for all of them22:53
chrisccoulsoncool, thanks22:53
* jdstrand gives back 946-1 to the usn tool22:54
ftachrisccoulson, it's too wide, but i can't think of anything to make it more compact23:01
ftabesides dropping jaunty :P23:01
asacfta: maybe announce the daily dashboard on -devel?23:48
ftaasac, irc?23:48
asacfta: you could make one table for  each release channel to avoid the wideness23:48
asacfta: no mailing list23:48
asacfta: also maybe a link directly to logs would be great for failed builds23:49
ftaasac, the reason i did it that way was because i wanted the package versions aligned23:49
asacfirefox-3.5 -> why is that still built for lucid?23:50
ftaasac, yep, i collect the log urls, but the tooltip is too simple (not clickable)23:50
asachmm23:50
asacfta: the versions are usually different for daily/beta/dev anyway ... arent they?23:50
ftalook at the date23:50
ftayes, version is different, but it helps to see that they are different when you know they shouldn't23:51
ftawell, at least, that's my view of it.. channels moving at different paces23:52
BUGabundoehe23:52
asacyeah. was just a suggestion. if you say its more useful for you that way, thats fine23:52
asacfirefox fails in hardy?23:52
asacah i remember23:53
asacqt23:53
asacmicahg: did we create a .hardy-karmic branch or something for ffox?23:53
ftathat's my 1st true python program :)23:53
asaclol23:53
asacfta: and do you start liking python?23:53
ftai finally made head or tail of the LP API23:54
micahgasac: no, I never made a branch23:54
ftanope, i prefer Perl or even javascript23:54
micahgasac: I just drop the KDE patches when I push to stable PPA23:54
asachmm23:55
asacthat feels bad ;)23:55
asacsomething better needs to be invented23:55
asaccheck with chrisccoulson ... maybe he has ideas23:55
BUGabundofta: JS ? ehe23:55
ftafor 15y, js was just onclick do something, recently, i've done big things with it, html5, canvas, ajax, I kind of like it now23:55
micahgasac: I know, it's been bothering me.  I was thinking of using fta's bot and making a branch, but never learned how to use it23:56
asachmmm23:56
asacnsFilePicker.cpp:603: error: 'gtk_widget_get_window' was not declared in this scope23:56
asacthat doesnt look qt related23:56
BUGabundoI don't code... but I would say Python is by far superior23:56
asachttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/49185714/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.firefox_3.6.5~hg20100526r34261%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~hardy_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz23:56
BUGabundobut hey, its my POV23:56
ftaBUGabundo, for webapps, python is useless23:56
chrisccoulsonthat patch needs fixing to not use the newer gtk functions ;)23:57
ftai find python slow23:57
asacchrisccoulson: ++23:57
asacchrisccoulson: can you help micahg to get the branch just build in hardy?23:57
micahgasac: http://pastebin.com/j625K7XD23:57
chrisccoulsonGTK_WIDGET(widget)->window ;)23:57
asacwould be great to make the patch so that the whole qt stuff23:57
asacis not used in karmic-hardy23:57
asacbut keeping the same build depends23:57
asacmicahg: right. for that part you could use what chrisccoulson posted23:58
asacbut at best there would be magic that would just skip the qt parts if the qt version is smaller than what is in lucid or something23:58
ftaI'm glad my page revived old ftbfs ;)23:58
micahgasac: I saw something that did patching dynamically, but I don't remember now, I'll look for it after this porting stuff is done23:59
asacfta: ;)23:59
asacmicahg: yeah. i think patchin dynamically is not really what we want. we rather want the pach just not use the qt bits if the qt version is lower than what is in lucid23:59
asacin that way all should just work23:59
chrisccoulsonasac - yeah, i can do that. i've already got a fix for the patch here, but it would be nice to have it only apply in lucid builds23:59
chrisccoulsoni just dropped the patch entirely for the official hardy and lucid updates23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!