[02:48] i'm getting a barrage of emails from apparently different users complaining about the keyserver failing on ppas [03:04] Yes, it is somewhat unwell at the moment :( [03:04] Has been for a few hours, by the look of things. [05:13] lifeless: halp! [05:14] lifeless: bzr is doing things different and confusing now :( [05:14] maco: What's it doing? [05:15] its acting like svn instead of bzr [05:15] Howso? [05:15] commit auto-pushed [05:15] i know lp's docs say there's a mode like that [05:15] how do i make it go back to distributed mode? [05:15] See 'bzr help checkouts' [05:15] Quick fix: bzr unbind [05:16] 'bzr checkout' creates a bound branch by default. 'bzr branch' creates an unbound one. [05:16] You switch between the two modes with 'bzr bind' and 'bzr unbind'. [05:16] oh [05:16] ok [05:16] i think i was trying to use bind to change where the push-place was [05:17] Did you mean 'bzr push --remember some://url'? [05:17] yeah probably [05:17] i dont recall seeing --remember in "man bzr" though [05:17] thank you wgrant [05:17] The manpage is not exhaustive. [05:17] bzr help push [05:18] Oh, it is pretty exhaustive now. [05:18] so treat bzr like chanserv. ok. [05:18] And --remember is there. [05:18] yes it is. oops [05:18] I forgot the manpage was autogenerated. [05:18] ... and is 2500 lines long. Ouch. [05:18] i probably expected it to be near "push" and it wasnt and so i then assumed some other command would do it [05:19] bzr help CMD is usually pretty useful [05:19] um yeah 2500 manpages arent the sort you read..they're the sort you grep and hope you're grepping the right words [05:19] Er, well, it is in the push section. [05:19] micahg: The manpage appears to be a combination of most of the the 'bzr help' output. [05:20] wgrant: makes sense [05:20] oh they have sections [05:20] ok. lets just all remove 10 of my geek points now [05:20] i think i looked at "command overview" and assumed that was it [05:20] Heh, not quite :P [05:22] i was trying to figure out how to make my branch be a team branch instead. i did a LOT of weird/wrong things to it in the meantime. then nigelb found the "change owner" option in the "branch details" section and so i went and used that and filed a bug saying it was too hard to find the "change owner" thing [05:22] maco: I thought you just push under the team in LP [05:23] the team didnt have a branch yet and i was confused [05:23] and when i tried doing that it said it was "stacking" the team branch on top of my branch [05:23] and then i got more confused [05:23] You can either move it or just push to a location that doesn't exist yet. [05:23] Ah, well, it will indeed stack if your branch is set as the development focus. [05:23] where "move it" means "find that change-owner thingy" right? [05:23] that's one feature I love about bzr is the autocreation when pushing [05:24] Right. [05:24] micahg: Yeah, the combination of bzr and LP there is pretty awesome. [05:24] oh is THAT why it did that?? [05:24] Yes. [05:25] well now i have things a bit muddled in gally & gally-asl. at least one of them has its development branch stacking on my branch now because i couldnt figure out how to move it [05:25] So, you want the team branch to be the dev focus? [05:25] yes [05:25] i have it pointed that way now [05:26] but because when i made the team branch, mine was the dev focus, the current-dev-focus one stacks on top of mine [05:26] There are only two gally branches. [05:26] Neither is stacked. [05:26] gally-asl then, i guess [05:26] i got one of them right and one of them wrong [05:26] Are you sure you didn't delete the newly created team branch, then rename the old one? [05:26] thats what i did with gally [05:27] See, gally-asl has only one branch. [05:27] oh or maybe i repeated that on gally-asl now too [05:27] So it's not stacked. [05:27] bah im so confused [05:27] Moving the dev focus around, when combined with stacking, can be pretty confusing, yes. [05:28] the last 2 days' worth of launchpad & bzr usage have been weeeeird [05:29] by the way, when creating a team, there's no way to set its owner at that point right? you just create it, then use the change-owner thing for the team then (if youre in the team that you made be owner) delete yourself? [05:29] Right, you can't set the owner at creation time. [05:30] Which is perhaps slightly inconvenient. [06:56] lamont: Hmm. Build farm disaster? [06:56] A few 'No route to host's, and lots of Fault 8002s on i386, which makes me suspect that a recipe build might have somehow made it through. [11:25] hello @all [11:26] is there any way to remove a translation template? [13:42] Hi there. Created a project in launchpad yesterday at morning. Wanna translate using it. I did upload 4 files and is still as "Nees Review". How long it will take? [14:36] Getting rejections to my ppa uploads and dont know why. [14:37] I uploaded it once and it was rejected because of my Changelog. Then, after a lot of searching, i fixed that and uploaded it again. [14:37] Now it says that my package is "is already accepted in ubuntu/lucid and you cannot upload the same version within the same distribution." [14:38] anyone anyone? [14:44] I believe it is still an issue with ym changelog. Can anyone please explain how in the world a changelog is supposed to look? this is irritating that such a small thing is causing such a PITA [14:44] I am trying to package code I have written and I have no idea how the changelog should look when i have no bug reports, etc.. [14:47] Hello all [14:47] Any one here who could help me with launchpad ppa uploads? [14:48] aakef: Im here for the same reason no one seems to be here [14:48] I registered a ppa page, uploaded to it with dput, but nothing happens [14:48] tell FullFlannelJacke: Hmm, thanks. Do you know a mailing list to ask on? [14:48] aakef: check your email. Your package probably got rejected and you will get an email telling you why [14:49] aakef: if you have even a tiny error in one of the files in /debian, it will get rejected automatically [14:50] tell FullFlannelJacke: I don't get a single mail [14:50] and sometimes it can take 10-15 minutes to get the email [14:50] aakef: is the gpg key you used for signing attached to your LP profile? [14:50] then if you got no email, then its likely your package is being "processed" by the server still [14:50] tell FullFlannelJacke: And as unionfs-fuse is already in Debian and Ubuntu, I don't think there is a packaging error [14:51] tell geser: Also already checked that, yes [14:52] GRRR. My package just got rejected AGAIN. Can anyone please tell me why my changelog keeps getting rejected? [14:52] FullFlannelJacke: what error message? [14:53] saying that instabUnable to find distroseries: unstable [14:53] Unable to find distroseries: unstable [14:53] But if I put lucid in there I get yet another error message [14:53] tell FullFlannelJacke: That would be Debian upload [14:53] PPA know only about Ubuntu release names, not Debian ones [14:53] Yeah but if I put lucid in there, it gets rejected still [14:54] tell FullFlannelJacke: I think you need to specify the Ubuntu distro, its in the lauchpad help page [14:54] if I put "lucid" there, i get this error: [14:54] is already accepted in ubuntu/lucid and you cannot upload the same version within the same distribution. You have to modify the source version and re-upload. [14:54] what's the package name and the version you try to upload? [14:54] FullFlannelJacke: You need to increment the version. [14:54] You can't upload the same version twice; that doesn't make sense. [14:55] This is MY package. i wrote the code. And it is version 1.0 [14:55] And I have not yet uploaded it [14:55] You did upload it. [14:55] so even if it gets rejected, i have to change the version? [14:55] No, it must have been accepted at some point. [14:56] Rejected versions do not count for the purposes of the version check. [14:56] not for rejects, but once it accepted you have to even if the build fails [14:56] Well, I did upload it many months ago, but I deleted it because of a bug..So, i have no idea what version I should be using.. [14:56] I guess I will try something like 1.2 [14:56] LP still remembers this old version [15:01] OK yes, I found it in LP..I will have to upload v1.02 or greater [15:01] I figured it only kept track if the package was *still* there. [15:12] When I got to my launchpad page, it does not even show "Technical details". Any idea? https://launchpad.net/~aakef/+archive/ppa [15:13] aakef: There are no packages to install from it, so it does not show installation instructions. [15:14] Did you sign the .changes file with the correct GPG key? [15:14] wgrant: I only have one key for the package mail adress [15:15] wgrant: If it at least would send me a single mail what is going wrong... [15:15] aakef: If it's not signed properly, it cannot determine who to send an email to! [15:20] gpg: Good signature from "Bernd Schubert " [15:20] Successfully uploaded packages. [15:21] Arg, and now suddenly I got a mail [15:26] wgrant: Thanks, it worked! Seems the reason was that I had an old mail address in my key, but I recently deleted that key from launchpad [15:26] I mean i deleted that mail address from launchpad === yofel_ is now known as yofel === fta_ is now known as fta [20:55] hi everyone [20:56] is it possible to make launchpad automatically build packages from a git repo? [20:56] on a regular basis [21:16] how come so many i386 ppa builders are disabled? === Meths_ is now known as Meths [22:02] How long does it usually take for a package to be built? Mine has been waiting 6 hours. [22:12] FullFlannelJacke: It varies greatly depending on what else has been submitted. [22:12] FullFlannelJacke: But at the moment it looks as though there is a problem. See: https://launchpad.net/builders/ [22:12] Must have been a lot of submissions today [22:13] FullFlannelJacke, depends on the size of the queue. or, in today's case, whether 80% of i386 PPA builders are disabled [22:14] hmm i wonder why so many are disabled? [22:20] FullFlannelJacke: A network glitch, it appears. [22:20] An admin should be around in a couple of hours; I'll poke them. [23:33] can anyone tell me why my build is failing? [23:34] it is saying something about it cant find the data files because they dont exist [23:34] even though they do