| === nobawk|away is now known as nobawk | ||
| Laney | mk-sbuild chroots seem to be very far from minimal | 00:21 |
|---|---|---|
| Laney | just noticed subversion being installed in a lenny one | 00:21 |
| funkyHat | I've posted a version bump debdiff which fixes mpd: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpd/+bug/588253 | 02:37 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 588253 in mpd (Ubuntu) "mpd: error while loading shared libraries: libavcodec.so.52" [Undecided,New] | 02:37 |
| cpscotti | Hey everyone, whats next for a SRU with verification-done? just waiting? ( bug 480772 ) | 02:54 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 480772 in harpia (Ubuntu Lucid) "OpenCV 2 incompatibilities" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/480772 | 02:54 |
| === nobawk|away is now known as nobawk | ||
| === nobawk is now known as nobawk|away | ||
| === nobawk|away is now known as nobawk | ||
| darkwing-netbook | Question... is packaging for GNOME (Ubuntu) and KDE (Kubuntu) The same? I want to learn and I and KDE/Kubuntu user so as I take my journey I want to learn the KDE side if there is a difference | 04:35 |
| ScottK | cpscotti: Is it tagged 'verification-done'? If so, then it's just a question of it having had enough age in proposed and then it will get copied to updates. | 05:22 |
| om26er | I have made an upload to revu should I subscribe ubuntu sponsers? | 06:44 |
| om26er | * to the bug report | 06:46 |
| dupondje | om26er: what bug # ? | 06:53 |
| om26er | bug 590048 | 06:53 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 590048 in Ubuntu "[needs packaging] gnome-global-menu" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/590048 | 06:53 |
| dupondje | think it should just be on REVU | 06:56 |
| dupondje | not totally sure neither :) | 06:56 |
| === MTecknology is now known as MTeck-ricer | ||
| YokoZar | ScottK: ugh so it appears that somehow we ended up with two versions of spring in the lucid archive | 07:29 |
| ScottK | YokoZar: Oops. | 07:29 |
| ScottK | How so? | 07:30 |
| YokoZar | ScottK: I think one was synced from debian ("spring") and the other was the upgrade of the one I made ("spring-engine") | 07:30 |
| \sh | ScottK, I just dist-upgraded to lucid yesterday, since then my dovecot sieve stuff is not working anymore...(not it's not the plugin s/cmusieve/sieve/ problem) and I can't see anything in the logfiles...any clue where I can have look to determine the problem? | 07:30 |
| ScottK | \sh: No. That's the only issue I've heard of. I'd ping ivoks when he's around. He knows it better than I do. | 07:31 |
| ScottK | YokoZar: What's the state of spring/spring-engine relative to each other? | 07:31 |
| \sh | YokoZar, talk to ttx.. because I wanted to work on integrating spring into ubuntu for the ehcache stuff | 07:31 |
| \sh | s/I/he == ttx/ | 07:32 |
| ScottK | \sh: Are you sure it's the same spring? | 07:32 |
| YokoZar | ScottK: lucid version of spring is unplayable and out of date. Debian unstable version is up to date. Lucid spring-engine is playable but one minor version behind debian unstable spring | 07:32 |
| \sh | argl..it RTS...hail double names | 07:32 |
| YokoZar | right that was one reason why I called it spring-engine to begin with | 07:33 |
| \sh | YokoZar, hmmm..then I think the java spring will be named after libspring-<foo>-java ? | 07:33 |
| YokoZar | If that makes more sense then yeah | 07:33 |
| ScottK | YokoZar: Then my recommendation would be to SRU the Lucid spring to be a dummy package that pulls in spring-engine and then do the reverse in maverick. | 07:33 |
| YokoZar | ScottK: Yeah that was my thought | 07:34 |
| ScottK | Then get spring-engine source removed in Maverick. | 07:34 |
| ScottK | We'll have to carry a diff until after then next LTS, but that's unavoidable now. | 07:34 |
| YokoZar | Well it was unavoidable when debian chose a different package name really | 07:35 |
| YokoZar | we'd always have to have the dummy package | 07:35 |
| ttx | \sh: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libspring-2.5-java | 07:35 |
| \sh | ttx, yes...aren't there any binaries for spring java still? | 07:36 |
| ttx | \sh: "Missing build dependencies: libtiles-java" | 07:37 |
| \sh | ScottK, FAILED /etc/dovecot/conf.d/01-dovecot-postfix.conf overwrote my dovecot.conf settings | 07:38 |
| ScottK | You had a file called /etc/dovecot/conf.d/01-dovecot-postfix.conf? | 07:39 |
| \sh | ScottK, no I haden't my old config was in dovecot.conf | 07:40 |
| ScottK | Then it didn't overwrite it. | 07:40 |
| \sh | ScottK, but now installed dovecot-postfix created one 01-dovecot-postfix.conf and this overwrote the settings in dovecot.conf it seems | 07:40 |
| ScottK | It may have over-ridden it .... | 07:40 |
| \sh | because in it is still cmusieve | 07:40 |
| \sh | which is wrong | 07:40 |
| ScottK | We did an SRU to fix the sieve naming problem in dovecot-postfix. | 07:41 |
| \sh | ScottK, is it sill in proposed? | 07:41 |
| ScottK | Is it still in -proposed maybe? | 07:41 |
| ScottK | Heh. | 07:41 |
| ScottK | I'd say have a look. | 07:42 |
| ScottK | (it's very late here) | 07:42 |
| maco2 | live lock on answers from each other now? | 07:42 |
| \sh | ScottK, still in proposed | 07:43 |
| ScottK | \sh: Give it a try and then mark it verified if it works. | 07:43 |
| dholbach | good morning | 07:59 |
| === happyaron is now known as im2KG | ||
| eric_ | when is next revu motu meeting day? | 10:07 |
| === im2KG is now known as happyaron | ||
| === happyaron is now known as autorejoin | ||
| === autorejoin is now known as happyaron | ||
| kaushal | hi | 11:42 |
| kaushal | can some one here help me with my post on https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/2010-June/004279.html ? | 11:43 |
| soren | kaushal: Did you read xtables-addons-common's package description? | 11:55 |
| kaushal | soren: is there a way to uninstall iptables ? | 11:58 |
| kaushal | I mean source | 11:58 |
| soren | Just delete it. | 11:58 |
| kaushal | where do i look for it ? | 11:58 |
| soren | You put it there. | 11:58 |
| kaushal | soren: i deleted it | 11:59 |
| soren | Then it's gone. | 11:59 |
| soren | this conversation is silly. | 11:59 |
| kaushal | soren: apologies | 12:00 |
| kaushal | I did that still it refers to iptables v1.4.4: Couldn't load match `ipp2p':/usr/local/libexec/xtables/libipt_ipp2p.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory | 12:01 |
| kaushal | wierd | 12:01 |
| soren | You did what? | 12:01 |
| kaushal | I did apt-get purge iptables xtables-addons-common | 12:01 |
| kaushal | and reinstalled it | 12:01 |
| soren | Well, you clearly installed some other version of iptables in /usr/local | 12:03 |
| kaushal | yeah | 12:03 |
| soren | You probably want to get rid of that. | 12:03 |
| kaushal | yes | 12:03 |
| kaushal | soren: is there a way to remove it completely | 12:04 |
| soren | kaushal: You could rm the files completely. Incidentally, "rm" is short for remove. | 12:04 |
| dholbach | Adri2000: are you still working on bug 366532? somebody in #debian-ubuntu just asked me about the bug | 12:04 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 366532 in Merge-o-Matic "Please don't list xbuildy packages on merges.ubuntu.com" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/366532 | 12:04 |
| kaushal | soren: i deleted it completely | 12:08 |
| kaushal | now the error i get is -bash: /usr/local/sbin/iptables: No such file or directory | 12:08 |
| kaushal | when i ran iptables -m ipp2p --help | 12:08 |
| Rhonda | kaushal: I think your question is better suited in #ubuntu, actually. But a "rehash" should help you. | 12:08 |
| Rhonda | hmm, or what that is called. | 12:09 |
| kaushal | Rhonda: i did hash ldconfig | 12:10 |
| Rhonda | It's iptables that gives you troubles, not ldconfig. Just restart your shell session will get rid of the message too, and those questions are still better suited in #ubuntu. | 12:11 |
| kaushal | sure | 12:11 |
| kaushal | Rhonda: Thanks | 12:12 |
| kaushal | Rhonda: i rebooted the box | 12:14 |
| kaushal | still no luck | 12:14 |
| Rhonda | kaushal: I'm sorry but I won't continue this in here because this clearly is the wrong channel for your question, see #ubuntu instead for end-user trouble shooting. Sorry. | 12:16 |
| kaushal | Rhonda: ok | 12:16 |
| xteejx | Hey guys, I'm messing around trying to package stuff for Ubuntu, more of a "learn to use my packaging skills" thing. Does it make a difference whether it is packaged for Ubuntu or Debian? i.e. can I package something purely for Ubuntu, and does it go over to Debian anyway or is that nothing to worry about? | 12:16 |
| Rhonda | xteejx: There is nothing going over to Debian, the workflow only does the other direction. Out of curiosity, why don't you want to have it in Debian? | 12:18 |
| xteejx | Rhonda: There's no reason, its just that the documentation for packaging for Ubuntu seems to be easier to follow | 12:18 |
| xteejx | I don't know how to package for Debian, barely even Ubuntu but getting there | 12:18 |
| Rhonda | It shouldn't be any difference, actually. :) | 12:19 |
| xteejx | Oh :) | 12:19 |
| Rhonda | If the package is proper for Ubuntu it should be proper for Debian too, lintian has only minor differences in Debian and Ubuntu. | 12:19 |
| xteejx | Oh cool, I've had no lintian errors or anything | 12:19 |
| Rhonda | And the policy isn't derived in relevant parts from what I know. | 12:19 |
| xteejx | That's handy then. So it's just a small change in the changelog really to reflect debian instead? | 12:20 |
| Rhonda | Usually yes. I think there is minor difference in the control file too. | 12:21 |
| Rhonda | Debian usually just uses Maintainer: field and nothing more in that respect that ubuntu does. | 12:21 |
| xteejx | One other question sorry for being a pain: Is it Ok to use dpatch with a single patch to change the Makefile? (I don't seem to be able to make the PREFIX bit work on its own) | 12:22 |
| xteejx | Oh that's good then :) | 12:22 |
| Rhonda | Oh, you aren't a pain. :) And actually I'd settle for quilt instead of dpatch, but yes, using patches is a good thing instead of changing directly. | 12:22 |
| Rhonda | Some people would even suggest to you to use source format 3.0 (quilt) right ahead. | 12:23 |
| xteejx | Is there any documentation for quilt at all? (I have googled but its a bit mumbo jumbo dpatch seems dead easy) | 12:23 |
| xteejx | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Howtos/Quilt found something :) | 12:26 |
| xteejx | Is anyone able to take a look at my debian/rules and Makefile please I think I've got it right but not totally sure http://paste.ubuntu.com/446080/ http://paste.ubuntu.com/446081/ | 13:27 |
| xteejx | Anyone at all? Please :) | 13:33 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: you can use "dh" for a much shorter debian/rules | 13:35 |
| xteejx | tumbleweed: How do you mean? | 13:36 |
| tumbleweed | you can use "install" instead of copy + chmod | 13:36 |
| tumbleweed | and instead of mkdir | 13:36 |
| xteejx | But that's what the upstream Makefile does I'm confused | 13:37 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: oh, don't modify upstream makefile if you don't have to. I assume you pasted it because you wrote it | 13:38 |
| === cr3_ is now known as cr3 | ||
| xteejx | Oh lol nope :) | 13:38 |
| === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna | ||
| xteejx | I ermmm nicked it for packaging it seemed a simple perl script would be easier to package for a first go than something complex :) | 13:39 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debians/rules is an example | 13:40 |
| tumbleweed | man dh for more | 13:41 |
| xteejx | tumbleweed: It's just dh $@ - what will that do? | 13:41 |
| sommer | morning | 13:41 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: that calls dh with the rule name as a parameter | 13:41 |
| tumbleweed | man dh to see what it does then | 13:41 |
| xteejx | ok thanks | 13:42 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: see http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/debhelper_dh_overrides/ for some more advanced usage | 13:42 |
| tumbleweed | (or look at packages using it) | 13:42 |
| carstenh | xteejx: if you don't like the short rules file just don't use it. there is nothing wrong with a longer one, although yours could be cleaned up | 13:46 |
| tumbleweed | and you have to understand what's going on in the longhand version to understand dh | 13:47 |
| xteejx | I understand the Makefile, dh is the problem | 13:49 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: dh just calls all the debhelper scripts one would normally call, in the right order | 13:50 |
| tumbleweed | and it can correctly build some of the most common build methods without any configuration | 13:51 |
| BlackZ | xteejx: I'd replace PREFIX ?= /usr/local with PREFIX ?= /usr | 13:51 |
| tumbleweed | BlackZ: that was the upstream Makefile | 13:53 |
| BlackZ | tumbleweed: well, I think /usr/local should be replaced by /usr | 13:54 |
| tumbleweed | BlackZ: that can be passed on the make command line | 13:55 |
| tumbleweed | i.e. make PREFIX=/usr | 13:55 |
| BlackZ | tumbleweed: sure | 13:55 |
| xteejx | yeah I tried that with the package itself "make PREFIX=/usr" and it looked fine | 13:56 |
| BlackZ | xteejx: yeah, that works | 13:56 |
| xteejx | I think that's the only difference from the Makefile really, just how to put it into a rules | 13:56 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: btw it's hard to evaluate your package just from the rules file. upload it to revu if you want decent feedback | 13:56 |
| BlackZ | tumbleweed: why revu and not in debian instead? | 13:57 |
| BlackZ | it'd have a lot of benefits | 13:57 |
| tumbleweed | BlackZ: oh, definitly, assuming xteejx is keen | 13:57 |
| xteejx | I'm keen :) | 13:57 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: mentors.debian.net | 13:57 |
| BlackZ | xteejx: read http://wiki.debian.org/Utnubu | 13:58 |
| BlackZ | it could help you too | 13:58 |
| xteejx | utnubu lol | 13:59 |
| tumbleweed | or probably more relevant https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian/ForUbuntuDevelopers | 13:59 |
| BlackZ | tumbleweed: what I have linked is the more simple, considering xteejx is still learning | 14:00 |
| BlackZ | s/what/the one | 14:00 |
| tumbleweed | BlackZ: that page is all about ubuntu for debian people. I don't seet hta much relevance | 14:01 |
| xteejx | So upload the package to debian mentors and have it reviewed then? Or revu? | 14:04 |
| BlackZ | xteejx: I'd suggest mentors.debian.net first | 14:04 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: if you can, get it through debian first. No need to duplicate effort | 14:04 |
| BlackZ | but if you prefer REVU, go ahead | 14:04 |
| BlackZ | the fact is that if you will get your work into debian it will be synced with ubuntu and the other debian-derivates | 14:05 |
| xteejx | I suppose if it was Ubuntu only, if someone in deb packaged it mine would get removed | 14:05 |
| BlackZ | so that would give more benefits | 14:05 |
| xteejx | never used revu by the way so either is fine with me :) | 14:05 |
| xteejx | http://wiki.debian.org/HowToPackageForDebian seems more readable on most things | 14:07 |
| tumbleweed | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide is also useful. But be aware - lots of guides on these topics are out of date | 14:09 |
| xteejx | that's cool I've already went through that one anyway :) | 14:09 |
| RunePhilosof | ajmitch, Is there something more I can do to speed up the sru process for bug 528957 (button clicks not detected)? | 14:53 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 528957 in libsdl1.2 (Ubuntu Lucid) "mouse button clicks not detected in windowed mode" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/528957 | 14:53 |
| === MTeck-ricer is now known as MTecknology | ||
| === valles is now known as effie_jayx | ||
| ari-tczew | cody-somerville: do you will merge xchat? | 16:06 |
| cody-somerville | I can | 16:09 |
| === mathiaz_ is now known as mathiaz | ||
| ari-tczew | cody-somerville: nice | 16:13 |
| cody-somerville | ari-tczew, If you're interested in doing it, please feel free to go ahead though | 16:13 |
| ari-tczew | cody-somerville: hmm, so, I'll try do it, if I won't got time or my work will fails, then I'll ask you for merge okay? | 16:14 |
| cody-somerville | ari-tczew, okay | 16:15 |
| ari-tczew | can I clean /var/cache/pbuilder/result by any command? | 16:20 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: wouldn't it make more sense to wait for 2.8.8 to appear in Debian? | 16:21 |
| arand | ari-tczew: I think rm ./* is the way things go.. | 16:22 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: I want to have a clean merge, now we have ubuntu5 revision. and we dunno when Debian will release 2.8.8 version | 16:23 |
| ari-tczew | I've reported to bug tracking a new upstream release a few days ago | 16:23 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: bug them :P | 16:23 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: *directly* | 16:23 |
| ari-tczew | ^^ | 16:23 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: what "directly" ? | 16:23 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: catch them in irc | 16:24 |
| ari-tczew | arand: I asked for command | 16:24 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: are you lazy? :> | 16:24 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: hm? | 16:24 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: wiki | 16:25 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: have you sent me a mail? :P | 16:25 |
| ari-tczew | I've forgotten email you yesterday | 16:25 |
| sebner | ;) | 16:25 |
| arand | ari-tczew: I was simply saying "there doesn't seem to be one".. | 16:25 |
| dupondje | doing some merges again :) | 16:25 |
| dupondje | hrhr :p | 16:25 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: I'll write something today, promised | 16:25 |
| ari-tczew | arand: ok | 16:26 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: what do you think about fix some security issues? | 16:26 |
| dupondje | like ? | 16:26 |
| ari-tczew | example | 16:27 |
| ari-tczew | are you interested? | 16:27 |
| dupondje | maby yea :) if its not that hard | 16:27 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: you should get to know fixing security issues if you're interested in MOTU | 16:28 |
| dupondje | fine, you have an example where I can start ? | 16:28 |
| ari-tczew | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdateProcedures | 16:29 |
| * micahg didn't think security fixes were part of MOTU | 16:30 | |
| jdstrand | they sure can be | 16:30 |
| highvoltage | micahg: who else would do them for universe :) | 16:30 |
| ari-tczew | open bugs are available on https://bugs.launchpad.net/~motu-swat | 16:31 |
| jdstrand | I would encourage anyone wanting to contribute to universe to look at open security issues | 16:31 |
| * ari-tczew +1 for jdstrand | 16:31 | |
| * micahg was referring to not required for becoming MOTU, not as in good to do | 16:31 | |
| dupondje | thats a nice list ... :) | 16:32 |
| ari-tczew | of course all CVEs are available on Ubuntu CVE Tracker http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/ but I think that we should fix security issues by importance and reports | 16:32 |
| ari-tczew | I disagree with micahg. I think that fixing security issues should be a part of MOTU work | 16:34 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: I'm not disagreeing with that | 16:34 |
| jdstrand | ari-tczew: well, I don't think micahg expressed an opinion, just current state | 16:34 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: I'm just saying that I didn't think it was *required* for becoming a MOTU | 16:35 |
| jdstrand | I too think it should be part of MOTU | 16:35 |
| ari-tczew | micahg: so current state, ok | 16:35 |
| ari-tczew | I think that this was a language barrer | 16:37 |
| micahg | ari-tczew: +1 | 16:37 |
| ari-tczew | :) | 16:37 |
| dupondje | so ari-tczew, pick one of https://bugs.launchpad.net/~motu-swat list ? | 16:42 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: I'll be glad | 16:42 |
| dupondje | damn, some seem to be extremely old | 16:43 |
| dupondje | and some have already patches :) | 16:43 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: yea, but you should check these patches in upstream | 16:44 |
| ari-tczew | there are a channel for security #ubuntu-hardened | 16:44 |
| ari-tczew | and I'm open for questions | 16:45 |
| === nobawk is now known as nobawk|away | ||
| xteejx | Question: If a source tarball has a directory Name-x.y-src can we change it to name-x.y when packaging it (even though this is changing the source)? | 17:12 |
| slytherin | xteejx: yes you can | 17:13 |
| xteejx | slytherin: Cool thanks :) | 17:13 |
| slytherin | xteejx: your .orig.tar.gz should have the directory in name-x.y format | 17:14 |
| xteejx | slytherin: The source tarball doesn't really matter then? Or keep that the same to it can be diff'd properly? | 17:14 |
| slytherin | It is acceptable to repack source tarball for cases like this. | 17:15 |
| xteejx | Oh Ok that saves messing around then hehe thanks slytherin :) | 17:16 |
| tumbleweed | dpkg-source doesn't care about the root directory in the .orig.tar.gz | 17:19 |
| tumbleweed | it can be called anything, as long as there is only one root-level item | 17:19 |
| Adri2000 | dholbach: no I'm not | 17:27 |
| dupondje | ari-tczew: http://dupondje.be/asterisk.debdiff | 17:27 |
| dholbach | Adri2000: ok :/ | 17:27 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: could you give me a bug number? | 17:28 |
| dupondje | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/dapper/+source/asterisk/+bug/173610 | 17:28 |
| ubottu | Error: Could not parse data returned by Ubuntu: list.index(x): x not in list (https://launchpad.net/bugs/173610) | 17:28 |
| dupondje | ah well :) | 17:29 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| dupondje | and ari-tczew :) | 17:43 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: wait 5 minutes okay? | 17:43 |
| dupondje | fine :) | 17:44 |
| dupondje | take your time | 17:44 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: do you plan using bazaar instead debdiffs? | 17:44 |
| dupondje | ari-tczew: never used bazaar ... | 17:46 |
| dupondje | but can't be that hard ? :) | 17:46 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: I thought that this is hard, but not! you're downloading source by command: bzr branch | 17:48 |
| ari-tczew | upload by: bzr push | 17:48 |
| * tumbleweed still finds mom quicker than the UDD equivalent | 17:49 | |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: I'll review your patch, if it will be good, then I'll teach you to use bzr | 17:49 |
| ari-tczew | can I got .deb files generated by pbuilder? | 17:53 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: /var/cache/pbuilder/result | 17:54 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: doesn't exist :/ | 17:54 |
| ari-tczew | .deb file of course doesn't exist | 17:54 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: are you using the standard .pbuilderrc where you specify DIST? | 17:54 |
| tumbleweed | then it would be /var/cache/pbuilder/maverick-amd64/result | 17:55 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: I use command $ sudo pbuilder-dist maverick build | 17:56 |
| tumbleweed | hmm never used that | 17:57 |
| tumbleweed | By default, pbuilder-dist will store all the files it generates in ~/pbuilder/. This can be changed by setting | 17:57 |
| tumbleweed | ... from pbuilder-dist(1) | 17:58 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: it's exist, thanks! you have a beer from me | 17:59 |
| tumbleweed | lol | 18:00 |
| dupondje | mmm beer :) | 18:00 |
| ari-tczew | ~/pbuilder/maverick_result | 18:00 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: you will get a more beer from me if you help me to clear bug list on ~motu-swat :) | 18:02 |
| dupondje | to bad | 18:05 |
| dupondje | i'll have to cook :P | 18:05 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: some comments from me about your patch, have you got a time right now? | 18:06 |
| dupondje | sure | 18:06 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: well, the line SECURITY UPDATE should be shorten. before http references you should put a "-" | 18:09 |
| ari-tczew | like in merges: first "*", below "-" | 18:10 |
| ari-tczew | CVE's number too have to start with - | 18:11 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: look at bug 322196 | 18:11 |
| ubottu | Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: list.index(x): x not in list (https://launchpad.net/bugs/322196) | 18:11 |
| ari-tczew | click on bzr diff, this is my patch. please look | 18:12 |
| dupondje | hmz ari-tczew all the previous changelog entries of asterisk doesn't have - in front ... | 18:12 |
| dupondje | thats why I did it like that | 18:12 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: I see, but please put as I propose to you | 18:13 |
| ari-tczew | latest upload in asterisk dapper was in 2007, long time ago | 18:13 |
| dupondje | I see, i'l fix | 18:13 |
| ari-tczew | also, I don't see patch description | 18:14 |
| ari-tczew | please follow with https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PatchTaggingGuidelines | 18:14 |
| ari-tczew | also you can look on my patch (bug number is above ^^ ) as example for security update. as you saw, ACK without problems | 18:15 |
| dupondje | http://ubuntu.dupondje.be/asterisk2.debdiff | 18:19 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: better, better! progress. but please in debian/changelog, please do [enter] after "Detail" word, then white spaces until word "Record" will be under "SECURITY". then will be looks clearly | 18:23 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: and rename file patch.CVE-2007-6170.dpatch to CVE-2007-6170.dpatch I don't see a reason for have this filename | 18:25 |
| ubottu | SQL injection vulnerability in the Call Detail Record Postgres logging engine (cdr_pgsql) in Asterisk 1.4.x before 1.4.15, 1.2.x before 1.2.25, B.x before B.2.3.4, and C.x before C.1.0-beta6 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via (1) ANI and (2) DNIS arguments. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-6170) | 18:25 |
| ubottu | SQL injection vulnerability in the Call Detail Record Postgres logging engine (cdr_pgsql) in Asterisk 1.4.x before 1.4.15, 1.2.x before 1.2.25, B.x before B.2.3.4, and C.x before C.1.0-beta6 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via (1) ANI and (2) DNIS arguments. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-6170) | 18:25 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: your CVE's patch still needs to got a description https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PatchTaggingGuidelines -> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ you can look on my patches | 18:27 |
| dupondje | http://ubuntu.dupondje.be/asterisk3.debdiff | 18:31 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: I'm going on dinner, you're free and go cooking :) | 18:32 |
| dupondje | ok chief ;) | 18:34 |
| ari-tczew | I'll leave a message | 18:34 |
| === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna | ||
| ari-tczew | dupondje: I have to go out right now. I'll review your 3rd patch later. | 19:07 |
| RoAkSoAx | micahg: did you file the bug for testdrive? | 19:25 |
| micahg | RoAkSoAx: no, I was going to SRU in your bug | 19:25 |
| micahg | RoAkSoAx: are there specific commits that I can pull to make an SRU? | 19:26 |
| dupondje | asac: you there ? | 19:26 |
| RoAkSoAx | micahg: just the support for vbox3.2 right? | 19:31 |
| micahg | RoAkSoAx: yep | 19:31 |
| RoAkSoAx | micahg: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~testdrive/testdrive/trunk/revision/245 though the packaging change has not yet been pushed to the trunk | 19:31 |
| micahg | RoAkSoAx: perfect, thank you, if you want, I can prepare the SRU | 19:32 |
| dupondje | somebody can help me with a MIR ? | 19:32 |
| micahg | RoAkSoAx: oh, right, we need to push the packaging change to maverick first | 19:32 |
| micahg | RoAkSoAx: so, should I just make a debdiff? | 19:33 |
| micahg | RoAkSoAx: unless you want to just push it, it's just | virtualbox-3.2 in control | 19:35 |
| ScottK | dupondje: What kind of help? | 19:46 |
| dupondje | ScottK: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libutempter/+bug/589103 | 19:50 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 589103 in libutempter (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libutempter" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 19:50 |
| dupondje | Include the rationale and description of the violations of UbuntuMainInclusionRequirements, and a confirmation that you checked the requirements carefully. | 19:50 |
| dupondje | tought I did it ... | 19:50 |
| ScottK | dupondje: List all the items 1 - 9 in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuMainInclusionRequirements in the bug. | 19:52 |
| dupondje | ScottK: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libutempter/+bug/589103 better ? :) | 20:06 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 589103 in libutempter (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libutempter" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 20:06 |
| ScottK | dupondje: Much. | 20:08 |
| dupondje | asac: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libutempter/+bug/589103 :) | 20:08 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 589103 in libutempter (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libutempter" [Undecided,New] | 20:08 |
| dupondje | feel free | 20:08 |
| ScottK | asac: Don't forget about gpsd .... I never heard back from lool on it. | 20:10 |
| BlackZ | please, sponsor bug #590481 | 20:17 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 590481 in hostname (Ubuntu) "Please merge hostname 3.04 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/590481 | 20:17 |
| dupondje | BlackZ: thats something for -devel | 20:19 |
| dupondje | main package .. | 20:19 |
| BlackZ | I think here are some core developers ;) | 20:19 |
| hyperair | it's off-topic here ;-) | 20:20 |
| BlackZ | OK hyperair sorry, asking in the -devel channel | 20:21 |
| dupondje | anyway if you added ubuntu-sponsors it should be ok :) | 20:21 |
| * hyperair agrees | 20:22 | |
| hyperair | i wish there was a way to filter out just the packages that i can upload =\ | 20:23 |
| hyperair | i used to regularly check the uus queue, but now that it's been merged with ums, it's kind of hard to figure out which packages you can and cannot sponsor | 20:23 |
| micahg | hyperair: well, CTRL + F on the sponsors page :) | 20:23 |
| geser | hyperair: go for core-dev :) | 20:23 |
| hyperair | =( | 20:24 |
| hyperair | micahg: what do you expect me to do, ctrl+f each of the... god knows how many packages there are in universe? | 20:24 |
| ScottK | Sounds like a great task for a new script in ubuntu-dev-tools | 20:25 |
| micahg | hyperair: sorry, I was about to look at the page, there was a new version that made it easier to tell what one could upload | 20:25 |
| hyperair | lol ScottK. | 20:25 |
| ScottK | Not kidding. | 20:25 |
| micahg | hyperair: would unseeded count? | 20:26 |
| hyperair | ScottK: i'm more inclined towards launchpad.net button^Wfilter | 20:26 |
| hyperair | micahg: i think so. | 20:26 |
| micahg | hyperair: http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/ | 20:26 |
| ScottK | hyperair: Yes, but guess which is easier to get done sooner ... | 20:26 |
| hyperair | hmm has that been updated? | 20:26 |
| dupondje | I can't sponsor :p | 20:26 |
| dupondje | hyperair: yes | 20:27 |
| hyperair | i remember that list being hopelessly outdated, *and* still sticking seeded packages in. | 20:27 |
| dupondje | Last updated at: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:26:25 +0100 | 20:27 |
| hyperair | ScottK: like syncpackage, eh? | 20:27 |
| ScottK | Sure. | 20:28 |
| dupondje | hyperair: if you feel bored: https://launchpad.net/bugs/590820, https://launchpad.net/bugs/590831 | 20:33 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 590820 in debian-med (Ubuntu) "Please merge debian-med 1.6 (universe) from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] | 20:33 |
| hyperair | eh no, i'm not bored =p | 20:34 |
| dupondje | https://launchpad.net/bugs/589908 | 20:34 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 589908 in synce-kpm (Ubuntu) "Fix FTBFS due to changed Python options" [Undecided,New] | 20:34 |
| dupondje | there is enough of review stuff :D | 20:34 |
| hyperair | i'll start looking at them once my btrfs woes are over. | 20:34 |
| hyperair | or otherwise temporarily stalled. | 20:35 |
| dupondje | exotic filesystems :) | 20:35 |
| ScottK | dupondje: I just put a comment in 589908 that I think we should hold off on uploading it for now. Let's see if we get the fix for free from Debain via sync first. | 20:37 |
| dupondje | ok | 20:39 |
| dupondje | there is an upstream bug, so it should be possible :) | 20:39 |
| ScottK | I'm pretty sure the guy that filed it will NMU the package if the maintainer doesn't respond. | 20:40 |
| dupondje | I keep an eye on it | 20:41 |
| hyperair | dupondje: yes, very exotic ;-) | 20:41 |
| dupondje | SynCE is outdated since karmic or so, its nice to have 0.15 now | 20:42 |
| dupondje | :) | 20:42 |
| dupondje | hyperair: xfs feels exotic also sometimes | 20:43 |
| dupondje | xfs_check doesn't even work if you don't have tons of memory :P | 20:43 |
| === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
| cpscotti | Hey any archive admin with some time to check a SRU with fix-commited and verification-done (10 days old) (bug 480772 ) Is there something else to do? Or waiting is enough? | 21:37 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 480772 in harpia (Ubuntu Lucid) "OpenCV 2 incompatibilities" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/480772 | 21:37 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: ping | 22:41 |
| lool | ScottK: Saw the gpsd ping, but didn't get a chance to have a look, dont have much time for MIRs right now | 22:49 |
| lool | ScottK: If you'd find another MIR reviewer in the mean time, that might work better | 22:49 |
| ScottK | asac: ^^^ | 23:04 |
| ScottK | lool: Thanks. | 23:04 |
| ari-tczew | lool: do you maintain libsmbios in Debian? | 23:09 |
| === nobawk|away is now known as nobawk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!