=== sconklin is now known as sconklin-gone | ||
=== bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
bjf | manjo, i've looked at uck, what about it? | 00:43 |
---|---|---|
=== bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
* apw yawns | 08:32 | |
cooloney | apw: morning | 08:34 |
apw | morning | 08:34 |
=== lag_ is now known as lag | ||
jk- | brb, rewiring house | 09:34 |
RAOF | And you'll be right back? :) | 09:36 |
jk- | back | 09:42 |
kraut | moin | 09:51 |
apw | ikepanhc, hey you about ? | 11:05 |
ikepanhc | apw: yes | 11:05 |
ikepanhc | apw: anything? | 11:05 |
apw | ikepanhc, is the current version of the karmic netbook branch well current | 11:05 |
apw | ikepanhc, in order to apply debian commonisation to it i need to 1) modify it and 2) rebase it to the current proposed kernel | 11:06 |
apw | ikepanhc, so i want to be sure you've not got a modified version | 11:06 |
ikepanhc | apw: I do not aware who is using the branch, can you give me a hint? | 11:07 |
apw | ikepanhc, the karmic netbook branch is the karmic equivalent of hardy netbook-lpia ... i thought you sort of looked after those for OEM | 11:07 |
ikepanhc | apw: as I know, we have oem projects using jaunty and hardy netbook branch | 11:08 |
apw | ikepanhc, ok so its likely as anything a dead branch | 11:08 |
apw | ikepanhc, and if you don't have any interest in it i can just 'do it' ... | 11:08 |
apw | thanks | 11:08 |
ikepanhc | apw: can wait for US guys awake? so that I can ask them | 11:09 |
apw | ikepanhc, i can, though if you arn't maintaining it for them, and i am not, then i suspect they arn't using it | 11:10 |
apw | origin/master Ubuntu-2.6.31-22.61 | 11:10 |
apw | origin/netbook Ubuntu-2.6.31-14.47 | 11:10 |
ikepanhc | apw: yeah, that's what I am going to ask, if anyone need a rebase on karmic netbook-lpia branch | 11:10 |
apw | oh dear, its 8 ABI bumps behind ... perhaps it really is _dead_ | 11:10 |
apw | ikepanhc, ok thanks man if you could ask, don't stay up till midnight to find out, i can wait till tomorrow no bother | 11:11 |
ikepanhc | apw: thanks, I need to finish hardy netbook branch rebase today, otherwise too much action item queue for me | 11:12 |
apw | good luck with that :) | 11:13 |
ikepanhc | apw: almost, just find out I forget to update debian/control | 11:14 |
apw | ikepanhc, we removed those generated files from the git repository on the other branches | 11:14 |
apw | that way they are missing rather than wrong if you don't clean before building, and the source package build fails then | 11:15 |
ikepanhc | apw: lrm/lum is removed, but not lbm :( | 11:15 |
apw | urgle, rip them out so you don't hit it again | 11:16 |
ikepanhc | apw: good idea | 11:16 |
ikepanhc | apw: btw, can take some time from you reviewing the removing LGUEST_GUEST config patch? Steve gave me a green light on removing it | 11:17 |
apw | ikepanhc, will have a look yep | 11:18 |
ikepanhc | apw: thanks | 11:18 |
apw | ikepanhc, done | 11:21 |
ikepanhc | apw: thanks a lot.. | 11:22 |
=== ericm|ubuntu is now known as ericm-afk | ||
* apw wanders out to get some parts | 12:11 | |
=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
apw | amazing ... success | 13:20 |
nessita | tgardner: good morning! I performed the Lucid server install, yesterday, and then installed the backport of the maverick kernel. Got oops-free dmesg outputs showing the e1000e issue | 13:51 |
ubot2 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=free | 13:51 |
nessita | tgardner: both dmesg output (lucid kernel, backported kernel) are attached to the bug report (#591707) | 13:52 |
nessita | ubot2: link please? | 13:53 |
ubot2 | Factoid 'link please?' not found | 13:53 |
nessita | bummer | 13:53 |
nessita | tgardner: I guess I don't need to tell that I still have no eth0 :-) | 13:54 |
tgardner | nessita, ack. | 13:56 |
tgardner | nessita, ok, one last test. Lets try a vanilla upstream kernel (http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.35-rc2-maverick/linux-image-2.6.35-020635rc2-generic_2.6.35-020635rc2_amd64.deb) to make sure there isn't an Ubuntu patch causing problems. | 14:04 |
nessita | tgardner: bien sur, monsier. Would that installs in lucid? | 14:05 |
tgardner | nessita, yes, it should work fine in your server flavour installation | 14:05 |
nessita | ok, I'll try as soon as I finish some code reviews | 14:06 |
tgardner | nessita, np, thanks for your time | 14:06 |
* abogani2 waves | 14:38 | |
abogani2 | apw: ping | 14:39 |
abogani2 | apw: Only for information I'm keeping up-to-date lowlatency git tree on Zinc and I'm also doing build test on my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~abogani/+archive/fix-436043/+packages | 14:49 |
nessita | tgardner: test done, no eth0 with the vanilla kernel, dmesg ouput attached to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/+source/linux/+bug/591707 | 15:03 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 591707 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "After upgrade lucid -> maverick eth0 interface is gone (affects: 1) (dups: 1) (heat: 16)" [High,In progress] | 15:03 |
tgardner | nessita, ok, I've sent an email to the e1000e Intel developers list | 15:10 |
nessita | tgardner: yey! | 15:12 |
nessita | tgardner: keep me posted, please. The connection through the USB dongle sucks :-/ | 15:12 |
tgardner | nessita, if you really need Maverick user space, its quite likely the Lucid kernel would work just fine. its worth a try. | 15:14 |
nessita | tgardner: video is messed up in my maverick installation using lucid kernel | 15:14 |
tgardner | nessita, I guess thats life on the bleeding edge :) | 15:15 |
* nessita loves adrenaline | 15:15 | |
ogasawara | apw: that check-alias build failure is odd. I expected the ports to fail in the latest upload, but they built just fine. | 15:29 |
tgardner | ogasawara, are the tools versions changing? | 15:30 |
ogasawara | tgardner: hrm, I'd have to check | 15:30 |
apw | ogasawara, yeah its 'dependant' on the state of the tree whether it triggers | 15:30 |
apw | i've taken the liberty of direct pushing a fix for it to your tree | 15:30 |
ogasawara | apw: cool | 15:31 |
apw | that allowed me to test it on the mainline builds, which trigger it every time | 15:31 |
apw | ogasawara, which in better news the 35-rc2 build has built correctly for the first time | 15:39 |
=== bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
phunge0 | achiang: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16090 | 16:42 |
phunge0 | achiang: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16161 | 16:42 |
ubot2 | bugzilla.kernel.org bug 16090 in PCI "sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename" [Normal,New] | 16:42 |
ubot2 | bugzilla.kernel.org bug 16161 in Video(Other) "[2.6.35-rc1 regression] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename ... XVR-600 related?" [Normal,New] | 16:42 |
achiang | phunge0: ugh, thanks for reminding me. i've been busy lately. :( | 16:43 |
phunge0 | np, understood | 16:44 |
achiang | phunge0: the issue, which i haven't figured out a nice way to fix yet, is that pci_sysfs_init() calls pci_create_sysfs_dev_files(), which then calls pci_create_slot_links() | 16:46 |
achiang | phunge0: preventing pci_create_slot_links() from being called during init would fix it, but i wonder why some of the other things like pci_create_capabilities_sysfs() seem to be fine | 16:47 |
achiang | phunge0: if you want to explore this area, i'd be happy to give you pointers. :) | 16:47 |
phunge0 | achiang: i can take a quick look | 16:49 |
phunge0 | achiang: but given that 2.6.35 is -rc2 people are starting to notice | 16:49 |
achiang | nod | 16:50 |
tgardner | nessita, inbound email re: e1000e | 16:50 |
nessita | tgardner: ok... I'll check. I hate flashing the BIOS :-( | 16:52 |
tgardner | nessita, yeah, its always a bit risky. | 16:52 |
achiang | phunge0: i just asked jesse to revert it. i'll try and find some time in the next merge window to get it working properly, i guess | 16:52 |
achiang | phunge0: especially since i have a reproducer | 16:53 |
achiang | phunge0: thanks for your help | 16:53 |
phunge0 | achiang: np, makes sense to me | 16:53 |
nessita | tgardner: other than updating the BIOS, there is nothing else I can try? | 16:53 |
tgardner | nessita, so far thats the only suggestion that I have from Intel | 16:53 |
achiang | phunge0: if you want to keep an eye out for the revert and help manage the bugzillas though, that would be awesome... | 16:54 |
nessita | tgardner: ok, thank you, I'll keep you posted | 16:54 |
tgardner | nessita, if the BIOS upgrade doesn't fix it, then I'll have to instrument the driver and give you a custom kernel | 16:54 |
nessita | right... | 16:55 |
phunge0 | achiang: sure, i keep an eye on lkml... though i'm not comfortable doing the revert request myself :) | 16:55 |
achiang | phunge0: oh, i just pinged jesse on irc, so that part's taken care of. | 16:55 |
achiang | phunge0: when it hits linus's tree, if you could close out the bz's that would be lovely | 16:56 |
achiang | or at least remind me and i can go do it | 16:56 |
=== tgardner is now known as tgardner-afk | ||
jjohansen | apw: is there a per flavour way of overriding the config enforcer | 17:39 |
=== pgraner is now known as pgraner-afk | ||
apw | jjohansen, not currently it would be possible to add pretty easily i suspect ... wahts your usecase ? | 17:56 |
jjohansen | well one of the configs I need if I can get this stupid thing to work is CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 | 17:57 |
jjohansen | which currently is enforced off | 17:58 |
apw | so for a branch you you can just edit the file and remove it | 18:01 |
apw | if its coming back to master, we'll need to add support for flavours in the file | 18:01 |
apw | jjohansen, i lied, seems i do have a flavour pred | 18:02 |
apw | so you should be able to say | 18:03 |
apw | (flavour ec2; value CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 y) | value CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2 n | 18:04 |
apw | or similar | 18:04 |
jjohansen | okay, thanks | 18:05 |
vosl | hi | 18:22 |
* bjf is having email problems and has no x on laptop after this a.m. update... been trying to get to a setup where I can get something done all a.m. | 18:33 | |
jjohansen | ouch | 18:34 |
* jjohansen has been avoiding updates since robbies email | 18:34 | |
bjf | but my btrfs is *FABULOUS* :-) | 18:35 |
sconklin | robbie's email to which list? | 18:36 |
vosl | hello | 18:37 |
bjf | sconklin, i'd tell you which list but I can't get to my email | 18:40 |
vosl | guys i just wanted some help on your kernel version numbering system | 18:40 |
vosl | how does it usually wwork | 18:40 |
vosl | i read the wiki but couldnt make sense of it | 18:40 |
bjf | vosl, what is your question? | 18:41 |
vosl | i assume for debian and ubuntu its the same kinda versioning | 18:41 |
vosl | liunx kernel version number | 18:41 |
vosl | how is the numbering done? | 18:41 |
bjf | vosl, via 'uname -r' = 2.6.32-22-generic | 18:43 |
bjf | vosl, we have made 22 abi bumps on a 2.6.32 kernel | 18:43 |
vosl | are you talking in general or this is specific to ubuntu kernels? | 18:43 |
bjf | vosl, this is a ubuntu lucid install | 18:44 |
vosl | ok how does the numbering work? | 18:45 |
vosl | 2.6.32-22 | 18:45 |
bjf | vosl, it is telling you that it is based on the 2.6.32 kernel from upstream (linus' tree) | 18:46 |
vosl | ah | 18:47 |
vosl | so this is the same case with vanilla too? | 18:47 |
vosl | the versioning doesnt differ per distro does it? | 18:47 |
dupondje | http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2208 / https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/103568/ | 18:48 |
ubot2 | bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org bug 2208 in others "Driver hang while running auto test cases" [Critical,Verified: fixed] | 18:48 |
dupondje | is this something we can get into maverick kernel bit earlier ? | 18:48 |
bjf | vosl, i don't know how other distros report versioning but it's probably similar | 18:48 |
vosl | ah | 18:48 |
vosl | what does the -22 stand for? | 18:48 |
bjf | vosl, as I said previously, there have been 22 abi bumps | 18:49 |
vosl | ooh ok | 18:49 |
=== bjf is now known as bjf[afk] | ||
vosl | bjf[afk]: which is better | 18:51 |
vosl | .30 or a .30.1? | 18:51 |
vosl | depends on which type of patches are allowed for each versions | 18:51 |
vosl | right? | 18:51 |
vosl | new features, regressions or bugfixes only | 18:51 |
cking | manjo, you around? | 18:59 |
manjo | cking, yes | 18:59 |
cking | ok to mumble for 5 mins? | 18:59 |
manjo | sure | 19:00 |
dupondje | When will maverick kernel be rebased on the upstream kernel ? | 19:00 |
dupondje | the bug seems fixed in it today http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=63a07cb64ccc3ceae619d3298545d602ab5ecd38;hp=b95a56809343fb727c818ad1b9da14a17fa92ef6 | 19:01 |
ogasawara | dupondje: it's already been rebased to 2.6.35-rc2. | 19:01 |
dupondje | will it get rebased to rc3 ? | 19:02 |
dupondje | cause that bug is killing me :) | 19:02 |
ogasawara | dupondje: yes, when it's released upstream we'll rebase again | 19:02 |
ogasawara | dupondje: wash, rinse, repeat for the entire 2.6.35 cycle | 19:02 |
dupondje | :) | 19:02 |
dupondje | is there a chance to get the patch in kernel faster, or you say, wait for rebase ? :) | 19:03 |
ogasawara | dupondje: seems we should just wait for the rebase as it'll be in -rc3 | 19:03 |
ogasawara | dupondje: and rc3 is just around the corner | 19:04 |
dupondje | lets hope so. its crashing daily atm :( anyway its good to see its in the main git now, so it will be picked up for sure now | 19:04 |
ogasawara | dupondje: as an interim solution you could use the latest mainline daily build | 19:05 |
ogasawara | dupondje: well you may need to wait till tomorrow for the build to include the patch that landed today | 19:05 |
dupondje | i'll grab it tomorrow | 19:05 |
=== tgardner-afk is now known as tgardner | ||
tgardner | kees, what does dumpable mean wrt to ptrace? | 19:50 |
kees | tgardner: it means core-dumpable. as in, "has this process transitioned uid?" | 19:51 |
kees | tgardner: you can't ptrace a process that started setuid, e.g. | 19:51 |
kees | tgardner: but this flag can be set by a process itself using prctl. | 19:52 |
kees | tgardner: this is what well-behaved processes that handle sensitive memory do (e.g. ssh-agent) | 19:52 |
tgardner | kees, I was just reviewing your email that includes the 10-ptrace.conf verbage. It occurred to me that dumpable didn't mean anything to me. | 19:52 |
kees | tgardner: see "man prctl" and search for PR_SET_DUMPABLE | 19:52 |
kees | tgardner: I was trying to be as accurate as possible while hopefully not being too opaque. :P | 19:53 |
=== bjf[afk] is now known as bjf | ||
jjohansen | ->Lunch | 20:21 |
MTecknology | jjohansen: enjoy | 20:22 |
Laibsch | manjo: please be more careful when closing bugs | 20:22 |
MaximLevitsky | what is the policy on EXPEREMENTAL in the ubuntu kernel? | 20:22 |
manjo | Laibsch, which one ? | 20:22 |
Laibsch | you should have received mail about it | 20:23 |
Laibsch | please be careful with any bug you close | 20:23 |
manjo | Laibsch, checking | 20:23 |
MaximLevitsky | I have 2 drivers in 2.6.35 | 20:23 |
Laibsch | you seem to be new at this | 20:23 |
ripps | What's the likelyhood of an updated wacom driver getting into the kernel? I'm constantly rebuilding the module because the default one doesn't work with my wacom bamboo ctl-460 | 20:23 |
MaximLevitsky | one of which I labeled experemental | 20:23 |
MaximLevitsky | now I say it is more or less well tested | 20:24 |
manjo | Laibsch, bug# ? | 20:24 |
dupondje | Is there a way I can build my own daily ? really need the patch that got in today :) | 20:24 |
MaximLevitsky | it still contains a disclaimer about how it can eat your cat & dog though :-) | 20:24 |
MaximLevitsky | I had no reports of this though :-) | 20:25 |
ogasawara | mjg59: hi, we've been carrying an Ubuntu kernel SAUCE patch that was originally authored by yourself years ago. I wanted to get your feedback on it and am curious if you prefer I use your redhat.com email address or a different one? | 20:25 |
MTecknology | Transaction rate: 7.31 trans/sec | 20:25 |
MTecknology | OUCH | 20:25 |
MTecknology | sorry... wrong channel | 20:25 |
mjg59 | ogasawara: Which one is it? | 20:25 |
MaximLevitsky | mjg59: hi | 20:25 |
manjo | Laibsch, if you can't tell me what bug number it is I can't help | 20:26 |
Laibsch | manjo: bug 527361 | 20:26 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 527361 in linux (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "hotplug interferes with ethernet card (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/527361 | 20:26 |
Laibsch | manjo: is it too much to ask that you check your mail? | 20:26 |
ogasawara | mjg59: the patch is "UBUNTU: SAUCE: hostap: send events on data interface as well as master interface" from back in 2007 | 20:26 |
Laibsch | geez | 20:26 |
manjo | Laibsch, sorry did not see your mail yet not in my inbox yet | 20:26 |
Laibsch | manjo: just don't close bugs if you don't understand what it means, OK? | 20:26 |
MaximLevitsky | How can I ask ubuntu to enable it in marvic kernel? | 20:27 |
mjg59 | ogasawara: That was because network manager was only listening for association events on the data interface, and hsotap was only sending them on the master interface | 20:27 |
mjg59 | ogasawara: I have no idea whether that's still an issue | 20:27 |
ogasawara | mjg59: I'm inclined to drop it and see who screams | 20:27 |
manjo | Laibsch, I don't think that bug is SRU'able | 20:28 |
mjg59 | ogasawara: Yeah, I'd go for it | 20:28 |
Laibsch | manjo: please learn about LP before making any further embarassing comments | 20:28 |
ogasawara | mjg59: perfect, thanks | 20:28 |
dupondje | ogasawara: can I build my own daily ? Its crashing to much :( | 20:29 |
MaximLevitsky | anybody ? | 20:29 |
ogasawara | dupondje: sure, go for it | 20:29 |
dupondje | ogasawara: is there some easy script or so for it ? or just pull from the git or ? :) | 20:30 |
ogasawara | dupondje: I don't have a link for building the upstream kernel off the top of my head, but should be easily found via google | 20:31 |
dupondje | the script you guys use for the dailies isn't availible ? :) | 20:31 |
MaximLevitsky | mjg59: btw I am bisecting another ACPI bug | 20:31 |
ogasawara | apw: ^^? | 20:31 |
mjg59 | MaximLevitsky: Excellent | 20:32 |
MaximLevitsky | mjg59: I see that on boot the EC GPE is disabled | 20:32 |
MaximLevitsky | mjg59: so no notify from battery, ac, .... | 20:32 |
MaximLevitsky | mjg59: suspend/resume 'fixes' this. I use the acpi-test branch now. Going to reboot | 20:33 |
manjo | tgardner, on the phone | 20:40 |
tgardner | manjo, ack | 20:40 |
MaximLevitsky | Is it possible to enable a driver that depends on EXPREMENTAL in ubuntu kernel? | 20:45 |
MaximLevitsky | my driver is CONFIG_SM_FTL (sm_ftl.ko) | 20:46 |
tgardner | MaximLevitsky, its possible. which driver(s) are you considering? | 20:46 |
MaximLevitsky | tgardner: ^^^ | 20:46 |
tgardner | lemme look | 20:46 |
MaximLevitsky | this is FTL (flash translation layer) | 20:46 |
MaximLevitsky | I admit that I overdue the Kconfig option for it | 20:47 |
tgardner | MaximLevitsky, likely to have little impact on the general PC class of installs. Are you building for an embedded device? | 20:47 |
MaximLevitsky | All reports I recieve untill now were positive (minus typical user errors) | 20:47 |
MaximLevitsky | tgardner: this is for xD card reader | 20:47 |
tgardner | ah, that thing. | 20:48 |
MaximLevitsky | Ricoh R852 xD card reader | 20:48 |
tgardner | MaximLevitsky, so, do you think it works better then what you've stated in the Kconfig description? | 20:49 |
MaximLevitsky | tgardner: I think yes | 20:49 |
MaximLevitsky | tgardner: I didn't update it from first merge. In general especially modern xD cards (type M) should be prefectly safe because they use emulated interface | 20:50 |
MaximLevitsky | In addition to that I need new udev rule | 20:51 |
MaximLevitsky | to load the FTL | 20:51 |
MaximLevitsky | and to tell devicekit to treat the device normally | 20:52 |
tgardner | MaximLevitsky, I was just gonna ask what loads the driver | 20:52 |
MaximLevitsky | converting whole mtd system to proper bus interface it too big job for me. | 20:53 |
tgardner | MaximLevitsky, are you getting any traction with the udev developers? I'm not sure I can help you get a new udev rule. | 20:54 |
MaximLevitsky | tgardner: I didn't yet posted anything to udev list | 20:54 |
MaximLevitsky | tgardner: however I also need some modifications to devicekit rules | 20:54 |
MaximLevitsky | the 'udisk' I forgot | 20:54 |
tgardner | MaximLevitsky, send a patch to the kernel team list enabling the config option. I'm not opposed to it. You're on your own for components outside the kernel. | 20:55 |
MaximLevitsky | because it treats all devices as system unless they are in white list | 20:55 |
MaximLevitsky | tgardner: beeing lazy, whats the address :-) | 20:56 |
tgardner | kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com | 20:56 |
MaximLevitsky | tgardner: thanks! | 20:56 |
MaximLevitsky | tgardner: last question, the debian.master/config is the place I am looking for to change the config option ? | 21:03 |
matumba | hello, i guess i should report bugs with ubuntu's mainline kernel to upstream rather than to launchpad? | 21:05 |
MaximLevitsky | matumba: its is always better to report to upstream | 21:05 |
matumba | MaximLevitsky, well then... thx ;-) | 21:08 |
ripps | What's the likelyhood of an updated wacom driver getting into the kernel? I'm constantly rebuilding the module because the default one doesn't work with my wacom bamboo ctl-460 | 21:08 |
tgardner | MaximLevitsky, yeah, change it to CONFIG_SM_FTL=m in debian.master/config/config.common.ubuntu, then run 'fakeroot debian/rules updateconfigs' | 21:09 |
manjo | tgardner, I am looking at SHAID bc9d24a3aeb1532fc3e234907a8b6d671f7ed68f | 21:10 |
MaximLevitsky | tgardner: thanks! | 21:10 |
manjo | which is the 2nd one mentioned | 21:10 |
tgardner | manjo, so I'm not sure where you came up with bc9d24a3aeb1532fc3e234907a8b6d671f7ed68f. Its not mentioned in either the BS or LP reports, is it? Though it does seem reasonable for a stable update. | 21:17 |
tgardner | BS->BZ | 21:17 |
manjo | tgardner, right I looked at the git logs for 2.6 upstream and I see eeepc-laptop: check wireless hotplug events with SHAID bc9d24a3aeb1532fc3e234907a8b6d671f7ed68f by Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Date: Mon Feb 22 16:03:58 2010 +0000 | 21:19 |
manjo | tgardner, the bz report mentions this patch from a private tree | 21:19 |
manjo | the last comment in BZ | 21:19 |
tgardner | ah | 21:19 |
manjo | that is what I have been talking all along | 21:20 |
manjo | talking about | 21:20 |
tgardner | manjo, ok, then see if you can get that one included for 2.6.32 stable | 21:20 |
tgardner | manjo, you're gonna have to do a backport of that commit since it doesn't apply cleanly. | 21:34 |
manjo | ah crap | 21:34 |
manjo | tgardner, will do thanks | 21:34 |
MaximLevitsky1 | I have another probably newbie question | 21:42 |
MaximLevitsky1 | I downloaded the marvic kernel from git://kernel.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-maverick.git | 21:42 |
MaximLevitsky1 | I do 'fakeroot debian/rules updateconfigs | 21:42 |
MaximLevitsky1 | dh_testdir: cannot read debian/control: No such file or directory | 21:42 |
tgardner | MaximLevitsky1, fakeroot debian/rules clean updateconfigs | 21:43 |
MaximLevitsky1 | I can copy the file there, but I think I need to start some init script | 21:43 |
tgardner | MaximLevitsky1, do the clean first | 21:43 |
MaximLevitsky1 | tgardner: works now | 21:43 |
MaximLevitsky1 | tgardner: maybe add that to wiki? | 21:44 |
MaximLevitsky1 | didn't find that at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev | 21:44 |
tgardner | MaximLevitsky1, I think its there somewhere. we're in the process of rewriting a lot of that info | 21:44 |
MaximLevitsky1 | tgardner: ok, thanks | 21:44 |
MaximLevitsky1 | tgardner: should I now build the package or the 'updateconfigs' is enough? | 21:47 |
MaximLevitsky1 | I hate waiting 2 hours for that :-( | 21:47 |
tgardner | the updateconfigs should be sufficient. | 21:47 |
MaximLevitsky1 | tgardner: thanks again | 21:48 |
=== sconklin is now known as sconklin-gone | ||
MTecknology | The only ban in here is a bot - does that still need to exist? | 23:04 |
manjo | emerald not responding | 23:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!