=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away
[04:46] <lfaraone> Can I ACK syncs that are "edubuntu bugs" as a MOTU?
[04:50] <ScottK> If they are in the edubuntu package set you probalby shouldn't.  I'm not sure if you can.
[04:55] <lfaraone> ScottK: they are.
[04:55] <ScottK> I'd leave them then.
[04:55] <cody-somerville> ugh
=== nobawk|away is now known as nobawk
=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away
=== cam is now known as Guest71321
=== Guest71321 is now known as bitshifternz
=== nobawk|away is now known as nobawk
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna
=== aronxu is now known as happyaron
[14:30] <_Andrew> Anyone know why this build failed.. https://launchpad.net/~andrewfenn/+archive/ogredev/+build/1762659
[14:31] <_Andrew> I check the log and it says it built successfully
[14:38] <nigelb> _Andrew: doesn't look at failed to build.  It says failed to upload
[14:38] <nigelb> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49299510/upload_1762659_log.txt
[14:39] <nigelb> I don't understand what it means though.  Perhaps poke somone on #launchpad
[14:39] <_Andrew> Ah yes I see
[14:40] <_Andrew> Also there's something weird going on with the AMD64 build.. dh_install isn't picking up files that are in my .install file and it's working on the i386 build..
[14:41] <joaopinto> _Andrew, perhaps you have an invalid value on debian/control Section:  field ?
[14:41] <joaopinto> "2010-05-29 07:35:43 WARNING 	mygui-tools_3.0.1-ogredev1_all.deb: Unknown section 'tools'"
[14:41] <_Andrew> yup
[15:18] <nigelb> anyone face issues with building sid pbuilder in lucid?
[15:47] <_Andrew> Well. I fixed that but now the amd64 build is failing when it shouldn't/..
[15:47] <_Andrew> https://launchpad.net/~andrewfenn/+archive/ogredev/+sourcepub/1154687/+listing-archive-extra
[15:48] <_Andrew> Does amd64 find files in the .install file differently from i386 ?
[16:45] <geser> _Andrew: those files mentioned in the amd64 build log seem to be part of mygui-doc with is an arch:all package (ie not build on the amd64 buildd)
[16:45] <_Andrew> ah...
[16:45] <_Andrew> I didn't know that
[16:46] <_Andrew> thanks!
[16:46] <geser> _Andrew: move the icon and the .desktop file to the package with the binary
[16:46] <geser> it doesn't make much sense to have them in the -doc package
[16:47] <_Andrew> It's for opening the documentation
[16:47] <geser> ah
[16:49] <ScottK> _Andrew: tools isn't a valid section is why that upload failed.
[16:49] <_Andrew> fixed that
[16:50] <_Andrew> Just stuck on the amd64 error
[16:51] <geser> _Andrew: and you might have a look at your -dbg package as it's empty (only the mandatory files) according to the i386 build log
[16:55] <_Andrew>  thanks
[16:55] <_Andrew> I didn't notice that
[17:00] <dupondje> somebody around that could sponsor https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aiccu/+bug/544910 ?
[17:00] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 544910 in aiccu (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to 10.04 beta1 blocked by aiccu" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[17:28] <lfaraone> dupondje: I'll take a look at it later today if you'd like.
[17:29] <dupondje> ok thx !
[17:29] <dupondje> its a small fix
[17:29] <dupondje> for an anoying issue :) that has been around since 8.04 it seems :s
[17:33] <crimsun> dupondje: uploaded. Thank you for your contribution to Ubuntu.
[17:38] <crimsun> dupondje: rather, the correct debconf one is uploaded now :-)
[18:08] <txwikinger> Does someone he has experience troubleshooting and fixing bugs in regard of parallel make during packaging?
[18:32] <dupondje> thx !
[18:32] <dupondje> @ crimsun  :)
[18:32] <dupondje> did forward it upstream also, lets hope they also pick it up :)
=== nobawk is now known as nobawk|away
[20:11] <lfaraone> dupondje: feel free to request a SRU if you want the change to be fixed in hardy etc.
[20:12] <dupondje> its only an issue when upgrading ...
[20:12] <dupondje> it never gets updated in a stable release, so its not really needed ?
[20:31] <lfaraone> dupondje: well, you could make the argument that it needs an SRU to Lucid, among others, since we still support upgrades from hardy>lucid, jaunty>karmic, karmic>lucid.
[20:31] <lfaraone> dupondje: from what I can tell in the bug, as is those upgrades may fail if aiccu is installed, no?
[20:33] <dupondje> well they get locked indeed, untill you manually kill aiccu ...
[20:33] <dupondje> so yea maby its and improvement :)
[20:35] <dupondje> btw, have no idea how to request an SRU neither :)
[20:48] <ScottK> !sru | dupondje
[20:48] <ubottu> dupondje: Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
[21:11] <dupondje> crimsun: it went upstream :D
[21:30] <dupondje> why are some packages not synced from unstable btw ?
[21:32] <geser> dupondje: which ones? new ones (not currently in maverick)?
[21:35] <arand> dupondje: If they have changes in ubuntu they need merging.
[21:37] <dupondje> http://packages.qa.debian.org/libr/librapi2.html
[21:37] <dupondje> this one
[21:39] <geser> this one needs to be inspected by someone because of the Ubuntu changes and either merged or synced
[21:39] <arand> !mom | dupondje
[21:40] <ubottu> dupondje: MoM is the Ubuntu Merge-O-Matic, a website helping the MOTUs keep Ubuntu in sync with Debian. See  https://merges.ubuntu.com/
[21:41] <arand> !merge | dupondje or rather
[21:41] <ubottu> dupondje or rather: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging
[21:47] <dupondje> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librapi2/+bug/317290 => isn't this quite invalid ? why should it depend on it ? :s
[21:47] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 317290 in librapi2 (Ubuntu) "librapi2-dev must depend on libsynce0-dev" [Undecided,Fix released]
[21:50] <geser> dupondje: a header from librapi2-dev #included a header from libsynce0-dev and without this dependency the other header file is not installed
[21:52] <dupondje> did you check all the code now or ? ;)
[21:52] <geser> I checked the header files from the -dev package as only they are part of the public API
[21:55] <geser> dupondje: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/maverick/librapi2/maverick/annotate/head:/src/rapi.h line 21
[21:57] <dupondje> seems like you already did the merge :)
[21:59] <geser> dupondje: you need to check if that's still the case in the version in unstable
[22:00] <dupondje> #include <synce.h>
[22:00] <dupondje> yea
[22:02] <dupondje> the following comment was already in the MoM: 'Merge done - Waiting on libsynce0-dev (>= 0.12)'
[22:02] <dupondje> what to do with that ?
[22:03] <geser> check if maverick has already this version of libsynce0-dev
[22:03] <dupondje> it does
[22:06] <dupondje> the merge is done, but no bugreport/debdiffs ?
[22:06] <geser> unfortunately it's impossible to tell who prepared the merge
[22:07] <geser> could you also forward the Ubuntu delta to Debian so we could sync in future again?
[22:09] <dupondje> i'll do :) now its just creating a debdiff with the changes from debian right ?
[22:09] <geser> yes
[22:10] <geser> or a debdiff to apply on the Debian package to re-apply the Ubuntu changes
[22:11] <geser> that way they are easier to review that no still needed Ubuntu changes got lost
[22:11] <dupondje> its only the depends that need to be fixed
[22:12] <dupondje> other change got into debian
[22:24] <dupondje> geser: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librapi2/+bug/587346 => looks ok ?
[22:24] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 587346 in librapi2 (Ubuntu) "Please merge librapi2 0.15-1 (universe) from Debian unstable" [Undecided,In progress]
[22:35] <geser> dupondje: almost fine, you forgot to retain the old ubuntu changelog entry
[22:37] <dupondje> fixed ! ;)
[22:41] <geser> dupondje: looks fine now, ready to get added to the sponsoring queue
[22:42] <dupondje> ubuntu-universe-sponsors right ? :)
[22:42] <geser> ubuntu-sponsors
[22:42] <geser> there is now only one sponsoring team for main and universe
[22:42] <dupondje> added :)
[22:43] <dupondje> thx for assistance !
[23:28] <dupondje> mailed to upstream also
=== MTecknology is now known as MTeck
=== Philip6 is now known as Philip5