/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/05/29/#ubuntu-motu.txt

=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away
lfaraoneCan I ACK syncs that are "edubuntu bugs" as a MOTU?04:46
ScottKIf they are in the edubuntu package set you probalby shouldn't.  I'm not sure if you can.04:50
lfaraoneScottK: they are.04:55
ScottKI'd leave them then.04:55
cody-somervilleugh04:55
=== nobawk|away is now known as nobawk
=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away
=== cam is now known as Guest71321
=== Guest71321 is now known as bitshifternz
=== nobawk|away is now known as nobawk
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna
=== aronxu is now known as happyaron
_AndrewAnyone know why this build failed.. https://launchpad.net/~andrewfenn/+archive/ogredev/+build/176265914:30
_AndrewI check the log and it says it built successfully14:31
nigelb_Andrew: doesn't look at failed to build.  It says failed to upload14:38
nigelbhttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/49299510/upload_1762659_log.txt14:38
nigelbI don't understand what it means though.  Perhaps poke somone on #launchpad14:39
_AndrewAh yes I see14:39
_AndrewAlso there's something weird going on with the AMD64 build.. dh_install isn't picking up files that are in my .install file and it's working on the i386 build..14:40
joaopinto_Andrew, perhaps you have an invalid value on debian/control Section:  field ?14:41
joaopinto"2010-05-29 07:35:43 WARNING mygui-tools_3.0.1-ogredev1_all.deb: Unknown section 'tools'"14:41
_Andrewyup14:41
nigelbanyone face issues with building sid pbuilder in lucid?15:18
_AndrewWell. I fixed that but now the amd64 build is failing when it shouldn't/..15:47
_Andrewhttps://launchpad.net/~andrewfenn/+archive/ogredev/+sourcepub/1154687/+listing-archive-extra15:47
_AndrewDoes amd64 find files in the .install file differently from i386 ?15:48
geser_Andrew: those files mentioned in the amd64 build log seem to be part of mygui-doc with is an arch:all package (ie not build on the amd64 buildd)16:45
_Andrewah...16:45
_AndrewI didn't know that16:45
_Andrewthanks!16:46
geser_Andrew: move the icon and the .desktop file to the package with the binary16:46
geserit doesn't make much sense to have them in the -doc package16:46
_AndrewIt's for opening the documentation16:47
geserah16:47
ScottK_Andrew: tools isn't a valid section is why that upload failed.16:49
_Andrewfixed that16:49
_AndrewJust stuck on the amd64 error16:50
geser_Andrew: and you might have a look at your -dbg package as it's empty (only the mandatory files) according to the i386 build log16:51
_Andrew thanks16:55
_AndrewI didn't notice that16:55
dupondjesomebody around that could sponsor https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/544910 ?17:00
ubottuUbuntu bug 544910 in aiccu (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to 10.04 beta1 blocked by aiccu" [Undecided,Confirmed]17:00
lfaraonedupondje: I'll take a look at it later today if you'd like.17:28
dupondjeok thx !17:29
dupondjeits a small fix17:29
dupondjefor an anoying issue :) that has been around since 8.04 it seems :s17:29
crimsundupondje: uploaded. Thank you for your contribution to Ubuntu.17:33
crimsundupondje: rather, the correct debconf one is uploaded now :-)17:38
txwikingerDoes someone he has experience troubleshooting and fixing bugs in regard of parallel make during packaging?18:08
dupondjethx !18:32
dupondje@ crimsun  :)18:32
dupondjedid forward it upstream also, lets hope they also pick it up :)18:32
=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away
lfaraonedupondje: feel free to request a SRU if you want the change to be fixed in hardy etc.20:11
dupondjeits only an issue when upgrading ...20:12
dupondjeit never gets updated in a stable release, so its not really needed ?20:12
lfaraonedupondje: well, you could make the argument that it needs an SRU to Lucid, among others, since we still support upgrades from hardy>lucid, jaunty>karmic, karmic>lucid.20:31
lfaraonedupondje: from what I can tell in the bug, as is those upgrades may fail if aiccu is installed, no?20:31
dupondjewell they get locked indeed, untill you manually kill aiccu ...20:33
dupondjeso yea maby its and improvement :)20:33
dupondjebtw, have no idea how to request an SRU neither :)20:35
ScottK!sru | dupondje20:48
ubottudupondje: Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates20:48
dupondjecrimsun: it went upstream :D21:11
dupondjewhy are some packages not synced from unstable btw ?21:30
geserdupondje: which ones? new ones (not currently in maverick)?21:32
aranddupondje: If they have changes in ubuntu they need merging.21:35
dupondjehttp://packages.qa.debian.org/libr/librapi2.html21:37
dupondjethis one21:37
geserthis one needs to be inspected by someone because of the Ubuntu changes and either merged or synced21:39
arand!mom | dupondje21:39
ubottudupondje: MoM is the Ubuntu Merge-O-Matic, a website helping the MOTUs keep Ubuntu in sync with Debian. See  https://merges.ubuntu.com/21:40
arand!merge | dupondje or rather21:41
ubottudupondje or rather: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging21:41
dupondjehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librapi2/+bug/317290 => isn't this quite invalid ? why should it depend on it ? :s21:47
ubottuUbuntu bug 317290 in librapi2 (Ubuntu) "librapi2-dev must depend on libsynce0-dev" [Undecided,Fix released]21:47
geserdupondje: a header from librapi2-dev #included a header from libsynce0-dev and without this dependency the other header file is not installed21:50
dupondjedid you check all the code now or ? ;)21:52
geserI checked the header files from the -dev package as only they are part of the public API21:52
geserdupondje: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/maverick/librapi2/maverick/annotate/head:/src/rapi.h line 2121:55
dupondjeseems like you already did the merge :)21:57
geserdupondje: you need to check if that's still the case in the version in unstable21:59
dupondje#include <synce.h>22:00
dupondjeyea22:00
dupondjethe following comment was already in the MoM: 'Merge done - Waiting on libsynce0-dev (>= 0.12)'22:02
dupondjewhat to do with that ?22:02
gesercheck if maverick has already this version of libsynce0-dev22:03
dupondjeit does22:03
dupondjethe merge is done, but no bugreport/debdiffs ?22:06
geserunfortunately it's impossible to tell who prepared the merge22:06
gesercould you also forward the Ubuntu delta to Debian so we could sync in future again?22:07
dupondjei'll do :) now its just creating a debdiff with the changes from debian right ?22:09
geseryes22:09
geseror a debdiff to apply on the Debian package to re-apply the Ubuntu changes22:10
geserthat way they are easier to review that no still needed Ubuntu changes got lost22:11
dupondjeits only the depends that need to be fixed22:11
dupondjeother change got into debian22:12
dupondjegeser: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librapi2/+bug/587346 => looks ok ?22:24
ubottuUbuntu bug 587346 in librapi2 (Ubuntu) "Please merge librapi2 0.15-1 (universe) from Debian unstable" [Undecided,In progress]22:24
geserdupondje: almost fine, you forgot to retain the old ubuntu changelog entry22:35
dupondjefixed ! ;)22:37
geserdupondje: looks fine now, ready to get added to the sponsoring queue22:41
dupondjeubuntu-universe-sponsors right ? :)22:42
geserubuntu-sponsors22:42
geserthere is now only one sponsoring team for main and universe22:42
dupondjeadded :)22:42
dupondjethx for assistance !22:43
dupondjemailed to upstream also23:28
=== MTecknology is now known as MTeck
=== Philip6 is now known as Philip5

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!