[08:43] <cwillu> heh, view bug reports freezes up for seconds at a time under the nightly 3.7 build
[08:43] <cwillu> viewing rather, on launchpad
[09:14] <BUGabundo_remote> bu dia!
[09:57] <nikolam> bah. importing seamonkey 1.1.17 profile into seamonkey 2.0.4 (seamonkey -migration) does not import passwords and looks to me like not importing most of inboxes i have
[10:09] <nikolam> ok, I take back my previous finding.
[10:09] <nikolam> It happens only if Sm2 is already used separately form previous profile and then migrated
[10:10] <nikolam> if there is no sm2 profile dir already, then migration to SM2 seems to work OK so far ;)
[10:34] <BUGabundo_remote> fta something is funky with Ch
[10:35] <BUGabundo_remote> I have "offer translation" disable and it still offers it :(
[10:44] <BUGabundo_remote> fta http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=45470
[11:03]  * cwillu pokes at bug
[14:55] <fta2> BUGabundo_remote, sorry, no time atm, i'm busy with work
[15:05] <BUGabundo_remote> np
[15:05] <BUGabundo_remote> I filed it upstream
[17:20] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ping
[17:21] <chrisccoulson> hi micahg
[17:21] <chrisccoulson> i see you uploaded some stuff to the transition PPA
[17:21] <micahg> chrisccoulson: hi, are we backporting the latest mozilla-devscripts
[17:21] <chrisccoulson> micahg - so far, there's been no need to
[17:21] <chrisccoulson> i'm not relying on any new features from it
[17:22] <chrisccoulson> and there's not much left to backport now ;)
[17:22] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, I updated the gobby doc last night with the extensions you worked on
[17:22] <chrisccoulson> micahg - thanks
[17:23] <chrisccoulson> i had a late night on friday ;)
[17:23] <micahg> chrisccoulson: are you working today, or just around?
[17:23] <chrisccoulson> micahg - i'm just hanging around atm, but i might do a bit of work after dinner
[17:23] <fta> transition PPA?
[17:24] <micahg> fta: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35
[17:24] <fta> oh
[17:24] <fta> http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/mozillateam--ffox35.html then
[17:24] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, so if the versions look ok, can you copy and rebuild my sources from the transition PPA
[17:25] <micahg> chrisccoulson: just the stuff I uploaded in the last 3 days
[17:25] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, will do
[17:25] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[17:25] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I'll be working on this today, not as much of a rush as before, but still trying to rush ;)
[17:26] <chrisccoulson> no bdrung about today?
[17:27] <chrisccoulson> micahg - do you know what the specific issue with the stumbleupon licensing was?
[17:27] <chrisccoulson> thats one of the extensions i still need to update in hardy
[17:27] <micahg> chrisccoulson: no idea
[17:28] <micahg> chrisccoulson: oh, prism won't build w/out newer mozilla-devscripts, but I guess I can hack the packaging to fix that
[17:28] <micahg> if it's the only package
[17:28] <micahg> chrisccoulson: maybe don't copy prism until the last minute
[17:31] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I'm trying openjdk now
[17:40] <chrisccoulson> micahg - FYI - the call for testing which will be going out soon is here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Firefox3.6.4Upgrade
[17:41] <micahg> chrisccoulson: let me know when and I'll pass along to bugsquad, I guess I do have to rush to finish everything today then ;)
[17:41] <chrisccoulson> ara has been helping with providing a way for us to get proper feedback
[17:41] <micahg> chrisccoulson: can people file bugs?
[17:48] <fta> which gnome are we targeting in maverick? 2.31?
[17:49] <micahg> fta: I think mostly 2.32 (3.0)
[17:50] <fta> k
[17:55] <micahg> fta: can you help me with a pbuilder line: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/442356/
[17:58] <fta> micahg, should be on two lines.. 1/ --update --othermirror "your deb line"  --override-config  2/ --build ...
[17:58] <micahg> fta: I tried that also and it didn't work
[18:04] <fta> micahg, http://paste.ubuntu.com/442364/
[18:05] <micahg> fta: I'll try recreating from scratch
[18:18] <fta> micahg, did it work?
[18:20] <micahg> fta: still trying
[18:21] <fta> micahg, oh, here, the --create part takes less than 1min
[18:22] <micahg> fta: yeah, I accidentally ran it twice
[18:24] <micahg> fta: weird, still not working I think my pbuilder sources aren't updating
[18:25] <fta> micahg, here is how to easily figure out: http://paste.ubuntu.com/442376/
[18:27] <fta> then build your stuff and you will see the hook pasting your apt sources at the beginning
[18:32] <micahg> fta: it doesn't like me today :(
[18:32] <fta> micahg, did you try with my hook?
[18:32] <micahg> no, hmmm, let me try
[18:33] <fta> if the sources files are correct, but it still doesn't work, update my hook and insert "apt-get update" before the exit
[18:35] <fta> to be sure, you can also insert an "apt-cache madison your_dep" to see if it's available or not
[18:38] <micahg> k, now it looks like it's working, let's see if it builds
[18:46] <micahg> fta: the line is in there
[18:58] <micahg> fta: it sees the package, just sayd tha it's uninstallable
[18:58] <fta> micahg, is it?
[18:58] <micahg> yep
[19:05] <fta> micahg, i mean, is it pbuilder's fault or is that package really uninstallable?
[19:05] <micahg> fta: idk
[19:05] <fta> micahg, could you paste the full logs?
[19:06] <micahg> fta: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/442394/
 if the sources files are correct, but it still doesn't work, update my hook and insert "apt-get update" before the exit
 to be sure, you can also insert an "apt-cache madison your_dep" to see if it's available or not
[19:07] <fta> micahg, ^^
[19:07] <micahg> fta: did that
[19:07] <micahg> I'm testing in my chroot now to see if there's an issue
[19:07] <fta> oh, right
[19:08] <micahg> wfm
[19:08] <micahg> I've wasted an hour on this already, I'm just going to push to my PPA and copy to team PPA if it builds
[19:10] <fta> which branch are you trying to build? maybe i can try
[19:10] <micahg> fta: openjdk-6
[19:10] <micahg> fta: with the patch for xul192
[19:11] <micahg> PPA builders aren't busy, so I don't care that much ATM
[19:11] <fta> ok
[19:27] <fta> i really wonder if i should bother filing bugs against maverick, noone seems to care at this point
[19:27] <micahg> fta: what do you mean?
[19:28] <fta> micahg, i've already reported a dozen crashers, nada
[19:29] <micahg> fta: it's still early and people are just trying to get packages updated
[19:29] <fta> yep, i know. i should just stop with the bugs then. it's pointless
[19:35] <micahg> fta: any idea why this patch wouldn't apply in hardy? http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6/raw-rev/8353f4e67ec1
[19:38] <fta> what do you mean?
[19:38] <micahg> fta: the patch doesn't apply because the files can't be found and I verified some of them are there
[19:43] <fta> micahg, did you update d/rules?
[19:44] <fta> it seems they have a special way to apply the patches
[19:49] <micahg> fta: yeah, I added the line there, it just doesn't seem to apply
[20:08] <fta> micahg, i don't know, i never touched this package, you should ask doko
[20:09] <micahg> fta: k, thanks
[20:29] <chrisccoulson> bdrung - do you remember what the licensing issue was with stumbleupon?
[20:30] <chrisccoulson> we're rolling out firefox 3.6.4 to hardy over the next week, and i'm trying to get all the extensions up-to-date
[20:30] <bdrung> chrisccoulson: no - i would have to check it
[20:30] <chrisccoulson> bdrung - would you mind doing that please? :)
[20:32] <bdrung> chrisccoulson: MPL and the GPL are incompatible
[20:34] <micahg> chrisccoulson: do you know anything about openjdk
[20:34] <bdrung> chrisccoulson: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/2010-January/000400.html
[20:35] <chrisccoulson> micahg - i don't know much about that, how come?
[20:35] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I can't get my patch to apply
[20:35] <chrisccoulson> bdrung - thanks. that leaves me with a bit of a problem ;)
[20:35] <micahg> chrisccoulson: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49452870/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-amd64.openjdk-6_6b11-2ubuntu2.3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz some of the files don't exist, but some do and it won't apply to them either...
[20:36] <chrisccoulson> we might have to just ship an empty stumbleupon package in hardy-security to remove the broken extension after the update, but that's quite suboptimal :(
[20:36] <sebner> bdrung: hab ich das schon einmal gewusst das du ein deutscher bist? =)
[20:37] <chrisccoulson> micahg - i'll have a look at that in a bit
[20:37] <micahg> chrisccoulson: thanks, I'll move on to something else in the mean time
[20:38] <bdrung> sebner: kA - es dauert meist sehr lang bis man merkt dass der andere auch Deutscher ist
[20:38] <chrisccoulson> asac - i'm a bit stuck here - i'm not sure what to do about stumbleupon (the latest version needed for the hardy update has a licensing issue - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/2010-January/000400.html)
[20:38] <sebner> bdrung: naja, auf mich trifft das ja nicht zu ;)
[20:38] <asac> chrisccoulson: is that in the archive?
[20:39] <chrisccoulson> asac - stumbleupon is in the archive until karmic (we dropped it last cycle)
[20:39] <bdrung> sebner: lass mich LP checken
[20:42] <bdrung> sebner: wien - dicht genug dran. wie kommst du jetzt eigentlich drauf?
[20:43] <sebner> bdrung: hab auf dem planten nur dein behind motu interview entdeckt :)
[20:43] <bdrung> chrisccoulson: if you find a solution for stumbleupon, please push it into debian (pkg-mozext)
[20:44] <bdrung> sebner: ja, ich habs nach nem halben jahr geschafft endlich daniel anfrage zu beantworten ;)
[20:44] <sebner> heh
[20:44] <BUGabundo> great :( gwibber is broken
[20:46] <BUGabundo> who is looking for gwibber now?
[21:08] <asac> chrisccoulson: if its gone in lucid, we should make it go away in hardy too ... just upload an empty package i guess
[21:08] <asac> chrisccoulson: or eat that licensing issue (if there is a real issue -- cant check in depth now)
[21:09] <asac> BUGabundo_fewd: kenvandine was always looking for gwibber
[21:09] <chrisccoulson> asac - yeah, that's what i thought (about the empty package). i'm not sure if that will surpise users though
[21:10] <asac> chrisccoulson: it might, but well. the other option is to just leave it as it is or force the new version
[21:10] <asac> have you tried if that works?
[21:10] <asac> e.g. bump maxversion?
[21:10] <asac> or use the karmic version and bump maxversion?
[21:10]  * asac assumes that was already tried for lucid
[21:10] <chrisccoulson> i'll see if that works. i can't remember if we tried that for stumbleupon in lucid
[21:12] <chrisccoulson> micahg - have you noticed plugin-container crashing in build6?
[21:12] <chrisccoulson> i've just realised i keep seeing apport pop up now
[21:13] <micahg> chrisccoulson: no, but I haven't looked at my crashes in a few days :-/
[21:22] <BUGabundo> asac: _was_? no longer is?
[21:23] <asac> BUGabundo: was and is
[21:26] <BUGabundo> asac: GO TO BED
[21:26] <BUGabundo> that's an order
[21:28] <micahg> chrisccoulson: do you have a problem if I backport the latest kazekhase to hardy?
[21:28] <micahg> chrisccoulson: It was going well, but now there are more intricate changes and I realize that the latest version already fixed all this
[21:30] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, if it's too much effort / too risky to patch the hardy version, then you could just backport the karmic version
[21:31] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, that should do it
[21:44] <micahg> chrisccoulson: seems like that won't work as GTK 2.16 is required :(
[21:44] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I'll try harder to backport
[21:44] <chrisccoulson> micahg - heh, same with epiphany ;)
[21:44] <chrisccoulson> i'd check which 2.16 features it *really* needs
[21:45] <micahg> chrisccoulson: yes, but you had to backport parts of GTK 2.16 for that, I don't think kazekhase is worth it, I just need to go find the last few commits upstream for xul192 support
[21:46] <micahg> chrisccoulson: is it ok to throw it all in one patch or should I separate the commits?
[21:46] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, that should be fine
[21:46] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k
[21:47] <micahg> bdrung: you're famous :)
[21:47] <bdrung> micahg: really?
[21:48] <micahg> bdrung: http://behindmotu.wordpress.com/2010/05/31/benjamin-drung-bdrung/
[21:48] <bdrung> micahg: i wouldn't count that as famous ;)
[21:49] <micahg> bdrung: it's on planet ubuntu :)
[21:49] <bdrung> micahg: look at the screenshot - that's the time needed for answering the questions :)
[21:49] <bdrung> micahg: my blog post are on planet ubuntu, too
[21:50] <micahg> bdrung: I know
[21:51] <bdrung> you know?
[21:52] <micahg> bdrung: I know your posts are on there, it was not so serious what I was saying before
[21:53] <bdrung> micahg: ok, i thought you knew that i needed month for it (-> http://behindmotu.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/bildschirmfoto.png)
[21:54] <micahg> oh  I guess I missed that :)
[22:31] <fta> lol http://www.osnews.com/story/23383/Firefox_for_Windows_Starts_64bit_Transition
[22:31] <mconnor> why lol?
[22:33] <BUGabundo> yep
[22:33] <BUGabundo> read it last week
[22:33] <BUGabundo> there's already a x64 project
[22:33] <BUGabundo> they are picking on that work
[22:33] <BUGabundo> and dailies will start soon
[22:33] <BUGabundo> mconnor: I guess fta is laughing to the fact Linux has 64bits build since for ever
[22:34] <BUGabundo> or better, years
[22:34] <BUGabundo> while windows only had swiftfox binaries, recently a x64 project, and only now oficial support
[22:34] <BUGabundo> with all the known limitations: no java, no flash, and no OS or manufactures supporting 64bits
[22:35] <BUGabundo> even linux is craming it
[23:01] <micahg> BUGabundo: debian just made 64 bit official 3 yrs ago
[23:02] <BUGabundo> ehe
[23:56] <mconnor> BUGabundo: linux has had, to be fair, crashy and unstable builds that we haven't supported and generated many reports of problems
[23:57] <mconnor> :)