[00:09] dinner [00:10] bleh [01:55] Is calling people out on the CoC really ok, considering they may not have even read it, let alone signed it? [01:56] * funkyHat gently pokes IdleOne [01:56] well, its Spacey [01:56] of course I may not be in posession of all the facts in this case [01:57] not many facts in that debate [01:58] funkyHat: sup dude ? [01:58] not signing the CoC does not mean that they don't have to abide by the channel rules [01:59] triple negative! [01:59] -ot is different I get that but the channel can be different and still follow the rules [02:00] IdleOne: the channel rules sure [02:00] obeying the CoC noted in the guidelines [02:00] Oh drat! [02:00] funkyHat: the CoC is a way of thinking, not a set of rules. They clearly state that respectfulness is a must at ALL times [02:01] s/they/it [02:01] I know I am being a little bit of a pain about this but -ot can be so much of a better place [02:02] -ot *is* far too lax [02:03] -ot in my mind is supposed to be a place where people can join and discuss a variety of topics intelligently. I think we can do that without the name calling and chasing out every person who comes in with a different point of view [02:06] funkyHat: btw I love spacey too. I consider him a friend but I can't let my friends slide. wrong is wrong and I will call it out every time I see it [02:52] FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (banlist filling up (this is a test, and might not detect a full banlist correctly, please report problems to LjL): 452) [04:02] FloodBot2 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (banlist filling up (this is a test, and might not detect a full banlist correctly, please report problems to LjL): 451) [06:12] FloodBot3 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (banlist filling up (this is a test, and might not detect a full banlist correctly, please report problems to LjL): 451) [06:55] In ubottu, Guest59509 said: your name is interesting [07:39] heads up on jungli === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth [09:04] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (banlist filling up (this is a test, and might not detect a full banlist correctly, please report problems to LjL): 451) [10:39] FloodBot1 called the ops in #ubuntu-ops-monitor (banlist filling up (this is a test, and might not detect a full banlist correctly, please report problems to LjL): 451) [11:15] is it /mode #channel +e to see the exemptions? [11:16] I believe so, I've just removed a good few of my bans, for some reason ubottu is not updating BT with all the ones I removed though [11:16] or simply /mode [11:16] whoops [11:16] /mode #channel e [11:36] I'll clear the exemptions if someone can confirm either of the above (not all , obviously, just the older ones) [11:48] i muted alabd on -ot, will think about him again tomorrow. if i forget, feel free to remove the +q [11:48] not that his contribution will be missed [11:54] to be honest, I think we have to be very careful if he is writing a book [11:54] he's using random peoples opinions as fact in a book (assuming he's telling the truth)) [12:06] tsimpson, you around? [12:12] 12:11 -!- poprazi [jungli@gateway/shell/bshellz.net/x-chtfoedqoucysnit] has left #ubuntu [] [12:12] same guy again [12:13] yep. but not trolled of late [12:13] what's the format for the indent ban in the new irc-server [12:13] is it still i=ident!nick!@host [12:13] I had a lengthy PM with him, and he knows any more of the 'ubuntards' or 'how to fix my redhat' will not be acceptable [12:14] yet he's just come in and said fuck suse [12:14] whoa missed that [12:14] need to work out the ident ban [12:14] nice catch, missed that [12:15] what about *!*@gateway/shell/bshellz.net/x-chtfoedqoucysnit [12:15] could someone confirm the correct format for ident specific ban for ircd-7 [12:15] bazhang: I thought that would be fine, however I learnt the other day that bzhellz last part isn't unique to the user [12:16] only the ident is [12:16] just caught that from ##linux [12:16] however he's not only the only problem user from bshellz, I think it's time we looked at banning the same way as the freenode gateway [12:16] I may put it on the agenda for the next council meeting [12:16] ikonia, not sure then, thought gateway users were getting a cloak , according to freenode wallop [12:17] though perhaps a different issue entirely, never mind me [12:17] I've not read the new stuff on the freenode webchat yet, I just meant in theory [12:34] ikonia, jayne is active now [12:34] jayne: can you confirm the correct format for an ident ban please ? [12:35] like /mode ##channel +b *!*ident@* you mean? [12:35] no as in ident@ [12:36] eg: nick = ikonia, ident = mattd, host = unafilliated/ikonia [12:36] so I'd want to ban ikonia i=mattd@unafilliated/ikonia [12:36] I want the mattd part [12:36] want it from what? [12:37] if you want to ban anyone using the ident of mattd, then *!*mattd@* [12:37] should it not be *!mattd@* or is *!*mattd@* right ? [12:38] if you know identd is in use (unlike yourself, for example), then you can drop the * [12:38] for example, I have an ident running, so there's no ~ [12:38] that's simpler than I remember it, thank you jayne [12:38] perfect [12:38] you don't have an identd running, so you get ~mattd instead === nik0 is now known as niko [12:38] yeah, we got rid of the i=/n= thing when we left hyperion [12:39] Do people still use identds? [12:39] jpds: sometimes. I mostly consider it useful for cloaked gateways [12:39] and shell providers that we know about [12:39] ... basically any time we know the users can't fake the ident [12:40] Oh, yeah. [12:40] odd, a user called text just pm'd me to tell me he saw my real name when he whois'd me and did I know it was showing my name [12:41] and was I "ok" with that [12:50] ikonia: Everyone is anonymous on the Internest. [12:52] bazhang: I am now [13:00] tsimpson, hi [13:01] hi [13:01] just wanted confirmation on removing exemptions; should be /mode #channel e to see them? [13:01] yes, but you need to be +o to see them [13:01] then /mode #channel -eeee to remove them [13:01] okay thanks tsimpson [13:01] yeah [13:02] one 'e' for every exempt up to 4 per line [13:02] just getting the -ops-monitor warnings of late, wanted to see if that would reduce or eliminate them [13:02] okay [13:02] I cleared out the +e list a day or two ago, didn't make much difference [13:03] oh right [13:03] well nice to have the knowledge nonetheless (will note down this conversation) [13:03] it should probably go in the operator guide document too [13:04] good point === gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak [13:38] !login [13:38] use @login [13:38] bah [13:38] i am such a numpty [13:38] @login [13:38] The operation succeeded. [13:38] @btlogin [13:39] * jussi hugs popey [13:39] got a fool in -uk being a bit of a troll, wondered if he was known [13:39] Russnix [13:42] popey: yeah, i noticed. I havent seen him before [13:42] me neither [13:42] popey: you know you can do @bansearch russnix [13:42] handy [13:42] thanks [13:42] very :) [13:43] yw [13:44] i get no results searching via the web interface for his nick, but @bansearch russnix returns two results. odd? [13:44] or am I 'doing it wrong' [13:45] no [13:45] because @bansearch uses ip [13:46] oh wait [13:46] no [13:46] its because he is using the gateway thats been banforwarded to proxy users [13:47] nothing to worry about - if you logged in using web chat it would be same [13:50] no, i'm not worrying about that, more the discrepancy between bansearch showing stuff and the website not [13:53] popey: yeah, its simple, just like I can switch nick and still be on the same host. @bansearch searches the host, not the nick [13:53] it looks at the user, pulls their host and searches that [14:43] !ping [14:43] pong [14:43] okay. [15:35] Why is autobleh telling me Fooey, Not Opped. I haven't done anything in a while :( [15:37] h00k: the new servers? [15:37] i havent tried it in a while [15:44] gnomefreak: the new servers? [15:44] h00k: sorry dont remember but it was a while ago [15:45] a couple of months but they just updated webchat maybe that is the issue [15:45] I think I figured it out, I had accidentally done /opme on an ircd server running from localhost and didn't have permissions [15:45] and autobleh still rememberd I wanted to op and was echoing that in channels I am in [15:45] I think since I've opped, it has since forgotten. [15:46] You could try unloading and reloading it? [15:46] I think I'm set, I saw: [15:46] 09:44 We've been opped [15:46] 09:44 Expiring action: "I've wanted to op h00k in #arg on since 1276139239" because of time [15:46] but it says expiring so I am guessing it is forgetting [15:50] there, I unloaded and reloaded. === nik0 is now known as niko [20:26] Hi, I was having an intermittent connection earlier, and it has now stabilized. Please allow me back into #ubuntu and #ubuntu-server. [20:26] RudyValencia: sure, one moment. [20:26] Thanks. [20:26] RudyValencia: You're all set. :) [20:27] Thanks. [20:33] !bestbot could alias with !best [20:33] Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) [20:33] !bestbot [20:33] !best [20:33] Usually, there is no single "best" application to perform a given task. It's up to you to choose, depending on your preferences, features you require, and other factors. Do NOT take polls in the channel. If you insist on getting people's opinions, ask BestBot in #ubuntu-bots. [20:33] !-best [20:33] best aliases: good, better, preference, polls, opinion, poll, favorite, favourite - added by LjL on 2006-07-21 01:18:13 - last edited by LjL on 2008-04-03 17:11:44 [20:34] !bestbot is best [20:34] I'll remember that, Pici [20:34] h00k: ding! [20:34] !bestbot [20:34] ta-da! Pici, you rock. [20:46] In ubottu, shadeslayer said: !ebook is FBReader is a ebook reader which supports several open e-book formats: fb2, html, chm, plucker, [20:46] In ubottu, shadeslayer said: !ebook is FBReader is a ebook reader which supports several open e-book formats: fb2, html, chm, plucker,palmdoc, ztxt, tcr (psion text), rtf, oeb, openreader, non-DRM'ed mobipocket, plain text, epub. To install type << sudo apt-get install fbreader >> [21:27] !dma [21:28] dma is Direct Memory Access/Addressing. It makes hardware transfer data faster, and is almost always enabled in Ubuntu 6.06. For more info see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DMA [21:28] in 6.06 ?! [21:28] hi, !dma seems to need an update :-) [21:29] how? [21:29] guntbert: you /just/ missed my comment about it :) [21:30] what would be the new info? [21:30] h00k: ah, I should have known you would spot it - thx for the support just now in #ubuntu [21:30] !dma [21:30] dma is Direct Memory Access/Addressing. It makes hardware transfer data faster, and is almost always enabled in Ubuntu 6.06. For more info see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DMA [21:31] 'enabled in 6.06' fantastic, but what about the latter? [21:32] have a nice time with it :-) -- bye [21:32] !dma is Direct Memory Access/Addressing. It makes hardware transfer data faster, and is supported by most systems since 2002. [21:32] In #ubuntu-ops, h00k said: !dma is Direct Memory Access/Addressing. It makes hardware transfer data faster, and is supported by most systems since 2002. [21:32] for more info, etc, etc. [21:32] !dma is Direct Memory Access/Addressing. It makes hardware transfer data faster, and is supported by most systems since 2002. For more info see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DMA [21:32] In #ubuntu-ops, h00k said: !dma is Direct Memory Access/Addressing. It makes hardware transfer data faster, and is supported by most systems since 2002. For more info see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DMA [21:32] there we go. [21:44] should be !dma is etc etc ; [21:45] !dma is Direct Memory Access/Addressing. It makes hardware transfer data faster, and is supported by most systems since 2002. For more info see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DMA [21:45] In #ubuntu-ops, knome said: !dma is Direct Memory Access/Addressing. It makes hardware transfer data faster, and is supported by most systems since 2002. For more info see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DMA [21:45] yeah. that. [21:45] bazhang, there you go [21:45] !dma is Direct Memory Access/Addressing. It makes hardware transfer data faster, and is supported by most systems since 2002. For more info see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DMA [21:45] But dma already means something else! [21:46] whoops [21:46] !dma [21:46] dma is Direct Memory Access/Addressing. It makes hardware transfer data faster, and is almost always enabled in Ubuntu 6.06. For more info see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DMA [21:46] har :) [21:46] any changes needed? [22:02] is running as root supported? I know changing the root password is not [22:02] like !noroot? !rootirc ? [22:03] no, like, someone in #ubuntu running as root user, apparently [22:04] should use sudo -i afaik