| * nigelb hugs persia | 02:42 | |
| nigelb | Finally, the script worked! | 02:42 |
|---|---|---|
| nigelb | persia: I have some good news :) | 03:14 |
| nigelb | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-reviewers&field.tag=-patch-needswork+-patch-forwarded-upstream+-patch-forwarded-debian+-patch-accepted-upstream+-patch-accepted-debian+-patch-rejected-upstream+-patch-rejected-debian+-patch-rejected&field.tags_combinator=ALL&start=0 | 03:14 |
| nigelb | only 1433 bugs with patches :) | 03:14 |
| nigelb | well, counting only those that fall in our subset :) | 03:14 |
| nigelb | I'll get to work on things when I get back from work :) | 03:26 |
| nigelb | So, I need to document workflow, add graphics, and re-write the docs :) | 03:26 |
| nigelb | hyperair: I got the sid pbuilder failure again | 03:39 |
| nigelb | can take a look at the logs and point out whats wrong? | 03:39 |
| nigelb | I: Configuring e2fsprogs... | 03:40 |
| nigelb | W: Failure while configuring required packages. | 03:40 |
| nigelb | hyperair: ^ | 03:40 |
| hyperair | O_o | 03:40 |
| hyperair | that's all there is to it? | 03:40 |
| nigelb | yep | 03:41 |
| nigelb | no i mean thats the last 2 lines | 03:41 |
| nigelb | you want the whole thing? | 03:41 |
| hyperair | =\ weird thing | 03:41 |
| nigelb | that is the error about apt, but I have the fix for that in .pbuilderrc | 03:41 |
| nigelb | so, Im not sure whta I'm doing wrong | 03:42 |
| hyperair | O_o the fix for that in .pbuilderrc? | 03:43 |
| hyperair | what fix is this? | 03:43 |
| nigelb | um, apt isn't a required package, so generally DEBOOTSTRAPOPTS=("--include=apt" "${DEBOOTSTRAPOPTS[@]}") works | 03:43 |
| nigelb | thats the usual error I used to see in karmic when making sid pbuilder | 03:44 |
| hyperair | nigelb: that's just the apt issue. i thought you had an issue with e2fsprogs | 04:13 |
| nigelb | hyperair: oh, grr. | 04:13 |
| nigelb | how do I fix it? | 04:13 |
| nigelb | hyperair: my pbuilderrc file http://paste.ubuntu.com/440668/ | 04:14 |
| hyperair | nigelb: i dunno. | 04:15 |
| hyperair | nigelb: can i see the full log? | 04:15 |
| nigelb | hyperair: sure, one moment | 04:15 |
| nigelb | http://paste.ubuntu.com/440670/ | 04:16 |
| hyperair | weird. i've never seen that before | 04:16 |
| nigelb | hmmm | 04:17 |
| nigelb | later, work. I'm late. | 04:17 |
| dholbach | good morning | 07:38 |
| === bdrung__ is now known as bdrung | ||
| seb128 | nigelb, dholbach: hey | 15:07 |
| seb128 | could we get patch-needsdesign as an option? | 15:07 |
| seb128 | seems to be required for some changes blocked on a design decision | 15:08 |
| dholbach | I'll let bdmurray and nigelb handle that :) | 15:09 |
| seb128 | also would be nice to have a tools or an easy description about how to open a bug in debian | 15:09 |
| seb128 | like give it a bug number in launchpad and get it to open an email with tags etc | 15:09 |
| seb128 | similar to submittodebian | 15:09 |
| seb128 | to forward changes to the bts | 15:10 |
| * vish thinks it is a nice addition , there are some bugs patches which are requests to change design | 15:10 | |
| nigelb | seb128: no problem. Can you give me the exact situation when it has to be used? I'll update documentation and poke brian about the change | 16:16 |
| seb128 | bug #562729 | 16:18 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 562729 in gdebi (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "gdebi: could not show link: operation not supported (affects: 2) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/562729 | 16:18 |
| seb128 | nigelb, ^ | 16:18 |
| seb128 | ups | 16:18 |
| seb128 | #433838 | 16:19 |
| nigelb | seb128: no no, I mean what should I change in the doc :) | 16:19 |
| seb128 | rather | 16:19 |
| seb128 | nigelb, well those have been reviewed from a packager perspective now | 16:19 |
| seb128 | so they should not be in the review list | 16:19 |
| seb128 | but they are blocked on design input | 16:20 |
| seb128 | so they are neither needswork | 16:20 |
| seb128 | not reviewed | 16:20 |
| seb128 | nor | 16:20 |
| nigelb | hm, I agree, but in that case we can add all the things blocked by something else into a new category | 16:20 |
| seb128 | ok, patch-needsreview | 16:21 |
| seb128 | or needs<something> | 16:21 |
| seb128 | I'm not sure what would be best wording | 16:22 |
| nigelb | patch-blocked? | 16:22 |
| nigelb | that sounds improper | 16:22 |
| seb128 | we just need a way to opt things out of the queue | 16:22 |
| seb128 | needsdecision | 16:22 |
| nigelb | yep, I hear you, I just want to think of something that could do that proprly | 16:22 |
| nigelb | \o/ | 16:22 |
| seb128 | or input | 16:22 |
| nigelb | patch-needsdecision it is :) | 16:22 |
| seb128 | or whatever | 16:22 |
| seb128 | you should maybe check with a native speaker ;-) | 16:23 |
| seb128 | I like needsinput as well I think | 16:23 |
| seb128 | but I'm not english speaker ;-) | 16:23 |
| nigelb | needsinput or needsdecision - whatever is fine. | 16:23 |
| nigelb | I'll talk to brian and get the script updated along with the documentation | 16:23 |
| nigelb | seb128: Also, thanks for the suggesion :) | 16:24 |
| seb128 | np | 16:24 |
| seb128 | thank you for working on this | 16:24 |
| nigelb | happy to be :) | 16:24 |
| seb128 | what about the "make easier to open a debian bug"? | 16:24 |
| seb128 | do you think we could have a script | 16:24 |
| seb128 | or email template? | 16:24 |
| nigelb | my coding skills are very poor, I know the right person to ping - bryce :D | 16:24 |
| nigelb | he probably already has a working beta of something similar ;) | 16:25 |
| nigelb | seb128: things seem to go faster than I thought. I may have something for the debian bug in a few hours. turns out its very easy :) | 16:36 |
| seb128 | nice | 16:38 |
| vish | nigelb: needsinput or needsdecision , miss the "design" mention there , which is the actual blocker | 16:49 |
| nigelb | vish: I want a catch-all-tag for all issues blocked by something else | 16:51 |
| nigelb | We really don't wanna have 25 tags do we? ;) | 16:51 |
| vish | nigelb: the problem there would be getting back to such design bugs , how does a UX advocate get to the bugs? | 16:52 |
| vish | nigelb: the design bugs are a category of its own | 16:52 |
| nigelb | vish: you can have an ayatana tag saying design and then check for design+needsinput | 16:52 |
| vish | nigelb: you are then having an extra tag there too ;) | 16:54 |
| nigelb | vish: that isn't a reviewers tag | 16:54 |
| nigelb | I wanted to keep the review tags down | 16:54 |
| nigelb | because other stuff is also going to block | 16:54 |
| vish | nigelb: nah , i meant the reviewer has to add them anyway , and it needs to be mentioned in the wiki | 16:55 |
| vish | reviewers wiki | 16:55 |
| nigelb | vish: um why? | 16:55 |
| vish | nigelb: ex: bug #433838 , where the design input is waiting for the patch | 16:56 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 433838 in software-center (Ubuntu) "Use an icon in the location bar (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/433838 | 16:56 |
| nigelb | vish: its an ubuntu-specific application, which is a very speical case. | 16:56 |
| nigelb | Most of the time, revieweres is about pushing back upstream | 16:56 |
| * nigelb afk for some time. | 16:57 | |
| nigelb | keep talking I'll reply when back | 16:57 |
| vish | nigelb: but we *are* having ubuntu specific apps too and the team is being subscribed to those bugs | 16:57 |
| vish | nigelb: patch is there , but the reviewer needs to know the right tags to add | 16:57 |
| * vish *shrugs* | 17:57 | |
| * nigelb coding | 18:05 | |
| nigelb | Needs another few more minutes to fix this thing and push it | 18:05 |
| bencrisford | nigelb: so if the patch doesn't work properly I just click "Add Tag" and add patch-needswork ? | 18:37 |
| nigelb | bencrisford: add a comment telling what is not working. Also tell that if the issue is fixed to change the tag back to patch tag | 18:43 |
| bencrisford | nigelb: Ok, I already told them what is not working, I will add the tag + second comment now | 18:49 |
| bencrisford | thanks :) | 18:49 |
| nigelb | bencrisford: awesome!! thanks :) | 18:50 |
| bencrisford | nigelb: hmm, it seems there wasnt even a "patch" tag in the first place | 18:51 |
| nigelb | how did you end up in the bug? | 18:51 |
| nigelb | that bug is part of clean sweep project, hence no patch tag | 18:51 |
| bencrisford | nigelb: Its assigned to me, bug 536975 | 18:54 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 536975 in qcad (Ubuntu) "Qcad menu entry lacks a category in lucid 10.04 (affects: 8) (dups: 1) (heat: 52)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/536975 | 18:54 |
| nigelb | bencrisford: ah, then its ok | 18:54 |
| bencrisford | the reviewers team is subscribed, but no patch tag | 18:54 |
| nigelb | hover over team name | 18:56 |
| nigelb | it should be subscribed by me | 18:56 |
| nigelb | I subscribed us to over 1000 bugs, adding tag would have generated huge deal of mails | 18:57 |
| bencrisford | Yeah it is :) | 18:57 |
| bencrisford | oh ok | 18:57 |
| nigelb | Its for a wider plan to clear all bugs with patches by maverick release | 18:57 |
| bencrisford | nigelb: cool :) | 19:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!