=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk
[01:12] <mathiaz> kees: hi - could you confirm that libpam-ccreds can be moved to main (bug 523354)?
[01:12] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 523354 in libpam-ccreds (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libpam-ccreds" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/523354
=== beek is now known as kentb
[02:25] <psusi> damn.... the 2tb wraparound happens on lucid amd64 too
[02:25] <psusi> with device mapper targets
=== \vish is now known as vish
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
[10:44] <nigelb> kees: Is the gcc task on bug 534459 valid since the orginal bug seems to be fixed
[10:44] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 534459 in gcc-4.4 (Ubuntu) "2.6-2 FTBFS on sparc (bus error in test cases)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/534459
=== Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
[11:56] <ghostcube_> hmmm, has there been any change from 9.10 to 10.04 about the nvidia drivers. cause in 10.04 my x3 game isnt starting anmore claiming not finding any working driver for grafic
[11:56] <ghostcube_> it needs 32 bit support but this worked fine in 9.10
[11:57] <ghostcube_> iam on 64 bit ubuntu 10.04
[14:58] <un214> anybody know how to replace the entire set of boot scripts?
[16:54] <LucidFox> Why is REVU so stagnant, I wonder
[16:55] <LucidFox> it has packages from more than a year ago
[16:55] <LucidFox> in the "needs review" section
[17:03] <nigelb> LucidFox: because we dont have too many people interested at doing the hard work of a thorough review
[17:04] <nigelb> LucidFox: if you have a new package, my suggestion would be to try to get it to debian and then sync'd to ubuntu
[17:07] <sebner> nigelb: don't worry, he can upload by himself ;=
[17:07] <sebner> *;)
[17:07] <LucidFox> she :)
[17:07] <sebner> LucidFox: haha, never noticed that for years :D
[17:07] <LucidFox> sebner> And well, I need the package reviewed by another developer first, right?
[17:08] <sebner> LucidFox: good but not a requirement
[17:08] <LucidFox> ...Really? I can upload new packages straight to NEW?
[17:09] <sebner> LucidFox: Aren't your MOTU for months/years now? O_o
[17:09] <nigelb> sebner: aha, she's awesome, I forget
[17:09] <sebner> *you
[17:09] <LucidFox> I am
[17:09] <LucidFox> But the REVU policy has always stated that packages by MOTUs need one more MOTU to review before they can leave REVU
[17:09] <sebner> LucidFox: you are missing a lot then :P
[17:10] <sebner> LucidFox: nah, in general it's adviced to do a peer review regarding improving quality but it's not a requirement, never was
[17:10] <LucidFox> I'm not sure MOTU even exists as a separate team now, though - I've noticed there were some merges, like with the sponsors and SRU teams.
[17:11] <nigelb> LucidFox: MOTU exists, but there are a few changes
[17:12] <LucidFox> I knew I always *could* upload packages to NEW in the sense that there was no technical restriction on that, but I assumed there was a policy restriction.
[17:32] <ScottK> LucidFox: MOTU still exists and will continue to exist.
[20:49] <LucidFox> apachelogger> I read your gmail address as "sister.harald" at first o_O
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[21:43] <lifeless> pitti: ping
[21:43] <lifeless> pitti: why did you drop the vcs-bzr header from the pm-utils-powersave-policy package ?
=== almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan
=== al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away
[21:50] <geser> lifeless: apt-get source informs if it sees a Vcs-* header that the package is maintained in that vcs and changes should be made there. it this isn't the case anymore than the field should get updated or dropped to not misguide.
[22:56] <lifeless> geser: yes, I know.
[22:56] <lifeless> geser: that doesn't explain why pitti removed it, and thats why I'm asking him why!