[00:29] <kb9vqf> So...any idea why the buildd-manager is not dispatching builds?
[00:38]  * kb9vqf feels like an idiot
[00:38] <kb9vqf> The PPA required a virtualized builder
[00:38] <kb9vqf> Hence the build job hanging
[00:48] <kb9vqf> Is there a way to turn off the default PPA virtualization requirement?
[00:49] <wgrant> Go to the PPA's +admin.
[00:49] <wgrant> Uncheck 'Require virtualized builder'
[00:50] <kb9vqf> I meant for all newly created PPAs
[00:50] <kb9vqf> Or, if it's better, how do I set up the Xen virtualization with Launchpad?
[00:51] <wgrant> You don't need to, unless you want the security guarantees that it provides.
[00:51] <wgrant> Just check 'Virtualized' on the builder, and enter some garbage for the virt host field.
[00:51] <kb9vqf> wgrant: I kept getting this: lp.buildmaster.interfaces.builder.CannotResumeHost: Undefined vm_host.
[00:52] <kb9vqf> And it wouldn't build anything
[00:52] <wgrant> Right, you need to populate the vm_host field with something. Anything should do.
[00:52] <kb9vqf> Ohm OK
[00:52] <kb9vqf> That's better
[00:54] <kb9vqf> Hmmm... "[QueryWithTimeoutProtocol,client] <freyja:http://kvasir-node001.cluster80.edu:8227/> communication failed "
[00:55] <kb9vqf> wgrant: Does the remote build system keep a logfile so I can troubleshoot that ^^
[00:55] <wgrant> kb9vqf: /var/log/launchpad-buildd/default.log
[00:57] <kb9vqf> Error accessing Librarian:
[00:57] <kb9vqf> So I need to fix the localhost problem ;-)
[01:04] <kb9vqf> wgrant: I'm having some problems getting SMTP to work properly
[01:04] <kb9vqf> The PPA notifications work
[01:04] <kb9vqf> Nothing else does
[01:04] <kb9vqf> Any hints?
[01:07] <wgrant> "Nothing else"? Being bugmail, or something else?
[01:08] <kb9vqf> wgrant: For starters, the GPG key request
[01:09] <kb9vqf> Not sure about bugmail, I'll have to try
[01:09] <wgrant> Have you looked at doc/email.txt?
[01:09] <kb9vqf> Yes
[01:09] <kb9vqf> If I want to make Librarian listen on two interfaces can I do this: upload_host: localhost 192.168.2.2
[01:10]  * kb9vqf wants to restart launchpad
[01:10] <wgrant> I don't think so.
[01:10] <wgrant> How would it know which to use?
[01:10] <kb9vqf> I wasn't sure if it worked something like Apache where you can listen on two
[01:11] <wgrant> That doesn't specify where it listens.
[01:12] <wgrant> That specifies where it connects to.
[01:13] <kb9vqf> Oops
[01:14] <kb9vqf> wgrant: Can I change the Librarian listen address somewhere
[01:14] <wgrant> kb9vqf: I don't know.
[01:14] <kb9vqf> OK
[01:18] <spiv> Not purely by editing the configuration, I think.
[01:19] <kb9vqf> Might be a network issue on my end after all...
[01:20] <spiv> It wouldn't be hard to modify daemons/librarian.tac listen on another port.
[01:21] <spiv> (To be clear, I meant to reply that the config doesn't allow for listening on multiple ports, but it does allow for changing which port and IP the server listens on.)
[01:29] <kb9vqf> wgrant: Any ideas on this one: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/448013/
[01:29] <wgrant> kb9vqf: 1) No. 2) WTF
[01:30] <kb9vqf> I wonder if I got a bad branch download
[01:30] <wgrant> Very unlikely.
[02:03] <kb9vqf> I can't seem to find any reason for this; is anyone familiar enough with the build system xmlrpc to comment on it? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/448013/
[02:05] <wgrant> Can you get the content of the request using Wireshark or something like that?
[02:06] <wgrant> I know both sides of that code very well.
[02:06] <wgrant> You are running buildd-manager and not something else like slavescanner, right?
[03:23] <kb9vqf> wgrant: Sorry, I had stepped out for a bit.  Yes I am running buildd-manager
[03:24] <kb9vqf> I'm firing up Wireshark now
[03:31] <kb9vqf> wgrant: I restarted the buildd process and I'm not getting the error any more...weird
[03:31] <kb9vqf> No changes were made to any files
[03:33] <kb9vqf> I think that leaves Email as the only problem remaining
[04:06] <kb9vqf> So...why might I be getting this failure during build?
[04:06] <kb9vqf> Initiating build 225cbfcd3c71afae51e4fa8c1f122a0296cdd831 with 8 processor cores.
[04:06] <kb9vqf> /var/debbuild/srcdep-lock is not a directory
[04:06] <kb9vqf> cat: build-progress: No such file or directory
[04:07] <kb9vqf> cat: build-progress: No such file or directory
[04:32] <kb9vqf> Initiating build 225cbfcd3c71afae51e4fa8c1f122a0296cdd831 with 8 processor cores.
[04:32] <kb9vqf> cat: build-progress: No such file or directory
[04:32] <kb9vqf> cat: build-progress: No such file or directory
[04:32] <kb9vqf> Why might I get that?
[04:32] <kb9vqf> Also I get a /var/debbuild/srcdep-lock is not a directory
[04:33] <kb9vqf> This is in a local PPA build log
[06:03] <kb9vqf> Why is my buildd remote builder complaining about "/var/debbuild/srcdep-lock is not a directory"?
[06:03] <kb9vqf> Any hints?
[06:06] <thumper> a wild stab in the dark, but /var/debbuild/srcdep-lock is not a directory
[06:06] <kb9vqf> I verified that it is a directory in the chroot environment
[06:07] <thumper> in which case, no, I don't know
[06:07] <kb9vqf> ls -l buildd/build-b6832b48d4bf4c44ff64492ec9808d8fbb258243/chroot-autobuild/var/debbuild/
[06:07] <kb9vqf> total 0
[06:07] <kb9vqf> -rw-rw-r-- 1 buildd buildd  0 Apr 30 13:49 avg-build-space
[06:07] <kb9vqf> -rw-rw-r-- 1 buildd buildd  0 Apr 30 13:49 avg-build-time
[06:07] <kb9vqf> drwxrwxr-x 2 buildd buildd 40 Apr 30 13:49 srcdep-lock
[06:10] <kb9vqf> thumper: Hmmm....looks like the chroot command itself either failed or was never run
[06:10] <kb9vqf> It's looking for that directory in the host's filesystem
[06:17] <kb9vqf> Maybe that's normal behavior?
[06:17]  * kb9vqf is not familiar enough with the buildd system
[07:01] <edakiri> After selecting 'this bug affects me" I get a skinny vertical window filled with the text of code in red.
[07:24] <kb9vqf> Why is my buildd remote builder complaining about "/var/debbuild/srcdep-lock is not a directory"?
[07:24] <kb9vqf> I verified that it is a directory in the chroot environment
[07:27] <edakiri> I restarted my browser & it still happens.
[07:29] <edakiri> Even in safe mode.
[08:18] <alket> hi , is it possible to translate firefox in launchpad ?
[09:25] <jacks_> does ubuntu 10.04 has problems with quilt 3.0 or waf builds?
[09:26] <maxb> lucid's dpkg supports source format 3.0 if that's what you mean?
[09:26] <maxb> I don't know what a waf is
[09:29] <jacks_> waf is something like scons
[09:30] <wgrant> It's a Python build system.
[09:30] <wgrant> I only know of it because of the recent issues in Debian.
[09:30] <wgrant> Not build issues, just the fact that everyone who uses it seems to embed a copy in their tree.
[09:33] <jacks_> hmm
[09:35] <jacks_> so waf or source format `3.0 (quilt)' shouldn't be problematic in launchpad ppa?
[09:35] <jacks_> lucid
[09:35] <wgrant> No, they're fine.
[09:35] <jacks_> hmm ok
[09:47] <bigjools> Wife Acceptance Factor
[10:32] <jacks_> why does this fail? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50123830/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-13ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[11:40] <shadeslayer> hi,can i import my ssh key in launchpad to my machine?
[11:56] <geser> LP has only the public part of your SSH key
[12:16] <shadeslayer> ah :(
[16:35] <badkya> how do i create a package that depends on another package within my PPA?
[16:35] <badkya> I keep getting "package not found" erorrs
[16:49] <ripps> jat: oops, sorry
[16:49] <ripps> I uploaded a broken orig.tar.gz to my new ripps818/wacom ppa, so I deleted the package and I tried to upload a new one, but I keep getting rejection emails because it says it already has a wacom-source_0.8.6.2.orig.tar.gz. How do I fix this?
[16:50] <gmb> badkya, ripps, Hi. Let me just try and find someone better placed to answer your question than I.
[16:51] <bigjools> ripps: you can't
[16:51] <bigjools> do that
[16:51] <bigjools> you need to upload a newer version
[16:51] <bigjools> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+faq/990
[16:52] <ripps> bigjools: well, that's annoying.
[16:52] <bigjools> why?
[17:01] <mkarnicki> Hi guys. I started lp:androidu1 project (devel branch here lp:androidu1/0.x ). My question is - I have created some milestones for my project, and just finished the first one. But still for some time the app is not suitable for general use. The project is developed from scratch.
[17:01] <mkarnicki> How can I show users that I have finished the milestone?
[17:01] <mkarnicki> I'm new to lp, and I may not get those milestones right.
[17:02] <mkarnicki> Does it make to make a release without an actual file to be downloaded (just to show that v0.1 has been completed) ?
[17:03] <mkarnicki> Any hints will be appreciated ;)
[17:39] <mkarnicki> ^ question. any suggestions? :)
[17:44] <mkarnicki> so many people, so silent =(
[18:04] <badkya> Hi, I'm getting build error for a 64-bit install even though there are no errors in the build log..
[18:04] <badkya> The same package on a 32-bit machine compiles just fine
[18:04] <badkya> There are some implicit pointer conversion warnings.. is that likely to cause a package build error?
[18:05] <crimsun_> badkya: yes.
[18:06] <crimsun_> implicit conversions of that sort can result in Bad Things
[18:07] <badkya> but its just a warning
[18:08] <badkya> and more importantly the warning does not cause a build failure on a 32-bit machine
[18:11] <crimsun_> that does not necessarily mean it isn't a bug.
[18:11] <crimsun_> (strictly speaking, it probably *is* a bug)
[18:11] <badkya> true.. just wondering why launchpad is not preparing the package
[18:24] <badkya> any ideas?
[18:28] <maxb> You should give us the link to the PPA in question so we can look at the build log
[18:31] <badkya> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/114285
[18:32] <badkya> I just opened a query
[18:37] <badkya> any help is appreciated.. thanks
[18:57] <bdmurray> What do I report a bug about if I want a merge proposal email changed?
[19:17] <deryck> bdmurray, you mean that you want the email MPs send to be different somehow?
[19:18] <bdmurray> bug 592771
[19:18] <bdmurray> deryck: yes
[19:18] <bdmurray> I think I may have gotten the project wrong though
[19:19] <deryck> bdmurray, launchpad-code ?
[19:19] <bdmurray> deryck: yes, that's what I guessed
[19:19] <deryck> bdmurray, yeah, that's right.
[19:19] <bdmurray> \o/
[19:29] <maxb> badkya: I think the message at the end of the log about implicit pointer conversions *is* the error
[19:35] <maxb> badkya: In fact, I'm convinced it's correct
[19:35] <badkya> I have the same message in my 32-bit install
[19:36] <maxb> Yes, but whether it's a warning or an error depends on the architecture
[19:36] <maxb> and also on the series
[19:42] <badkya> oh well.. i can try with suitable changes.. thanks
[20:20] <badkya> yup that indeed fixed it
[20:20] <badkya> i would hope that launchpad flags it as an ERROR so I don't have to go on a wild goose/duck guessing chase.. :P
[20:31] <mkarnicki> Hi guys. I started lp:androidu1 project (devel branch here lp:androidu1/0.x ). My question is - I have created some milestones for my project, and just finished the first one. But still for some time the app is not suitable for general use. The project is developed from scratch.
[20:31] <mkarnicki> How can I show users that I have finished the milestone?
[20:31] <mkarnicki> I'm new to lp, and I may not get those milestones right.
[20:31] <mkarnicki> Does it make to make a release without an actual file to be downloaded (just to show that v0.1 has been completed) ?