[00:58] <MTecknology> thumper: you seem to be thumping a few joins
[04:11] <lfaraone> +junk branches cannot merge into other branches, can they?
[04:11] <lfaraone> Rather, can I request a merge?
[04:13] <wgrant> lfaraone: No, you can't.
[04:13] <wgrant> If code is in a state that such a thing is wanted, it's probably actually a project.
[04:14] <lfaraone> wgrant: mk. I'm eyeing lp:~ubuntu-dev/+junk/ack-sync , which I wrote some patches for. Would it be a faux pas to create a project for it and reassign it?
[04:14] <lfaraone> *reassign the branch
[04:15] <wgrant> lfaraone: Doesn't that belong in u-d-t?
[04:16] <lfaraone> wgrant: probably, but I'm not sure how we'd propose to merge it. I think it's probably on the same footing a syncpackage, not officially endorsed. Anyway, I'm not the author of the code, so I'm not sure if I'm the right person to request a merge. (although I technically could merge it without discussion)
[06:58] <micahg> is there a reason why dget doesn't work on PPA .dscs?
[07:01] <wgrant> micahg: It should work. What goes wrong?
[07:02] <micahg> wgrant: I get 404s on the orig.tar.gz
[07:04] <micahg> wgrant: dget: curl miro_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35/+files/miro_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz failed
[07:05] <wgrant> micahg: Ah. If you use the archive URL it will work fine.
[07:05] <wgrant> But the LP webapp one won't work for some files at the moment (it's a bug).
[07:05] <wgrant> But it should work for most stuff.
[07:05] <micahg> k, the bug's been filed I assume?
[07:06]  * micahg actually has them all locally  (I think)
[07:06] <wgrant> Yes.
[07:06] <wgrant> It's known, but not easy.
[07:14] <micahg> wgrant: k
[08:54] <Splex> any way to suppress the warning message when anonymously getting source from a LP repo?
[09:31] <defcon> hi
[09:34] <defcon> when will the karma be updated? i answered a lot of question and the karma is dropped :/
[09:35] <BlackZ> defcon: some hours later
[09:35] <defcon> well, the answers are 15h old...
[09:36] <BlackZ> defcon: with 24 h then :)
[09:36] <BlackZ> a curiosity: why is the karma so important, defcon?
[09:37] <defcon> it's not important, i'm just wondering why it is dropped
[09:37] <defcon> ;)
[09:37] <BlackZ> defcon: as I said the karma will be updated within 24 h
[09:37] <BlackZ> so wait 24 h, what's your launchpad ID?
[09:38] <defcon> from this time the answers are written?
[09:39] <BlackZ> defcon: if you tell me your launchpad ID I could see
[09:45] <defcon> thanks for help in the query BlackZ
[09:45] <defcon> cya
[14:38] <pmjdebruijn> hi
[14:38] <pmjdebruijn> there is a package missing from my PPA page
[14:38] <pmjdebruijn> https://launchpad.net/~pmjdebruijn/+archive/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=lucid
[14:38] <pmjdebruijn> gnome-color-manager should be there as well
[14:40] <tsimpson> pmjdebruijn: it was deleted: https://launchpad.net/~pmjdebruijn/+archive/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter=lucid
[14:40] <pmjdebruijn> tsimpson: huh?
[14:41] <pmjdebruijn> erhm
[14:41] <pmjdebruijn> I might have deleted a failed build
[14:41] <pmjdebruijn> does that delete the proper build as well :(
[14:41] <tsimpson>  Deleted  on 2010-05-09  by Pascal de Bruijn
[14:41] <tsimpson> Build-Depends on packages not in Lucid.
[14:41] <pmjdebruijn> yeah
[14:41] <pmjdebruijn> I ment to delete the failed build
[14:41] <pmjdebruijn> not the good one
[14:41] <pmjdebruijn> crap
[14:42] <tsimpson> you don't need to delete failed builds, nothing is published
[14:42] <tsimpson> just upload a new version
[14:42] <pmjdebruijn> tsimpson: there was never going to be a newer version
[14:43] <pmjdebruijn> tsimpson: the upstream has dependancies that can't be met
[14:43] <tsimpson> pmjdebruijn: I'm saying, if it failed to build, no new packages would be published and the previous version would still be available
[14:43] <pmjdebruijn> tsimpson: but then I'm stuck with the build failed messages on my PPA
[14:44] <tsimpson> when you choose to delete it, you're asking for the package(s) to be removed from the PPA, not just that version
[14:44] <tsimpson> *that package in that series
[14:45] <tsimpson> pmjdebruijn: as you can see, even if you delete it you still have the failed to build message
[14:45] <tsimpson> it's not something which impacts your PPA, so there is really no reason (other than ascetic or pride) to remove it
[14:45] <pmjdebruijn> tsimpson: I noticed :)
[14:46] <pmjdebruijn> tsimpson: btw can I view that log myself?
[14:46] <tsimpson> which log?
[14:46] <pmjdebruijn> delete
[14:47] <tsimpson> yeah, it's available to everyone, just click on the deleted source and it'll show it
[14:48] <pmjdebruijn> ah
[14:48] <pmjdebruijn> status = any
[14:48] <pmjdebruijn> right, thanks
[14:49] <tsimpson> the default view is to only show published packages in a PPA, as that's what most people would be interested in
[14:49] <pmjdebruijn> indeed
[14:51] <pmjdebruijn> heh
[14:51] <pmjdebruijn> and I can't resubmit my package
[14:51] <pmjdebruijn> I disabled my old GPG key, so I had to resign
[14:51] <pmjdebruijn> I guess I can up the version
[14:52] <pmjdebruijn> It's a bit of a shame that policy sometimes requires senseless versioning
[17:02] <xapantu> hi all !
[17:03] <xapantu> I can't import any svn revision with pear.
[17:04] <xapantu> https://code.launchpad.net/~stk-team/stk/trunk
[17:04] <xapantu> but it works with russkaya
[17:38] <detly> my package for intrepid keeps getting rejected with "Cannot build any of the architectures requested: all" - what does this actually mean?
[17:39] <geser> detly: as intrepid is EOL, PPA doesn't support intrepid either anymore
[17:40] <tsimpson> Intrepid is no longer supported, it reached end of life in April
[17:40] <detly> oh
[17:40] <detly> but... the hardy package seems to have built just fine
[17:40] <detly> or is that an lts release?
[17:43] <tsimpson> detly: yes, Hardy is LTS
[17:44] <detly> right, thanks for explaining :) one less distro to worry about, too
[18:48] <stefano_> how do i add a new language from an existing template in rosetta? do i need to upload it again, or create a .po file and commit?
[20:58] <Kangarooo> hello i cant post crash. i got error something http 500
[21:00] <Kangarooo> if ill send crash to another computer and try from that send then it will send with crashed computers logs yes?
[22:07] <bjsnider> rejected: Cannot build any of the architectures requested: any
[22:08] <geser> bjsnider: intrepid?
[22:08] <bjsnider> affirmatyive
[22:09] <bjsnider> it just rejects any?
[22:09] <geser> intrepid is EOL and PPA doesn't support it anymore
[22:09] <bjsnider> cool!
[22:09] <bjsnider> i dig it
[22:09] <bjsnider> i don't have to send anything in for it anymore then
[22:12] <Kangarooo> anybody can answer my question?
[22:13] <Kangarooo> ill be back in 3 min