/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/06/11/#ubuntu+1.txt

foxmulder881I also agree with Daekdroom, why not just use apt-get for everything in place of Aptitude?00:01
Daekdroomfoxmulder881, I actually believe it should be the other way around.00:02
yofelfoxmulder881: err, we meant use aptitude and get rid of apt-get00:02
foxmulder881Daekdroom; sorry. Misunderstood. I guess we disagree then! lol00:02
patdk-wkheh, I hate aptitude's menu crap00:03
patdk-wkand always use apt-get00:03
foxmulder881Daekdroom; what's so special about Aptitude?00:03
yofelfoxmulder881: why do you think we should use apt-get? because it has less features?00:03
Daekdroomfoxmulder881, it's "smarter"00:03
yofelpatdk-wk: you don't have to use the curses interface...00:03
Daekdroompatdk-wk, I hate its interface, but the command line is awesome00:03
foxmulder881yofel; it does everything required and is simple to use and understand. I personally can't stand Aptitude.00:03
* yofel actually likes the interface...00:04
BUGabundoerrk..00:04
yofelfoxmulder881: err... how are the command line options of aptitude more complicated than the apt-get ones?00:04
BUGabundopatdk-wk: you ever used aptitude via cli, no ncrusers?00:04
BUGabundoits more powerful then apt-get00:05
patdk-wknever knew you could :)00:05
patdk-wkand haven't seen anything that told me you could00:05
DaekdroomI actually found out recently aptitude had a ncurses interface.00:05
DaekdroomTripped over it by accident a few days ago :P00:05
patdk-wkeverything is aptitude menu stuff, or apt-get00:05
BUGabundopatdk-wk: aptitude install BLA00:05
BUGabundoor my fab00:05
BUGabundoalias aptitudeupgrade='sudo aptitude update ; sudo aptitude safe-upgrade ; sudo aptitude full-upgrade'00:06
bukayoopatdk-wk: aptitude --help00:06
foxmulder881So what can Aptitude do that apt-get can't?00:06
foxmulder881Genuine question.00:06
BUGabundoaptitude moo00:06
BUGabundofoxmulder881: resolve some dep messes , for starter?00:06
arandintelligent dependency solution suggestions00:06
jcastrocitations needed!00:07
BUGabundoyeah that too00:07
BUGabundonot that I ever use it00:07
BUGabundojcastro: ?00:07
jcastro"resolve some dep messes , for starter? "00:07
BUGabundojcastro: I felt in love with aptitude when we did the kde 3.5->4.x migration00:08
arandThe gain is more like 2MB by the way (tasksel+aptitude), and ONLY if the install is done via ubiquity, d-i will still use it.00:08
BUGabundonothing does package dep resolving better then aptitude00:08
foxmulder881By dep messes I'm assuming you mean general dep error for which apt-get can also fix? Or different.00:08
BUGabundoapt-get can fix dep fails?00:08
BUGabundonever did for me00:08
BUGabundospecially when you have to downgrade a package00:08
arandSo if you use alternate install, you'll always get aptitude, if I've understood things correctly00:09
yofel-f install can I think, but it never did what I wanted00:09
BUGabundolol00:09
BUGabundoI stop using -f IONs ago00:09
foxmulder881Yes, -f is what I'm referring to.00:09
jcastroI don't know what you mean by "dep fail"00:09
BUGabundonever actually fixes anythig00:09
foxmulder881Works for me!00:09
yofeland I'm not sure if apt-get will show you more than one resolution00:10
patdk-wkI thought -f only fixed the apt-get database of installed crap00:10
patdk-wkbut not fix anything00:10
BUGabundojcastro: do you run devel cicle before beta? :p00:10
arandHmm, it has fixed countless things for me, but anyways...00:10
jcastroBUGabundo: yes, for the past 5 years!00:10
BUGabundothen you should know what I me00:10
BUGabundotake the X migration going right now00:10
BUGabundoaptitude won't install anything critical of it00:10
jcastroapt's been holding it back for me00:11
BUGabundoapt-get full-upgrade would, no questions asked00:11
jcastroyou mean dist-upgrade?00:11
foxmulder881What the hell is full-upgrade?00:11
BUGabundoyes sorry00:12
BUGabundothe habit of aptitude00:12
foxmulder881lol00:12
jcastroi've been running apt-get upgrade every day and it's holding back the packages like it's supposed to00:12
foxmulder881Apt-get and Aptitude breed different types of lingo!00:12
arandWell, same questions as aptitude full-upgrade, really, but aptitude tries to keep it sane, and tells you things, apt-get just says here's what I'll do, dowant?00:12
BUGabundothey do00:12
jcastrodist-upgrade is for upgrading from one distro release to another00:12
BUGabundoone of the most confusing one00:12
BUGabundois aptitude install also does upgrades00:13
foxmulder881arand; that's crap.00:13
yofeljust tried to compare safe-upgrade with apt-get upgrade and they already disagree, aptitude will install the new kernel images, apt-get won't00:14
BUGabundo\o/00:14
* BUGabundo serves a slice of bread with peanut butter to yofel00:14
foxmulder881yofel; so find out why.00:14
yofelthanks00:15
DaekdroomBUGabundo, aptitude install also removes "useless" packages, instead of only suggesting it like apt-get does00:15
yofelfoxmulder881: no reason, apt-get holds the linux meta packages back, while aptitude simply installs the new files they now depend on and upgrades them00:15
foxmulder881There's always a reason behind it if apt-get fails for some reason. I like to manually get behind the source of problems like that. I don't like applications to do everything for me and not let me know why it went pear-shaped in the first place.00:15
BUGabundoI would love to see apt be more verbose some times00:15
BUGabundothen again, we have dselect00:15
jcastroapt installed the new kernel for me yesterday00:15
arandjcastro: Hmm, well, it is for operations other than upgrading packages, e.g. removals and new-installs00:15
BUGabundoDaekdroom: that's debian/ubuntu policy00:16
BUGabundohas been for one or two cycles00:16
DaekdroomBUGabundo, but apt-get doesn't do that at all.00:16
DaekdroomIt's aptitude specific00:16
arandWhich I guess once released, is rather irrelevant00:16
BUGabundodid last time I tried on debian00:16
arandDaekdroom: apt-get autoremove does.00:17
Daekdroomarand, yeah, but aptitude does it with only an aptitude install. No specific command for that.00:17
arandYou always have to be more specific with apt-* no holding hands like with aptitude..00:17
BUGabundoif that was true, based on what synaptic shows as obsolete00:17
BUGabundoI would have 500 MBs extra free space :)00:18
foxmulder881arand; that's what I'm trying to say. That's the way I prefer things.00:18
DaekdroomSo we need a package manager that's verbose-esque like aptitude and specific like apt-get?00:18
foxmulder881I guess so!00:18
arandYes, so do I, but I've come to understand that ubuntu will kill my babies, and such is life.00:19
BUGabundoDaekdroom: dselect00:19
BUGabundoor go all hardcore, and dpgk00:20
BUGabundo*dpkg00:20
jcastrodon't use dselect, it will just make you want to kill yourself00:20
foxmulder881I also like dpkg. But only for purging stuff and if no other deps required. But it is rock soild every time.00:20
* patdk-wk uses dpkg* alot00:20
BUGabundojcastro: I was jk, ofc00:20
jcastroheh00:21
* yofel only uses dpkg if there are .debs to install or --force-* is needed00:21
* Daekdroom doesn't like --force at all00:21
yofelit's there for a reason, and no, you shouldn't use it without knowing what you're doing00:22
arandHmm, building your own packages means a lot of dpkg, and dpkg -L/-S is just crazy useful00:22
yofel+100:22
yofel(forgot about that ^^)00:23
jcastroBUGabundo: what are you doing tomorrow? Want to help with unity/global menu?00:23
foxmulder881I'm off for now. Cheers folks. Off to reinstall lucid actually!00:24
arandThat tasksel is going though... not awfully sad about that, it's a beast of messing up a system..00:24
BUGabundojcastro: last day of work, before one week vacations mostly offline00:25
BUGabundoif weather permits00:25
BUGabundoarand: tasksel is nice00:26
BUGabundojcastro: I really should re-test unity00:26
BUGabundohaven't boot into it since it was out00:26
arandBUGabundo: IT IS NOT: Bug #57428700:26
ubottuLaunchpad bug 574287 in tasksel (Ubuntu) "tasksel uninstalled my system!" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/57428700:26
jcastroholla at me when you want to try, I need help testing the global menu!00:26
BUGabundoarand: LOOOL00:26
BUGabundojcastro: okay00:26
BUGabundoI'll probably _cry_ about the here and StatusNet/twitter00:27
BUGabundoI even created the SN group for it )00:27
BUGabundo:)00:27
BUGabundoidenti.ca/group/unity00:27
arandI still need to test it out on debian, since presumably it's not an ubuntu change inducing that, seems like tasksel and ubuntu-desktop = unfriends...00:28
BUGabundoahaha00:28
BUGabundoonly if you clear -desktop task00:29
BUGabundoduh00:29
arandBUGabundo: Nope: 1 install openssh, 2 uninstall openssh = removal of half of gnome :/00:30
DaekdroomWhat does tasksel do?00:31
BUGabundowhat?!?!00:31
BUGabundono can do!00:31
arandDaekdroom: Install a group of packages meant for a specific task.00:32
BUGabundoDaekdroom: think like this00:32
BUGabundoyou want to install a LAMP00:32
BUGabundoit does it all for you00:32
BUGabundono need to fetch, apache, mysql, php, etc by hand00:32
BUGabundoits like a special meta-package00:33
BUGabundosooooooo00:33
BUGabundoanyone can confirm mocp is DOA?00:33
arand..google says museum of contemporary photography, hmm..00:34
arandBUGabundo: mocp who?00:35
Sarvattwell that stinks, no more 64 bit flash00:52
SensivaSarvatt elaborate please?00:53
Sarvattthey closed down the beta since it was based on 10 instead of 10.100:54
Sarvattcan't download it from their website anymore00:54
cwillupokity poke01:12
koshieHi01:26
lucituFlash crashing in chrome?01:30
arandlucitu: Has been for ages, I think..01:36
lucituarand: only recently01:36
arandHmm, well I'm not a chromium user, but I rember it doing that a week or so ago...01:36
lucituarand: about 2wks ago when libgtk2.0 was upgraded..had to downgrade to lucid version to work01:37
lucituarand: looks like libgtk2.0 will stay that way..01:38
arandSarvatt: Hmm, I've got the .so if you want it?01:38
Sarvattarand: nah I've got it, thank you though. just a shame they stopped it01:39
arandlucitu: Hmm, yea, I'm sorry i don't think I can be much help there, but search LP, as is my general-handwavey-response to most things..01:40
arandI'm off to bed..01:40
cwilluwho can I poke about alsa development?  Rumour has it that the latest alsa has support for some speciality recording hardware that I have, but I haven't had any luck compiling it for 2.6.>28, and it appears that lucid's alsa doesn't have it, even though as far as I can tell it _should_ have it01:49
cwillum-audio fast track ultra, 8x8 channel usb01:49
Volkodavcwillu just compile the latest and see if it works01:49
Volkodavthat's all01:49
cwilluthanks for reading what I wrote :p01:50
VolkodavI mean on the later kernels01:50
cwillu2.6.>28 == anything newer than 2.6.2801:50
Volkodavdid you try 34 35 ?01:50
cwilluyes01:50
cwillumissing symbols01:50
Volkodavwhile compiling ?01:51
cwillubut I can rebuild the kernel itself fine01:51
cwilluyes01:51
Volkodavon all kernels or some specifics ?01:51
cwillunot dead sure I've tried against 2.6.35 yet, hang on (that machine is in the other room, and I haven't installed ssh on it yet)01:52
cwillu2.6.34 is the latest I've tried01:53
Volkodavdid you try to compile om maverick or lynx ?01:53
Volkodavwell 35 is in the mainstream ppa rc 2 I believe01:53
cwillurc2 isn't, no;  last I checked it only has a source deb01:53
* Volkodav was about to install it too01:53
Volkodavhttp://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/01:53
cwilluplanning on moving to it on a couple servers as soon as rc3 is available (.35 has a bunch of btrfs fixes that I want, and rc2 has a known btrfs corruption issue)01:54
Volkodavall 3 debs are there for maverick only on 35 rc201:54
cwilluoh, wait, I was looking at the lucid source, yep01:54
VolkodavDid you read about the regression on 35 ?01:54
cwilluthere's so many, did you mean a particular one?01:55
Volkodavoverall performance speed etc01:55
cwilluudev and btrfs are what I'm aware of01:55
cwilluya, that's a udev issue01:55
cwilluthat phoeronix junk01:55
VolkodavI would like to tinker btrfs on my SSD01:55
cwilluafaik, that's already been sorted out01:55
cwilluyou can set up btrfs via dkms easily enough, just haven't bothered yet01:56
cwillu_requires_ 2.6.35 currently though01:56
Volkodavis it in the installer option on maverick yet ?01:56
cwilluno idea;01:56
Volkodavset up you mean convert ?01:56
cwilluI've been using it for about a year though01:56
* psusi is quite pleased with ext4 on his ssd... and on the new 1.5 tb wd drive01:56
psusianyone wanna test e2defrag? ;)01:57
cwilluno, I meant to install btrfs modules from git via dkms instead of what's in mainline (given that rc2 has some issues there)01:57
Volkodavcwillu did you try the snapshot yet on it ?01:57
cwillulong ago mate :)01:57
Volkodavoh ok01:57
cwilluI've been deploying embedded stuff on it for about 8 months01:57
* psusi hopes to get his patch for e2fsck into maverick and lazy_itable_init on by default so it only takes 30 seconds instead of 15 minutes to format a 1.5 tb ext4 partition01:57
cwilluchecksumming is so very handy when you only have crappy sd cards as root drives01:58
Volkodavhow is it different from ZFS dtrace ?01:58
cwilluhaven't used zfs01:58
cwillualthough my impression is that btrfs is on much more solid theoretical footing than zfs01:58
cwilluwe're probably going to have lzo compression in a day or two, raid5 is coming along nicely, etc01:59
Volkodavwell then you have an option of playing with rc2 ot compile your own I guess01:59
cwilluanyways, back to alsa :p01:59
cwilluunless you wanna keep talking btrfs :p01:59
Volkodavhow does raid5 plays with ssd s though ?01:59
cwilluhow do you mean?01:59
VolkodavI heard they had issues on early stages01:59
Volkodavthey simly did not work02:00
cwilluwhich raid5?  It's not done yet02:00
psusidon't work is not an error description...02:00
Volkodavany raid for that matter with ssd02:00
cwillulots of things don't simply don't work, because they haven't been implemented02:00
cwilluno, that's not true02:00
psusidrives don't know or care if they are in a raid02:00
psusiyou're not going to be able to TRIM them currently though...02:01
Volkodavbut internally every ssd is already a raid02:01
cwillulayering btrfs on top of lvm has been troublesome, mainly because lvm didn't pass through barriers properly to the hardware02:01
cwilluVolkodav, so are most harddrives02:01
psusino, an ssd is an ssd02:01
psusiraid stands for redundant array of inexpensive disks... definitionally impossible for a single disk to be one02:02
Volkodavevery ssd has internal raid controller with bunch of memory in it02:02
cwilluVolkodav, it's more complicated than that in fact02:02
psusino, it has a flash memory controller02:02
cwilluthe controller does much more than most raid controllers do02:02
psusithat emulates a sata disk02:02
Volkodavdoes trimming etc02:02
psusino, trimming is something the os does02:03
psusior is working towards doing...02:03
cwilluwear levelling, compaction, etc02:03
Volkodavos kernel and FS02:03
Volkodavtakes 3 just to trim02:03
cwilluthe performance differences between ssd drives largely comes down to the algorithms in use02:03
psusios driver = part of kernel02:03
psusierr, fs driver rather02:03
Volkodavcwillu but the bottom line that they are all internally in raid02:04
cwilluthe companies with experience with incremental garbage collection were the first to get decent lasting performance02:04
cwilluVolkodav, no, the bottom line is that they're apples and oranges02:04
cwilluyou might as well say a system with multiple mounts is a raid02:05
Volkodavapples ssd who is oranges ?02:05
cwilluraid02:05
psusior a disk with multiple heads... multiple heads do not a raid make... a floppy disk is not a raid...02:05
Volkodavso there is no difference in setting up ssd or regular harddrive say in raid02:06
cwilluno, there's big differences02:07
Volkodavthat's all I was saying02:07
* psusi needs to do a thorough check to make sure everything is in order and release a new rev of e2defrag and get someone to sponsor uploading it to maverick universe02:07
cwillu... and we keep telling you you're wrong :p02:07
Volkodavpeople could not even boot them first02:07
cwilluVolkodav, ssd drives?  yes, yes they could02:07
cwilluBefore they had ata interfaces in front of them, they weren't at all like block devices at all02:08
cwilluwhile raid is a way of taking a bunch of block devices, and ganging them into a single device02:08
Volkodavthey just needed  boot parameter dmraid=true02:09
Volkodavwell back to alsa02:09
cwillu:p02:09
psusidmraid has nothing to do with ssd.. dmraid is bios fake hardware raid support02:09
Volkodavwhat are you trying to get to work ?02:09
psusireally only exists for compatibility with winders02:09
cwillupiece of hardware called "m-audio fast track ultra"02:10
cwilluI can get usb id's and such02:10
cwillucurrently only the midi interfaces comes up properly02:10
psusihrm.. that reminds me... I need to poke someone about getting the dmraid regression in lucid SRU'd in time for the 10.04.1 respin...02:10
Volkodavso it is a newer sound card I guess ?02:10
cwilluSomebody posted usb traces of all the mixer functionality under windows, I was planning on hacking that in, but I need to start with the basic support02:10
cwilluit's a year or so old, but the others in its family also weren't supported02:11
cwilluthere's been patches floating around, but they're in the changelog for the latest alsa stable02:11
cwilluand in the source02:11
Volkodavhmm02:11
Volkodavmay as well patch02:11
* Volkodav just patched exaile 02:12
Volkodavmini mode is not working02:12
Volkodavwas not*02:12
cwilluVolkodav, I finding it hard to not say this in a rude fashion02:12
cwilluVolkodav, but your reading comprehension leaves a little bit to be desired :p02:12
Volkodavoh all that was for windoze ?02:13
* Volkodav getting focus together02:13
cwillucase in point :p02:13
cwillulet's start over02:13
Volkodavhmm02:13
cwillu(a) alsa mainline doesn't compile against recent kernels without patches that I can't find02:13
Fudgedoes luke chat in here?02:13
cwillu(b) ubuntu's alsa doesn't seem to be recent enough to include the new drivers02:14
Volkodavdo they exist those patches yet ?02:14
cwillu(c) I need to be able to compile from some source, so that I can generate patches to send upstream02:14
VolkodavI would check gentoo forums02:14
Volkodavooouf02:14
cwilluand I will not under any circumstances be installing gentoo on my machines :p02:15
Volkodavyou may find the patches on their forums02:15
VolkodavI did twice02:15
cwilluI was hoping to find an alsa maintainer or someone with similar experience, to basically copy their approach to this02:15
cwilluVolkodav, the problem isn't so much finding a way to make it build, and more finding the _right_ way to make it build02:16
cwilluif I include patches to build it under 2.6.35, and those don't match what we in debian/ubuntu use, then it makes it harder for me to get support with testing and development, let alone upstreaming02:17
Volkodavoh we talking  not just the dirty hack to make it work - you want elegant ?02:17
cwilluThe point of the endeavour is to not have magic packages on my system :)02:17
Volkodavor the alsa type approach02:17
cwilluthe sooner I can upstream it, the sooner I can work on _other_ things which need fixing :)02:18
Volkodavthere must some channel for alsa I think02:18
cwilluan ubuntu/debian alsa channel?02:18
Volkodavdebian probably be a better shoice02:19
Volkodavor deb-dev02:19
Volkodavthey have a few dev channels for debian02:19
cwilluyou know, I really wish I would remember sooner alternate nicks that particular people have :p02:22
cwillucrimsun_, can I poke you for a couple minutes?02:22
psusiif anyone cares to test the defrag package, a new build is now in my ppa03:14
bukayoopsusi: wud love to..where is the ppa? am assuming the dev has to be unmounted?03:18
psusibukayoo, on launchpad... ppa:psusi/ppa... yes, has to be unmounted, and of course, have a current backup, or otherwise don't care if the data on it is lost... works well for me, but still has a serious possibility of totally destroying all your data ;)03:19
Nitsugahello!03:20
NitsugaAm I the only one with rhytmbox plugins problems?03:20
bukayoopsusi: aside from destroyed data, how can I tell if success?  does the % non-contiguous from fsck enough?03:21
psusibukayoo, that's one indicator... it has an ncurses interface that shows the disk map too, and has a frag program to check fragmentation of specific files... also you can run the e2freegrag from e2fsprogs to check free space fragmentation03:21
bukayoopsusi: guessing it shud be zero after?03:22
psusialso run an e2fsck -f after defrag03:22
psusiyep03:22
bukayoopsusi: ok..will try03:22
psusiit's a little slow creating the relocation map now... changed it to use a double binary tree indexed extent list instead of a double array of block pointers so it can now handle very large disks without many, many gigs of ram, at the expense of some cpu03:23
psusiwill need to do some optimizations to regain startup speed but I can now defrag a 1.5 tb disk with only 2 gigs of ram03:23
psusiohh, you should also do a read only pass first with -r to make sure it works03:24
psusiand depending ont he size of the disk and ram size you might want to add -p and specify a larger buffer pool size than the default 32768 to speed things up03:25
bukayoopsusi: can I try on a vbox disk?03:26
psusisure03:26
bukayoopsusi: great..i have some junk I can try.03:27
psusifor my testing I usually just make a test lvm volume and either restore a dump to it or dd a snapshot of my root volume03:27
psusiand in case the name led you to think otherwise, it does work on ext403:34
psusinow03:34
Sensivapsusi launchpad link please?03:34
psusiSensiva, launchpad.net/e2defrag is the project... for the ppa just apt-add-repository ppa:psusi/ppa03:36
bukayoopsusi: could not determine the filesystem type. pls run the appropriate defragmenter03:36
psusibukayoo, ohh... I forgot it even had a generic auto defragger... just run e2defrag instead... I'll have to take a look at the wrapper now03:37
bukayoopsusi: ok..now working03:38
psusiit used to support ext, xia, and minix too03:38
psusioh weird... looks like the wrapper is just a script that calls file on the dev node and parses its output to decide what the fs is... that doesn't work on actual devices... anymore...03:41
bukayoopsusi: it's working now..just like pacman..will try later on a real hd bec the virtual disk is clean03:44
=== [Nitsuga] is now known as Nitsuga
psusihehe03:44
psusigood old ascii graphics ;)03:44
psusitakes you back doesn't it?  I remember using this thing when I first tried slackware back in '9503:45
bukayoopsusi: yes it does..I see some 'B'ad blocks.  what is that?03:46
psusiprobably the journal03:46
psusiB is just generic for anything that can't be moved03:46
bukayoopsusi: ok03:47
psusino, wait... I made the journal movable....03:47
psusihrm....03:47
psusihow big of a volume is this?  is it freshly formatted?  ext4?  it might be the resize inode...03:47
psusibut usually that's so small it doesn't show up03:47
bukayoopsusi: it's an ext403:48
bukayoopsusi: where is the image paste bin?03:48
psusiphotobucket?03:48
* psusi wishes Ted, Alex, and Linus hand't given up on this thing03:50
psusierr, Remmy not Alex03:50
bukayoopsusi: here is a snapshot  http://imagebin.ca/view/0ABy22N6.html03:50
psusiahh, yea, that's the resize inode03:50
psusireserves a little space after each block group descriptor table for expansion03:51
bukayoopsusi: what are the little white dots?  looks like it didn't put them all together?03:53
psusifree space, see the key? ;)03:53
bukayoobundled closer to the front?03:53
psusior legend03:53
bukayoopsusi: ohh..my bad03:53
psusiby default it tries to locate data in the block group of the owning inode03:53
psusiif you use the inode priority file option though to assign a high priority to an inode, it will force it to the start of the disk rather than in its native block group03:54
psusithis is handy for packing all the boot files ureadahead reads at the start of the disk, even if their inodes are scattered around03:55
bukayoopsusi: if I remember it correctly the windowz defragmenter kind of move them up front..was it windows or norton?03:56
bukayoopsusi: will try now on a real hd..03:58
bukayoopsusi: but I think mine boots so fast some stuff aren't ready in time.. always get a fatal: module.dep load failure 3x before it loads properly03:59
psusiafaik, microsoft licensed diskkeeper, and that just kind of randomly moves fragmented files around until they are not fragmented anymore04:02
psusithis acts like it started with a completely empty disk, allocating blocks one after the other from left to right until every file on the disk has had blocks allocated... then moves everything from its current position to the new position04:03
psusibut like I said, it tries to allocate blocks in the same block group as the inode that wants them so they are located near the owning inode04:05
bukayoopsusi: just for my enlightenment.. I was thinking b4 can I achieve the same if I copy the whole disk out, reformat old disk and then copy back?04:06
psusibukayoo, doing that with ext4 will generally result in low fragmentation, but does not do the same thing since the kernel uses different allocation algorithms04:10
bukayoopsusi: e2freefrag count error after -  http://imagebin.ca/view/kOdpoy.html04:12
psusirun e2fsck -f first after defrag04:13
psusiright now defrag does not update the free blocks count in the superblock if it ends up allocating/freeing blocks for the extent tree so it can end up wrong... fsck will fix that easily.. that's on my todo list04:14
bukayoopsusi: here is the e2freefrag after http://imagebin.ca/view/xdeqNNm6.html04:15
psusiyep, that looks about what I've come to expect04:16
bukayoopsusi: here is the before - http://imagebin.ca/view/KgLIOZ.html04:17
psusiyou can get larger than 2gb free space chunks if you up the flex_bg factor when you mkfs too with mke2fs -G x... the default is 32 which gives the 2gb maxium contiguous free space04:17
bukayoopsusi: ok..but remember this is a vbox virtual disk04:18
bukayoocreated by vbox04:19
bukayoopsusi: anyway thnks for the nice tool..will try on real hd. will let you know04:21
psusimake sure you backup first ;)04:21
ZykoticK9have the xserver-xorg-video-* files been kept back for a while now?  I've just installed so am curious if it's been like this for a while already?  (I'm happily using "sudo aptitude safe-upgrade")04:24
psusiand it was originally written by Theodore Tso, Remmy Card, and Linus Torvalds... they just abandoned it ages ago and I'm bringing it back to life ;)04:24
psusiof course it will probably be rendered obsolete in a year or two by e4defrag, but hey... was interesting to work on and gives us something to use in the mean time04:25
psusiand hell, I might even port it to work on ntfs04:26
psusiand fat3204:26
bukayoopsusi: definitely..what is e4defrag?  the newer version from these trio?04:27
psusidefragger supposedly being written from scratch to do online defrag of ext404:27
psusiusing ioctls built into the kernel rather than directly mucking with the disk04:27
psusiit has the advantage of being able to work on a mounted fs, and be safe by going through the journal... but since it has to allocate a new file, then atomically swap blocks, I doubt it will ever be as fast or be able to pack files as well as e2defrag04:28
psusior optimize free space04:28
psusiif you loose power in the middle of an e2defrag, your screwed ;)04:29
bukayoopsusi: i wud think so.unless you stop all procs writing to it04:29
bukayoopsusi: i used to work with tandem and had to stop procs so to increase max extents of file near max04:31
psusithe really nifty thing about e2defrag is that you can build a priority list from the ureadahead pack file and pass it to e2defrag so it packs all those files sequentially at the start of the disk to speed up boot time... I don't see e4defrag ever being able to do that04:31
psusiext4's delayed allocation, extents, and multiblock allocator really does a fantastic job of minimizing fragmentation04:33
psusieven for bit torrenting, which usually results in horrible fragmentation... ext4 keeps it contiguous as long as the torrent app uses fallocate() to tell it how big the file is going to be up front...04:34
psusiand even if it does't, ext4 still seems to do a pretty good job04:35
cwillupsusi, there's no reason an online defragmenter couldn't do all the same things though04:35
cwilluwith the possible exception of dealing with a near full filesystem,04:36
psusicwillu, I'm not sure how it could... the way it is designed now, it has to create a new file, force it to allocate blocks, then swap those blocks with the file it is trying to defragment... doesn't really have a way to analyze all files on the fs at once, including the free space04:36
psusie4defrag that is04:37
bukayooplus with all processes doing IO to the disk04:38
bukayooit's like cleaning a kitchen with the cooks still at it04:39
psusiof course, e2defrag doesn't care if the fs is 99.9% full, it will defrag it just fine ;)04:40
cwillupsusi, the ioctl's don't give any control over location?04:40
bukayooI always tell windowz user to stop screen savers, anti-virus, as much processes before doing defrag04:41
psusicwillu, as I understand it, the new ioctls just allow e4defrag to request that the kernel atomically swap the blocks between two files.. so it creates a dummy donor file first, hopes that it is allocated some contiguous blocks, then swaps with the file it is trying to defrag, then deletes the donor04:41
ZykoticK9psusi, sorry side question - do you happen to know if Transmission observes fallocate() as you noted above?  i have run into issue with fragmentation on drives with ext3/4 when used with torrents.  I was under the impression the only way to "defrag" was to copy everything to another media, delete the origional, then copy everything back.04:42
cwilluso all you'd need is a call to attempt to make a file of a given size at a given location, and you're laughing :)04:42
psusiZykoticK9, I believe it does... from what I have seen transmission results in little to no fragmentation on ext4... ext3 is a different story04:43
ZykoticK9psusi, thanks04:43
* cwillu looks forward to more fancy user-space tools for btrfs04:43
psusibe nice when btrfs is actually stable and well supported04:51
psusiin the mean time I'm waiting for the new lvm tools to get merged into maverick so we can use lvm to take snapshots, test upgrading, and be able to revert if things to wrong04:52
bukayoopsusi: is the 4096 block size now the std? with smaller files this may be too big?04:54
psusibukayoo, 4k block size has been pretty standard for many years now...04:54
psusiI actually wish ext supported > 4k blocks... seems there are some bugs in the kernel that prevent it from working04:56
psusimy 1.5 tb disk wastes far too much space on unused inodes, and allocation bitmaps that would be reduced with a larger block size04:57
bukayoopsusi: I guess if you use it for big files like multimedia, a much bigger blk size wud help04:57
bukayooless 'swiss cheese'04:58
psusithe main problem with ext4 is that you end up having a good deal of space used by the block allocation bitmaps, and the maxium size of a block group is 128mb... and the default is to allocate 8192 inodes per block group, which leas to far more than anyone could ever need on tb+ size disks04:59
psusiyou can reduce the allocated inodes at mkfs time with -E largefile or largefile405:00
psusibut then you are still wasting space on the allocation bitmaps05:01
psusiI need to check on how the 64 bit feature is coming along... that will allow much larger block groups..05:02
bukayooagreed05:02
bukayoogot to go.nice talking to you psusi05:03
psusibut now the wife says it's bed time... night05:03
BUGabundo_remoteraises the sales,row to south!09:16
arandNow the floodgates of xserver seems to have opened ./10:05
BUGabundo_remotethey are?10:11
foxmulder881Can someone here help me with something quickly?10:50
BUGabundo_remoteshoot10:50
foxmulder881Not related to Maverick, but Lucid, sorry. But guys in #ubuntu are a bit ditsy at the moment. I upgraded Lucid today in tty1 via apt-get and noticed a few message stating "unattended upgrades...". Any idea what that is all about or is it just normal messages from something?10:52
foxmulder881No ideas!!! :-(10:55
foxmulder881Perhaps I'll reinstall again tomorrow morning and try upgrade via aptitude and see how it goes.10:56
cwillufoxbuntu, from a terminal, use "do-release-upgrade"11:29
cwillutoo late now of course, but ya11:29
cwilluor did you mean it was already lucid, and you just applied new updates?11:29
cwilluer, nvm11:29
cwilluthat'll teach me to not show parts11:29
BUGabundo_remotecwillu hum no, foxbuntu is still here11:51
cwilluBUGabundo_remote, has foxbuntu said anything recently?11:53
cwilluas opposed to a certain other fox11:53
cwillutab complete fail :p11:53
cwillubecause the target is no longer in the room11:54
BUGabundo_remoteahh11:58
zniavrehello12:52
zniavreim trying rgba option with 10.10 it works quite well12:52
zniavresome of you experienced some bug with panels and rgba activated ?12:53
DrHalantrying the new x13:00
DrHalanseems to work :)13:00
DrHalanbut gnome-power-manager stilll doesnt -.-13:00
rippsDoes anybody know how to remove the battery indicator? I'm on a desktop, so a battery inidcator is pointless13:01
DrHalanripps: annoys me too.13:02
DrHalannormally you can set taht in the energy properties13:02
DrHalanbut i guess its a bug13:02
rippsI also can't remove the bluetooth applet.13:03
rippsThat one doesn't annoy me as much, as I do have a bluetooth.13:03
gnomefreak76remove the applet-indicator should do it, but shhhh im not here13:03
DrHalanam i the olny one not getting past gdm?13:05
gnomefreak76useing nvidia?13:06
DrHalanim suing virtualbox13:08
DrHalanwhen gdm comes up it says gnome-power-manager couldnt be started or something like that13:08
gnomefreak76most likely not but i dont have it loading on start up13:09
* gnomefreak76 not very good with this away thing13:09
DrHalanhows that gnomefreak?13:10
DrHalancan i just remove it?13:10
gnomefreak76DrHalan: i shouldnt be here13:10
gnomefreak76DrHalan: i wouldnt remove it13:10
BUGabundo_remoteDrHalan: there's and vb pacakage on hold due to X migration13:11
BUGabundo_remoteif you forced it to install, maybe that's why you got a broken GDM13:11
DrHalanwell gdm works i can seee login but there an indicator on the top right that says that gnome-power-manager couldnt be started13:11
DrHalanand when i try to login x crashes13:11
=== gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak
shadeslayerhey all :D13:17
shadeslayeranyone using kubuntu?13:17
BUGabundo_remotenope13:17
shadeslayeri cant seem to find the show desktop plasmoid13:17
shadeslayerany ideas?13:24
mfraz74quickaccess plasmoid has been updated13:32
shadeslayermfraz74: yes :)13:32
shadeslayermfraz74: does it work now?13:32
mfraz74no13:33
mfraz74unless i need to logout and log back in13:34
shadeslayermfraz74: hmm..13:34
DrHalanthre were some packages missing its working now :913:34
shadeslayermfraz74: plasma crashes ?13:34
DrHalanthere iwll be another upgrade to 1.9 right?13:34
mfraz74shadeslayer: yes, background goes black and the refreshes13:35
mfraz74how do i find out if the new version is the one i'm using?13:38
h00kIdleOne: :)14:13
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna
Ian_cornegwibber update BUGabundo_remote14:26
h00kIdleOne: I had a bunch of xserver updates actually install with a safe-upgrade yesterday14:27
cwillu!info binutils14:29
ubottubinutils (source: binutils): The GNU assembler, linker and binary utilities. In component main, is optional. Version 2.20.51.20100608-0ubuntu1 (maverick), package size 2139 kB, installed size 11676 kB14:29
Ian_corneSomething is still conflicting with nvidia-current14:29
PiciThe bot is only updated once or twice a day, so you may not see your updated pacakges in there.14:30
cwilluwho, me?14:30
BUGabundo_remoteIan_corne: fyi I run daily ppa14:31
Picicwillu: you're not a bot, are you?14:31
cwilluPici, I just poked a bot14:31
BUGabundo_remoteyes Pici, cwillu is a domestic bot14:31
BUGabundo_remoteI tried to make him do the place of roomba14:31
BUGabundo_remotebut he just scarted garbish14:31
* cwillu starts breaking a stick into toothpicks, scattering them as he goes14:32
cwillusanity check:  a kernel built with binutils 2.20 won't have modules loadable on a system with binutils 2.19?14:32
cwilluor something like that?14:33
cwillutrying to figure out why somebody's kernel builds stopped being usable, my current theory is that he started building for maverick, and that broke his lucid builds14:33
Ian_corneBUGabundo_remote: ok14:38
Ian_corneAnyone know of a ppa for freeciv?14:46
psusiIan_corne: it's in the main repo14:47
bukayoohello psusi14:48
psusio/14:48
bukayoopsusi: just did a defrag on a data drive and the results are great14:48
patdk-wkpsusi, making progress on that still?14:49
psusipatdk-wk: yea... just made a new release last night with a build in my ppa14:49
bukayoopsusi: yes here is the results http://imagebin.ca/view/F-2z5lZv.html14:50
patdk-wkwhere's it at? :)14:50
psusiand just fired off an email to the motu mailing list asking for review and sponsorship14:50
psusilaunchpad.net/e2defrag, ppa:psusi/ppa14:50
* patdk-wk has been hiding in +1 cause this channel is too noisy :)14:50
bukayoopsusi: from 35% non-contiguous to zero14:51
BUGabundo_remotewow14:52
BUGabundo_remotethat's impressive t14:52
Ian_cornepsusi: yes but not good enough :p14:52
patdk-wkoh, and I thought I was reading #ubuntu :)14:52
Ian_cornewell not far enough14:52
* BUGabundo_remote slaps patdk-wk14:52
patdk-wkI noticed when BUG said something :)14:52
psusibukayoo: wow, you had 35% to start?14:53
psusiIan_corne: what do you mean?14:54
bukayoopsusi: yes and that's an ext4 fs..expected bec I do a lot of rw to it..multimedia files and lots of vbox vdi files14:54
psusibukayoo: is this an old ext3 fs?14:54
bukayoopsusi: nope it's a new ext4 from the start14:55
Ian_cornepsusi: that 2.2.1 is released14:55
psusihrm... I wouldn't expect to see that much fragmentation on ext4... especially with plenty of free space14:55
psusiIan_corne: ohh, you mean freeciv just made a brand new release?  yea, it will take a while for someone to package and upload14:56
Ian_corneWell could be they maintained one14:57
Ian_cornethemselves14:57
Ian_cornesome developers do :)14:57
psusibukayoo: how long did that take by the way?  if you have the memory you can speed it up by giving it more buffer pool to play with.. it defaults to only using 32mb... giving it 256 or 512 megs can help a good bit15:04
bukayoopsusi: I think about 30-40 mins?15:05
psusioutch15:05
bukayoopsusi: I have 6gig RAM15:06
bukayoowill do next time..however the other data drive about the same size has only .6% non-contiguous..can't explain why.. do the same amt of rw15:07
wizard__I'm using indicator-applet-appmenu but it only works for VLC, and nothing else.  Is anyone else experienceing this, or is it just me?  No other apps, no matter which ones I try (Ive tried dozens) it only works for VLC.15:10
cwillu!info ardour15:27
ubottuardour (source: ardour): digital audio workstation (graphical gtk2 interface). In component universe, is optional. Version 1:2.8.9-1 (maverick), package size 5184 kB, installed size 14992 kB15:27
gnomefreakthis is just great. no graphics and TTY is very very small15:27
gnomefreakeven upstream drivers work15:27
yofelhm?15:28
patdk-wk/dev/sde: 943/715520 files (39.8% non-contiguous), 131174728/183143646 blocks15:28
patdk-wkthat is just normal ext3, it's still karmic15:28
gnomefreaki can barely see the text in all the TTYs. it is due to nvidia not building against updated X15:29
gnomefreakagians kernel sorry15:29
patdk-wkhmm, strange, that disk only contains movies, that where copied there, an rsync from another drive15:29
patdk-wkwonder why it's so fragmented15:29
patdk-wkas no files where deleted or modified15:29
yofelgnomefreak: tried nvidia 256?15:30
yofelworks fine here15:30
yofelI'm trying to rebuild the package for new X though15:31
gnomefreak.me tries PPA15:31
yofelI have it from x-updates15:31
yofelwon't install with X1.815:31
gnomefreakearlier it said it was removing nvidia-173 and -common but trying to install them says it is newest. but im trying PPa right now15:32
gnomefreak?15:33
gnomefreak256?15:33
yofelnvidia-current:15:34
yofel  Installed: 256.29-0ubuntu1~xup15:34
yofel  Candidate: 256.29-0ubuntu1~xup15:34
Sarvattthanks for reminding me i need to rebuild that15:34
gnomefreakyofel: from our archives?15:34
yofelgnomefreak: no, x-updates ppa15:34
yofelSarvatt: np ;)15:34
Sarvattuploading now15:35
yofelthanks15:36
gnomefreakyofel: im still doiong them. but looking at policy it show install and canadte being 0.2.23 but i guess because it is still downloading15:36
Sarvattnvidia-graphics-drivers shouldn't be providing an ABI in the first place, its compatible with multiple ones15:36
gnomefreakSarvatt: rebuild what? im scared :/15:36
gnomefreakah15:36
patdk-wkpsusi, Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/e2defrag/ppa/ubuntu/dists/maverick/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz  404  Not Found15:38
psusipatdk-wk: don't think it build for maverick... just lucid15:38
patdk-wkoh heh15:39
patdk-wkon the launchpad page it said only maverick :)15:39
patdk-wkso that is where I attempted to try it :)15:39
gnomefreaknow i just hope nvidia-current 256.29 works with my card15:40
Sarvattwhat card?15:40
gnomefreaknvidia 620015:41
Sarvattnope :(15:41
Sarvattand nvidia-173 doesn't work with 1.8 yet last I checked15:41
bjsnidersupport starts at the 6k series15:41
gnomefreakany other bad news i should know :(15:41
gnomefreakmaybe i can go back to upstream drivers since the X updates15:42
gnomefreakupdatees from PPA15:42
Sarvattoh sorry, it might15:42
Sarvattcould you use nvidia-current before?15:43
gnomefreakSarvatt: what about the 185?15:43
Sarvattcould you ever use it?15:43
gnomefreakSarvatt: no drivers worked. i filed a bug on it15:43
Sarvattif so you can, they didn't drop any older cards since 17315:43
gnomefreaknot in last month15:43
BUGabundo_remotenvidia-current:  Installed: 195.36.24-0ubuntu115:43
knittlhi guys15:43
SarvattBUGabundo_remote: you rebuild that? the one in the archive wont let you upgrade X stuff15:44
gnomefreakBUGabundo_remote: you rnot using PPA and that package didnt work for me either but i have nothing to lose but to try it15:44
knittlanyobdy interested in helping me fix my recurring sound problems with flash?15:45
BUGabundo_remoteSarvatt: gnomefreak: that's plain maverick archive for me15:45
BUGabundo_remoteits on hold due to X upgrades15:45
BUGabundo_remoteworks nicely for me15:45
knittlin soundsettings i can see which streams are playing, and firefox [alsa-plugin] flickers there15:46
SarvattBUGabundo_remote: if you purge nvidia-current you can upgrade everything :)15:46
BUGabundo_remoteI'm even scared for once the builds are all done... seem ill be without X for a while, again, this cycle15:46
BUGabundo_remoteguess ill be testing nouveua again :)15:46
gnomefreakdo X updates like i did and nvidia gets removed but i figured since ive been on upstream drivers it would hurt me. damn was i ever wrong15:46
BUGabundo_remoteSarvatt: will I still have an working blob for 3D?15:46
gnomefreaknouveua didnt work for me either15:46
Sarvattjust use x-updates for a few hours and ppa-purge -p x-updates ubuntu-x-swat after if you dont like the 256 drivers, i'm trying to get nvidia uploaded to the archive now15:48
Sarvattwell nvidia-current that works with maverick is still waiting to build in there15:48
BUGabundo_remoteSarvatt: I'm in no hurry :)15:50
BUGabundo_remoteonce its ready, ill update15:50
gnomefreakSarvatt: will the nvidia-glx-180 work?15:50
BUGabundo_remoteor better, my system will15:50
Sarvattnvidia-glx-180 hasn't been a package in years15:50
gnomefreakits in maverick as a dummy package for the 195 drivers ir the 185 driver15:51
Sarvattjust empty transitional packages15:51
patdk-wkheh, working systems are so overrated :)15:51
Sarvattyeah15:51
BUGabundo_remoteyep15:52
BUGabundo_remotetell me about it15:52
gnomefreakmy upstream drivers are 195* but wont build against kernel or X i dont recall15:52
Sarvattonly using blobs on development releases is nuts :)15:52
BUGabundo_remoteI spent , last cycle, more time in #-x then in here15:52
Sarvattcould be worse, you could be using fglrx :)15:53
BUGabundo_remoteahahahahaha15:53
BUGabundo_remotedon't remind me15:53
BUGabundo_remoteI have my bros laptop in karmic still15:54
BUGabundo_remotewant to upgrade it, but after the horror stories I hear, its better like it is now15:54
gnomefreakits not building against the kernel mods. im wondering if i can use a lower kernal15:54
yofelBUGabundo_remote: dd the HDD, upgrade and dd the image back when it fails?15:55
SarvattBUGabundo_remote: 195 builds against the maverick kernel for you?15:55
BUGabundo_remoteSarvatt: yep15:57
BUGabundo_remoteall but 2.6.2315:57
Sarvattok tseliot is uploading nvidia-* soon :)15:57
BUGabundo_remotewhich I was using cause of desktop couch bug15:58
* BUGabundo_remote is afraid15:58
gnomefreakgood maybe we will have it in next day or 2.15:58
yofel23? you mean 3315:58
BUGabundo_remotedoh15:58
BUGabundo_remotefollow mouse, not eyes15:58
SarvattBUGabundo_remote: oh, wonder why it doesn't work for gnomefreak15:58
gnomefreakSarvatt: any idea what is wrong with the ISOs?15:59
Sarvattwhat's wrong with them?15:59
gnomefreakupstream drivers wont build15:59
gnomefreakSarvatt: the current alternate they are only there for a day and take 2 days off. when they are there they are oversized16:00
Sarvattno space?16:00
gnomefreak704mb  but tis known they are oversized16:00
Sarvattthey've been screwed up for the past few days while X was getting sorted16:00
gnomefreakSarvatt: ah ok that is a good reason16:00
BUGabundo_remotenvidia 5400mG16:00
Sarvattbefore that there was another problem but i forgot what it was16:00
BUGabundo_remoteI thk16:00
Sarvattthere should be one from today though?16:01
gnomefreakSarvatt: past week they have not even been there most days16:01
patdk-wkhmm, ok installed ppa, installed e2defrag16:01
gnomefreakSarvatt: todays is oversized when i looked ~3 hours ago16:01
patdk-wkhave readme files, and stuff, and e2freefrag16:01
Sarvattyeah todays should be the first since monday16:01
patdk-wkbut there is no *defrag* program on my machine :(16:01
BUGabundo_remote01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G86 [GeForce 8400M G] (rev a1)16:02
BUGabundo_remotesilly me16:02
BUGabundo_remotedon't even recall my own hw16:02
BUGabundo_remotetoo many machines to know :S16:02
gnomefreakthe 173 wont build against kernel16:02
gnomefreakpatdk-wk: there should be one in the archives16:02
Sarvattthings got held up because none of us working on the X packages this time could upload to main and its over 50 packages :(16:03
* gnomefreak may drop to another kernel or use my Lucid install for a while since i have to check email16:03
gnomefreakeh ISOs are not really important atm16:05
Sarvattnouveau doesn't work for ya?16:06
gnomefreakSarvatt: no they didnt16:06
gnomefreakiw ill try again in a few16:06
Sarvattgnomefreak: you removed the nvidia drivers first?16:06
gnomefreaks/iw ill/1 will16:07
gnomefreakSarvatt: apt did that for me :)16:07
gnomefreakSarvatt: i am running a few things atm but i will try soon16:07
Sarvattah, if it doesn't work a bug would be appreciated if possible, need to get that fixed16:08
gnomefreakbe back in a few, Sarvatt i dont recall bug # but i did file one. my Lp page should have it in reported bugs section16:08
Sarvattah alrighty will check16:08
Sarvatt~gnomefreak?16:08
gnomefreakthat should give you everything if not i will add to it when i can just comment on bug so if i switch to Lucid i will know16:09
gnomefreakSarvatt: yes16:09
gnomefreak.:11:00:05:. <      gnomefreak > Sarvatt: the current alternate they are only there for a day and take 2 days off. when they are there they are oversized16:09
gnomefreakdamn that is odd16:09
gnomefreaki was playing with mouse pleae ignore that16:10
patdk-wkin the *archives*?16:11
patdk-wkI did a, find / -name '*defrag*'16:11
patdk-wkand it couldn't find one16:11
patdk-wkoh, it didn't install fro mthe ppa :(16:12
gnomefreakpatdk-wk: try apt-cache search defrag it should bring up some16:12
patdk-wke2defrag - ext[234] filesystem defragmenter16:12
patdk-wkthat is what I installed16:12
patdk-wkthought it was from the ppa16:12
patdk-wkcause it installed the ppa16:12
* patdk-wk is really confused now16:12
gnomefreakrunning the search c0ommand searches PPA and normal archives16:13
patdk-wkdeb http://ppa.launchpad.net/e2defrag/ppa/ubuntu lucid main16:13
gnomefreaklibnids1.2116:14
patdk-wkMaintainer: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>16:14
patdk-wkArchitecture: amd6416:14
patdk-wkVersion: 0.7516:14
patdk-wkDepends: file16:14
patdk-wkFilename: pool/main/d/defrag/e2defrag_0.75_amd64.deb16:14
patdk-wklibnids?16:14
gnomefreakpatdk-wk: Lucid is not in this challen16:14
patdk-wkI know16:14
patdk-wkwhy I was confused we where talking about it, but it wouldn't install on maverick16:14
patdk-wkand I was talking to psusi :)16:14
gnomefreakhe wasnt talking to you ;)16:15
Sensivapsusi Do you know any resources that talks about fragmentation in ext* filesystems?16:15
patdk-wkit's irc16:15
patdk-wkpeople are always afk :)16:16
patdk-wkbut if you don't explain, well, it's pointless to just wait :)16:16
* gnomefreak tries to be. ill be back ina few going to try something16:16
psusiSensiva: google?  there's one article that I've seen tossed about on the ubuntu forums that is not too horrible ;)16:16
BUGabundo_remotepatdk-wk: apt-cache policy e2defrag16:17
BUGabundo_remotewill tell you the source of the install16:17
BUGabundo_remotearchive or ppa16:17
Sensivaty16:17
psusipatdk-wk: it won't install on maverick eh?  hrm...16:18
patdk-wkmaverick was the 404 not found error16:18
patdk-wkon lucid it installs16:18
patdk-wkbut there is no e2defrag program16:18
patdk-wkjust /usr/share/doc/e2defag files16:18
psusidpkg -L defrag... should be there16:19
patdk-wkusing amd64 version16:19
patdk-wknope16:19
psusithink it's in sbin16:20
patdk-wkadd-apt-repository ppa:e2defrag/ppa16:20
patdk-wkapt-get update, apt-get install e2defrag16:20
psusipatdk-wk: it's in /usr/sbin...16:22
patdk-wkroot@oplex960-1:/usr/sbin# ls *defrag*16:23
patdk-wkls: cannot access *defrag*: No such file or directory16:23
patdk-wknow e2freefrag is in there16:24
psusithen the package isn't installed?16:24
psusithat's part of e2fsprogs16:24
patdk-wke2defrag is installed16:24
yofelpatdk-wk: 'dpkg -L e2defrag | pastebinit'16:24
patdk-wkhttp://e2defrag.pastebin.com/rHsqva0B16:25
patdk-wkI was just doing that16:25
yofelodd16:25
psusiwhat's apt-get policy say?  you got version 0.77 right?16:25
patdk-wkinvalid operation16:25
psusierr, apt-cache policy16:26
patdk-wk0.75 :(16:26
patdk-wkslow mirrors?16:26
yofelppas aren't mirrored16:27
psusippas aren't mirroed afaik16:27
patdk-wkI didn't think so16:27
BUGabundo_remotepatdk-wk: apt-cache policy e2defrag | pastebinit16:27
patdk-wkhttp://pastebin.com/9YZmhLQf16:27
yofelnot yet published maybe?16:27
psusiit's published according to the ppa page, and someone else managed to install it just fine16:27
BUGabundo_remotemaybe16:27
yofelhm16:27
patdk-wkI'm on amd64 though16:27
patdk-wkwhere they?16:28
psusidunno, but I am as well16:28
psusiand I just downloaded the binary package and checked, and the files are in there... https://launchpad.net/~psusi/+archive/ppa/+packages16:28
psusiohh, you aren't using my ppa16:29
psusiyou're using the e2defrag group ppa...16:29
patdk-wkoh?16:29
psusiI guess I should have uploaded it there but I just used my personal one16:30
psusiyea, it says launchpad.net/e2defrag/ppa/ubuntu... should be /psusi16:31
psusiapt-add-repository ppa:psusi/ppa16:31
patdk-wkok, it's loaded16:31
psusiand the package is just defrag again, not e2defrag16:31
patdk-wkand working now :)16:31
patdk-wktoo many different ppa's :)16:32
patdk-wkdefently needs more colors :)16:35
psusihehe16:35
patdk-wk it's so much slower without -r16:36
* patdk-wk files a bug report16:36
psusilol16:36
patdk-wkit's also on an encrypted block device16:38
psusiI hope you aren't running it on data you don't want to loose ;)16:39
patdk-wkit's a nightly backups of my colo server16:39
patdk-wkI have it backed up on other machines also16:39
psusithrowing more buffer space at it can speed things up too16:40
patdk-wkdidn't see an option for that16:40
psusi-p16:40
patdk-wkok, it wasn't an option in -h :)16:40
psusiohh, yea, that's probably out of date... read the man page ;)16:41
patdk-wkwhen it gets done :)16:41
patdk-wkcontrol-c, q, esc, doesn't work to stop it :)16:41
psusiyea, stopping it would be bad ;)16:41
patdk-wkso it's not a safe defrag?16:41
psusiif it gets interrupted, kiss your fs goodby16:42
psusinope16:42
patdk-wkI would defently make it safe, duplicate the blocks16:42
patdk-wkupdate inode info to new blocks16:42
patdk-wkthen if power goes out in the middle your good16:42
patdk-wkdoes slow it down some, but not much16:42
psusiit was made to be fast rather than safe... it updates all of the inodes first, then starts relocating the blocks in the largest contiguous chunks it can to minimize seeking16:43
* patdk-wk marks it down as evil defrag :)16:43
psusiactually it would slow it down a good deal...16:43
patdk-wkmust take ones own protective measures before hand :)16:43
psusihence the make a full backup first warning ;)16:44
* patdk-wk wonders if he should try it on a 500gig drive with >60M inodes used16:44
psusithe default 32 meg buffer pool doesn't lend itself to minimizing seeks very well on modern disks... does quite a bit better with a larger pool16:45
psusiI actually just wrote a patch to reduce memory usage with lots of free inodes... right now it allocates an array of ints for the inode order map... one for each inode, which is a few hundred mb on a 1.5 tb disk... also iirc an int ends up being 8 bytes on amd64 when inode numbers are only 32 bit anyhow16:46
psusiso I just changed it to use a __u32 and only allocate as many as there are USED inodes16:47
ActionParsniphey guys16:47
ActionParsnipis there an equiv to ALT+F2 in UNE maverick ?16:48
ActionParsnipdoesn't seem to fly16:48
patdk-wkhmm, up to 10gigs moved now16:50
psusiit also tries very hard to only move a given block once.. which means it writes a block to its new location, first reading the old data to rescue it from being overwritten if needed.. so if you crash at that point, the rescued data is only in ram and so is lost16:51
patdk-wk4.6M inodes, using 90megs of ram16:52
psusia larger pool would definately have helped ;)16:52
ActionParsnipdoes anyone use the netbook edition? Seems a bit weird16:52
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
patdk-wkI only have 12gigs of ram, 10gigs free :)16:53
BUGabundo_remote*only*16:54
psusimmmm..... 6 gig buffer pool...... it could do sequential reads for minutes at a time before seeking to write16:54
patdk-wkI build vm's on this machine16:55
patdk-wkso I need lots of memory, then I don't :)16:55
ActionParsnipwhere is alt+f2 :(16:55
patdk-wkhmm, it on the last part16:58
patdk-wkall seq16:58
psusiit's kinda funny watching iotop when you give it a large buffer pool.... you see max read io for a while.... then max write io for a while...16:58
patdk-wkI'm doing about 32MB/s read and write on iotop16:59
psusiI should have it check how much free ram you have and up the default buffer pool size automatically if you don't specify it16:59
patdk-wkhalf of free ram?16:59
psusisounds good16:59
* patdk-wk wonders if free ram should include buffers + cache17:00
psusiproblem is if it tries to use too much, it could end up being killed in the middle by the OOM killer17:00
patdk-wkI guess it should17:00
psusiyes, it should17:00
patdk-wkthey haven't put in the kernel patch so programs can protect themselfs from OOM?17:00
patdk-wkI thought I saw that years ago?17:00
patdk-wkI know it was floating around in v2.017:00
psusiI think there's some way to change the oom priority yea, so it will try to kill other things instead17:01
patdk-wkbut I haven't payed much attention to the kernel since 2.217:01
psusibut you still don't want to run out of memory17:01
patdk-wkalloc, lock, stop-oom17:01
patdk-wkshould be good enough17:01
psusiyea, I suppose I could lock the pages....17:01
patdk-wklock from swapping :)17:02
patdk-wkand if <512megs ram free, keep buffer small?17:02
patdk-wkok, it's done17:03
psusinow e2fsck -f17:03
patdk-wkit left 4 things not sorted17:03
psusiwhat do you mean?17:03
patdk-wkall the *data* blocks are in a line17:03
patdk-wkexcept 4 of them17:03
patdk-wkwell, 4 clusters17:03
psusiit tries to locate blocks in the block group of the owning inode, so it can leave some gaps17:04
psusiif some block groups don't have many or large inodes17:04
patdk-wkhttp://www.maneshi.com/gallery/v/Users/sysadm/Screenshot-root_oplex960-1_+-etc-apt-sources_list_d.png.html17:05
patdk-wkfsck -f was clean before17:06
patdk-wkInode 140789 has out of order extents17:06
patdk-wk(invalid logical block 28672, physical block 8323072, len 32768)17:06
psusiruh-roh17:06
patdk-wkclear?17:06
Ian_corne:p17:06
patdk-wkI guess so, since I don't care :)17:06
psusino, stop it and umm.... let me ssh in ;)17:06
patdk-wktoo late17:07
psusior e2image17:07
patdk-wkPass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes17:07
patdk-wkInode 140789 has out of order extents17:07
patdk-wk(invalid logical block 28672, physical block 8323072, len 32768)17:07
patdk-wkClear<y>? yes17:07
patdk-wkInode 140789 has out of order extents17:07
patdk-wk(invalid logical block 61440, physical block 8355840, len 26624)17:07
psusidamn... need to analyze it with debugfs17:07
patdk-wkClear<y>? yes17:07
patdk-wkInode 140789, i_blocks is 955296, should be 255648.  Fix<y>? yes17:07
patdk-wk^C/dev/mapper/udisks-luks-uuid-5c1a5a03-8ab0-4c2c-9ce3-e0bf9f901e3d-uid1000: e2fsck canceled.17:07
patdk-wkI'm sure there are more wrong17:07
patdk-wkit wsa just getting started :)17:07
patdk-wkor maybe not17:08
patdk-wkrunning fsck -f again17:08
patdk-wkBlock bitmap differences:  -(1522279--1527172) -(1540096--1560756) -(1581088--1597410) -(1606657--1630207) -(1638607--1660633)17:08
patdk-wkFix<y>?17:08
patdk-wkstill want in?17:08
psusiyea, may as well fix that17:08
psusithe bitmap is now wrong because it freed those blocks in the first step17:08
patdk-wkok17:09
psusithe question is, how/why did defrag screw up the extent tree...17:09
patdk-wkI'll not do that again17:09
patdk-wkthis is ext3 though, I didn't tink it's converted to ext417:09
patdk-wkso there shoulnd be any?17:09
psusihrm.... fsck seems to think there's extents there....17:09
patdk-wkFilesystem features:      has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize17:10
patdk-wkit does17:10
patdk-wkso guess it got converted (cause I didn't do it)17:10
psusihrm... is that inode a 3 gig file?17:11
patdk-wkhow would I check?17:12
patdk-wkbut I doubt it, it's a backup of a mailspool17:12
psusidebugfs /dev/foo and ncheck 14078917:12
psusito get the name of the file17:12
patdk-wk467meg access.log17:13
psusiI did test it with a 4 gig dvd image file on the fs once and ran into problems with unallocated extents... but thought I fixed it17:13
psusiit is 467 meg now, or was before? :)17:14
patdk-wkwill sync it from the colo and find out :)17:14
psusiyou did say yes to e2fsck to fix the block count right?17:15
patdk-wkyep :(17:15
patdk-wk489m on the colo17:16
patdk-wkactually 466megs on the colo17:16
psusihrm... wonder if it was horribly fragmented before and somehow screwed up shrinking the size of the extent tree after defragging...17:16
* patdk-wk notes it grew?17:16
patdk-wkhmm, it sounds like a believe able size17:18
patdk-wkfreebsd vs linux is rounding megs dfferently17:18
psusiI'll have to look up that error message in the e2fsck sources and figure out exactly what it decided was wrong... but that's for later.. it's lunch time!17:19
patdk-wkoverrated :)17:20
BUGabundo_remote aptitude -v moo17:29
BUGabundo_remoteThere really are no Easter Eggs in this program.17:29
ActionParsnipBUGabundo_remote: sl is kinda like an easter egg17:32
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
yofelmeh, kde sure is broken, desktop settings don't survive a logout :/17:33
h00ksilly x, why did you die17:33
BUGabundo_remoteyofel: don't turn it of then17:33
yofelBUGabundo_remote: settings, not effects17:34
yofelit resets the  background to default and doesn't display any widgets after login17:34
geserBUGabundo_remote: try adding more 'v' to that aptitude call :)17:35
BUGabundo_remoteI know geser17:35
BUGabundo_remote-vvvv17:35
* BUGabundo_remote is getting kicked17:36
BUGabundo_remote$ aptitude -vvvvv moo17:36
BUGabundo_remoteAll right, you win.17:36
BUGabundo_remote                               /----\17:36
BUGabundo_remote                       -------/      \17:36
BUGabundo_remote                      /               \17:36
BUGabundo_remote                     /                |17:36
BUGabundo_remote   -----------------/                  --------\17:36
BUGabundo_remote   ----------------------------------------------17:36
* BUGabundo_remote hides17:36
yofelWhat is it?  It's an elephant being eaten by a snake, of course.17:36
yofel:P17:36
yofelhaven't tried that in a while :D17:36
ActionParsnipi hope you guys have sl installed CHOO-WOO17:37
yofelheh17:37
crimsun_cwillu: what do you need?17:53
knittlwhat abotu all this xserver-xorg-video-* stuff?17:55
knittlremove -all an -tseng?17:55
crimsun_what about it?17:56
knittlcan i remove those two packages or do i have to wait until it resolves itself?17:57
knittlhm oh, dist-upgrade will keep everything else back and remove them. that's stupid17:58
knittlso … back to waiting?17:58
crimsun_-all is a meta; it's fairly unimportant18:02
crimsun_you're quite unlikely to be using -tseng18:02
knittli guess there's some dependency missing18:03
crimsun_if you don't mind reinstalling -all afterward (i.e., being proactive in tracking dependencies as they're updated), there's no reason to hold back the needed driver18:03
crimsun_if you're at all unsure, you'll want to hold off updating18:03
knittldist-upgrade will not upgrade any packages, it will only remove two, so it doesn't make sense18:03
knittlseems like nvidia-current is the culprit18:04
psusialright, yuo win?  lol...18:23
=== shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_vacati
=== BUGabundo_vacati is now known as BUGa_vacations
BUGa_vacationsand so it beggins :|18:44
h00khrm?18:47
patdk-wkhell :)18:48
=== shadeslayer_ is now known as shadeslayer
psusipatdk-wk: if you can reproduce that problem and get me an e2image file before and after, I should be able to debug it18:55
patdk-wkbefore and after the defrag?18:55
psusiyea18:56
patdk-wkok, but I am leaving on work trip tonight, and won't be back for a week18:56
patdk-wkso it will be alittle bit :)18:56
psusior hell, just before should be enough... I should be able to run defrag on it myself and get the same result ;)18:56
patdk-wke2image makes a copy of the fs?18:57
patdk-wkoh, just the fun stuff18:57
psusisort of... it just includes the inodes... no normal data18:57
patdk-wkjust non-block data18:57
psusiyea18:57
psusiI don't care what is in the blocks, just where they were18:58
patdk-wkfun19:00
patdk-wk1.1G in normal19:00
patdk-wkand 69G in raw mode19:00
psusipipe it to bzip2 like the man page suggests... it's mostly zeroes so will compress down quite well19:01
patdk-wkwell, there is no point to doing a raw dump over a normal19:01
patdk-wkI am comparing how both methods compress though19:01
patdk-wkwell, -r is horrible :(19:04
patdk-wkthe none -r one compressed to 9.3megs19:04
patdk-wkthe -r compressed one is at 73megs is still growing19:05
patdk-wkya, it is taking gzip forever and it's still not done and it's so much bigger :(19:11
psusidamn... you have many used inodes I guess...19:11
patdk-wkonly 5M19:11
psusieach one needs about a kb in the image file so... ;)19:12
patdk-wkbut it's the -r that is the issue19:12
patdk-wkprobably cause it's dumping empty ones too19:12
patdk-wkjust dumping a normal one, then compress, makes it nice and small :)19:13
psusiwithout -r it just doesn't bother including the directories and extent trees19:13
patdk-wkah :(19:13
patdk-wkoh well, will just have to let it go19:13
* psusi tries creating a 3 tb zero volume and then a 5 gig snapshot of it with lvm to end up with a thin provisioned gigantic virtual disk19:19
jcastroI am looking for volunteers who have a lucid machine and are testing the unity ppa, if you want to help please join me in #ayatana!19:33
BUGa_vacationsI would .... but I'm depressed19:35
patdk-wkya, vacations suck19:44
ugaAnyone found that after upgrading to maverick, the intel gfx card does only 50fps?20:01
ugaI've digged google ,bug reports, etc, but nothing found20:01
uga(glxgears test)20:02
Ian_corneuga: where do you see this 50 fps20:02
Ian_corneaha20:02
Ian_cornei'll check20:02
ugait says around 200 frames in 5s20:02
ugaand glxinfo seems to say everything is correct20:02
Daekdroomuga, what does glxinfo | grep OpenGL say?20:02
Ian_cornegrep -i20:02
ugaOpenGL vendor string: Tungsten Graphics, Inc20:03
ugaOpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965Q GEM 20100328 2010Q120:03
ugaOpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.8.120:03
Ian_corneinstalling mesa-utils :)20:03
Ian_corne261 frames in  5 seconds20:03
Ian_corne14420:03
ugayes, sounds as bad as mine20:03
ugaiirc, this card used to be better at it?20:04
psusioh wow, that freed up a ton of ram...20:04
crdlbuga: have you tried a real 3d app?20:04
ugasuch as=?20:04
DaekdroomWhat bugs me is the OpenGL vendor string: Tungsten Graphics, Inc20:04
crdlbuga: an OpenGL game?20:04
patdk-wkwhat?20:04
ugacrdlb: no, this is not a gaming machine. I'm mostly concerned about effects rendering etc20:05
Ian_corne$ glxinfo | grep OpenGL | pastebinit20:05
Ian_cornehttp://pastebin.com/wfbavGUQ20:05
psusipatdk-wk: you talking to me?20:05
patdk-wkya20:05
ugacrdlb: not a single game installed (work box ;))20:05
Ian_cornecompiz is disabled20:05
Ian_corneopenarena is a good test20:05
Ian_cornebut my eee won't run that :p20:06
Ian_corneuga: if you just upgraded, chances are you have the new xserver20:06
DaekdroomIt seems it's using the gallium driver over classic mesa.20:06
Ian_corneat least, I do20:06
ugaah20:06
psusipatdk-wk: it was computing the average location of each inode's data blocks to assist in sorting the inode optimization order... so that a higher numbered inode that happens to have most of its data blocks earlier on the disk than a lower number inode, it would optimize the higher number inode first to keep its data blocks before the other one rather than swap them20:07
crdlbuga: you're using maverick on your work box? ;)20:07
ugacrdlb: after I did heavy testing at home, yes20:07
psusipatdk-wk: this used 4 bytes of ram to hold the average position of every possible inode on disk... which adds up when you have 60 million possible inodes on a 1 tb disk ;)20:07
ugathis is a good time for an upgrade....20:07
ugacrdlb: unfortunately my home box runs on nvidia20:07
psusiI don't think that feature is actually very useful so I tore it out...20:07
DaekdroomGood lord, uga, I'm a fan on bleeding edge and I'm afraid to use Maverick20:08
crdlbuga: I hope you realize it will probably break several times before now an release, right? :)20:08
DaekdroomI'm waiting for the API freeze + 2 days or so.. Less likely to break after then20:08
krosonhi everyone what is the default nvidia driver that maverick is using?20:08
Daekdroomkroson, nouveau20:08
krosontks20:08
psusipatdk-wk: went from using ~400 megs of ram to defrag a 1tb fs to 17520:08
patdk-wkpsusi it would probably be much more useful to do that by directory20:08
patdk-wkthen per inode20:08
krosonDaekdroom: what version? 3d-enabled? mesa classic or gallium?20:08
krosontks20:08
ugacrdlb: I know, I know... I can work on vi and gcc though. I just need a working xorg and a virtualbox mostly ;)20:08
patdk-wkand group all inodes per directory together20:08
crdlbit's barely even an alpha20:08
Daekdroomkroson, well, about that I don't know..20:09
ugait was the best time for an upgrade, and I always test changes at home before doing anything at workplace20:09
Daekdroomkroson, but I believe 2-D only, classic Mesa.20:09
patdk-wkwell, I'm outtahere20:09
krosonok tks20:09
krosonxD20:09
ugaI had a few probs with booting, but nothing unsolvable20:09
crdlbuga: I hope your hardware at home is identical ...20:09
ugahehe20:09
DaekdroomYou should also test any updates at home before updating over work..20:10
DaekdroomO.o20:10
ugayups, that's my initial plan20:10
ugaif I didn't upgrade today, I'd not upgrade till next year20:10
ugaas I said, I can survive with no desktop, as far as I have vi and a simple Xorg window ;P20:11
uga(and if everything fails, restore / in about 30 mins)20:12
krosonwill 10.10 include the new gnome 3.0?20:12
Daekdroomkroson, yes, just not Gnome Shell20:12
krosonok fine20:12
krosonif i test maverick i will get the latest version of gnome right?20:12
* uga reads on about gallium...20:13
* psusi wonders just how large of a thin provisioned disk he can make with lvm.... an exebyte? hrm...20:14
nperryWow, that was a smooth X transation!20:18
nperryAll went fine20:18
nperryHmmmmm, Moc doesn't seem to be working :/20:20
siimothe maverick meercat boot cd kernels panics with sync hd(0,0) or something.. basically it cant recognize my hdd/partitions...20:30
ActionParsnipyo yo yo20:31
siimo=/20:31
psusisiimo: sounds like your grub config is messed up and not loading the initrd20:32
ActionParsnipis the app bar on the left the new gnome desktop design in maverick?20:32
siimopsusi: this is off the boot cd though20:32
siimohttp://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/mini.iso20:32
siimo^20:32
ugaIan_corne: strangely, openarena tests dont' seem too bad20:34
ugaalthough I can run it only under 640x48020:34
ugais it that the mesa api got deprecated or something? =)20:35
Ian_corneI have no idea20:37
Ian_cornealtho since 2.6.28 intel graphics have been bad20:38
ActionParsnipIan_corne: works fine here20:39
Ian_cornewhat works fine?20:39
ActionParsnipMobile 945GM20:39
ActionParsnipintel vga20:39
Ian_corneIt works20:40
Ian_cornebut doesn't perform as well as it should20:40
ActionParsnipIan_corne: not had an issue here personally. I read that some intel chips can get a boost with som package or somesuch20:41
ActionParsnipwas on omg ubuntu of all places20:41
yofelIMHO the intel performance got worse again with xserver 1.8, at least it does feel so on my 945GME20:45
yofeland since updating X I can't enable a bunch of kwin effects anymore20:46
h00kI hope that Unity gets some sort of better application launcher than just opening the folder :|20:46
crimsun_h00k: heh, I just background the executable invocation in a terminal emulator ;)20:48
vishh00k: expecting ponies , i see20:48
ugaActionParsnip: Ian_corne: I tested a mcahine I have here, same gfx card, but still not upgraded... it does >500fps easily20:48
ugaon glxgears20:48
ugatahts' around 10 times as much20:48
crdlbyes, but glxgears only tells you how fast it runs glxgears20:49
h00k!pony20:49
h00kd'aw.20:49
ugacrdlb: is a 17fps score in openarena good?20:49
h00kvish: not ponies, just something decent :(20:49
h00kcrimsun_: Yes, that does work, it's kind of a pain20:49
ugacrdlb: glxgears is a pretty basic test20:50
crdlbuga: certainly not, but I have no idea what the drivers on lucid could do with that gpu20:50
crimsun_h00k: absolutely. OTOH, I'm a terminal emulator person mainly, so it's no sweat.20:50
ugacrdlb: that's what I just told you. around 2100 frames in 5s in lucid20:51
ugavs 200frames in 5s for maverick20:51
crdlbuga: I don't care about glxgears on lucid, only openarena on lucid20:51
ugaah well20:51
ugaI can't go and install openarena everywhere on my work machines  I'm afraid20:51
ugaand I don't think the main issue about a desktop is openarena anyway20:52
h00kcrimsun_: and it's nice if you know the name of what you want to run20:52
ugabut wehen dektop effects get disabled bececause checks say it's slow, that's trouble20:52
crdlbalthough 50fps is below vsync even, so my guess is that there really is a performance regression20:52
ActionParsnipso is the left hand bar thing the default in gnome desktop or is it a remnant of the netbook20:52
ugadoing more tests...20:53
h00kcrimsun_: for instance, I don't know what executable to call for 'Appearance' or 'network connections'20:54
h00ketc,20:54
Ian_cornegnome-appearence-properties20:54
Ian_corne:p20:54
duffydackIve added the unity ppa in maverick, all updated and installed unity, yet its not showing up in the login menu.  Its ok on my lucid netbook20:55
ActionParsnipduffydack: does the ppa have a maverick entry?20:56
h00kduffydack: unity is in the normal repository20:57
h00kduffydack: in maverick, you don't have to install the ppa20:57
duffydackAh...20:57
h00kduffydack: and for me, unity launched along with netbook-launcher on the Netbook Edition session, I just disabled netbook-launcher20:57
h00kduffydack: YRMV20:59
Ian_corneYMMV?21:00
Ian_corneor what does YRMV mean?21:00
duffydackalso.. im using the touch the light theme (see omgubuntu) and its got the buttons on the right, and I have used the gconftool-2 --set "/apps/metacity/general/button_layout" --type string "close,minimize,maximize" command to set to the left which it has, but the "menu" is still on the right, how do I get rid.21:00
Ian_corneyour result may vary?21:00
h00kYour results may vary21:01
duffydacknevermind... ok I still cant see unity.. i have removed the ppa and removed the package...and reinstalled21:04
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_is_MAD
=== BUGa_is_MAD is now known as BUGa_depressed
delaccan anyone tell if Meerkat will reintroduce settings for Indicator  Applet Session? (I'm mostly concerned about the "don't ask password" setting)21:32
=== thomasn_ is now known as iAmerikan
z0rt|workthe new netbook remix gui is interesting22:05
BUGa_depressedunity?22:05
BUGa_depressedyes it is22:06
BUGa_depressedvery very fast too22:06
rippsSomething's up with the latest updates. After about an hour, everything starts to segfault and my desktop slow crashes22:06
z0rt|worki like the root terminal application22:06
BUGa_depressedripps: let me check, also go look in syslog and kernel log please22:06
h00kI've had x die completely twice today22:07
BUGa_depressedmetacity?22:08
BUGa_depressedyeah, there's something frisky there22:08
h00kno, x. I get bumped out to a GDM22:08
BUGa_depressedalso exaile will render X deade22:08
h00kIt's happened opening new dialogs, it seemed22:08
rippsBUGa_depressed: http://pastebin.com/MyiwPvbr22:08
rippsI can't even a browser now.22:08
BUGa_depressedripps: nothing in the upgrade queue that would cause that22:09
BUGa_depresseddid you force X upgrades?22:09
BUGa_depressedthey are on hold until everything is build22:09
BUGa_depressed[ 2992.238827] gnome-about[10950]: segfault at 695cb ip 00fadaac sp bfa81464 error 4 in ld-2.12.so[fa4000+1c000]22:09
BUGa_depressedWOW22:09
h00kmine ended up upgrading on the netbook which is probably why I keep dying.22:09
BUGa_depressedgnome-about segphauting?22:09
rippsBUGa_depressed: I downgraded from xorg-edger22:09
rippsbut I'm completely maverick now22:10
BUGa_depressedripps: you can use ppa-purge or what ever its name22:10
BUGa_depresseddoes a lot good work to downgrade packages22:10
rippsBUGa_depressed: that's how I did it :P22:10
BUGa_depressedcool22:10
BUGa_depressedcan you try to reinstall gnome-about?22:10
BUGa_depressedor isntall dbg packages for it22:10
BUGa_depressedand start it in gdb22:11
BUGa_depressedto trace the cause22:11
rippsBUGa_depressed: yeah, but even notify-send isn't working. That has nothing to do with gnome22:11
BUGa_depressedhumm22:11
BUGa_depressedwhat is under it?22:12
BUGa_depressedlibc?22:12
BUGa_depressedlol22:12
BUGa_depressedagain?!22:12
rippsBUGa_depressed: I have a nautilus backtrace hold on a sec22:12
=== BUGa_depressed is now known as BUGabundo
rippsBUGabundo: http://pastebin.com/yTXjyh9u22:12
* BUGabundo prepares to install a bunch of gdbsym packages22:12
BUGabundo#8  0x00110857 in _start () from /lib/ld-linux.so.222:13
BUGabundohumm22:13
BUGabundoIO ?22:13
Ian_cornelol @ __PRETTY_FUNCTION__22:13
BUGabundoripps: boot from livecd and fsck22:13
BUGabundosomething is messing your file discretpor queues22:13
rippsBUGabundo: okay, see ya in a little while22:13
BUGabundoeither disc or faulty mem22:14
Ian_corneyou can fsck on a live system too22:14
BUGabundodo a memcheck while you are on it22:14
Ian_cornejust not fixing stuff22:14
Ian_corneto check22:14
BUGabundoIan_corne: yah22:14
BUGabundobut live would be sanner22:14
BUGabundolast time I had a online check22:14
BUGabundofsck decided to rearrenge some indexs22:14
BUGabundoleaving me with a dead system22:14
Ian_cornelo22:15
BUGabundoand 200GB of data to recover22:15
BUGabundoand it didn't even changed the FS22:15
BUGabundoit was just the file index table22:15
Daekdroomfsck can't save.22:15
DaekdroomReal life experience.22:15
BUGabundoseems both of them got corrupt22:15
BUGabundodropping the laptop 1,5mts from the air and kick it, tend to do that to discs22:16
DaekdroomSSD or HDD?22:16
* BUGabundo goes back to watching Ip Man 2 movie22:16
BUGabundoeheh hdd... I wish for ssd22:16
BUGabundobeen waiting for it for a few months22:16
rippsBUGabundo: I'm back, and there's nothing wrong with my filesystem22:27
rippsfsck said it was clean22:27
BUGabundonor memory ?22:27
BUGabundodid you force the fsck ?22:28
BUGabundo$ sudo fsck.ext4 -fDv /dev/sda122:28
BUGabundo:p22:28
BUGabundowell then... it beats me! fire apport and file a bug :)22:28
rippsno... I didn't know I needed to. Besides, everything is working now.22:28
BUGabundoahh so you hadn't rebooted yet?22:28
rippsBUGabundo: no, I've been to livecd, and now I'm back in normal boot22:29
rippsI tried a fsck from livecd and it said all my linux filesystems were clean22:29
guntbertripps: did you force the check with -f ?22:30
BUGabundolololol22:30
* BUGabundo hears an echo22:30
rippsno... should I go do that? I didn't know it was necessary.22:30
BUGabundoripps: the FS may be corrupt and fsck table test still thinks its clean22:31
BUGabundosince you did a clean shutdown22:31
BUGabundono flags were set22:31
ripps*sigh* be back in a sec22:31
BUGabundothe -f will actually check the entire FS22:31
BUGabundoits just precasionary messure22:31
BUGabundoand he is gone22:31
BUGabundoI bet he will take longer then a sec22:32
BUGabundoeven longer then 600 secs22:32
BUGabundo:D22:32
guntbertBUGabundo: amen22:32
BUGabundowb ripps22:48
BUGabundothat was fast22:49
rippsBUGabundo: yep, only problem was superblock mount time22:50
BUGabundonot bad22:50
BUGabundowell, if it happens again, let us know22:50
rippsI did optimize the disk with -D though, so hopefully things will work better22:51
BUGabundoheeh22:52
BUGabundoyou can use tune2fs too22:52
BUGabundoeven on a mounted system22:52
BUGabundothere's a nifty options that do improve the OS22:53
BUGabundoresponse22:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!