[05:40] <pitti> Good morning
[06:02]  * pitti re-enables cron jobs, the uninstallabilities from last email report should all be gone now
[06:12] <pitti> ok, needs livecd-base first, which needs the linux kernel NEWed first, doing that now
[07:43] <pitti> cjwatson: sorry for the initial d-i FTBFS spam (NEWed kernel wasn't published yet), it's building now
[08:00] <ara> pitti, ping
[08:00] <pitti> hey ara, good morning!
[08:00] <ara> pitti, morning :-)
[08:00] <ara> pitti, quick question, for alpha-1, are we releasing only ubuntu alt?
[08:01] <pitti> ara: I don't know yet; I'm waiting for the publisher to get d-i updated, then I'll build a first set of images and see what breaks
[08:01] <ara> pitti, OK, thanks. Please, keep me posted :-)
[08:01] <pitti> ara: if they build and work, I think we should release desktops, too; they're great for testing on various hw, etc.
[08:01] <ara> pitti, what about other flavours?
[08:02] <pitti> I expect at least Kubuntu, not sure about the others
[08:02] <pitti> (and server)
[08:02] <ara> pitti, OK, thanks!
[08:02] <pitti> I guess we'll build them all, post them to the tracker, and see what sticks?
[08:02] <pitti> is that ok with you?
[08:02] <ara> pitti, sure, if they build... :)
[09:02] <pitti> ah, live cd base finally built
[09:03]  * pitti boldly starts an ubuntu live build
[09:08] <pitti> meh, failed with an empty log
[09:08] <pitti> cjwatson: do you know why http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/20100531.1/source/ also has a lucid-src?
[09:25] <pitti> ok, missioncontrol uninstallability sorted out
[09:26] <pitti> but what I don't understand is why the daily ubuntu and server .isos don't show up, just their reports.html
[09:49] <pitti> cjwatson: FTR, all "Release minus 6 days" stuff should be done now, except the marketing team bit
[09:59] <pitti> so, I fixed the seeds for the -5 kernel, but that shouldn't stop cron.daily from building at least a broken iso, or does it?
[10:01] <pitti> ah, seems it does, sorry
[10:01] <pitti> debian-installer has kernel ABI 2.6.34-5-generic, but no corresponding udebs are on the CD!
[10:01] <pitti> make: *** [/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntu/daily/tmp/maverick-amd64/bootable-stamp] Error 1
[11:16] <pitti> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/20100531.2/ for your testing pleasure
[11:16] <pitti> ara: ^FYI
[11:16]  * pitti rsyncs and does a smoketest first
[11:16] <ara> pitti, thanks
[11:16] <pitti> ara: I grab the amd64 one, just to see how far we'll get with a default install
[11:17] <ara> pitti, OK, I'll do the i386 one
[11:27] <pitti> ttx: FYI, http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/20100531.1/ is the first maverick server build ever; mind doing a quick smoketest? (or delegating to someone :) )
[11:28] <pitti> I don't know why lucid images are there as well
[11:30] <pitti> ara, all: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20100531/ good for first smoketest (beware, oversized)
[11:30] <ara> pitti, OK, thanks. I will start syncing
[11:32] <pitti> I'll drop langpacks for tomorrow's daily
[11:42] <pitti> Riddell: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily/20100531/ -> for first smoketest
[11:42] <pitti> building kubuntu desktop now
[12:28] <ttx> pitti: sure
[12:40] <ara> pitti, alt i386 installs correctly and reboots correctly (spanish; no-network)
[12:45] <pitti> ara: thanks; desktop doesn't start for me, hangs forever on usplash; will have a look after lunch
[12:46] <ara> pitti, same thing here (i386)
[12:49] <ttx> pitti: anything special to explain the suddenly oversized CD ? Looking at the package list I don't see anything that would explain +30Mb
[12:56]  * ttx will dig deeper when the ISO will be downloaded
[13:31] <pitti> ara: ah, booting without splash/quiet reveals it: kernel oops in aufs
[13:32]  * pitti files bug
[13:33] <ara> pitti, cool, thanks
[13:45] <ttx> pitti: tracked sudden size inflation it down to pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-2.6.34-5-virtual_2.6.34-5.12_amd64.deb
[13:46] <ttx> 12110 -r--r--r--  4 root root 12399730 2010-04-16 16:05 pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-2.6.32-21-virtual_2.6.32-21.32_amd64.deb
[13:46] <ttx> 31782 -r--r--r-- 2 root root 32544062 2010-05-31 08:05 pool/main/l/linux/linux-image-2.6.34-5-virtual_2.6.34-5.12_amd64.deb
[13:46] <ttx> it's no longer a leaner kernel :)
[13:51] <pitti> ara_: filed as bug 587888 FYI, for the kernel team's enjoyment
[13:51] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 587888 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "aufs oops in au_do_open() on maverick live system boot (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/587888
[13:51]  * pitti waves to apw
[13:55] <ttx> pitti: filed bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/587893
[13:55] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 587893 in linux (Ubuntu) "linux-image-2.6.34-5-virtual is oversized, results in oversized server ISO (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New]
[13:55] <ttx> pitti: is an oversized CD a blocker for alpha1 ?
[13:56] <pitti> ttx: well, not a really critical one, but this seems easy to fix
[13:56] <pitti> looks like a bad dependency in a metapackage somewhere?
[13:57] <pitti> ttx: oh, misunderstood you -- I thought you used ls on the CD pool/ to show that the CD now ships two kernels (lucid and maverick)
[13:58] <ttx> pitti: no, it's just the -virtual kernel that more than doubled in size
[13:58] <ttx> it may or may not be simple
[13:58] <pitti> right
[13:58] <ttx> pitti: I'll talk to john about it tomorrow, but if you want it fixed you should also mark it against alpha1
[13:59] <pitti> ttx: is there something else we could temporarily take off the CD?
[13:59] <ttx> nothing easy that would spare us ~20Mb.
[14:10] <doko> ubuntu-archive: please accept llvm-2.7 in NEW
[15:00] <ttx> pitti: server CD mostly in good shape, spotted a syntax error when logging in
[15:01] <pitti> ttx: not bad for the very first maverick image ever
[15:01] <ttx> some bash-completion issue, will file bug
[15:12] <ttx> ev: bug 587910
[15:12] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 587910 in bash-completion (Ubuntu) "[maverick] Syntax error in bash-completion.d/apt prints ugly messages at every login (affects: 1)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/587910
[15:45] <ScottK> cjwatson: Around?
[16:44] <ogra> pitti, please skip arm images for A1 (or even dailies) we're re-rolling the build scripts for omap between A1 and A2
[16:44] <pitti> ogra: right, they have a horrible list of uninstallability anyway
[16:44] <ogra> oh ?
[16:45]  * ogra doesnt see anything image relevant on the ftbfs list
[16:46] <ogra> hmm, but i also dont see any ubuntu-netbook build logs for maverick
[16:47] <pitti> ogra: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/maverick_probs.html
[16:47] <pitti> ogra: although most of it should just be Kubuntu due to a very low-level package (qt?)
[16:47] <ogra> right
[16:47] <ogra> there is nothing on the list that would prevent the armel netbook image on a quick look
[16:49] <ogra> (no armel under netbook-meta)
[18:32] <ScottK> qt4-x11 just got fixed on armel, so KDE should be buildable now, it's just a question of how long it will take.
[18:34] <ScottK> Speaking of which, pitti: would you please rescore phonon on armel?
[18:52] <pitti> ScottK: done
[18:53] <ScottK> pitti: Thanks.
[18:53]  * ScottK is going to see how far he can get on getting the stack built....