=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away | ||
lfaraone | Can I ACK syncs that are "edubuntu bugs" as a MOTU? | 04:46 |
---|---|---|
ScottK | If they are in the edubuntu package set you probalby shouldn't. I'm not sure if you can. | 04:50 |
lfaraone | ScottK: they are. | 04:55 |
ScottK | I'd leave them then. | 04:55 |
cody-somerville | ugh | 04:55 |
=== nobawk|away is now known as nobawk | ||
=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away | ||
=== cam is now known as Guest71321 | ||
=== Guest71321 is now known as bitshifternz | ||
=== nobawk|away is now known as nobawk | ||
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna | ||
=== aronxu is now known as happyaron | ||
_Andrew | Anyone know why this build failed.. https://launchpad.net/~andrewfenn/+archive/ogredev/+build/1762659 | 14:30 |
_Andrew | I check the log and it says it built successfully | 14:31 |
nigelb | _Andrew: doesn't look at failed to build. It says failed to upload | 14:38 |
nigelb | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49299510/upload_1762659_log.txt | 14:38 |
nigelb | I don't understand what it means though. Perhaps poke somone on #launchpad | 14:39 |
_Andrew | Ah yes I see | 14:39 |
_Andrew | Also there's something weird going on with the AMD64 build.. dh_install isn't picking up files that are in my .install file and it's working on the i386 build.. | 14:40 |
joaopinto | _Andrew, perhaps you have an invalid value on debian/control Section: field ? | 14:41 |
joaopinto | "2010-05-29 07:35:43 WARNING mygui-tools_3.0.1-ogredev1_all.deb: Unknown section 'tools'" | 14:41 |
_Andrew | yup | 14:41 |
nigelb | anyone face issues with building sid pbuilder in lucid? | 15:18 |
_Andrew | Well. I fixed that but now the amd64 build is failing when it shouldn't/.. | 15:47 |
_Andrew | https://launchpad.net/~andrewfenn/+archive/ogredev/+sourcepub/1154687/+listing-archive-extra | 15:47 |
_Andrew | Does amd64 find files in the .install file differently from i386 ? | 15:48 |
geser | _Andrew: those files mentioned in the amd64 build log seem to be part of mygui-doc with is an arch:all package (ie not build on the amd64 buildd) | 16:45 |
_Andrew | ah... | 16:45 |
_Andrew | I didn't know that | 16:45 |
_Andrew | thanks! | 16:46 |
geser | _Andrew: move the icon and the .desktop file to the package with the binary | 16:46 |
geser | it doesn't make much sense to have them in the -doc package | 16:46 |
_Andrew | It's for opening the documentation | 16:47 |
geser | ah | 16:47 |
ScottK | _Andrew: tools isn't a valid section is why that upload failed. | 16:49 |
_Andrew | fixed that | 16:49 |
_Andrew | Just stuck on the amd64 error | 16:50 |
geser | _Andrew: and you might have a look at your -dbg package as it's empty (only the mandatory files) according to the i386 build log | 16:51 |
_Andrew | thanks | 16:55 |
_Andrew | I didn't notice that | 16:55 |
dupondje | somebody around that could sponsor https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/544910 ? | 17:00 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 544910 in aiccu (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to 10.04 beta1 blocked by aiccu" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 17:00 |
lfaraone | dupondje: I'll take a look at it later today if you'd like. | 17:28 |
dupondje | ok thx ! | 17:29 |
dupondje | its a small fix | 17:29 |
dupondje | for an anoying issue :) that has been around since 8.04 it seems :s | 17:29 |
crimsun | dupondje: uploaded. Thank you for your contribution to Ubuntu. | 17:33 |
crimsun | dupondje: rather, the correct debconf one is uploaded now :-) | 17:38 |
txwikinger | Does someone he has experience troubleshooting and fixing bugs in regard of parallel make during packaging? | 18:08 |
dupondje | thx ! | 18:32 |
dupondje | @ crimsun :) | 18:32 |
dupondje | did forward it upstream also, lets hope they also pick it up :) | 18:32 |
=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away | ||
lfaraone | dupondje: feel free to request a SRU if you want the change to be fixed in hardy etc. | 20:11 |
dupondje | its only an issue when upgrading ... | 20:12 |
dupondje | it never gets updated in a stable release, so its not really needed ? | 20:12 |
lfaraone | dupondje: well, you could make the argument that it needs an SRU to Lucid, among others, since we still support upgrades from hardy>lucid, jaunty>karmic, karmic>lucid. | 20:31 |
lfaraone | dupondje: from what I can tell in the bug, as is those upgrades may fail if aiccu is installed, no? | 20:31 |
dupondje | well they get locked indeed, untill you manually kill aiccu ... | 20:33 |
dupondje | so yea maby its and improvement :) | 20:33 |
dupondje | btw, have no idea how to request an SRU neither :) | 20:35 |
ScottK | !sru | dupondje | 20:48 |
ubottu | dupondje: Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates | 20:48 |
dupondje | crimsun: it went upstream :D | 21:11 |
dupondje | why are some packages not synced from unstable btw ? | 21:30 |
geser | dupondje: which ones? new ones (not currently in maverick)? | 21:32 |
arand | dupondje: If they have changes in ubuntu they need merging. | 21:35 |
dupondje | http://packages.qa.debian.org/libr/librapi2.html | 21:37 |
dupondje | this one | 21:37 |
geser | this one needs to be inspected by someone because of the Ubuntu changes and either merged or synced | 21:39 |
arand | !mom | dupondje | 21:39 |
ubottu | dupondje: MoM is the Ubuntu Merge-O-Matic, a website helping the MOTUs keep Ubuntu in sync with Debian. See https://merges.ubuntu.com/ | 21:40 |
arand | !merge | dupondje or rather | 21:41 |
ubottu | dupondje or rather: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging | 21:41 |
dupondje | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librapi2/+bug/317290 => isn't this quite invalid ? why should it depend on it ? :s | 21:47 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 317290 in librapi2 (Ubuntu) "librapi2-dev must depend on libsynce0-dev" [Undecided,Fix released] | 21:47 |
geser | dupondje: a header from librapi2-dev #included a header from libsynce0-dev and without this dependency the other header file is not installed | 21:50 |
dupondje | did you check all the code now or ? ;) | 21:52 |
geser | I checked the header files from the -dev package as only they are part of the public API | 21:52 |
geser | dupondje: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/maverick/librapi2/maverick/annotate/head:/src/rapi.h line 21 | 21:55 |
dupondje | seems like you already did the merge :) | 21:57 |
geser | dupondje: you need to check if that's still the case in the version in unstable | 21:59 |
dupondje | #include <synce.h> | 22:00 |
dupondje | yea | 22:00 |
dupondje | the following comment was already in the MoM: 'Merge done - Waiting on libsynce0-dev (>= 0.12)' | 22:02 |
dupondje | what to do with that ? | 22:02 |
geser | check if maverick has already this version of libsynce0-dev | 22:03 |
dupondje | it does | 22:03 |
dupondje | the merge is done, but no bugreport/debdiffs ? | 22:06 |
geser | unfortunately it's impossible to tell who prepared the merge | 22:06 |
geser | could you also forward the Ubuntu delta to Debian so we could sync in future again? | 22:07 |
dupondje | i'll do :) now its just creating a debdiff with the changes from debian right ? | 22:09 |
geser | yes | 22:09 |
geser | or a debdiff to apply on the Debian package to re-apply the Ubuntu changes | 22:10 |
geser | that way they are easier to review that no still needed Ubuntu changes got lost | 22:11 |
dupondje | its only the depends that need to be fixed | 22:11 |
dupondje | other change got into debian | 22:12 |
dupondje | geser: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librapi2/+bug/587346 => looks ok ? | 22:24 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 587346 in librapi2 (Ubuntu) "Please merge librapi2 0.15-1 (universe) from Debian unstable" [Undecided,In progress] | 22:24 |
geser | dupondje: almost fine, you forgot to retain the old ubuntu changelog entry | 22:35 |
dupondje | fixed ! ;) | 22:37 |
geser | dupondje: looks fine now, ready to get added to the sponsoring queue | 22:41 |
dupondje | ubuntu-universe-sponsors right ? :) | 22:42 |
geser | ubuntu-sponsors | 22:42 |
geser | there is now only one sponsoring team for main and universe | 22:42 |
dupondje | added :) | 22:42 |
dupondje | thx for assistance ! | 22:43 |
dupondje | mailed to upstream also | 23:28 |
=== MTecknology is now known as MTeck | ||
=== Philip6 is now known as Philip5 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!