| Dimmuxx | http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_64bit.html | 00:07 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimmuxx | hmmm maybe there will be no 64bit 10.1 alpha/beta then | 00:07 |
| micahg | Dimmuxx: which is why I refused to entertain the idea of packaging it in the archive :) | 00:08 |
| Dimmuxx | the security hole probably won't be targeted for linux system anyways so I can live with the old version :P | 00:10 |
| micahg | Dimmuxx: IIRC, all platforms were affected | 00:11 |
| Dimmuxx | indeed they are but to use it you still need to target linux systems for it to do any real harm | 00:11 |
| Dimmuxx | windows trojans won't work in linux :P | 00:11 |
| Dimmuxx | heh they even closed the forum for it | 00:13 |
| micahg | Dimmuxx: the forum was to discuss the alpha release | 00:13 |
| fta | http://html5test.com/ | 00:13 |
| Dimmuxx | that's pretty much a f**k you to all their testers | 00:13 |
| Dimmuxx | the statement says 10.1 64-bit linux beta, I have only seen the 10 64-bit linux alpha | 00:14 |
| Dimmuxx | so maybe there are some 10.1 64bit betas out somewhere ;) | 00:15 |
| BUGabundo | fta WTH!! 217? | 00:19 |
| BUGabundo | was at 144 | 00:19 |
| [reed] | how quickly can 10.1 be pushed out? | 01:37 |
| bobby_ | It'll be avalible on October 10th | 01:37 |
| [reed] | no | 01:37 |
| [reed] | it's released now | 01:37 |
| [reed] | no? | 01:38 |
| bobby_ | That is just the alpha 1 release | 01:38 |
| [reed] | or is that just for windows? | 01:38 |
| bobby_ | ... What are you talking about? | 01:38 |
| bobby_ | 10.10 is currently an Alpha 1 release, which is pre-beta | 01:38 |
| [reed] | no | 01:38 |
| [reed] | it was released today | 01:38 |
| micahg | [reed]: it should be out soon | 01:38 |
| [reed] | oh | 01:38 |
| [reed] | Flash 10.1 | 01:38 |
| micahg | [reed]: it's in maverick already | 01:38 |
| [reed] | not Ubuntu | 01:38 |
| [reed] | sorry | 01:38 |
| bobby_ | OOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHH.... | 01:38 |
| [reed] | micahg: ok, good | 01:38 |
| bobby_ | I was like "WTF?" | 01:38 |
| bobby_ | 10.1 is already out, but should be available in the repos soon | 01:39 |
| micahg | [reed]: tomorrow maybe? I know that the security team is working on it | 01:39 |
| [reed] | ok | 01:40 |
| [reed] | cool | 01:40 |
| [reed] | thanks | 01:40 |
| bobby_ | I built it myself already, and it is loading flash pages much faster | 01:40 |
| micahg | [reed]: do you know who I can poke about lightning bugs? | 01:40 |
| [reed] | #calendar or #sunbird on moznet or whatever? | 01:41 |
| micahg | [reed]: I've tried calendar and no one is active :( | 01:41 |
| [reed] | yeah | 01:41 |
| [reed] | it's not a very active project | 01:41 |
| micahg | [reed]: ah | 01:41 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| BUGabundo_remote | raises the sales,row to south! | 09:16 |
| fta2 | BUGabundo_remote, i score 227+10 at home | 10:13 |
| BUGabundo_remote | nice | 10:19 |
| BUGabundo_remote | let me retest | 10:19 |
| BUGabundo_remote | same here | 10:19 |
| BUGabundo_remote | didn't notice the extra bonus | 10:19 |
| fta2 | i only get 217+10 here | 10:20 |
| fta2 | same version | 10:20 |
| fta2 | different arch | 10:20 |
| fta2 | weird | 10:20 |
| BUGabundo_remote | 217+10 | 10:23 |
| BUGabundo_remote | 64bits | 10:23 |
| BUGabundo_remote | fta ff3.6 139+4 | 11:31 |
| BUGabundo_remote | ff 3.7 176+9 | 11:32 |
| gnomefreak | i think i found my zsync problem | 12:07 |
| gnomefreak | they prefer we use zsync instead os rsync they should install it by default. IIRC rsync is still default | 12:08 |
| gnomefreak | s/os/of | 12:12 |
| asac | !test | 12:17 |
| ubot4 | hrm? | 12:17 |
| gnomefreak76 | Host 'Development', running Linux 2.6.35-2-generic - Cpu0: Intel 1681 MHz; Up: 2:00; Users: 4; Load: 0.48; Free: [Mem: 35/243 Mio] [Swap: 637/714 Mio] [/: 23168/37885 Mio]; Vpenis: 30.8 cm; | 12:48 |
| gnomefreak76 | ok at least that works | 12:48 |
| gnomefreak76 | ok maybe this will work | 12:49 |
| gnomefreak76 | damnit | 12:49 |
| BUGabundo_remote | gnomefreak v*penis* ??? | 13:12 |
| gnomefreak76 | BUGabundo_remote: its part of the script | 13:13 |
| * gnomefreak76 didnt write it | 13:13 | |
| === gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| gnomefreak | ok i have to get this done. ill be back in an hour or 2 | 13:14 |
| gnomefreak | the alternate iso's came back but they are oversized. the past few weeks there are not there or they are oversized. ok im going before i throw things | 13:19 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: hey, why is seamonkey listed in http://mozilla.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/test/4173? I don't see xul listed in its depends... | 14:03 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, ara added that because it is in the PPA | 14:04 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: are we hoping to push 2.0.5 out as well or just do that some other time? | 14:04 |
| chrisccoulson | we were going to replace seamonkey 1 in the older releases at the next security update, as that's been rotting for a while now | 14:04 |
| jdstrand | ok | 14:05 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: I'm going to ignore it for now | 14:05 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, that's ok | 14:05 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: when you/others have tested it and you tell me to push the button, I'll push it to -security | 14:05 |
| chrisccoulson | thanks. we're just waiting for the proper release for that now | 14:06 |
| jdstrand | (that's normally how we handled seamonkey, since it is in universe) | 14:06 |
| jdstrand | cool, thanks | 14:06 |
| jdstrand | fta: hi! mdz told me that he upgraded to chromium-browser in lucid-proposed and that the fonts look different, especially in google docs | 14:11 |
| asac | !test | 15:34 |
| ubot4 | hrm? | 15:34 |
| BUGabundo_remote | asac: you are getting as boring as the bot | 15:38 |
| BUGabundo_remote | just join #ubuntu-offtopic | 15:38 |
| BUGabundo_remote | before your page refreshs, you know you are online or not | 15:38 |
| asac | is a bot there? | 15:38 |
| asac | no i dont know that | 15:39 |
| asac | website pages reload even after IP changed | 15:39 |
| asac | while irc stays offline for a longer time | 15:39 |
| asac | and if i get an answer from bot i at least know that everything i sent before my ping got submitted ;) | 15:40 |
| asac | anyway ... i am not in offtopic | 15:40 |
| asac | BUGabundo_remote: they dont want me to use offtopic for !test :( | 15:45 |
| * asac feels not loved | 15:45 | |
| gnomefreak | bot is in all *buntu channels | 15:48 |
| BUGabundo_remote | asac: that's NOT what I mean | 15:48 |
| gnomefreak | hell this bot wont let me log in iu dont think | 15:48 |
| gnomefreak | @login | 15:48 |
| BUGabundo_remote | asac: I meant that if you are there, or any other active channel, | 15:48 |
| gnomefreak | @whoami | 15:48 |
| ubot4 | gnomefreak: I don't recognize you. | 15:48 |
| BUGabundo_remote | you will see messages | 15:48 |
| gnomefreak | see :( | 15:48 |
| BUGabundo_remote | if you don't, then you are offline | 15:48 |
| asac | BUGabundo_remote: ok :) | 15:49 |
| asac | i might send a !test now and then here too ... just to spread the pain for lurkers ;) | 15:50 |
| asac | actually they said i should go into #test | 15:50 |
| BUGabundo_remote | yep | 15:51 |
| BUGabundo_remote | or #ubuntu-bots | 15:51 |
| BUGabundo_remote | or you can query the bot directly | 15:51 |
| * sebner hugs asac ;) | 15:58 | |
| * asac hugs sebner | 15:58 | |
| sebner | asac: do you feel loved now? :D | 15:59 |
| fta | asac, do you find adding the official repos to my dashboards useful? | 16:01 |
| fta | asac, like here: http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/chromium-daily.html | 16:01 |
| asac | fta: what does "x" mean? | 16:02 |
| asac | is that supposed to be green or red or none? | 16:02 |
| asac | in general i find it useful | 16:02 |
| fta | asac, well, it means, "i haven't decided what to put there yet" | 16:02 |
| asac | is that second table a "wrapped line" table? | 16:03 |
| fta | all arches will sure be too wide | 16:03 |
| asac | ah yeah | 16:03 |
| asac | i would say just make green | 16:03 |
| asac | and if there is a failure you could make a red with arch name | 16:03 |
| asac | like in ppas | 16:03 |
| fta | it's not really a wrapped table. i used -r --grouped --output chromium-daily.html chromium-daily/stable,beta chromium-daily/ppa,dev | 16:04 |
| fta | so it's two tables grouped on the same page | 16:04 |
| BUGabundo_remote | LOL @ (2010-06-11 16:02:52) fta: asac, well, it means, "i haven't decided what to put there yet" | 16:04 |
| fta | also, it seems only useful for me, so i'm not sure if it's worth spending more time on this | 16:05 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| micahg | jdstrand: did someone upload openjdk for the hardy backport already? | 16:26 |
| jdstrand | micahg: chrisccoulson uploaded icedtea-gcjwebplugin that fixed the issue, yes | 16:27 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - i uploaded the icedtea plugin, but that's a separate source package from openjdk isn't it? | 16:27 |
| micahg | jdstrand: so we don't need the full backport? | 16:27 |
| jdstrand | micahg: I've updated the wiki and test results page for it as well | 16:27 |
| chrisccoulson | that wasn't what you were already working on was it? | 16:27 |
| jdstrand | it is a separate source package | 16:27 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: no, I was going to do a full backport of openjdk and replace the plugin from the in source one | 16:27 |
| jdstrand | it doesn't require the new openjdk afaics | 16:27 |
| jdstrand | though, that update would be nice to have (unrelated to the ff update) | 16:28 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - ah, there's probably no need to now. i got the plugin working yesterday without doing a backport | 16:28 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: great | 16:28 |
| jdstrand | micahg: if you are doing more with that, keep me posted as I will need to redo my tests/wiki page | 16:28 |
| micahg | jdstrand: well, I'm half way done with the backport, but I could work on that later if it's not needed for this update | 16:29 |
| jdstrand | micahg: that is up to you. I'm interested in the openjdk update in as much as I like people to provide updates for universe security :) but for the firefox transition, it is not required | 16:30 |
| * micahg will go back to finishing kazekhase this weekend and midbrowser | 16:31 | |
| micahg | jdstrand: midbrowser is in main in hardy | 16:34 |
| jdstrand | micahg: noted | 16:35 |
| * jdstrand updates wiki | 16:35 | |
| micahg | jdstrand: unless chrisccoulson wants to do it today, it'll be ready monday | 16:35 |
| jdstrand | micahg: is it moving to webkit or the newer xul? | 16:36 |
| micahg | jdstrand: new xul, I think it was a custom ubuntu app that was dropped | 16:36 |
| micahg | jdstrand: ah, it was an attempt at a mobile xul browser, but we have fennec now | 16:37 |
| * jdstrand wonders about xulrunner-1.9.2 down the line... | 16:38 | |
| jdstrand | will we need to provide 1.9.3 to hardy if 1.9.2 is deprecated? I guess hardy desktop will be eol by then... | 16:39 |
| micahg | jdstrand: that's the hope :) | 16:40 |
| micahg | jdstrand: xul192 is the last xul to support PPC on OS X, so they'll probably keep it around a little longer | 16:41 |
| micahg | hopefully we can make it till next April | 16:42 |
| jdstrand | cool | 16:42 |
| * micahg is hoping Lucid can jump straight to xul-2.0.1 | 16:42 | |
| fta | jdstrand, 5.0.371 introduced some changes wrt the fonts. see http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2010/04/dev-channel-update_08.html | 16:42 |
| micahg | jdstrand: kazehakase is also missing from the wiki, but it's in universe | 16:44 |
| jdstrand | fta: thanks | 16:44 |
| fta | BUGabundo_remote, i confirm i get 227+10 on i386, and 217+10 on amd64 | 16:44 |
| BUGabundo_remote | lol | 16:44 |
| BUGabundo_remote | fail | 16:44 |
| jdstrand | micahg: yeah-- I haven't added all the universe bits cause I'm not actively testing most of them. I recommended QA get involved | 16:44 |
| micahg | jdstrand: k | 16:44 |
| jdstrand | micahg: I might have mentioned that to chrisccoulson off-channel... | 16:45 |
| fta | BUGabundo_remote, oh, i know | 16:48 |
| fta | $ grep CHROMIUM_FLAGS /etc/chromium-browser/default | 16:48 |
| fta | CHROMIUM_FLAGS="--enable-webgl --enable-extension-timeline-api" | 16:48 |
| fta | webgl gave me some points | 16:49 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| chrisccoulson | jdtrand - i figured out why its not using the freetype LCD filter now | 16:59 |
| chrisccoulson | oops, jdstrand ;) | 17:00 |
| chrisccoulson | i spelt your name wrong | 17:00 |
| jdstrand | oh cool | 17:01 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson, micahg: re universe> let me clarify slightly-- I'm not testing the universe bits as much, but I do need to have a complete list for pocket copying to -security (they just won't be in the USN). so as you upload stuff, please let me know | 17:03 |
| chrisccoulson | i've been keeping a list here as i upload things | 17:03 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| fta | BUGabundo_remote, is xserver-* upgradable for you? mine is stuck since yesterday | 17:41 |
| fta | damb | 17:41 |
| fta | n | 17:41 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, the fonts are looking really good on hardy now :) | 18:36 |
| jdstrand | \o/ | 18:36 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: so will this be in a .3 upload? | 18:37 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand - yeah, i will do a .3 upload tonight | 18:37 |
| jdstrand | nice | 18:37 |
| chrisccoulson | and then there will likely be another one next week for the last remaining font issue | 18:37 |
| chrisccoulson | but, i'm pretty much done with hardy now :) | 18:38 |
| chrisccoulson | other than testing everything is still working | 18:38 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: did you figure out the issue with totem-mozilla? | 18:38 |
| chrisccoulson | ah, no, i've got no idea what would cause that. i did another upload to put the symlinks in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, which is consistent with where we put them on lucid | 18:39 |
| chrisccoulson | but that doesn't solve your issue | 18:39 |
| chrisccoulson | it's like something deleted all the symlinks from your plugins folder ;) | 18:39 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: well, flash worked, and it isn't in /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins | 18:40 |
| jdstrand | actually, hold on... | 18:40 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, yeah, flash works because it is in /usr/lib/firefox/plugins and /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins | 18:41 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: openjdk seems to work, and it isn't in /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins | 18:43 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: I purged and installed totem-mozilla and still nothing | 18:43 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, yeah, that's in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins too | 18:43 |
| chrisccoulson | hmmmm | 18:43 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: maybe totem-mozilla should be put in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins since that seems to work? | 18:43 |
| === BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_vacati | ||
| === BUGabundo_vacati is now known as BUGa_vacations | ||
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, it should be in there now (i did that with the last upload) | 18:44 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: ubuntu4? | 18:44 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, it's currently ubuntu3.8.04.3 | 18:45 |
| chrisccoulson | where did you get ubuntu4 from? :) | 18:45 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: I didn't upgrade yet and guessed that is what you used, since you used ubuntu3 before | 18:46 |
| chrisccoulson | ah, ubuntu3 is the version in -updates | 18:46 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: let me try that one. if it works, I'll stop pestering you about it :) | 18:46 |
| chrisccoulson | i hope it works, otherwise i'm completely confused ;) | 18:47 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: that update fixes it here. thanks! | 18:53 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, excellent, that's ok then :) | 18:53 |
| chrisccoulson | i will start on karmic now | 18:54 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: when you have the final hardy ff package, I'll run my tests through with clean VMs | 18:54 |
| * jdstrand updates wiki and QA page | 18:54 | |
| jdstrand | micahg: are you working on midbrowser? I get "Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.0.1 and 1.9.0.1... | 20:18 |
| jdstrand | micahg: that is with the released version.. | 20:19 |
| micahg | jdstrand: yeah, this weekend | 20:19 |
| jdstrand | that is a fairly nower version range ;) | 20:19 |
| jdstrand | nower? | 20:19 |
| jdstrand | narrow | 20:19 |
| jdstrand | micahg: k | 20:19 |
| micahg | jdstrand: yeah, I'll try to make it variable like the rest of the xul apps | 20:20 |
| jdstrand | cool, thanks | 20:20 |
| fta | micahg, the timeout bug didn't move an inch :( | 20:29 |
| * micahg checks the archvie admin queue | 20:30 | |
| micahg | jdstrand: you have time for bug 591758 today? | 20:30 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 591758 in tct (Ubuntu) "please remove 'timeout' from Maverick (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/591758 | 20:31 |
| micahg | fta: wait | 20:31 |
| micahg | fta: it's still being built, we need a new upload that doesn't build it | 20:32 |
| * micahg doesn't see why it would build in ubuntu and not debian | 20:33 | |
| jdstrand | micahg: that bug is not clear to me. tct is in unstable, and we both have the same version | 20:34 |
| micahg | jdstrand: yeah, I just noticed that... | 20:34 |
| micahg | jdstrand: so, do we need an upload to drop the timeout binary and then have archive admin remove it? | 20:34 |
| jdstrand | tct is also in universe, so anything in main or restricted won't pull that into a build | 20:34 |
| micahg | jdstrand: the binary was removed in debian w/out removing it from the package | 20:35 |
| jdstrand | micahg: that would be one way to do it. it would be best to just follow Debian. Is there a Debian bug reference? | 20:35 |
| jdstrand | oh, that is weird | 20:35 |
| * micahg looks for it | 20:35 | |
| micahg | debian 570997 | 20:36 |
| ubot4 | Debian bug 570997 in ftp.debian.org "RM: timeout -- ROM; uninstallable; superseded by coreutils" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/570997 | 20:36 |
| * micahg wonders why they didn't do a -2 to drop the binary first | 20:37 | |
| micahg | jdstrand: ^^^ | 20:37 |
| jdstrand | micahg: in that case, a Debian bug should be filed, it should get fixed in 0.19-2 at which point we can sync it | 20:37 |
| jdstrand | micahg: yeah | 20:37 |
| micahg | jdstrand: k, should you unsub archive admin from our bug until that happens? | 20:37 |
| jdstrand | yes | 20:38 |
| micahg | jdstrand: k, thanks | 20:38 |
| jdstrand | I can do that and add a reference | 20:38 |
| micahg | fta: so, do you want to file the bug for debian to release a 1.19-2 to drop the binary? | 20:38 |
| micahg | fta: or I can do it over the weekend | 20:38 |
| fta | micahg, please do. i'm bad at following bugs elsewhere | 20:39 |
| micahg | fta: k, will do | 20:39 |
| fta | thanks | 20:39 |
| micahg | np | 20:39 |
| fta | jdstrand, micahg: just fyi, the reason i filed the timeout bug is that it broke chromium in maverick. it was fine in a ppa, but someone sync coreutils from debian in the meantime :( | 21:04 |
| jdstrand | hmm | 21:05 |
| jdstrand | fta: that is the latest security relevant one? | 21:05 |
| fta | yes | 21:05 |
| jdstrand | fta: I'll see what I can do. I'm unable to login to perform the removal atm | 21:10 |
| fta | thanks | 21:11 |
| === BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_is_MAD | ||
| === BUGa_is_MAD is now known as BUGa_depressed | ||
| micahg | fta: does switching the order to coreutils > 7,5 | timeout help? | 21:34 |
| jdstrand | fwiw, it is removed | 21:34 |
| fta | micahg, no: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50008608/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-i386.chromium-browser_5.0.375.70~r48679-0ubuntu2~ucd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 21:34 |
| fta | i still see it in apt-cache policy timeout, i guess it takes some time to reach the index | 21:36 |
| micahg | fta: that seems to just have timeout | 21:36 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson, micahg: fyi, ctxextensions doesn't work, but I couldn't get it to work in hardy with 3.0.19 either. see the QA tracker for details | 22:06 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand - yeah, that was my experience too. i'm not too bothered about making things work that didn't work before | 22:06 |
| jdstrand | no, me either | 22:06 |
| jdstrand | hence the 'fyi' :) | 22:06 |
| micahg | +it's in universe | 22:07 |
| jdstrand | though I could go to the upstream site and get it to work with 3.0.19, so it probably a packaging bug | 22:07 |
| jdstrand | (ie, by installing the xpi directly) | 22:07 |
| BUGa_depressed | fta: Jun 11 22:07:23 BluBUG kernel: [12916.541271] chromium-browse[22510]: segfault at 8 ip 0000000000f5fd6c sp 00007fff93765ca0 error 4 in chromium-browser[400000+27e2000] | 22:07 |
| jdstrand | anyhoo, I gave extensions a PASS on the wiki for what I tested and what others reported | 22:08 |
| micahg | jdstrand: chrisccoulson: I can try to look at it after I finish my other packaging tasks this weekend | 22:08 |
| jdstrand | (but noted the ctxextensions issue) | 22:08 |
| jdstrand | micahg: imho it would be a fairly low priority | 22:08 |
| micahg | jdstrand: k, so karmic updates would come first then? | 22:09 |
| jdstrand | it's broke now, it will continue to be broken | 22:09 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, i wouldn't waste too much time looking at things which already don't work | 22:09 |
| jdstrand | micahg: oh yes :) | 22:09 |
| micahg | k | 22:09 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, karmic would be better | 22:09 |
| * micahg hopes to accomplish something this weekend :) | 22:09 | |
| jdstrand | heh | 22:09 |
| === BUGa_depressed is now known as BUGabundo | ||
| fta | BUGabundo, me too. chromium-browse[22083]: segfault at 4 ip 08ba5177 sp bfa72e90 error 4 in chromium-browser[8048000+23c5000] | 22:22 |
| BUGabundo | got the log filled with those | 22:23 |
| BUGabundo | serious? | 22:23 |
| fta | BUGabundo, but i didn't loose any window. it's just the new flash crashing | 22:23 |
| BUGabundo | or just oververbose? | 22:23 |
| BUGabundo | yeah I got that at work | 22:23 |
| BUGabundo | flash crashed a few times | 22:23 |
| BUGabundo | didn't notice it here, yet | 22:23 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: build7 for 3.6.4 FYI | 22:46 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - cool, will get that uploaded in a bit | 22:46 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: thanks | 22:47 |
| Dimmuxx | what's fixed in build 7? | 23:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!