[00:00] dutchie: I guess the --logfile option is what you want [00:01] ooh, maybe --preserve-buildplace too === andreas_ is now known as anoteng === keffie_jayx_ is now known as keffie_jayx === pinkrobotking is now known as apachelogger [01:04] neither --logfile nor --preserve-buildplace are what I'm looking for [01:19] i managed to work around it by doing ^Z on the pdebuild process and cd'ing into the build dir === nobawk is now known as nobawk|away [02:09] chrisccoulson: re bug 567819, we can't readd pyjamas to Lucid and just remove the -desktop package, can we? [02:09] Launchpad bug 567819 in xulrunner-1.9.1 (Ubuntu) "Please remove xulrunner-1.9.1 source, binaries and remaining rdepends from Lucid" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/567819 [02:10] lfaraone: I think only in backports at this point === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna === nobawk|away is now known as nobawk === nobawk is now known as nobawk|away [09:08] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synce-kpm/+bug/589908 => if anybody wants to review :D feel free :) [09:08] Ubuntu bug 589908 in synce-kpm (Ubuntu) "Fix FTBFS due to changed Python options" [Undecided,New] [09:19] Where can I see a list of the packages most recently moved into lucid-updates? [09:31] Is this a normal REVU warning? Warning! This package could not be extracted; there's no browsable directory for it on REVU. [09:49] YokoZar: source format 3? [10:25] Would anyone care to sponsor Bug #581331? [10:25] Launchpad bug 581331 in bitlbee (Ubuntu Karmic) "error message while trying to use my MSN account in bitlbee" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/581331 [10:25] (not only error, inability, to log in) [10:34] it it possible that an app can be without any copyright holders? [10:36] om26er: someone can give up their copyrights by putting it into the public domain, but in that case we still want to document they did that in the copyright file [10:36] also maybe in 90 years there will be some software with expired copyright === hannesw_ is now known as hannesw === BlackZ_ is now known as BlackZ [11:43] argh, did a grab-merge, edited a patch, and now it makes a totally crap debdiff :s [11:45] diff of a diff? [11:52] geser: http://dupondje.be/diff.debdiff [11:52] this is what it generates :s [11:56] dupondje: how did you check that the patches can be dropped? [12:02] i'll redo :) [12:02] dupondje: don't forget that a v3 source package applies the patches after unpack [12:07] well yea indeed [12:20] jl@laptopjl:~/Dev/virtinst/virtinst/virtinst-0.500.3-1ubuntu1$ quilt push 0002-Fix-path-to-pygrub.patch [12:20] Patch 0002-Fix-path-to-pygrub.patch is currently applied [12:20] jl@laptopjl:~/Dev/virtinst/virtinst/virtinst-0.500.3-1ubuntu1$ quilt refresh 0002-Fix-path-to-pygrub.patch [12:20] Nothing in patch 0002-Fix-path-to-pygrub.patch === keffie_jayx_ is now known as keffie_jayx [12:40] hello all, quick q, What is a pristine package? [12:40] keffie_jayx: I think its before having a debian folder [12:40] just the source package [12:41] its either thta ora folder on which debuild -S hasn't been run === apachelogger is now known as pinkrobotking [12:56] nigelb: thanks :) === pinkrobotking is now known as apachelogger [13:18] argh [13:18] still having trouble with the bug-buddy FTBFS [13:19] it seems that the compiler flags for libebook-1.2 are not being included in the compilation, but I can't for the life of me work out why not [13:24] dutchie: have you got the build log? [13:24] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49132948/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-i386.bug-buddy_2.30.0%2Bdfsg-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [13:26] some other packages building against evolution seem also to have problems with pkg-config [13:27] i logged into the chroot and "pkg-config --cflags libebook-1.2" seemed to work fine [13:28] I don't know the details but it involved something with the replacement of the variables in the configure script [13:28] and I don't know if it the same problem here [13:29] yeah, the BUG_BUDDY_EDS_CFLAGS variable was just empty === nobawk|away is now known as nobawk [13:32] dutchie: is there a open bug for that? [13:33] not afaik [13:33] dupondje: OK, report it and assign it to me, I will have the time to work on it after the week-end [13:33] thanks [13:33] was that supposed to be me? [13:35] dupondje: nope [13:35] I have asked you to report a new bug and assign it to me (if you want) [13:35] ops, I meant dutchie sorry [13:35] * BlackZ kills his tab [13:35] :) [13:36] thanks dutchie :) [13:38] sorry for the tab mistake, dupondje [13:41] BlackZ: what's your LP id? [13:41] dutchie: blackz [13:41] so it is [13:41] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bug-buddy/+bug/590094 [13:41] Ubuntu bug 590094 in bug-buddy (Ubuntu) "FTFBS on maverick" [Undecided,New] [13:42] s/FTFBS/FTBFS [13:42] just noticed that [13:56] hi BlackZ :P [13:57] grab-merge seems to apply some patches, some not [13:57] wtf :x [14:11] dutchie: should be fixed now, I will build it in few minutes [14:12] BlackZ: awesome [14:12] what was the problem? [14:17] dutchie: I have added what you said to CFLAGS in configure [14:17] I will see if that fixes the problem [14:18] what are the rules on transitional packages, we keep them forever or ? [14:19] i tried doing that in src/Makefile.{am,in} and it didn't seem to work [14:20] dutchie: I think you have to modify the config file instead :) [14:20] s/config/configure [14:20] yeah [14:20] there are the CFLAGS [14:21] it doesn't seem like a proper fix though [14:23] dutchie: building it now [14:36] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtinst/+bug/590068 => does that look good ? :) [14:36] Ubuntu bug 590068 in virtinst (Ubuntu) "Please merge virtinst (0.500.3-1) main from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] [15:00] is there a way to easly generate a debdiff without po noise ? [15:01] don't change the po files? [15:15] dupondje: we keep them only as long as needed [15:18] ok [15:19] I got a package doing: VERSION := $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog | sed -n 's/ubuntu[0-9]*$$//; s/\+.*$$//; /^Version/s/.* //p') [15:19] and then: egrep -q '^#define VERSION "$(VERSION)"$$' config.h [15:19] when I do the parsechangelog from shell, I get 5.0.5ubuntu1 [15:19] dupondje: it looks like the transitional package can be dropped now (as updates from hardy or karmic have to upgrade to lucid first, so they transition). But if you want to be sure, ask someone from the ubuntu-virt team. If it still to be kept then it should also be in the merge changelog [15:20] but @ build it give:s egrep -q '^#define VERSION "5.0.5"$' config.h [15:21] geser: i'll check with them [15:24] dupondje: otherwise the debdiff looks fine (although I only did a rough check (e.g. didn't compared it to the current delta)) [15:25] dupondje: which package is it? [15:26] whois [15:27] dupondje: did you also run your parsechangelog output through sed? as this should strip ubuntu1 from the version [15:29] jl@laptopjl:~/Dev/whois/test2/whois-5.0.2ubuntu1$ dpkg-parsechangelog | sed -n 's/ubuntu[0-9]*$$//; s/\+.*$$//; /^Version/s/.* //p' [15:29] 5.0.2ubuntu1 [15:30] ah, replace $$ with $ in that command in your shell (the $$ is an escaped $ inside a makefile) [15:38] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whois/+bug/590111 => working :) [15:38] Ubuntu bug 590111 in whois (Ubuntu) "Please merge whois (5.0.5) main from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] [15:39] Is there somewhere where recommendations on PPA numbering can be found? I'm looking for best practices so that a team I'm involved with can test new versions of pacakges we intend to eventually officially backport or SRU (as appropreate) to Lucid. [16:08] lool: ping [16:11] lool: will you merge gst-plugins-bad0.10 0.10.19-1? [16:58] YokoZar: Are you still doing the spring merge? [17:25] * ScottK files his first removal bug of the cycle. All feels right with the world again. === yofel_ is now known as yofel === nobawk is now known as nobawk|away [18:25] Would anyone care to sponsor Bug #581331? [18:25] Launchpad bug 581331 in bitlbee (Ubuntu Karmic) "error message while trying to use my MSN account in bitlbee" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/581331 [19:12] Hi, I'm trying to learn the ropes of ubuntu-packaging ... [19:12] I have been able to build a very simple package using debuild and it installs correctly. However when I try pbuilder, it fails giving the following log http://dpaste.org/OE1e/ ... [19:13] I have been following the instructions given on this page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete [19:13] what could be going wrong? [19:15] i'm trying this out on ubuntu-maverick-alpha1 [19:16] looks like you don't have universe enabled in your pbuilder [19:25] geser, hmm ho do I fix that? [19:26] m_anish: For that you would need echo "COMPONENTS=\"main restricted universe multiverse\"" > ~/.pbuilderrc [19:27] arand, ok let me try... [19:27] m_anish: and then remake the environment [19:28] arand, strange, I don't seem to have a ~/.pbuilderrc [19:28] i followed the steps given here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto [19:28] m_anish: There's none by default [19:28] arand, ah ok [19:29] sudo pbuilder update --override-config in order to update with the new stuff [19:30] I think that is override config as in overriding the alreeady existing config for the chroot, [19:31] arand, ok its now downloading ... will take some time (~512k connection) :/ [19:32] s/connection/speed/ === effie_jayx_ is now known as keffie_jayx [19:38] arand, it is currently downloading but it seems to be downloading or storing multiple instances ... [19:38] Get:85 http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main libfreetype6 2.3.11-1ubuntu2 [434kB] [19:38] Get:86 http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main libfreetype6 2.3.11-1ubuntu2 [434kB] [19:38] Get:87 http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main libfreetype6 2.3.11-1ubuntu2 [434kB] [19:38] Get:88 http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main ucf 3.0025 [68.1kB] [19:38] Get:89 http://in.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main ucf 3.0025 [68.1kB] [19:39] * m_anish should use pastebins [19:39] m_anish: Is that not just weird rendering by apt in the terminal? [19:40] arand, hmm could be [19:42] arand, its incrementing the number in each line (which is the misleading part) ... could be a bug in apt [19:42] ? [19:42] m_anish: Yes, I also see that quite often, I've never really given it much thought.. [20:12] hi [20:13] so I've added a Release.gpg file to my repo. what's a good place to put the public key users should add to their apt-key? in the root directory along with Release/Source,etc? (like myKey.gpg) [20:15] ramiro_: That's really not on topic for this channel. [20:17] hmm, I thought it kind of would be. any suggestions for a more on-topic channel? [20:40] No. [21:25] ScottK: Yeah [21:25] YokoZar: Thanks. [23:20] on the ftbfs list, when it says 'waiting for package xxx', does it automaticly retry to build after some time? or does it need to be triggered ? [23:22] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghc6/6.12.1-13/+build/1724568/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-ia64.ghc6_6.12.1-13_MANUALDEPWAIT.txt.gz => thats a cool one :p ghc6 is waiting for ghc6 ... :p === andreas__ is now known as anoteng [23:33] dupondje: Yes. [23:33] (it automatically retries) [23:33] ah ok :) [23:34] /usr/bin/install: cannot change ownership of `debian/tmp-src/usr/share/man/man1/build-qmail.1': Operation not permitted => got any clue btw? Aren't packages builded as root ? [23:34] Normally fakeroot. [23:35] But, meh. qmail. Ancient history. [23:35] still used alot :) [23:40] You say that like it's a good thing. [23:41] if alot of people still use it, its good to keep the package up-to-date