[08:26] <dholbach> good morning
[09:29] <seb128> hey
[10:04] <seb128> nigelb, hello
[10:04] <seb128> nigelb, is there an url or webpage listing all patches than need review?
[10:26] <dholbach> nigelb: proposed a merge for your tool
[11:51] <vish> seb128: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers/+subscribedbugs , is a list of sort
[11:53] <seb128> vish, it lists bugs which have been reviewed already though and are tagged waiting on upstream or such
[11:53] <seb128> not very efficient to have a list of things still waiting ;-)
[11:53] <vish> seb128: yeah , it is still a bit confusing workflow :)
[11:53] <seb128> vish, hey btw, how are you?
[11:54] <vish> seb128: good , and you?
[11:54] <seb128> I'm good thanks
[15:18] <james_w> nigelb: http://paste.ubuntu.com/440420/
[16:06] <nigelb> seb128: poke
[16:08] <nigelb> vish: that's not the place to look for bugs to review
[16:09] <nigelb> seb128: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow
[16:09] <nigelb> that query is for new bugs with patches.  I'm still working on getting a list of old bugs, not very sucessful though
[16:09] <nigelb> dholbach: taking a look now :)
[16:10] <nigelb> james_w: thanks :)
[16:12] <nigelb> dholbach: can you modify the description of https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-reviewers to say "To help review patches, please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ReviewGuide#Workflow" ?
[16:13] <dholbach> nigelb: done
[16:13] <nigelb> dholbach: whoa, you're fast :)
[16:15] <nigelb> vish: and um, how is the workflow confusing?  I corrected the wiki long back.
[16:17] <seb128> nigelb, hello
[16:18] <seb128> nigelb, I've been reading this wikipage
[16:18] <seb128> nigelb, the quey lists some 250 patches though
[16:18] <seb128> I though there were 2000 to review
[16:19] <nigelb> seb128: there are 2 lists now, the list of new patches to review and the whole list including the backlog
[16:19] <nigelb> that list isn't complete, I'm having some problem in the script, should be ready by monday
[16:19] <seb128> ok thanks
[16:19] <nigelb> I do have a whole lot clarification to do.  Just I got a little busy with real life :)
[16:54] <nigelb> persia: around
[16:54] <nigelb> I'll be running that script again today to see how it goes :)
[17:16] <vish> nigelb: well , the list of subscribed bugs always increases since we dont subscribe the bugs even after the task is completed , i dont see why we do that
[17:16] <vish> dont unsubscribe*
[17:17] <nigelb> vish: Why should we.  I'd like to know how many bugs were processed through us
[17:17] <nigelb> once you review something it wont come into reivew queue anyway
[17:17] <vish> seemed there was a discussion on that and not sure what the reason was
[17:17] <nigelb> There was a *big* discussion.  It was actually like meh either ways.
[17:18] <nigelb> For statistical reasons, I prefered not unsubscribing.
[17:19] <nigelb> review queue is different from sponsors or other work lists, they have only 2 status "to be done" and "done" while we have a bunch of buckets
[17:22] <vish> nigelb:  hmm , stats for ?
[17:23] <nigelb> vish: stats for what we've done, so far, etc.
[17:23]  * nigelb doesn't remember everything.
[17:23]  * vish  adds more GB to nigelb's brain ;p
[17:24] <nigelb> try playing with php,apache,solr,drupal for 9 hours - its fun
[17:24] <nigelb> I totally can't think of code
[17:27] <vish> nigelb: we could add the query link for new patches :  http://tinyurl.com/3a7lqqr  to the topic ?
[17:27]  * vish adds..
[17:28]  * nigelb cheers