/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/06/06/#launchpad.txt

bjsnideri'm getting a barrage of emails from apparently different users complaining about the keyserver failing on ppas02:48
wgrantYes, it is somewhat unwell at the moment :(03:04
wgrantHas been for a few hours, by the look of things.03:04
macolifeless: halp!05:13
macolifeless: bzr is doing things different and confusing now :(05:14
wgrantmaco: What's it doing?05:14
macoits acting like svn instead of bzr05:15
wgrantHowso?05:15
macocommit auto-pushed05:15
macoi know lp's docs say there's a mode like that05:15
macohow do i make it go back to distributed mode?05:15
wgrantSee 'bzr help checkouts'05:15
wgrantQuick fix: bzr unbind05:15
wgrant'bzr checkout' creates a bound branch by default. 'bzr branch' creates an unbound one.05:16
wgrantYou switch between the two modes with 'bzr bind' and 'bzr unbind'.05:16
macooh05:16
macook05:16
macoi think i was trying to use bind to change where the push-place was05:16
wgrantDid you mean 'bzr push --remember some://url'?05:17
macoyeah probably05:17
macoi dont recall seeing --remember in "man bzr" though05:17
macothank you wgrant05:17
wgrantThe manpage is not exhaustive.05:17
wgrantbzr help push05:17
wgrantOh, it is pretty exhaustive now.05:18
macoso treat bzr like chanserv. ok.05:18
wgrantAnd --remember is there.05:18
macoyes it is. oops05:18
wgrantI forgot the manpage was autogenerated.05:18
wgrant... and is 2500 lines long. Ouch.05:18
macoi probably expected it to be near "push" and it wasnt and so i then assumed some other command would do it05:18
micahgbzr help CMD is usually pretty useful05:19
macoum yeah 2500 manpages arent the sort you read..they're the sort you grep and hope you're grepping the right words05:19
wgrantEr, well, it is in the push section.05:19
wgrantmicahg: The manpage appears to be a combination of most of the the 'bzr help' output.05:19
micahgwgrant: makes sense05:20
macooh they have sections05:20
macook. lets just all remove 10 of my geek points now05:20
macoi think i looked at "command overview" and assumed that was it05:20
wgrantHeh, not quite :P05:20
macoi was trying to figure out how to make my branch be a team branch instead. i did a LOT of weird/wrong things to it in the meantime. then nigelb found the "change owner" option in the "branch details" section and so i went and used that and filed a bug saying it was too hard to find the "change owner" thing05:22
micahgmaco: I thought you just push under the team in LP05:22
macothe team didnt have a branch yet and i was confused05:23
macoand when i tried doing that it said it was "stacking" the team branch on top of my branch05:23
macoand then i got more confused05:23
wgrantYou can either move it or just push to a location that doesn't exist yet.05:23
wgrantAh, well, it will indeed stack if your branch is set as the development focus.05:23
macowhere "move it" means "find that change-owner thingy" right?05:23
micahgthat's one feature I love about bzr is the autocreation when pushing05:23
wgrantRight.05:24
wgrantmicahg: Yeah, the combination of bzr and LP there is pretty awesome.05:24
macooh is THAT why it did that??05:24
wgrantYes.05:24
macowell now i have things a bit muddled in gally & gally-asl. at least one of them has its development branch stacking on my branch now because i couldnt figure out how to move it05:25
wgrantSo, you want the team branch to be the dev focus?05:25
macoyes05:25
macoi have it pointed that way now05:25
macobut because when i made the team branch, mine was the dev focus, the current-dev-focus one stacks on top of mine05:26
wgrantThere are only two gally branches.05:26
wgrantNeither is stacked.05:26
macogally-asl then, i guess05:26
macoi got one of them right and one of them wrong05:26
wgrantAre you sure you didn't delete the newly created team branch, then rename the old one?05:26
macothats what i did with gally05:26
wgrantSee, gally-asl has only one branch.05:27
macooh or maybe i repeated that on gally-asl now too05:27
wgrantSo it's not stacked.05:27
macobah im so confused05:27
wgrantMoving the dev focus around, when combined with stacking, can be pretty confusing, yes.05:27
macothe last 2 days' worth of launchpad & bzr usage have been weeeeird05:28
macoby the way, when creating a team, there's no way to set its owner at that point right? you just create it, then use the change-owner thing for the team then (if youre in the team that you made be owner) delete yourself?05:29
wgrantRight, you can't set the owner at creation time.05:29
wgrantWhich is perhaps slightly inconvenient.05:30
wgrantlamont: Hmm. Build farm disaster?06:56
wgrantA few 'No route to host's, and lots of Fault 8002s on i386, which makes me suspect that a recipe build might have somehow made it through.06:56
dakerhello @all11:25
dakeris there any way to remove a translation template?11:26
kalibHi there. Created a project in launchpad yesterday at morning. Wanna translate using it. I did upload 4 files and is still as "Nees Review". How long it will take?13:42
FullFlannelJackeGetting rejections to my ppa uploads and dont know why.14:36
FullFlannelJackeI uploaded it once and it was rejected because of my Changelog.  Then, after a lot of searching, i fixed that and uploaded it again.14:37
FullFlannelJackeNow it says that my package is "is already accepted in ubuntu/lucid and you cannot upload the same version within the same distribution."14:37
FullFlannelJackeanyone anyone?14:38
FullFlannelJackeI believe it is still an issue with ym changelog.  Can anyone please explain how in the world a changelog is supposed to look?  this is irritating that such a small thing is causing such a PITA14:44
FullFlannelJackeI am trying to package code I have written and I have no idea how the changelog should look when i have no bug reports, etc..14:44
aakefHello all14:47
aakefAny one here who could help me with launchpad ppa uploads?14:47
FullFlannelJackeaakef: Im here for the same reason no one seems to be here14:48
aakefI registered a ppa page, uploaded to it with dput, but nothing happens14:48
aakeftell FullFlannelJacke: Hmm, thanks. Do you know a mailing list to ask on?14:48
FullFlannelJackeaakef: check your email.  Your package probably got rejected and you will get an email telling you why14:48
FullFlannelJackeaakef: if you have even a tiny error in one of the files in /debian, it will get rejected automatically14:49
aakeftell FullFlannelJacke: I don't get a single mail14:50
FullFlannelJackeand sometimes it can take 10-15 minutes to get the email14:50
geseraakef: is the gpg key you used for signing attached to your LP profile?14:50
FullFlannelJackethen if you got no email, then its likely your package is being "processed" by the server still14:50
aakeftell FullFlannelJacke: And as unionfs-fuse is already in Debian and Ubuntu, I don't think there is a packaging error14:50
aakeftell geser: Also already checked that, yes14:51
FullFlannelJackeGRRR.  My package just got rejected AGAIN.  Can anyone please tell me why my changelog keeps getting rejected?14:52
geserFullFlannelJacke: what error message?14:52
FullFlannelJackesaying that instabUnable to find distroseries: unstable14:53
FullFlannelJackeUnable to find distroseries: unstable14:53
FullFlannelJackeBut if I put lucid in there I get yet another error message14:53
aakeftell FullFlannelJacke: That would be Debian upload14:53
geserPPA know only about Ubuntu release names, not Debian ones14:53
FullFlannelJackeYeah but if I put lucid in there, it gets rejected still14:53
aakeftell FullFlannelJacke: I think you need to specify the Ubuntu distro, its in the lauchpad help page14:54
FullFlannelJackeif I put "lucid" there, i get this error:14:54
FullFlannelJackeis already accepted in ubuntu/lucid and you cannot upload the same version within the same distribution. You have to modify the source version and re-upload.14:54
geserwhat's the package name and the version you try to upload?14:54
wgrantFullFlannelJacke: You need to increment the version.14:54
wgrantYou can't upload the same version twice; that doesn't make sense.14:54
FullFlannelJackeThis is MY package.  i wrote the code.  And it is version 1.014:55
FullFlannelJackeAnd I have not yet uploaded it14:55
wgrantYou did upload it.14:55
FullFlannelJackeso even if it gets rejected, i have to change the version?14:55
wgrantNo, it must have been accepted at some point.14:55
wgrantRejected versions do not count for the purposes of the version check.14:56
gesernot for rejects, but once it accepted you have to even if the build fails14:56
FullFlannelJackeWell, I did upload it many months ago, but I deleted it because of a bug..So, i have no idea what version I should be using..14:56
FullFlannelJackeI guess I will try something like 1.214:56
geserLP still remembers this old version14:56
FullFlannelJackeOK yes, I found it in LP..I will have to upload v1.02 or greater15:01
FullFlannelJackeI figured it only kept track if the package was *still* there.15:01
aakefWhen I got to my launchpad page, it does not even show "Technical details". Any idea? https://launchpad.net/~aakef/+archive/ppa15:12
wgrantaakef: There are no packages to install from it, so it does not show installation instructions.15:13
wgrantDid you sign the .changes file with the correct GPG key?15:14
aakefwgrant: I only have one key for the package mail adress15:14
aakefwgrant: If it at least would send me a single mail what is going wrong...15:15
wgrantaakef: If it's not signed properly, it cannot determine who to send an email to!15:15
aakefgpg: Good signature from "Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>"15:20
aakefSuccessfully uploaded packages.15:20
aakefArg, and now suddenly I got a mail15:21
aakefwgrant: Thanks, it worked! Seems the reason was that I had an old mail address in my key, but I recently deleted that key from launchpad15:26
aakefI mean i deleted that mail address from launchpad15:26
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== fta_ is now known as fta
ochosihi everyone20:55
ochosiis it possible to make launchpad automatically build packages from a git repo?20:56
ochosion a regular basis20:56
directhexhow come so many i386 ppa builders are disabled?21:16
=== Meths_ is now known as Meths
FullFlannelJackeHow long does it usually take for a package to be built?  Mine has been waiting 6 hours.22:02
oojahFullFlannelJacke: It varies greatly depending on what else has been submitted.22:12
oojahFullFlannelJacke: But at the moment it looks as though there is a problem. See: https://launchpad.net/builders/22:12
FullFlannelJackeMust have been a lot of submissions today22:12
directhexFullFlannelJacke, depends on the size of the queue. or, in today's case, whether 80% of i386 PPA builders are disabled22:13
FullFlannelJackehmm i wonder why so many are disabled?22:14
wgrantFullFlannelJacke: A network glitch, it appears.22:20
wgrantAn admin should be around in a couple of hours; I'll poke them.22:20
FullFlannelJackecan anyone tell me why my build is failing?23:33
FullFlannelJackeit is saying something about it cant find the data files because they dont exist23:34
FullFlannelJackeeven though they do23:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!