dotblank | how long does it take for a package to show up in the ppa when you upload it? | 01:34 |
---|---|---|
wgrant | dotblank: You should receive an email within five minutes, unless you've not properly signed the .changes file. | 01:35 |
wgrant | If it's accepted, it will appear on the PPA page at that time. | 01:35 |
dotblank | Rejected: | 02:30 |
dotblank | groove_0.0.1-1.dsc: Unknown section 'Multimedia' | 02:30 |
dotblank | launchpad keeps rejecting based on that | 02:31 |
lifeless | perhaps you should use one of the official sections | 02:37 |
dotblank | whoa | 02:47 |
dotblank | this is too cool | 02:47 |
dotblank | says it will build in 2 hours | 02:47 |
dotblank | first time using launchpad | 02:47 |
dotblank | but this is very cool | 02:47 |
thumper | :) | 02:48 |
dotblank | but im sad its building only for amd64 when I know it will build for lots of others | 02:49 |
thumper | like? | 02:51 |
dotblank | x86 | 02:51 |
dotblank | arm | 02:51 |
dotblank | and others | 02:51 |
thumper | hmm... I don't know why it wouldn't build for those that we have builers for | 02:54 |
thumper | perhaps someone like wgrant would know | 02:54 |
dotblank | I think I specified and a target in the control... I think its fixed now though | 02:54 |
dotblank | a target* | 02:54 |
dotblank | https://launchpad.net/~eliaswoods/+archive/groove | 02:56 |
* thumper knows nothing about packaging | 02:56 | |
nigelb | I got an OOPS mail OOPS-1616MPJ1 | 03:27 |
ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1616MPJ1 | 03:27 |
nigelb | I was changed the owner of a branch before merging, now I can't merge :( | 03:27 |
nigelb | *I changed | 03:27 |
ripps | Okay... a bunch of i386 and amd64 builders are idle, so why is my gmpc package say it has to wait 6 hours before building? | 03:43 |
nigelb | ppa? | 03:44 |
ripps | In fact, it said it would take 4 hours a few hours ago | 03:44 |
ripps | nigelb: yes | 03:44 |
nigelb | I think there are few builders only for PPA, but I'm not sure | 03:44 |
ripps | The build farm page says otherwise, 11 amd64 and 14 i386. Although, the PPA build status lists unknown for all queues | 03:45 |
nigelb | wgrant: around? ^ | 03:45 |
mwhudson | i think the queue status thing is unknown because of a bug in the last rollout | 03:46 |
chmac | This is out of date: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/revelation-bugs | 03:47 |
chmac | The bugs are now here: http://oss.codepoet.no/revelation/issues/ | 03:47 |
chmac | Which is a bitbucket site, don't think it's supported by launchpad. | 03:47 |
chmac | I was going to edit the info, but seems like it would break the link. Not sure what the best course of action is. Any recommendations? | 03:47 |
thumper | chmac: ask a question on the launchpad project would be best I think | 03:48 |
chmac | thumper: Ok, will try to track down a url for that... :-) | 03:51 |
thumper | chmac: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | 03:51 |
chmac | thumper: Just got there, thanks :-) | 03:52 |
KurtKraut | If Launchpad detects a package has a new upstream release, does it mean it will be packaged for the next Ubuntu release? Like mtr 0.77: https://launchpad.net/mtr/+download | 03:56 |
chmac | thumper: Turns out there's already a question on there, so I added a little comment. Thanks for the tip. :-) | 03:56 |
chmac | G'night all | 03:56 |
wgrant | KurtKraut: No -- somebody needs to package the new release and get an Ubuntu developer to upload it. | 04:02 |
KurtKraut | wgrant,T hat's what I though at the first moment. But why Launchpad tracks the upstream FTP server and detects the latest version as available? | 04:02 |
wgrant | KurtKraut: Launchpad doesn't exist solely for Ubuntu. | 04:03 |
KurtKraut | wgrant, I'm aware of that but I think this is not an explanation. Or at least, I didn't get your point. | 04:04 |
wgrant | dotblank: Your .dsc says 'Architecture: amd64'. This is because the sole binary specified in debian/control is marked 'Architecture: amd64'. | 04:04 |
wgrant | KurtKraut: I'm not sure why exactly it does it, but not all useful features have to be for Ubuntu's purposes. | 04:05 |
wgrant | And automatically uploading them would be a very bad idea. | 04:05 |
lifeless | I can has root? | 04:06 |
lifeless | wgrant: not really different to daily builds | 04:06 |
wgrant | lifeless: One is to a PPA, which you trust explicitly with your life. | 04:07 |
wgrant | One is to the primary archive. In the primary archive case, you don't trust the upstream developer. | 04:08 |
wgrant | Whereas if you enable a daily PPA for a particular upstream, you probably do. | 04:09 |
=== oubiwann is now known as oubiwann_ | ||
=== stub1 is now known as stub | ||
=== stub1 is now known as stub | ||
bilalakhtar | Just out of curiosity: Why are the milestones 10.01-10.05 still open? | 07:43 |
kalon33 | hello all, it seems there is a problem with launchpad PPA buildd, only a small subset of them are taking building tasks | 08:12 |
kalon33 | everybody is sleeping it seems ;) | 08:15 |
wgrant | kalon33: Do you have a particular build in mind that should have dispatched a while ago, but hasn't yet? | 08:19 |
wgrant | Ah, I see. | 08:20 |
kalon33 | wgrant: no, I just launch a few ones now, but looking at edge.launchpad.net/builders/, just a few are processing, one which took 50min to unpack build-deps... and there is a long queue according to build delays | 08:21 |
kalon33 | *build time estimations | 08:21 |
noodles775 | Strange, looking at the build history of the idle ones the seem to have been active recently. | 08:21 |
* noodles775 wishes we could re-enable the queue info on that page. | 08:22 | |
* kalon33 wishes it too | 08:22 | |
kalon33 | wgrant, problems with the build dispatcher ? | 08:23 |
wgrant | Oh. Hmm. | 08:23 |
wgrant | So they are sort of working sometimes? | 08:23 |
kalon33 | if you look at rosehip, this buildd has not refreshed his log for a while (55min, or it is still unpacking) | 08:26 |
kalon33 | (44min for shipova) | 08:26 |
fta2 | wgrant, all my builds are waiting, but the queue appears empty | 08:39 |
wgrant | fta2: Appears empty, or appears unknown? | 08:39 |
wgrant | What is the estimated start time on the build page? | 08:39 |
fta2 | hours | 08:39 |
fta2 | 5, 8, .. | 08:39 |
fta2 | http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/chromium-daily.html http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/ubuntu-mozilla-daily--ppa.html | 08:40 |
wgrant | Right, so the queue isn't empty. Something is pretty wrong. | 08:40 |
spm | fta2: unrelated aside; they are sweet dashboard pages! v nice! | 08:41 |
fta2 | spm, thanks. i'm still trying to improve it | 08:42 |
fta2 | btw, bug 589068 is still impacting me | 08:42 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 589068 in Soyuz "Upload rejected with "unsupported operand type(s) for -: 'datetime.datetime' and 'NoneType'" (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/589068 | 08:42 |
kalon33 | wgrant, official buildd are maybe affected: kubuntu-meta is building for 1hour... but it is a meta, no? This shouldn't took so long | 08:45 |
wgrant | kalon33: Right, something is very wrong. The same master deals with the official and PPA buildds, so it's unsurprising that they're both broken. | 08:45 |
wgrant | It is being investigated. | 08:45 |
kalon33 | wgrant, thanks :) | 08:46 |
cos^ | is is it possible to cancel rebuild of a package? | 08:53 |
wgrant | cos^: It won't build if you delete the source package. | 08:54 |
wgrant | But you can't cancel the builds any other way, at the moment. | 08:54 |
cos^ | ok. i just accidentally started build of an old package | 08:55 |
oojah | I have a ppa package that has BuildDepends including "libsqlite3-dev (>= 3.6.14.1)". The Depends line doesn't explicitly include libsqlite3. If I upload to lucid, the dependency on libsqlite3 gets set to the version in lucid, not 3.6.14.1. Is this expected behaviour? | 09:07 |
wgrant | oojah: The version in the build-depends line doesn't affect that. | 09:10 |
wgrant | The shlibs file in libsqlite3-dev specifies the version of the dependency. | 09:10 |
wgrant | This is so it depends on a version with the right symbols. | 09:11 |
wgrant | (ABI handles some things, but not symbol addition, for example) | 09:11 |
fta2 | is there a limit to the number of source ids i can pass to getBuildSummariesForSourceIds()? | 09:13 |
wgrant | fta2: Well, it'll start timing out eventually, so be nice. | 09:14 |
wgrant | But no, not really. | 09:14 |
fta2 | ok | 09:14 |
oojah | wgrant: Right, so that's a yes :) | 09:15 |
fta2 | i'm currently doing it one by one but this is inefficient (too many http requests) | 09:15 |
wgrant | oojah: Right, it's expected. | 09:16 |
fta2 | speaking of unnecessary requests, source_package_publishing_history (as returned by getPublishedSources()) should have a 'dist' attribute.. as accessing srcpkg.distro_series.name just to get its dist makes an http request | 09:17 |
wgrant | fta2: Well, it shouldn't really have such an attribute. launchpadlib should just be smarter, somehow. | 09:18 |
wgrant | Or you should be able to tell launchpadlib to grab the distroseries too. | 09:18 |
fta2 | either way, it's the same for me. i suffer from too many moderately-slow requests so the less the better | 09:22 |
fta2 | i wonder why login_anonymously() usually returns in 100~300ms but very often spikes to 30, 50, 60sec | 09:26 |
geser | fta2: to save some http requests you could "cache" the distro_series object. you could look at spph.distro_series_link (it's an attribute so no extra http request) and only fetch the distro_series if you didn't have it already (it's unlike that it will change during the runtime of your script) | 09:48 |
fta2 | geser, thanks. parsing distro_series_link is hackish but helps a bit | 10:03 |
thekorn | fta2, did you publish the dashboard code somewhere? | 10:04 |
fta2 | thekorn, not yet | 10:06 |
thekorn | fta2, ok, please ping me with an url once it's available, I'm interested to see how it works, and why it is so slow | 10:10 |
geser | fta2: you don't necessarily need to parse it, just use it as a key for a dict with already fetched disto_series object | 10:10 |
hrw | hi | 10:13 |
fta2 | geser, i need it for display | 10:14 |
fta2 | +too | 10:14 |
hrw | I noticed one nasty thing: when I add new email to my LP account I got email with verify link. Going to that link gives me page with "Cancel|Continue" buttons but no message explaining what to do. I know that 'Continue' is proper one but what about other users? why there is no message on page? | 10:15 |
YaManicKill | can i let another launchpad user upload to a ppa owned by me? | 10:19 |
geser | fta2: instead of always accessing spph.distro_series.name try this: http://paste.ubuntu.com/444507/ this should save you some http requests while still giving you access to the distro_series.name attribute | 10:22 |
shadeslayer | hi,any idea where i can find support for shop.canonical.com | 10:58 |
ripps | y'know I thought the "starting X hours" on the build status page was supposed to decrease, instead of increase... | 11:10 |
ripps | It started at 2 hours about 12 hours ago, and now it's 10 hours | 11:10 |
shadeslayer | ripps: that depends on the stuff which has more priority :) | 11:14 |
zachtib | hey, are the PPA build servers running behind? I uploaded something last night and it's still pending with a 2-hour start time. | 11:20 |
bigjools | yes we have big delays, we're working on it | 11:20 |
zachtib | ok, just wanted to make sure it was a known issue and it wasn't just me, thanks | 11:21 |
=== bigjools changed the topic of #launchpad to: Large delays processing builds, we're working on it | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: gary_poster | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | ||
derick212 | Hi. Having issues getting a file from the launchpad servers. As requested joined channel. | 12:45 |
derick212 | URL is http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/mahara/master/download/head%3A/htdocs/js/paginator.js/paginator.js Been trying on and off for the last hour | 12:46 |
=== Meths_ is now known as Meths | ||
=== bac changed the topic of #launchpad to: Large delays processing builds, we're working on it | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: bac | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | ||
=== nailuj24_ is now known as nailuj24 | ||
mok0 | where can I learn about recipes? | 13:36 |
mok0 | ah found ut | 13:37 |
mok0 | it | 13:37 |
* rowinggolfer_ reads topic..... and his question is answered, thanks | 14:05 | |
bigjools | rowinggolfer_: should be fixed soon | 14:17 |
rowinggolfer_ | bigjools, no worries. | 14:19 |
apw | are we aware that the "Queue Status" is all unknown on the build farm? i guess this could be fallout from slow builds | 14:31 |
jpds | apw: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/588684 | 14:32 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 588684 in Soyuz "builders index timing out after 10.05 release (affected: 1, heat: 8)" [High,In progress] | 14:32 |
bigjools | it's getting fixed as we speak | 14:33 |
* apw bets you are getting beaten from all sides :) | 14:33 | |
bigjools | :/ | 14:34 |
apw | bigjools, ahh this would affect regular buildd's too wouldn't it, and would explain the odd case i had where a job started 5 hours later than its estimate | 14:41 |
bigjools | yes, all build dispatching is delayed | 14:42 |
bigjools | we're not sure why, but a database query that was previously taking 400ms is now taking 10 minutes sometimes | 14:42 |
apw | bigjools, do we know why testing on edge on the live db didn't catch the regression? oh i guess we don't connect any machines to edge scheduling wise | 14:44 |
apw | but the main page not having data should have shown up before? i use that on edge a lot | 14:44 |
bigjools | edge doesn't have any builders | 14:45 |
apw | no but it has the /builders page no ? | 14:45 |
apw | and that was the first reported symptom ? | 14:45 |
bigjools | that's a different issue to the one I'm talking about | 14:45 |
apw | oh ok fair enough | 14:45 |
bigjools | it wouldn't get caught on edge anyway | 14:46 |
noodles775 | apw: the change landed on db-devel (by necessity) so didn't hit edge, and staging (and dogfood where we also test things) only have a few builders compared with production. So that is a point that we could improve. | 14:50 |
bigjools | it's generally a problem that we don't have a production-like build environment to test in and not one that's easy to fix either | 14:52 |
=== bigjools changed the topic of #launchpad to: Builds are dispatching properly again, but there is a backlog | http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: bac | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | ||
Penguin_Guy | Is the bug email interface guide ( https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface ) correct? I tried changing the status using the method in that guide and the text appeared in my post (https://bugs.launchpad.net/codemonkey/+bug/589177/comments/1). | 15:47 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 589177 in Code Monkey "Need some kind of Branding Icon (affected: 2, heat: 12)" [Medium,In progress] | 15:47 |
bac | Penguin_Guy: were you careful to indent the message as required? | 15:55 |
Penguin_Guy | bac: What's the indentation supposed to be? I thought it was just a single space. | 15:56 |
bac | Penguin_Guy: it looks like you did | 15:56 |
Penguin_Guy | bac: I copied the indentation exactly as it appeared on the help page. | 15:56 |
bac | Penguin_Guy: yeah, i see that now. unfortunately i rarely/never use the email interface. but i know people who use it all of the time | 15:57 |
Penguin_Guy | bac: Anyone on IRC now who might have the answer? | 15:58 |
bac | Penguin_Guy: BjornT or gmb might. ^^ | 15:58 |
Penguin_Guy | bac: Thanks. | 15:58 |
Penguin_Guy | BjornT, gmb: Can either of you help me with setting bug status through email? | 15:59 |
bac | Penguin_Guy: i wonder if the attachment was done improperly, confusing it? | 16:01 |
Penguin_Guy | bac: I don't see what could have gone wrong with adding an attachment, the 'net seems to say just to attach it like any other attachment. | 16:03 |
bac | Penguin_Guy: just grasping for straws... | 16:03 |
bac | Penguin_Guy: the body of your email looked fine to me so that was the only other variable... | 16:04 |
Penguin_Guy | bac: The only thing I could think of was if the guide was wrong or out of date. That's why I was looking for someone who uses the email interface regularly. I'll try some more Google searches and see what I can find. Thanks for the help. | 16:05 |
bac | Penguin_Guy: ok. if you would, follow up with me here if you figure it out and i'll update the doc if needed. | 16:06 |
Penguin_Guy | bac: Sure. | 16:07 |
lifeeth|sleep | nick lifeeth | 16:59 |
lifeeth|sleep | oops | 16:59 |
=== lifeeth|sleep is now known as lifeeth | ||
lifeeth | Hello all... can some one point me to a howto on tarring my repo? | 16:59 |
maxb | lifeeth: It is not clear what you mean - please explain more. | 17:04 |
lifeeth | github / bitbucket have an option to dowload the current revision via a web UI | 17:04 |
lifeeth | akin to bzr export and tar | 17:04 |
lifeeth | anything similar on launchpad? | 17:04 |
maxb | No, there is no equivalent feature in the web UI | 17:05 |
lifeeth | Thanks.. just wanted to know that bit | 17:05 |
maxb | lifeeth: Perhaps you can use 'bzr export myproject.tar.gz lp:~somebody/myproject/branchname' instead | 17:07 |
lifeeth | Got that | 17:07 |
maxb | Is it a known issue that all the build queues on /builders are showing 'unknown' ? | 17:14 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
geser | maxb: yes | 17:22 |
geser | maxb: bug 588684 | 17:23 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 588684 in Soyuz "builders index timing out after 10.05 release (affected: 1, heat: 8)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/588684 | 17:23 |
maxb | Thanks | 17:23 |
* maxb subscribes | 17:23 | |
bigjools | noodles has a branch to fix it, it'll land soon | 17:29 |
christophechauve | Hi | 17:34 |
christophechauve | We bought a commercial projet, whom is private, but we cannot made the branch as private, anybody can check if there is no problem ? | 17:35 |
pmjdebruijn | huh? | 17:37 |
pmjdebruijn | christophechauve: you might want to explain further | 17:37 |
pmjdebruijn | christophechauve: I could be wrong, but I don't think Launchpad is intended for commercial private hosting :) | 17:38 |
pmjdebruijn | again, I could be wrong | 17:38 |
christophechauve | pmjdebruijn: lol | 17:38 |
christophechauve | you can use it as proprietary licence but you must pay for it | 17:39 |
tsimpson | pmjdebruijn: you can purchase a commercial license with Launchpad, free hosting is reserved for open-source projects | 17:39 |
pmjdebruijn | oh | 17:39 |
pmjdebruijn | well, I said I could be wrong :) | 17:39 |
christophechauve | pmjdebruijn: ;) | 17:39 |
bac | hi christophechauve | 17:54 |
bac | pmjdebruijn: yes, commercial/proprietary projects can use launchpad if they buy a "commercial-use" subscription. | 17:55 |
bac | christophechauve: i will be happy to help you get your project set up properly | 17:55 |
christophechauve | bac i just send an email to help@launchpad.net with URL for project and branch | 17:56 |
* bac looks | 17:56 | |
christophechauve | bac: thanks | 17:56 |
bac | haven't gotten it yet | 17:56 |
christophechauve | ok | 17:57 |
christophechauve | this is the url project https://launchpad.net/syleam.openerp | 17:58 |
christophechauve | this project is private (it's ok) but the branch are public, we want to made it as private | 17:59 |
Penguin_Guy | Does anyone here know how to use the email interface to change bug properties? | 19:45 |
micahg | Penguin_Guy: https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface | 19:48 |
Penguin_Guy | micahg: I tried that but it doesn't seem to work | 19:54 |
micahg | Penguin_Guy: sorry, that's all I know, maybe someone else can help | 19:56 |
=== shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer_ | ||
=== apachelogger is now known as pinkrobotking | ||
maxb | Penguin_Guy: I suspect it's probably mandatory to gpg-sign your emails to edit bugs that way | 20:43 |
Penguin_Guy | maxb: Yeah, it was signed. | 20:44 |
maxb | oh :-/ | 20:45 |
maxb | and you did put a leading space at the beginning of each command line? | 20:45 |
=== shtylman is now known as pinkrobot0003 | ||
=== shadeslayer_ is now known as bluerobot | ||
=== bluerobot is now known as shadeslayer_ | ||
=== pinkrobot0003 is now known as shtylman | ||
Penguin_Guy | max: Yes | 21:38 |
=== Penguin_Guy_ is now known as JoshB | ||
=== JoshB is now known as JBrown | ||
=== JBrown is now known as Josh_Brown | ||
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!