[01:12] <mathiaz> kees: hi - could you confirm that libpam-ccreds can be moved to main (bug 523354)?
[02:25] <psusi> damn.... the 2tb wraparound happens on lucid amd64 too
[02:25] <psusi> with device mapper targets
[10:44] <nigelb> kees: Is the gcc task on bug 534459 valid since the orginal bug seems to be fixed
[11:56] <ghostcube_> hmmm, has there been any change from 9.10 to 10.04 about the nvidia drivers. cause in 10.04 my x3 game isnt starting anmore claiming not finding any working driver for grafic
[11:56] <ghostcube_> it needs 32 bit support but this worked fine in 9.10
[11:57] <ghostcube_> iam on 64 bit ubuntu 10.04
[14:58] <un214> anybody know how to replace the entire set of boot scripts?
[16:54] <LucidFox> Why is REVU so stagnant, I wonder
[16:55] <LucidFox> it has packages from more than a year ago
[16:55] <LucidFox> in the "needs review" section
[17:03] <nigelb> LucidFox: because we dont have too many people interested at doing the hard work of a thorough review
[17:04] <nigelb> LucidFox: if you have a new package, my suggestion would be to try to get it to debian and then sync'd to ubuntu
[17:07] <sebner> nigelb: don't worry, he can upload by himself ;=
[17:07] <sebner> *;)
[17:07] <LucidFox> she :)
[17:07] <sebner> LucidFox: haha, never noticed that for years :D
[17:07] <LucidFox> sebner> And well, I need the package reviewed by another developer first, right?
[17:08] <sebner> LucidFox: good but not a requirement
[17:08] <LucidFox> ...Really? I can upload new packages straight to NEW?
[17:09] <sebner> LucidFox: Aren't your MOTU for months/years now? O_o
[17:09] <nigelb> sebner: aha, she's awesome, I forget
[17:09] <sebner> *you
[17:09] <LucidFox> I am
[17:09] <LucidFox> But the REVU policy has always stated that packages by MOTUs need one more MOTU to review before they can leave REVU
[17:09] <sebner> LucidFox: you are missing a lot then :P
[17:10] <sebner> LucidFox: nah, in general it's adviced to do a peer review regarding improving quality but it's not a requirement, never was
[17:10] <LucidFox> I'm not sure MOTU even exists as a separate team now, though - I've noticed there were some merges, like with the sponsors and SRU teams.
[17:11] <nigelb> LucidFox: MOTU exists, but there are a few changes
[17:12] <LucidFox> I knew I always *could* upload packages to NEW in the sense that there was no technical restriction on that, but I assumed there was a policy restriction.
[17:32] <ScottK> LucidFox: MOTU still exists and will continue to exist.
[20:49] <LucidFox> apachelogger> I read your gmail address as "sister.harald" at first o_O
[21:43] <lifeless> pitti: ping
[21:43] <lifeless> pitti: why did you drop the vcs-bzr header from the pm-utils-powersave-policy package ?
[21:50] <geser> lifeless: apt-get source informs if it sees a Vcs-* header that the package is maintained in that vcs and changes should be made there. it this isn't the case anymore than the field should get updated or dropped to not misguide.
[22:56] <lifeless> geser: yes, I know.
[22:56] <lifeless> geser: that doesn't explain why pitti removed it, and thats why I'm asking him why!