[00:08] <BUGabundo> VLC does not support the audio or video format "XVID". Unfortunately there is no way for you to fix this.
[00:09] <BUGabundo> great.... gstream went wanky
[00:10] <BUGabundo> humm
[00:10] <BUGabundo> if videos don't play
[00:10] <BUGabundo> I better go to bed
[00:10] <BUGabundo> cy
=== cbone is now known as cbone_away
=== cbone_away is now known as cbone
[06:29] <litropy> Hi, peeps. I followed this guide http://www.webupd8.org/2010/05/how-to-upgrade-to-ubuntu-1010-maverick.html and get an "upgrade-broken" error upon sudo do-release-upgrade -d. See paste: http://pastebin.com/TneSwbih
[08:55] <KurtKraut> What is the proper way to propose a feature for next Ubuntu release?
[09:14] <BUGabundo_remote> bu dia!
=== siriusnova_ is now known as siriusnova
[09:40] <vish> KurtKraut: depends.. what feature?
[09:41] <KurtKraut> vish, this one: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/dns-cache-by-default
[09:43] <vish> KurtKraut: for inclusion of a package by default you can bring it up in the desktop or devel-discuss mailing lists
[09:44] <vish> KurtKraut: i bet very few have even seen/noticed that BP
[09:45] <KurtKraut> vish, okay, I'll do that. Thanks!
[09:45] <vish> np..
[09:45] <KurtKraut> vish, I've been trying to promote this since Jaunty. Never got any sort of reply.
=== JohnFlux__ is now known as JohnFlux
[09:45] <vish> KurtKraut: promote? how? was this discussed in the mailing lists already?
[09:46] <KurtKraut> vish, the only place I didn't mentioned it was through mailing list. Even in Ideastorm I've added it: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/20842/
=== TheImp is now known as TheInfinity
[09:48] <vish> KurtKraut: fyi, bah , rarely those get looked into ;p
[09:48] <KurtKraut> vish, indeed :P
[09:48] <vish> KurtKraut: best chance is the relevant mailing lists
[09:49] <KurtKraut> vish, If my idea got an approval, is there a chance of being implemented on 10.10?
[09:49] <vish> KurtKraut: brainstorm is a huge pool and there are way too many ideas , which makes it difficult for the good ones to get attention ;)
[09:49] <vish> KurtKraut: i doubt it , we already had the UDS 2 weeks ago , but give it a shot and maybe 11.04? :)
[09:50] <vish> in the uds most of the discussion about inclusion takes place
[09:50] <KurtKraut> vish, ... I'm sad to hear that :/
[09:51] <vish> KurtKraut: there are always exceptions ;)  and the earlier you start discussing it the bettr chances for inclusion in 11.04 ;)
[09:54] <vish> KurtKraut: and it helps to file a bug about it too. bp are not really the place for such issues
[10:00] <KurtKraut> vish, so I'll file a bug too. But against what?
[10:01] <vish> KurtKraut: the package you want included by default , or was it network manager?
[10:01] <vish> fwiw , we *might* move to conman for 11.04
[10:01] <vish> err..  connman
[10:02] <KurtKraut> vish, there are 3 possible packages that would do the job (DNS cache by default): dnsmasq (my prefered), nscd (used by openSUSE) or bind itself.
[10:02] <KurtKraut> vish, DNS cache doesn't depend or need to rely on network-manager.
[10:03] <vish> KurtKraut: hmm , then better off discussing in the ML
[10:03] <joaopinto> KurtKraut, try sending a mail to the ubuntu-devel-discuss ML
[10:04] <KurtKraut> Ok, I intend to post an email today about it.
[10:40] <gl0wurm3wE> when ubuntu 10.10 Alpha 1 comes out what kernel will it have?
[10:41] <hifi> 2.6.34 atm
[10:44] <BUGabundo_remote> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=45470
[10:44] <BUGabundo_remote> I love to see apps take control, over OUR preferences :S
[10:44] <hifi> or does it
[10:44] <hifi> I have 2.6.34 but it might be from the xorg-edgers PPA
[10:44] <BUGabundo_remote> Maverick is expected to ship with .35
[10:44] <BUGabundo_remote> !info linux
[10:44] <ubottu> linux (source: linux-meta): Generic complete Linux kernel.. In component main, is optional. Version 2.6.34.5.4 (maverick), package size 4 kB, installed size 32 kB (Only available for i386 amd64 lpia all armel)
[10:45] <gl0wurm3wE> cool, how stable is the .34 kernel and are changes in .35 very critical?
[10:45] <hifi> .35 is not released yet
[10:54] <gl0wurm3wE> !info gnome
[10:54] <ubottu> gnome (source: meta-gnome2): The GNOME Desktop Environment, with extra components. In component universe, is optional. Version 1:2.28+1ubuntu3 (maverick), package size 16 kB, installed size 56 kB
[10:56] <gl0wurm3wE> !info Dependency
[10:56] <ubottu> Package Dependency does not exist in maverick
[10:57] <gl0wurm3wE> !info maverick
[10:57] <ubottu> Package maverick does not exist in maverick
[10:58] <BUGabundo_remote> gl0wurm3wE: please stop abusing the bot :)
[10:59] <BUGabundo_remote> use packages.ubuntu.com instead
[10:59] <gl0wurm3wE> k
[11:01] <David-T> or at the very least, /msg
[11:02] <gl0wurm3wE> will do
[11:19] <gl0wurm3wE> so if 10.10 will ship with .35, then will the work done on .34 be ported to .35? Is that the standard procedure to target odd kernel releases on odd numbered releases?
[11:20] <gl0wurm3wE> Just curious
[11:21] <SwedeMike> gl0wurm3wE: there is nothing magical about odd or even numbered releases.
=== popey_ is now known as popey
[11:36] <gl0wurm3wE> i didn't think it was magical, i was just trying to figure out the kernel number for the next long term support release
[11:39] <gl0wurm3wE> kind of like how there will never be a supported .33 ubuntu kernel
[11:47] <gl0wurm3wE> it also shows that development of ubuntu takes twice as long to release then a stable kernel dose
[11:51] <gl0wurm3wE> it also makes sense to dev. on a stable kernel and target the dev. kernel to be released
[12:28] <arand> LiveCDs \o/
[15:46] <funkyHat> gstreamer is complaining about wma8 and wmv8 files, but when I click on the "look for a package that has the right decoder" button it says it can't find one
[15:57] <bjsnider> funkyHat, where are the video samples you're looking at?
[15:58] <funkyHat> bjsnider: just some of the stuff in my music folder
[16:00] <funkyHat> Typically I can't find any examples now...
=== \vish is now known as vish
[16:26] <BUGabundo_remote> bjsnider: I got that yesterday
[16:26] <BUGabundo_remote> both wma, divx,xvid, etc
[16:27] <BUGabundo_remote> gstreamer is busted
[16:29] <bjsnider> yeah but i'm just wondering if my version isn't
[16:29] <bjsnider> i'd need a sample of the content first
[16:33] <BUGabundo_remote> get any current tv show rip
[16:33] <BUGabundo_remote> or I can run it in debug here, if you want
[16:34] <BUGabundo_remote> totem totem-common totem-dbg totem-mozilla totem-plugins
[16:34] <BUGabundo_remote> humm
[16:34] <BUGabundo_remote> some updates
[16:34] <BUGabundo_remote> let me see if its fixed
[16:36] <BUGabundo_remote> The following packages are BROKEN:  gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad kdelibs5-plugins mplayer update-manager
[16:36] <BUGabundo_remote> The following NEW packages will be installed:  libdirectfb-1.2-9{a}
[16:36] <BUGabundo_remote> The following packages will be REMOVED:  libdirectfb-1.2-0{a}
[16:36] <BUGabundo_remote> The following packages will be upgraded:  kdelibs5-data libsdl1.2debian libsdl1.2debian-pulseaudio
[16:36] <BUGabundo_remote> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[16:36] <BUGabundo_remote>   gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad: Depends: libdirectfb-1.2-0 but it is not installable  mplayer: Depends: libdirectfb-1.2-0 but it is not installable  update-manager: Depends: update-manager-core (= 1:0.141) but 1:0.140 is installed kdelibs5-plugins: Depends: kdelibs5-data (= 4:4.4.80-0ubuntu2) but 4:4.4.80-0ubuntu3 is to be installed.
[16:39] <bjsnider> i mean specifically the wmv8 codec
[17:01] <BUGabundo_remote> back
[17:01] <BUGabundo_remote> darn NX
[17:07] <Ian_Corne> anyonelse getting this: Unpacking replacement ffmpeg ...
[17:07] <Ian_Corne> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ffmpeg_4%3a0.6~svn20100505-1ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/share/ffmpeg/libx264-baseline.ffpreset', which is also in package libavcodec52 4:0.5.1-1ubuntu1
[17:07] <Ian_Corne> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
[17:09] <bjsnider> Ian_Corne, your ffmpeg and libavcodec packages don't match
[17:09] <Ian_Corne> Yes
[17:09] <Ian_Corne> and I can't remove any of them
[17:09] <Ian_Corne> nor will aptitude or apt do it
[17:10] <bjsnider> libavcodec might not be published in the archive yet
[17:55] <funkyHat> Ian_Corne: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ffmpeg/+bug/587369
[17:55] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 587369 in ffmpeg (Ubuntu) "package ffmpeg 4:0.5.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/ffmpeg/libx264-baseline.ffpreset', which is also in package libavcodec52 4:0.5.1-1ubuntu1" [High,Triaged]
=== Blizzzek is now known as Blizzz
[20:44] <BUGabundo> great :( gwibber is broken
[20:47] <dupondje> héhé BUGabundo  :)
[20:47] <dupondje> thats alpha life
[20:47] <BUGabundo> gstream is broken, kdelibs are broken, now gwibber
[20:47] <BUGabundo> and we aren't even in A1 :\
[20:48] <dupondje> well its now that it starts to break :)
[20:49] <BUGabundo> $ mplayer
[20:49] <BUGabundo> mplayer: error while loading shared libraries: libavutil.so.49: cannot open shared object file: No such file or direct
[20:49] <BUGabundo> damn it
[20:52] <dupondje> wasnt it FTBFS
[20:54] <dupondje> its on  the MoM list
[20:58] <dupondje> lets check if we can sync/merge
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_fews
=== BUGabundo_fews is now known as BUGabundo_fewd
[21:01] <chrisccoulson> your issue is that the libavutil binary is empty
[21:02] <dupondje> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/m/mplayer/current/changelog => contains ubuntu changelog .. is there any specific reason for that ?
[21:12] <knittl> wah, metacity is crashing again
[21:12] <knittl> after new updates
=== BUGabundo_fewd is now known as BUGabundo
[21:23] <dupondje> not here :)
[21:23] <knittl> :-/
[21:23] <knittl> my x was frozen so i had to magic-reisub my pc
[21:23] <knittl> now it's crashing again
[21:23] <knittl> when trying to install the .debs i get »a newer version is already installed«
[21:24] <knittl> is there an alternate wm i can use for now?
[21:26] <knittl> ok, kwin works for now xD
[21:26] <dupondje> BUGabundo: seems like we have to wait :) mplayer in unstable has no gui atm
[21:27] <dupondje> there is new package in NEW
[21:27] <dupondje> gonne wait for that
[21:28] <BUGabundo> dupondje: if it was only mplayer I would survive
[21:28] <BUGabundo> no codecs for ANY player, not so much
[21:28] <BUGabundo> already missing the HOG gwibber
[21:30] <BUGabundo> $ gwibber-service -o -d
[21:30] <BUGabundo> Traceback (most recent call last):
[21:30] <BUGabundo>   File "/usr/bin/gwibber-service", line 43, in <module>
[21:34] <dupondje> BUGabundo: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ffmpeg-extra/+bug/587424
[21:35] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 587424 in ffmpeg-extra (Ubuntu) "libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc)" [High,Triaged]
[21:35] <Ian_Corne> That's not the main problem yet I think :D
[21:37] <BUGabundo> thanks
[21:37] <BUGabundo> Ian_Corne: I agree
[21:37] <BUGabundo> there's something causeing all this codec/gstreamer probs
[21:38] <dupondje> BUGabundo: well all the codecs are empty
[21:38] <dupondje> titlte is not correct ... :D
[21:38] <Ian_Corne> ah
[21:38] <dupondje> try appling the debdiff included
[21:38] <dupondje> build it
[21:38] <dupondje> try it :D
[21:40] <dupondje> "This is … what you might have expected to happen when you delete the dh_install line from debian/rules."
[21:40] <dupondje> :P
[21:41] <Ian_Corne> i've also been getting bash: /etc/bash_completion.d/apt: line 32: syntax error near unexpected token `;'
[21:41] <Ian_Corne> anyone else
[21:41] <arand> Ian_Corne: everyone.
[21:41] <Ian_Corne> ok
[21:41] <knittl> Ian_Corne: 2 extraneous semicolons
[21:41] <Ian_Corne> I've been looking at the file
[21:41] <Ian_Corne> oh must have missed it
[21:42] <Ian_Corne> ah yes
[21:43] <BUGabundo> Ian_Corne: me too
[21:43] <BUGabundo> im on that bug
[21:43] <BUGabundo> but don't have it on hand
[21:43] <BUGabundo> can't start KMail to check email now either
[21:43] <BUGabundo> so no help from me
[21:43] <Ian_Corne> You don't have any backup lucid system? :D
[21:44] <Ian_Corne> or run a vm with lucid in your maverick? :D
[21:44] <arand> bug 546794
[21:44] <BUGabundo> I got all the systems
[21:44] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 546794 in bash-completion (Ubuntu) "[revert, causes errors] Smarter lib* aware autocompletion?" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/546794
[21:44] <BUGabundo> I got VMs for karmic and lucid
[21:44] <BUGabundo> a laptop in karmic
[21:45] <BUGabundo> and a bunch of pendrives on all  lucid versions
[21:45] <BUGabundo> 23 and 64 bits
[21:45] <BUGabundo> thanks arand
[21:45] <BUGabundo> Ian_Corne: but I'm a die hard , hard core
[21:45] <BUGabundo> FIXIT cause I'll be here nagging about it not working
[21:45] <BUGabundo> anyone wants to look at douch desktop?
[21:45] <BUGabundo> broken too
[21:46] <arand> I just started migrating to Lucid :> With the hopeful prospect of replacinging my kk install once (if ever) we get btrfs in mm..
[22:02] <Ken8521> when is the ISO gonna be out again? june 3?
[22:05] <arand> Ken8521: First daily live came today, alternate some days ago, alpha will be when alpha is scheduled ↑↑ topic.
[22:06] <Ken8521> arand, the topic doesn't say anything about when the ISO's is or were released
[22:06] <arand> Ken8521: It has a release schedule.
[22:07] <Ken8521> yeah, but it doesn't really say when the ISO's were released
[22:08] <arand> Ken8521: Nope. But it's implied that one will get released for alphas/betas at least.
[22:09] <Ken8521> arand, do you think i didn't read it before asking the question? "implied".. is not an answer.
[22:09] <Ken8521> as you said.
[22:09] <arand> I'm not sure if the non-announcing of the start of liveCD building is intentional..
[22:09] <Ken8521> arand, if you didn't have an answer, why did you even bother responding w/ completely irrelevant babble?
[22:11] <arand> Ken8521: Sorry, but I did say that an iso was out today, which I figured was an answer.
[22:11] <Ken8521> then you pointed me at the topic like i'm some kind of retard and didn't read it.. and it(nor any of the links) say anything about when the iso was released
[22:13] <arand> Ken8521: Sorry, wrong of me, it was rather rude I admit.
[22:50] <BUGabundo> The following packages will be REMOVED:
[22:50] <BUGabundo>   freepats{u} libcdaudio1{u} libdc1394-22{u} libdirac-encoder0{u} libfftw3-3{u} libflite1{u} libgme0{u} libgsm1{u}libiptcdata0{u} libkate1{u}  libmimic0{u} libofa0{u} liborc-0.4-0{u} libwildmidi0{u}
=== emma_ is now known as emma
[23:56] <itdock> mmm