/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/05/31/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

cwilluheh, view bug reports freezes up for seconds at a time under the nightly 3.7 build08:43
cwilluviewing rather, on launchpad08:43
BUGabundo_remotebu dia!09:14
nikolambah. importing seamonkey 1.1.17 profile into seamonkey 2.0.4 (seamonkey -migration) does not import passwords and looks to me like not importing most of inboxes i have09:57
nikolamok, I take back my previous finding.10:09
nikolamIt happens only if Sm2 is already used separately form previous profile and then migrated10:09
nikolamif there is no sm2 profile dir already, then migration to SM2 seems to work OK so far ;)10:10
BUGabundo_remotefta something is funky with Ch10:34
BUGabundo_remoteI have "offer translation" disable and it still offers it :(10:35
BUGabundo_remotefta http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=4547010:44
* cwillu pokes at bug11:03
=== almaisan-away is now known as almaisan
fta2BUGabundo_remote, sorry, no time atm, i'm busy with work14:55
BUGabundo_remotenp15:05
BUGabundo_remoteI filed it upstream15:05
=== \vish is now known as vish
=== nikolam_ is now known as nikolam
micahgchrisccoulson: ping17:20
chrisccoulsonhi micahg17:21
chrisccoulsoni see you uploaded some stuff to the transition PPA17:21
micahgchrisccoulson: hi, are we backporting the latest mozilla-devscripts17:21
chrisccoulsonmicahg - so far, there's been no need to17:21
chrisccoulsoni'm not relying on any new features from it17:21
chrisccoulsonand there's not much left to backport now ;)17:22
micahgchrisccoulson: k, I updated the gobby doc last night with the extensions you worked on17:22
chrisccoulsonmicahg - thanks17:22
chrisccoulsoni had a late night on friday ;)17:23
micahgchrisccoulson: are you working today, or just around?17:23
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i'm just hanging around atm, but i might do a bit of work after dinner17:23
ftatransition PPA?17:23
micahgfta: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox3517:24
ftaoh17:24
ftahttp://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/mozillateam--ffox35.html then17:24
micahgchrisccoulson: k, so if the versions look ok, can you copy and rebuild my sources from the transition PPA17:24
micahgchrisccoulson: just the stuff I uploaded in the last 3 days17:25
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, will do17:25
chrisccoulsonthanks17:25
micahgchrisccoulson: I'll be working on this today, not as much of a rush as before, but still trying to rush ;)17:25
chrisccoulsonno bdrung about today?17:26
chrisccoulsonmicahg - do you know what the specific issue with the stumbleupon licensing was?17:27
chrisccoulsonthats one of the extensions i still need to update in hardy17:27
micahgchrisccoulson: no idea17:27
micahgchrisccoulson: oh, prism won't build w/out newer mozilla-devscripts, but I guess I can hack the packaging to fix that17:28
micahgif it's the only package17:28
micahgchrisccoulson: maybe don't copy prism until the last minute17:28
micahgchrisccoulson: I'm trying openjdk now17:31
chrisccoulsonmicahg - FYI - the call for testing which will be going out soon is here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Firefox3.6.4Upgrade17:40
micahgchrisccoulson: let me know when and I'll pass along to bugsquad, I guess I do have to rush to finish everything today then ;)17:41
chrisccoulsonara has been helping with providing a way for us to get proper feedback17:41
micahgchrisccoulson: can people file bugs?17:41
ftawhich gnome are we targeting in maverick? 2.31?17:48
micahgfta: I think mostly 2.32 (3.0)17:49
ftak17:50
micahgfta: can you help me with a pbuilder line: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/442356/17:55
ftamicahg, should be on two lines.. 1/ --update --othermirror "your deb line"  --override-config  2/ --build ...17:58
micahgfta: I tried that also and it didn't work17:58
ftamicahg, http://paste.ubuntu.com/442364/18:04
micahgfta: I'll try recreating from scratch18:05
ftamicahg, did it work?18:18
micahgfta: still trying18:20
ftamicahg, oh, here, the --create part takes less than 1min18:21
micahgfta: yeah, I accidentally ran it twice18:22
micahgfta: weird, still not working I think my pbuilder sources aren't updating18:24
ftamicahg, here is how to easily figure out: http://paste.ubuntu.com/442376/18:25
ftathen build your stuff and you will see the hook pasting your apt sources at the beginning18:27
micahgfta: it doesn't like me today :(18:32
ftamicahg, did you try with my hook?18:32
micahgno, hmmm, let me try18:32
ftaif the sources files are correct, but it still doesn't work, update my hook and insert "apt-get update" before the exit18:33
ftato be sure, you can also insert an "apt-cache madison your_dep" to see if it's available or not18:35
micahgk, now it looks like it's working, let's see if it builds18:38
micahgfta: the line is in there18:46
micahgfta: it sees the package, just sayd tha it's uninstallable18:58
ftamicahg, is it?18:58
micahgyep18:58
ftamicahg, i mean, is it pbuilder's fault or is that package really uninstallable?19:05
micahgfta: idk19:05
ftamicahg, could you paste the full logs?19:05
micahgfta: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/442394/19:06
fta<fta> if the sources files are correct, but it still doesn't work, update my hook and insert "apt-get update" before the exit19:07
fta<fta> to be sure, you can also insert an "apt-cache madison your_dep" to see if it's available or not19:07
ftamicahg, ^^19:07
micahgfta: did that19:07
micahgI'm testing in my chroot now to see if there's an issue19:07
ftaoh, right19:07
micahgwfm19:08
micahgI've wasted an hour on this already, I'm just going to push to my PPA and copy to team PPA if it builds19:08
ftawhich branch are you trying to build? maybe i can try19:10
micahgfta: openjdk-619:10
micahgfta: with the patch for xul19219:10
micahgPPA builders aren't busy, so I don't care that much ATM19:11
ftaok19:11
ftai really wonder if i should bother filing bugs against maverick, noone seems to care at this point19:27
micahgfta: what do you mean?19:27
ftamicahg, i've already reported a dozen crashers, nada19:28
micahgfta: it's still early and people are just trying to get packages updated19:29
ftayep, i know. i should just stop with the bugs then. it's pointless19:29
micahgfta: any idea why this patch wouldn't apply in hardy? http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6/raw-rev/8353f4e67ec119:35
ftawhat do you mean?19:38
micahgfta: the patch doesn't apply because the files can't be found and I verified some of them are there19:38
ftamicahg, did you update d/rules?19:43
ftait seems they have a special way to apply the patches19:44
micahgfta: yeah, I added the line there, it just doesn't seem to apply19:49
ftamicahg, i don't know, i never touched this package, you should ask doko20:08
micahgfta: k, thanks20:09
chrisccoulsonbdrung - do you remember what the licensing issue was with stumbleupon?20:29
chrisccoulsonwe're rolling out firefox 3.6.4 to hardy over the next week, and i'm trying to get all the extensions up-to-date20:30
bdrungchrisccoulson: no - i would have to check it20:30
chrisccoulsonbdrung - would you mind doing that please? :)20:30
bdrungchrisccoulson: MPL and the GPL are incompatible20:32
micahgchrisccoulson: do you know anything about openjdk20:34
bdrungchrisccoulson: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/2010-January/000400.html20:34
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i don't know much about that, how come?20:35
micahgchrisccoulson: I can't get my patch to apply20:35
chrisccoulsonbdrung - thanks. that leaves me with a bit of a problem ;)20:35
micahgchrisccoulson: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49452870/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-amd64.openjdk-6_6b11-2ubuntu2.3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz some of the files don't exist, but some do and it won't apply to them either...20:35
chrisccoulsonwe might have to just ship an empty stumbleupon package in hardy-security to remove the broken extension after the update, but that's quite suboptimal :(20:36
sebnerbdrung: hab ich das schon einmal gewusst das du ein deutscher bist? =)20:36
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i'll have a look at that in a bit20:37
micahgchrisccoulson: thanks, I'll move on to something else in the mean time20:37
bdrungsebner: kA - es dauert meist sehr lang bis man merkt dass der andere auch Deutscher ist20:38
chrisccoulsonasac - i'm a bit stuck here - i'm not sure what to do about stumbleupon (the latest version needed for the hardy update has a licensing issue - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/2010-January/000400.html)20:38
sebnerbdrung: naja, auf mich trifft das ja nicht zu ;)20:38
asacchrisccoulson: is that in the archive?20:38
chrisccoulsonasac - stumbleupon is in the archive until karmic (we dropped it last cycle)20:39
bdrungsebner: lass mich LP checken20:39
bdrungsebner: wien - dicht genug dran. wie kommst du jetzt eigentlich drauf?20:42
sebnerbdrung: hab auf dem planten nur dein behind motu interview entdeckt :)20:43
bdrungchrisccoulson: if you find a solution for stumbleupon, please push it into debian (pkg-mozext)20:43
bdrungsebner: ja, ich habs nach nem halben jahr geschafft endlich daniel anfrage zu beantworten ;)20:44
sebnerheh20:44
BUGabundogreat :( gwibber is broken20:44
BUGabundowho is looking for gwibber now?20:46
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_fews
=== BUGabundo_fews is now known as BUGabundo_fewd
asacchrisccoulson: if its gone in lucid, we should make it go away in hardy too ... just upload an empty package i guess21:08
asacchrisccoulson: or eat that licensing issue (if there is a real issue -- cant check in depth now)21:08
asacBUGabundo_fewd: kenvandine was always looking for gwibber21:09
chrisccoulsonasac - yeah, that's what i thought (about the empty package). i'm not sure if that will surpise users though21:09
asacchrisccoulson: it might, but well. the other option is to just leave it as it is or force the new version21:10
asachave you tried if that works?21:10
asace.g. bump maxversion?21:10
asacor use the karmic version and bump maxversion?21:10
* asac assumes that was already tried for lucid21:10
chrisccoulsoni'll see if that works. i can't remember if we tried that for stumbleupon in lucid21:10
chrisccoulsonmicahg - have you noticed plugin-container crashing in build6?21:12
chrisccoulsoni've just realised i keep seeing apport pop up now21:12
micahgchrisccoulson: no, but I haven't looked at my crashes in a few days :-/21:13
=== BUGabundo_fewd is now known as BUGabundo
BUGabundoasac: _was_? no longer is?21:22
asacBUGabundo: was and is21:23
BUGabundoasac: GO TO BED21:26
BUGabundothat's an order21:26
micahgchrisccoulson: do you have a problem if I backport the latest kazekhase to hardy?21:28
micahgchrisccoulson: It was going well, but now there are more intricate changes and I realize that the latest version already fixed all this21:28
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, if it's too much effort / too risky to patch the hardy version, then you could just backport the karmic version21:30
micahgchrisccoulson: k, that should do it21:31
micahgchrisccoulson: seems like that won't work as GTK 2.16 is required :(21:44
micahgchrisccoulson: I'll try harder to backport21:44
chrisccoulsonmicahg - heh, same with epiphany ;)21:44
chrisccoulsoni'd check which 2.16 features it *really* needs21:44
micahgchrisccoulson: yes, but you had to backport parts of GTK 2.16 for that, I don't think kazekhase is worth it, I just need to go find the last few commits upstream for xul192 support21:45
micahgchrisccoulson: is it ok to throw it all in one patch or should I separate the commits?21:46
chrisccoulsonmicahg - yeah, that should be fine21:46
micahgchrisccoulson: k21:46
micahgbdrung: you're famous :)21:47
bdrungmicahg: really?21:47
micahgbdrung: http://behindmotu.wordpress.com/2010/05/31/benjamin-drung-bdrung/21:48
bdrungmicahg: i wouldn't count that as famous ;)21:48
micahgbdrung: it's on planet ubuntu :)21:49
bdrungmicahg: look at the screenshot - that's the time needed for answering the questions :)21:49
bdrungmicahg: my blog post are on planet ubuntu, too21:49
micahgbdrung: I know21:50
bdrungyou know?21:51
micahgbdrung: I know your posts are on there, it was not so serious what I was saying before21:52
bdrungmicahg: ok, i thought you knew that i needed month for it (-> http://behindmotu.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/bildschirmfoto.png)21:53
micahgoh  I guess I missed that :)21:54
=== almaisan is now known as almaisan-away
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
ftalol http://www.osnews.com/story/23383/Firefox_for_Windows_Starts_64bit_Transition22:31
mconnorwhy lol?22:31
BUGabundoyep22:33
BUGabundoread it last week22:33
BUGabundothere's already a x64 project22:33
BUGabundothey are picking on that work22:33
BUGabundoand dailies will start soon22:33
BUGabundomconnor: I guess fta is laughing to the fact Linux has 64bits build since for ever22:33
BUGabundoor better, years22:34
BUGabundowhile windows only had swiftfox binaries, recently a x64 project, and only now oficial support22:34
BUGabundowith all the known limitations: no java, no flash, and no OS or manufactures supporting 64bits22:34
BUGabundoeven linux is craming it22:35
micahgBUGabundo: debian just made 64 bit official 3 yrs ago23:01
BUGabundoehe23:02
mconnorBUGabundo: linux has had, to be fair, crashy and unstable builds that we haven't supported and generated many reports of problems23:56
mconnor:)23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!