[08:43] heh, view bug reports freezes up for seconds at a time under the nightly 3.7 build [08:43] viewing rather, on launchpad [09:14] bu dia! [09:57] bah. importing seamonkey 1.1.17 profile into seamonkey 2.0.4 (seamonkey -migration) does not import passwords and looks to me like not importing most of inboxes i have [10:09] ok, I take back my previous finding. [10:09] It happens only if Sm2 is already used separately form previous profile and then migrated [10:10] if there is no sm2 profile dir already, then migration to SM2 seems to work OK so far ;) [10:34] fta something is funky with Ch [10:35] I have "offer translation" disable and it still offers it :( [10:44] fta http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=45470 [11:03] * cwillu pokes at bug === almaisan-away is now known as almaisan [14:55] BUGabundo_remote, sorry, no time atm, i'm busy with work [15:05] np [15:05] I filed it upstream === \vish is now known as vish === nikolam_ is now known as nikolam [17:20] chrisccoulson: ping [17:21] hi micahg [17:21] i see you uploaded some stuff to the transition PPA [17:21] chrisccoulson: hi, are we backporting the latest mozilla-devscripts [17:21] micahg - so far, there's been no need to [17:21] i'm not relying on any new features from it [17:22] and there's not much left to backport now ;) [17:22] chrisccoulson: k, I updated the gobby doc last night with the extensions you worked on [17:22] micahg - thanks [17:23] i had a late night on friday ;) [17:23] chrisccoulson: are you working today, or just around? [17:23] micahg - i'm just hanging around atm, but i might do a bit of work after dinner [17:23] transition PPA? [17:24] fta: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ffox35 [17:24] oh [17:24] http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/mozillateam--ffox35.html then [17:24] chrisccoulson: k, so if the versions look ok, can you copy and rebuild my sources from the transition PPA [17:25] chrisccoulson: just the stuff I uploaded in the last 3 days [17:25] micahg - yeah, will do [17:25] thanks [17:25] chrisccoulson: I'll be working on this today, not as much of a rush as before, but still trying to rush ;) [17:26] no bdrung about today? [17:27] micahg - do you know what the specific issue with the stumbleupon licensing was? [17:27] thats one of the extensions i still need to update in hardy [17:27] chrisccoulson: no idea [17:28] chrisccoulson: oh, prism won't build w/out newer mozilla-devscripts, but I guess I can hack the packaging to fix that [17:28] if it's the only package [17:28] chrisccoulson: maybe don't copy prism until the last minute [17:31] chrisccoulson: I'm trying openjdk now [17:40] micahg - FYI - the call for testing which will be going out soon is here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Firefox3.6.4Upgrade [17:41] chrisccoulson: let me know when and I'll pass along to bugsquad, I guess I do have to rush to finish everything today then ;) [17:41] ara has been helping with providing a way for us to get proper feedback [17:41] chrisccoulson: can people file bugs? [17:48] which gnome are we targeting in maverick? 2.31? [17:49] fta: I think mostly 2.32 (3.0) [17:50] k [17:55] fta: can you help me with a pbuilder line: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/442356/ [17:58] micahg, should be on two lines.. 1/ --update --othermirror "your deb line" --override-config 2/ --build ... [17:58] fta: I tried that also and it didn't work [18:04] micahg, http://paste.ubuntu.com/442364/ [18:05] fta: I'll try recreating from scratch [18:18] micahg, did it work? [18:20] fta: still trying [18:21] micahg, oh, here, the --create part takes less than 1min [18:22] fta: yeah, I accidentally ran it twice [18:24] fta: weird, still not working I think my pbuilder sources aren't updating [18:25] micahg, here is how to easily figure out: http://paste.ubuntu.com/442376/ [18:27] then build your stuff and you will see the hook pasting your apt sources at the beginning [18:32] fta: it doesn't like me today :( [18:32] micahg, did you try with my hook? [18:32] no, hmmm, let me try [18:33] if the sources files are correct, but it still doesn't work, update my hook and insert "apt-get update" before the exit [18:35] to be sure, you can also insert an "apt-cache madison your_dep" to see if it's available or not [18:38] k, now it looks like it's working, let's see if it builds [18:46] fta: the line is in there [18:58] fta: it sees the package, just sayd tha it's uninstallable [18:58] micahg, is it? [18:58] yep [19:05] micahg, i mean, is it pbuilder's fault or is that package really uninstallable? [19:05] fta: idk [19:05] micahg, could you paste the full logs? [19:06] fta: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/442394/ [19:07] if the sources files are correct, but it still doesn't work, update my hook and insert "apt-get update" before the exit [19:07] to be sure, you can also insert an "apt-cache madison your_dep" to see if it's available or not [19:07] micahg, ^^ [19:07] fta: did that [19:07] I'm testing in my chroot now to see if there's an issue [19:07] oh, right [19:08] wfm [19:08] I've wasted an hour on this already, I'm just going to push to my PPA and copy to team PPA if it builds [19:10] which branch are you trying to build? maybe i can try [19:10] fta: openjdk-6 [19:10] fta: with the patch for xul192 [19:11] PPA builders aren't busy, so I don't care that much ATM [19:11] ok [19:27] i really wonder if i should bother filing bugs against maverick, noone seems to care at this point [19:27] fta: what do you mean? [19:28] micahg, i've already reported a dozen crashers, nada [19:29] fta: it's still early and people are just trying to get packages updated [19:29] yep, i know. i should just stop with the bugs then. it's pointless [19:35] fta: any idea why this patch wouldn't apply in hardy? http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6/raw-rev/8353f4e67ec1 [19:38] what do you mean? [19:38] fta: the patch doesn't apply because the files can't be found and I verified some of them are there [19:43] micahg, did you update d/rules? [19:44] it seems they have a special way to apply the patches [19:49] fta: yeah, I added the line there, it just doesn't seem to apply [20:08] micahg, i don't know, i never touched this package, you should ask doko [20:09] fta: k, thanks [20:29] bdrung - do you remember what the licensing issue was with stumbleupon? [20:30] we're rolling out firefox 3.6.4 to hardy over the next week, and i'm trying to get all the extensions up-to-date [20:30] chrisccoulson: no - i would have to check it [20:30] bdrung - would you mind doing that please? :) [20:32] chrisccoulson: MPL and the GPL are incompatible [20:34] chrisccoulson: do you know anything about openjdk [20:34] chrisccoulson: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/2010-January/000400.html [20:35] micahg - i don't know much about that, how come? [20:35] chrisccoulson: I can't get my patch to apply [20:35] bdrung - thanks. that leaves me with a bit of a problem ;) [20:35] chrisccoulson: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49452870/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-amd64.openjdk-6_6b11-2ubuntu2.3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz some of the files don't exist, but some do and it won't apply to them either... [20:36] we might have to just ship an empty stumbleupon package in hardy-security to remove the broken extension after the update, but that's quite suboptimal :( [20:36] bdrung: hab ich das schon einmal gewusst das du ein deutscher bist? =) [20:37] micahg - i'll have a look at that in a bit [20:37] chrisccoulson: thanks, I'll move on to something else in the mean time [20:38] sebner: kA - es dauert meist sehr lang bis man merkt dass der andere auch Deutscher ist [20:38] asac - i'm a bit stuck here - i'm not sure what to do about stumbleupon (the latest version needed for the hardy update has a licensing issue - http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/2010-January/000400.html) [20:38] bdrung: naja, auf mich trifft das ja nicht zu ;) [20:38] chrisccoulson: is that in the archive? [20:39] asac - stumbleupon is in the archive until karmic (we dropped it last cycle) [20:39] sebner: lass mich LP checken [20:42] sebner: wien - dicht genug dran. wie kommst du jetzt eigentlich drauf? [20:43] bdrung: hab auf dem planten nur dein behind motu interview entdeckt :) [20:43] chrisccoulson: if you find a solution for stumbleupon, please push it into debian (pkg-mozext) [20:44] sebner: ja, ich habs nach nem halben jahr geschafft endlich daniel anfrage zu beantworten ;) [20:44] heh [20:44] great :( gwibber is broken [20:46] who is looking for gwibber now? === BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_fews === BUGabundo_fews is now known as BUGabundo_fewd [21:08] chrisccoulson: if its gone in lucid, we should make it go away in hardy too ... just upload an empty package i guess [21:08] chrisccoulson: or eat that licensing issue (if there is a real issue -- cant check in depth now) [21:09] BUGabundo_fewd: kenvandine was always looking for gwibber [21:09] asac - yeah, that's what i thought (about the empty package). i'm not sure if that will surpise users though [21:10] chrisccoulson: it might, but well. the other option is to just leave it as it is or force the new version [21:10] have you tried if that works? [21:10] e.g. bump maxversion? [21:10] or use the karmic version and bump maxversion? [21:10] * asac assumes that was already tried for lucid [21:10] i'll see if that works. i can't remember if we tried that for stumbleupon in lucid [21:12] micahg - have you noticed plugin-container crashing in build6? [21:12] i've just realised i keep seeing apport pop up now [21:13] chrisccoulson: no, but I haven't looked at my crashes in a few days :-/ === BUGabundo_fewd is now known as BUGabundo [21:22] asac: _was_? no longer is? [21:23] BUGabundo: was and is [21:26] asac: GO TO BED [21:26] that's an order [21:28] chrisccoulson: do you have a problem if I backport the latest kazekhase to hardy? [21:28] chrisccoulson: It was going well, but now there are more intricate changes and I realize that the latest version already fixed all this [21:30] micahg - yeah, if it's too much effort / too risky to patch the hardy version, then you could just backport the karmic version [21:31] chrisccoulson: k, that should do it [21:44] chrisccoulson: seems like that won't work as GTK 2.16 is required :( [21:44] chrisccoulson: I'll try harder to backport [21:44] micahg - heh, same with epiphany ;) [21:44] i'd check which 2.16 features it *really* needs [21:45] chrisccoulson: yes, but you had to backport parts of GTK 2.16 for that, I don't think kazekhase is worth it, I just need to go find the last few commits upstream for xul192 support [21:46] chrisccoulson: is it ok to throw it all in one patch or should I separate the commits? [21:46] micahg - yeah, that should be fine [21:46] chrisccoulson: k [21:47] bdrung: you're famous :) [21:47] micahg: really? [21:48] bdrung: http://behindmotu.wordpress.com/2010/05/31/benjamin-drung-bdrung/ [21:48] micahg: i wouldn't count that as famous ;) [21:49] bdrung: it's on planet ubuntu :) [21:49] micahg: look at the screenshot - that's the time needed for answering the questions :) [21:49] micahg: my blog post are on planet ubuntu, too [21:50] bdrung: I know [21:51] you know? [21:52] bdrung: I know your posts are on there, it was not so serious what I was saying before [21:53] micahg: ok, i thought you knew that i needed month for it (-> http://behindmotu.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/bildschirmfoto.png) [21:54] oh I guess I missed that :) === almaisan is now known as almaisan-away === micahg1 is now known as micahg [22:31] lol http://www.osnews.com/story/23383/Firefox_for_Windows_Starts_64bit_Transition [22:31] why lol? [22:33] yep [22:33] read it last week [22:33] there's already a x64 project [22:33] they are picking on that work [22:33] and dailies will start soon [22:33] mconnor: I guess fta is laughing to the fact Linux has 64bits build since for ever [22:34] or better, years [22:34] while windows only had swiftfox binaries, recently a x64 project, and only now oficial support [22:34] with all the known limitations: no java, no flash, and no OS or manufactures supporting 64bits [22:35] even linux is craming it [23:01] BUGabundo: debian just made 64 bit official 3 yrs ago [23:02] ehe [23:56] BUGabundo: linux has had, to be fair, crashy and unstable builds that we haven't supported and generated many reports of problems [23:57] :)