[07:17] <alourie|work> good morning
[07:28] <ara> good morning all!
=== djay-il|work is now known as alourie
[10:05] <alourie> hello
[10:05] <alourie> I have a question
[10:05] <alourie> during the test of Maverick server i386, I do the encrypted LVM test
[10:11] <alourie> when it comes to the password step (after install complete), then after each pressed key the request line repeats itself
[10:11] <alourie> god, I explain this badly
[10:13] <ara> alourie, are you using KVM?
[10:14] <alourie> ara: no, VMWare ESXi hypervisor
[10:14] <alourie> it's like vmware generic
[10:14] <alourie> or rather, vmware server
[10:15] <ara> alourie, please, file a bug against plymouth, then we will try to reproduce in KVM or bare metal
[10:15] <alourie> ara: ok. I can provide a couple of screenshots to explain myself better...
[10:16] <ara> alourie, that would be great, thanks
[10:17] <alourie> hold on a sec
[10:18] <alourie> ara: take a look here: http://img15.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=unencr2.png
[10:19] <alourie> it explains what I see in first key pressed, and a second key pressed
[10:19] <ara> alourie, what's wrong with it?
[10:20] <ara> first key pressed: 1 *
[10:20] <ara> second: 2 *
[10:20] <alourie> yes, and the line above, the one that begins with "Unlocking"....
[10:20] <alourie> just added itself once again
[10:20] <alourie> now, my password includes 23 characters
[10:21] <alourie> so I will see the line added after each character pressed, that means 23 redundant lines on the screen
[10:22] <ara> ah, ok, now I understand
[10:22] <ara> I didn't understand it before
[10:22] <alourie> btw, this will be also true if I press "backspace", so my screen will be filled with this
[10:22] <ara> let me check which package you should file against
[10:22] <alourie> ara: yea, I found it hard to expain
[10:22] <alourie> *explain
[10:30] <ara> alourie, I can't find the package right now. File against "Ubuntu" and put it in the iso tracker (although mark the test as Passed, as it is a minor error)
[10:30] <ara> we will assign the right package later on
[10:30] <alourie> ara: ok
[10:32] <alourie> well
[10:33] <alourie> ara: see this https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/566818 :-)
[10:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 566818 in plymouth (Ubuntu) "[Lucid] cryptsetup passphrase prompt during boot: every character typed repeats the prompt (affects: 5) (dups: 1) (heat: 45)" [Medium,Confirmed]
[10:33] <ara> alourie, it is not the same one
[10:33] <ara> alourie, server does not use plymouth
[10:33] <alourie> hm
[10:34] <ara> yes, it is the same, sorry
[10:34] <alourie> ara: well, the description is exactly the same. Maybe it is assigned to the wrong package :-)
[10:34] <ara> alourie, yes, it shouldn't be plymouth, I think, but it is indeed the same bug
[10:34] <ara> alourie, nice catch!
[10:34] <alourie> ara: google search still beats them all
[10:35] <alourie> so I just report the test as passed? Or attach the bug ID anyway?
[10:35] <ara> alourie, "passed" but adding the bug ID as well
[10:39] <alourie> ok
[10:40] <alourie> ara: if I have notes for the QA Tracker itself, who should I talk to?
[10:40] <ara> alourie, me, i.e. ;-)
[10:41] <alourie> ara: ok :-), but they are small and cosmetic. Does they still count?
[10:41] <ara> alourie, yes, they do
[10:41] <ara> alourie, bugs might be already filed at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/
[10:47] <alourie> ok
[10:47] <alourie> sec
[10:58] <alourie> ara: when updating a case results after setting it to "Started", the button text says "Edit result". I think that "Update Result" would be much better
[10:58] <ara> alourie, nice, an easy one :)
[10:59] <alourie> ara: ok, then here's another one:
[10:59] <alourie> A test description says "Set hostname: default - ubuntu"
[10:59] <alourie> which is not clear, set the hostname to "default-ubuntu" or to default value "ubuntu"
[11:00] <alourie> there are multuple tests like that...
[11:01] <ara> alourie, that's something that you can fix
[11:01] <ara> the testcases are under testcases.qa.ubuntu.com which is an editable wiki
[11:01] <alourie> cool
[11:02] <alourie> amazing
[11:06] <pitti> hello all
[11:06] <pitti> just a quick summary of what happens with alpha-1 right now
[11:06] <pitti> all alternate  (including server and EC2) should be working, and are up for testing on the tracker
[11:07] <pitti> ubuntu-desktop should work as well, and up for testing in the tracker
[11:07] <pitti> I'm currently building ubuntu-netbook, kubuntu, kubuntu-netbook, and xubuntu desktop images (they were delayed due to a couple of bugs and problems)
[11:08] <alourie> ara: great, so I will handle test descriptions when I stumble on ambiguities
=== smb is now known as smb-afk
[11:23] <pitti> ubuntu-netbook ready for testing and added to tracker
[11:24] <ara> pitti, thanks :)
[11:39] <pitti> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu-netbook/daily-live/20100602/ ready for testing, added to tracker
[11:59] <pitti> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily-live/20100602/ for your testing pleasure
[12:06] <pitti> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily-live/20100602.3/ ready for testing
=== smb-afk is now known as smb
=== cking is now known as cking-afk
=== cking-afk is now known as cking
[13:47] <alourie> ara: If I know how to fix that button name, can I patch it somehow?
[13:48] <ara> alourie, sure, create a bug against the project ubuntu-qa-website, then branch the code, and propose a merge with your changes
[13:48] <alourie> ara: ok. Is there any way I can test it?
[13:49] <alourie> I mean I want to be sure I'm fixing the right thing :-)
[13:50] <ara> alourie, I need to step out now for lunch, send me an email to ara AT ubuntu DOT com, and I will explain to you
[13:50]  * ara -> lunch
[13:50] <alourie> ara: great, thanks
[14:05] <moustafa> cr3, fader, marjo, everyone I may have missed: Bonjour
[14:05] <fader_> moustafa: Hey dude!
[14:06] <marjo> moustafa: hi!
[14:08] <moustafa> Hello!  How are things in the Orange and Aubergine world?
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn
[15:57] <ara> charlie-tca, are you around?
[16:22] <bladernr_> hey... anyone seen pkgsel fail during d-i install?
[16:24] <bladernr_> it appears in Studio and seems to be one of the 4 package choices that causes the failure (I started by selecting all 4)
[16:39] <charlie-tca> ara: yes, I am here now
[16:40] <ara> charlie-tca, hey, don't worry, I was wondering about the systray bug, but I have seen that you already filed in
[16:41] <charlie-tca> okay
[16:42] <ara> ta
[16:43] <charlie-tca> thank you for checking
[17:11] <alourie> ara: got your email, thanks. I will take a look into it
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[17:57] <sbeattie> QA Meeting reminder: 5 min in #ubuntu-meeting
[18:00] <alourie> ara: got your email, thanks. I will take a look into it
[18:01] <ara> alourie, np
[18:01] <ara> alourie, we are having the QA meeting now at #ubuntu-meeting, if you want to join
[18:02] <alourie> ara: yea, just did
[18:02] <alourie> thansk
[18:22] <charlie-tca> ara: got a workaround on that systray bug after the installation is done and system rebooted.
[18:23] <ara> charlie-tca, nice, you may want to talk pitti to release note the work around (and the bug)
[18:23] <charlie-tca> okay
[18:30] <ara> charlie-tca, if he's not around, send him an email, he's working very early European hours this week
[18:30] <charlie-tca> Oh, okay
[18:34] <charlie-tca> Anybody testing the Xubuntu images, please take a look at bug https://launchpad.net/bugs/586012
[18:34] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 586012 in xfce4-panel (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "[Maverick] XFCE system tray became unusable after upgrade to libgtk2.0-0 2.21.0-1ubuntu2 (affects: 7) (dups: 3) (heat: 48)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[18:34] <charlie-tca> Try the workaround to make the desktop settle down, please.
[20:51] <davmor2> hello cr3 fader_ how did alpha 1 testing go?
[20:54] <fader_> davmor2: alpha what now?
[20:54] <fader_> ;)
[20:55] <davmor2> The thing you just tested dude