[11:49] <CIA-4> debian-installer: cjwatson * r1317 ubuntu/ (5 files in 5 dirs): Remove a few last vestiges of lpia.
[12:59] <ev> michaelforrest: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/06/proposed-ubuntu-1010-installer-changes.html - in the event you haven't seen it yet
[13:35] <michaelforrest> ev: I hadn't. I was going to comment but then there were too many comments :S
[13:36] <ev> largely positive, and the major negative comments seem to all be non-issues ("don't remove the manual partitioner")
[13:36] <ev> so, yay
[13:36] <michaelforrest> :)
[13:36] <ev> michaelforrest: any time tomorrow to go over the comments I've added to the spec?  I'll be back in the office then.
[13:41] <michaelforrest> absolutely.
[13:43] <michaelforrest> shoulda known I'd get pulled up about that bootcamp thing.
[13:44] <ev> nothing wrong with working off a proven design
[14:43] <michaelforrest> ev: my friend said "one thing that I found worrying when I installed Ubuntu was that I couldn't seem to choose which partition I wanted Ubuntu to be installed in, it always chose the first free partition, but this was smaller than my third, empty partition which I wanted to use"
[14:43] <michaelforrest> ev: do you know why this might have happened?
[14:47] <ev> it sounds like it offered to resize a partition as the default, with the use largest unpartitioned space option appearing as another, unselected, radio button.  Does that sound right to you?
[14:49] <ev> michaelforrest: ^
[14:50] <ev> If that's the case, that's currently the way the automatic partitioning page works.  We should probably flip that, should we keep around the option to use unpartitioned space.