[00:58] thumper: you seem to be thumping a few joins [04:11] +junk branches cannot merge into other branches, can they? [04:11] Rather, can I request a merge? [04:13] lfaraone: No, you can't. [04:13] If code is in a state that such a thing is wanted, it's probably actually a project. [04:14] wgrant: mk. I'm eyeing lp:~ubuntu-dev/+junk/ack-sync , which I wrote some patches for. Would it be a faux pas to create a project for it and reassign it? [04:14] *reassign the branch [04:15] lfaraone: Doesn't that belong in u-d-t? [04:16] wgrant: probably, but I'm not sure how we'd propose to merge it. I think it's probably on the same footing a syncpackage, not officially endorsed. Anyway, I'm not the author of the code, so I'm not sure if I'm the right person to request a merge. (although I technically could merge it without discussion) [06:58] is there a reason why dget doesn't work on PPA .dscs? [07:01] micahg: It should work. What goes wrong? [07:02] wgrant: I get 404s on the orig.tar.gz [07:04] wgrant: dget: curl miro_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35/+files/miro_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz failed [07:05] micahg: Ah. If you use the archive URL it will work fine. [07:05] But the LP webapp one won't work for some files at the moment (it's a bug). [07:05] But it should work for most stuff. [07:05] k, the bug's been filed I assume? [07:06] * micahg actually has them all locally (I think) [07:06] Yes. [07:06] It's known, but not easy. [07:14] wgrant: k [08:54] any way to suppress the warning message when anonymously getting source from a LP repo? [09:31] hi [09:34] when will the karma be updated? i answered a lot of question and the karma is dropped :/ [09:35] defcon: some hours later [09:35] well, the answers are 15h old... [09:36] defcon: with 24 h then :) [09:36] a curiosity: why is the karma so important, defcon? [09:37] it's not important, i'm just wondering why it is dropped [09:37] ;) [09:37] defcon: as I said the karma will be updated within 24 h [09:37] so wait 24 h, what's your launchpad ID? [09:38] from this time the answers are written? [09:39] defcon: if you tell me your launchpad ID I could see [09:45] thanks for help in the query BlackZ [09:45] cya [14:38] hi [14:38] there is a package missing from my PPA page [14:38] https://launchpad.net/~pmjdebruijn/+archive/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=lucid [14:38] gnome-color-manager should be there as well [14:40] pmjdebruijn: it was deleted: https://launchpad.net/~pmjdebruijn/+archive/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter=lucid [14:40] tsimpson: huh? [14:41] erhm [14:41] I might have deleted a failed build [14:41] does that delete the proper build as well :( [14:41] Deleted on 2010-05-09 by Pascal de Bruijn [14:41] Build-Depends on packages not in Lucid. [14:41] yeah [14:41] I ment to delete the failed build [14:41] not the good one [14:41] crap [14:42] you don't need to delete failed builds, nothing is published [14:42] just upload a new version [14:42] tsimpson: there was never going to be a newer version [14:43] tsimpson: the upstream has dependancies that can't be met [14:43] pmjdebruijn: I'm saying, if it failed to build, no new packages would be published and the previous version would still be available [14:43] tsimpson: but then I'm stuck with the build failed messages on my PPA [14:44] when you choose to delete it, you're asking for the package(s) to be removed from the PPA, not just that version [14:44] *that package in that series [14:45] pmjdebruijn: as you can see, even if you delete it you still have the failed to build message [14:45] it's not something which impacts your PPA, so there is really no reason (other than ascetic or pride) to remove it [14:45] tsimpson: I noticed :) [14:46] tsimpson: btw can I view that log myself? [14:46] which log? [14:46] delete [14:47] yeah, it's available to everyone, just click on the deleted source and it'll show it [14:48] ah [14:48] status = any [14:48] right, thanks [14:49] the default view is to only show published packages in a PPA, as that's what most people would be interested in [14:49] indeed [14:51] heh [14:51] and I can't resubmit my package [14:51] I disabled my old GPG key, so I had to resign [14:51] I guess I can up the version [14:52] It's a bit of a shame that policy sometimes requires senseless versioning === JanC_ is now known as JanC [17:02] hi all ! [17:03] I can't import any svn revision with pear. [17:04] https://code.launchpad.net/~stk-team/stk/trunk [17:04] but it works with russkaya [17:38] my package for intrepid keeps getting rejected with "Cannot build any of the architectures requested: all" - what does this actually mean? [17:39] detly: as intrepid is EOL, PPA doesn't support intrepid either anymore [17:40] Intrepid is no longer supported, it reached end of life in April [17:40] oh [17:40] but... the hardy package seems to have built just fine [17:40] or is that an lts release? [17:43] detly: yes, Hardy is LTS [17:44] right, thanks for explaining :) one less distro to worry about, too [18:48] how do i add a new language from an existing template in rosetta? do i need to upload it again, or create a .po file and commit? === ripps_ is now known as ripps === yofel_ is now known as yofel [20:58] hello i cant post crash. i got error something http 500 [21:00] if ill send crash to another computer and try from that send then it will send with crashed computers logs yes? [22:07] rejected: Cannot build any of the architectures requested: any [22:08] bjsnider: intrepid? [22:08] affirmatyive [22:09] it just rejects any? [22:09] intrepid is EOL and PPA doesn't support it anymore [22:09] cool! [22:09] i dig it [22:09] i don't have to send anything in for it anymore then [22:12] anybody can answer my question? [22:13] ill be back in 3 min === MTecknology is now known as Guest00000001 === Guest00000001 is now known as MTecknology