[08:26] good morning [09:29] hey [10:04] nigelb, hello [10:04] nigelb, is there an url or webpage listing all patches than need review? [10:26] nigelb: proposed a merge for your tool [11:51] seb128: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs , is a list of sort [11:53] vish, it lists bugs which have been reviewed already though and are tagged waiting on upstream or such [11:53] not very efficient to have a list of things still waiting ;-) [11:53] seb128: yeah , it is still a bit confusing workflow :) [11:53] vish, hey btw, how are you? [11:54] seb128: good , and you? [11:54] I'm good thanks [15:18] nigelb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/440420/ [16:06] seb128: poke [16:08] vish: that's not the place to look for bugs to review [16:09] seb128: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow [16:09] that query is for new bugs with patches. I'm still working on getting a list of old bugs, not very sucessful though [16:09] dholbach: taking a look now :) [16:10] james_w: thanks :) [16:12] dholbach: can you modify the description of https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers to say "To help review patches, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow" ? [16:13] nigelb: done [16:13] dholbach: whoa, you're fast :) [16:15] vish: and um, how is the workflow confusing? I corrected the wiki long back. [16:17] nigelb, hello [16:18] nigelb, I've been reading this wikipage [16:18] nigelb, the quey lists some 250 patches though [16:18] I though there were 2000 to review [16:19] seb128: there are 2 lists now, the list of new patches to review and the whole list including the backlog [16:19] that list isn't complete, I'm having some problem in the script, should be ready by monday [16:19] ok thanks [16:19] I do have a whole lot clarification to do. Just I got a little busy with real life :) [16:54] persia: around [16:54] I'll be running that script again today to see how it goes :) [17:16] nigelb: well , the list of subscribed bugs always increases since we dont subscribe the bugs even after the task is completed , i dont see why we do that [17:16] dont unsubscribe* [17:17] vish: Why should we. I'd like to know how many bugs were processed through us [17:17] once you review something it wont come into reivew queue anyway [17:17] seemed there was a discussion on that and not sure what the reason was [17:17] There was a *big* discussion. It was actually like meh either ways. [17:18] For statistical reasons, I prefered not unsubscribing. [17:19] review queue is different from sponsors or other work lists, they have only 2 status "to be done" and "done" while we have a bunch of buckets [17:22] nigelb: hmm , stats for ? [17:23] vish: stats for what we've done, so far, etc. [17:23] * nigelb doesn't remember everything. [17:23] * vish adds more GB to nigelb's brain ;p [17:24] try playing with php,apache,solr,drupal for 9 hours - its fun [17:24] I totally can't think of code [17:27] nigelb: we could add the query link for new patches : http://tinyurl.com/3a7lqqr to the topic ? [17:27] * vish adds.. [17:28] * nigelb cheers === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-reviews to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Reviews IRC Channel : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam || Patches yet to be reviewed : http://tinyurl.com/3a7lqqr || All Bugs: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.has_patch=on || http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/patches/ === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-reviews to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Reviews IRC Channel : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam || Patches yet to be reviewed : http://tinyurl.com/3a7lqqr || All Bugs with patches: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.has_patch=on || http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/patches/