[02:53] <Paddy_NI> why did I get banned Flannel?
[02:53] <Flannel> Paddy_NI: Because you're a liability
[02:53] <Paddy_NI> how dare you no I am not
[02:54] <Flannel> Paddy_NI: You showed me that you're well aware of your actions and behaviors, and are doing them on purpose.
[02:54] <Paddy_NI> Flannel, no I did not.. what are you talking about?
[02:54] <Paddy_NI> show me?
[02:54] <Paddy_NI> yet again it is you or IdleOne
[02:54] <Paddy_NI> the famous two
[02:55] <Paddy_NI> literally.. you or IdleOne.. no one else
[02:56] <Flannel> Paddy_NI: that's not accurate, but it's also not important.
[02:56] <Paddy_NI> nonsense
[02:57] <Paddy_NI> and its spot on
[02:59] <elky> I can't really see a point in the past half hour where your comments in -ot have been for any other purpose than to get a rise from someone.
[03:00] <Paddy_NI> I was simply making an observation about a network
[03:00] <Paddy_NI> no I was not looking for a rise
[03:01] <elky> calling snuxoll a fad boy for having a palm pre rather than the iphone you'd previously subscribed wasn't an attempt to get a rise?
[03:01] <Paddy_NI> elky, that is incorrect
[03:01] <Paddy_NI> I said both where fads
[03:02] <Paddy_NI> like pokemon and such
[03:02] <elky> So you namecalled 2 people and you admit it. Cool. Ban stays.
[03:02] <Paddy_NI> elky, heh
[03:03] <Paddy_NI> typical.. well it can stay I guess.. I am at the mercy of OPs that need reseated
[03:03] <elky> Your only purpose there today seems to have been to make it less comfortable for other people to be there. That's not the kind of contribution we want for there.
[03:03] <Paddy_NI> elky, you make it less comfortable on a daily basis.. yet I am at your mercy.. what am I to do
[03:04] <Paddy_NI> you know.. leave it.. some other time
[03:08] <funkyHat> When rww starts having a go at people that aren't behaving properly I feel it makes it harder for me to do anything about it...
[03:27] <Flannel> funkyHat: If he's just heckling, it's not doing any good, so it'd be good to step in anyway
[03:34] <elky> funkyHat, talk to him about it if it's affecting you like that. he's not closed-minded
[03:40] <IdleOne> How did I get blamed for something I didn't do when I wasn't here in a channel I don't have ops in :/
[03:41] <Flannel> IdleOne: never let the facts get in the way of a good story
[03:42] <IdleOne> Flannel: noted
[04:02] <elky> And there's no story like a sob story.
[04:12] <jrib> help please...
[04:12] <jrib> !#ubuntu-bots
[04:12] <jrib> ubottu: forget #ubuntu-bots
[04:13] <jrib> you liar.
[04:14] <Flannel> jrib: The factoid has no hash
[04:14] <jrib> !ubuntu-bots
[04:14] <jrib> I see
[04:14] <jrib> ubottu: forget ubuntu-bots
[04:14] <jrib> thanks Flannel
[07:36] <bazhang> the bot thinks I set a ban in -ot
[07:39] <Flannel> bazhang: Where?
[07:39] <Flannel> or, which ban?
[07:39] <bazhang> Flannel, in the weekly prompt via PM, on witeshark
[07:40] <bazhang>  Hi, please review the ban 'witeshark!~witeshark@adsl-215-10-101.mia.bellsouth.net' that you set on Sat May 29 05:40:07 2010 in #ubuntu-offtopic,  etc/link
[07:41] <Flannel> bazhang: That's a mark, it seems.
[07:56] <elky> It'd have to be, and getting reminded about those is a little redundant
[07:56] <Flannel> It might just be because it uses the same internal search as bansearch, which shows marks
[07:57] <bazhang> pepper_haze is still trying to defend the 'pixplz'
[07:57] <maco> if we're doing feature requests, could the bot prompt just once in the case of a /kb ? it wants you to comment on the remove and the ban. do we really need to comment twice?
[07:57] <maco> bazhang: not the brightest bulb
[07:57] <bazhang> maco, understatement of all time
[07:58] <Flannel> bazhang: If we stop reacting to it, I imagine it'll die down
[08:26] <Tm_T> hi
[08:26] <bazhang> hi Tm_T
[08:30] <bazhang> jungli is back at it. I have him in PM again.
[08:37] <Tm_T> funny person this haze
[08:38] <bazhang> tried to PM cokers but no response (back in #ubuntu )
[08:41] <elky> has anyone spoken in PM with pepper_haze?
[08:41] <bazhang> I will
[08:42] <elky> because his only intent is to stomp on others
[08:43] <bazhang> no response so far
[08:43] <elky> bazhang, let me know if he starts shouting at you in PM and I'll help him on his way.
[08:45] <elky> bazhang, still no response?
[08:45] <bazhang> elky, not yet
 where do you leave improvement ideas for ubottu
[08:49] <bazhang> finally responded, btw
[08:54] <elky> I'm pretty sure this happens every time he comes past, fwiw
[08:54] <elky> the nick is has a familiar sound to it to me, for the wrong reasons
 anyone want a free psychic reading? i'm in a rare mood
[09:28] <bazhang> aw he quit
[12:22] <jayne> anyone around? Sounds like a +q (or +b) *!*bobrown@* may be in order
[12:22] <bazhang> jayne, did so
[12:22] <bazhang> whoops not that but the entire IP address
[12:22] <jayne> oh, no wonder I didn't see anything. I was scrolled way up.
[12:23] <bazhang> thanks :)
[12:23] <elky> jayne, thanks :)
[14:33] <funkyHat> profound...
[14:36] <IdleOne> deep thoughts by visvanath
[14:37] <Tm_T> I'm not sure if mocking users like that would be wise in the long run though
[14:46] <IdleOne> Tm_T: you are correct and I apologize
[14:46] <IdleOne> I let my stupid come out for a moment :/
[14:47] <Tm_T> no problems, I think we all do that in times
[14:47] <IdleOne> I will try to not let that happen again
[14:49]  * Tm_T wonders the wonders of human nature
[14:50] <IdleOne> Tm_T: if you mean the ease with which a human can turn ugly, yes it is scary
[14:51] <Tm_T> not only that
[17:45] <IdleOne> edbian: not sure that can be done but talk to jussi or tsimpson perhaps
[17:46] <nhandler> edbian: The only people who have access to the logs on irclogs.ubuntu.com are the canonical sysadmins. You would need to file an rt ticket (email rt@ubuntu.com) to do that
[17:46] <edbian> nhandler, thanks
[17:46] <IdleOne> there ya go nhandler always knows
[17:46] <IdleOne> :)
[17:46] <nhandler> I know there were other similar tickets filed, but I am not sure whether or not the Canonical sysadmins actually remove stuff like this from the logs.
[17:49] <edbian> If only those admins can see it do I have a lot to worry about?
[17:49] <edbian> At least it's not like posted publicly on some web page for a thousand spam bots to scan.
[17:49] <Tm_T> edbian: no, logs are public, but they're only one who has write access
[17:50] <Tm_T> edbian: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/06/05/%23ubuntu.html
[17:50] <edbian> Tm_T, Thanks
[17:50] <nhandler> edbian: Also keep in mind that other bots produce public logs of #ubuntu as well https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/Bots#External%20Bots
[17:51] <edbian> ugh
[17:51] <edbian> thanks...
[18:06] <IdleOne> Pici: Re: puregnome factoid. My system got foo and bard it removed several apps including nvidia drivers, system was bootable and I recovered easily but I think that it may be safe to assume a new ubuntu user might get lost with outcome and recovery process not to mention upset at "us" for providing that info. I also suspect that the fact I am running Maverick may have had a large part in my issues with the factoid but can't be certain. if some
[18:06] <IdleOne> one would be willing to test it on a vanilla 10.04 install and report the outcome it would be helpful
[18:26] <IdleOne> ubottu: unforget puregnome
[18:26] <IdleOne> err no access :/
[18:27] <bazhang> already forgotten IdleOne
[18:27] <bazhang> p i c i wants to hold off on remembering it
[18:27] <IdleOne> yeah I was looking for the older version of the factoid
[18:29] <IdleOne> older/original I should say
[18:42] <bazhang> same IP though
[18:43] <jussi> all gone :)
[18:44] <maco> wait wait there's an *unforget* command?
[18:44] <jussi> maco: yes...
[18:45] <maco> wow
[18:45] <maco> if only humans had that command!
[18:45] <jussi> lol
[18:45] <jussi> if only humans had sudo :P
[18:46] <maco> sudo make me a sandwich
[18:47] <ikonia> I've put a mute on them, while I ask why he has clones
[18:47] <bazhang> they should be klined any second now
[18:47] <bazhang> the last batch was
[18:48] <ikonia> there you go
[18:48] <ikonia> connection died
[18:48] <maco> pfft i put teh mute first
[18:48] <maco> you were still typing
[18:48] <ikonia> maco: I'll remove your ip specific ban if that's ok and leave my ip range ban in place for a while
[18:48] <maco> ok
[18:48] <ikonia> give it an hour or so in case they come back
[18:49] <maco> but the IPs they had when bazhang got them werent in that range
[18:49] <bazhang> 80.10.46.79 was what they had previously
[18:49] <maco> yeah and this was a 90.x.x.x
[18:50] <ikonia> the 80.10 got klined, the 90. didn't
[18:50] <ikonia> hence why I only put the ban on the 90 range
[18:50] <marienz> hmm, I don't have enough of an eye on this place
[18:51] <ikonia> marienz: your eyes are everywhere, you can't watch everything
[18:54] <marienz> ikonia: can you forward them somewhere (like #-unregged) so I can see them join and take them out?
[18:54] <ikonia> sure
[18:54] <ikonia> I'll change the two bans to forwards
[18:55] <marienz> thank you
[18:55] <ikonia> marienz: what specific channel do you want ?
[18:55] <ikonia> the actual channel #-unregged ?
[18:55] <marienz> any will do (#-unregged has the advantage that they'll also end up there if they miss your forward and hit the join throttle)
[18:55] <marienz> no, I meant #ubuntu-unregged
[18:55] <ikonia> ok, just checking
[18:57] <ikonia> sorted
[18:59] <jrib> maco: alias unforget relearn  in humans unfortunately
[19:02] <marienz> I'll keep an eye on #ubuntu and #ubuntu-unregged for a while, but I'll probably have to leave to make dinner in half an hour or so
[19:03] <marienz> please prod me or staff in general if another wave of those hits
[19:03] <ikonia> all seems quiet too, looks like ##c has gone +r
[19:03] <marienz> they were in there?
[19:03] <ikonia> maybe worth considering it for #ubuntu if they come back
[19:04] <ikonia> not sure, but users (for some reason) are pm'ing me asking why they can't talk in ##c, it looks like it's gone +r earlier today
[19:04] <marienz> it seems unlikely the hosts these come in from will contribute positively to the network, so we're happy to kline them for a while to keep the network tidy.
[19:04] <ikonia> I'm assuming they are linked
[22:43] <maco> IdleOne just got called "baby girl" by a random person in #ubuntu
[22:43]  * maco squirms
[22:43] <IdleOne> maco: got called dude
[22:43] <maco> yes that too
[22:43] <maco> but that happens often enough to have ceased to be noteworthy ;-)
[22:43] <IdleOne> granted
[22:43] <mneptok> incoming mental image of cross-dressing fellow ops. and it's a frickin' doozy.
[22:43] <maco> hahaha
[22:43] <IdleOne> I have NEVER been called baby girl before
[22:45] <maco> mneptok: http://whereisandy.com/media/image/har/teslamural.jpg
[22:47] <maco> mneptok: a drag night at uds could be quite amusing ^_^
[22:47] <mneptok> "excellent fashion sense" and "black nail polish" are mutually exclusive
[22:53] <Tm_T> mneptok: are you sure it's black?
[23:44] <MTecknology> Flannel: ping
[23:47] <Flannel> Howdy MTecknology
[23:47] <MTecknology> hi
[23:49] <MTecknology> have i been banned long enough?
[23:49] <Flannel> MTecknology: I have no idea how you've existed on IRC without noticing that noticing a channel is bad.  But is it safe to assume you know now?
[23:50] <MTecknology> it's safe to assume I know it's no ok in #ubuntu*
[23:50] <MTecknology> s/no/not/
[23:50] <Flannel> MTecknology: It's probably safe to say it's universally considered rude, but if you wind up getting in trouble in other channels, that's none of my business
[23:51] <Flannel> MTecknology: Anyway, as long as you're now familiar with the fact that pinging everyone in a channel is rude, I've got no issue removing your ban.
[23:52] <MTecknology> alrighty
[23:52] <Flannel> MTecknology: I've removed it, please join and say something to make sure I got it right.
[23:53] <Flannel> or... don't.
[23:54] <IdleOne> heh
[23:57] <Pici> When did he notice the channel?
[23:57] <Flannel> Pici: A few days ago, -ot
[23:57] <Flannel> let me look
[23:58] <Flannel> May 31 06:30 UTC (according to BT)
[23:58] <Pici> Flannel: I don't care that much, just wondering
[23:58] <Flannel> or thats when I banned him anyway
[23:58] <Flannel> Just totally random, and then it took a few of his reactions to people's reactions for me to figure out he wasn't doing it accidentally.
[23:58] <IdleOne> notcie channel? what channel?
[23:59] <knome> IdleOne, "-ot"
[23:59] <IdleOne> I am not following
[23:59] <IdleOne> splain plez
[23:59] <Pici> /notice