[00:32] <arand> Is LP upload (dput) speed capped at around ~120KiB/s ?
[06:49] <MTecknology> Can anyone tell me what project Bug #214349 belongs to?
[07:10] <poolie> MTecknology, not one i can view :)
[07:11] <MTecknology> poolie: I can't either :P
[07:12] <poolie> why do you want to know?
[07:13] <MTecknology> poolie: I was just curious what project it's assigned to
[07:14] <poolie> i just wondered where you hit that bug number
[07:15] <MTecknology> poolie: I saw it linked to from bug 193830
[07:15] <poolie> heh
[07:16] <MTecknology> poolie: that one I do have access to :P
[07:16] <MTecknology> but there's nothing private in it..
[07:17] <MTecknology> poolie: actually - 193830 has no private info in it - but because it's duplicate is i assume this shoudl stay that way - so idk what to do
[07:18] <poolie> i think 214349 is about a private canonical project
[07:18] <poolie> is it a dupe of the 193 bug or is it just mentioned?
[07:18] <poolie> if it's just mentioned there's no harm making it public
[07:18] <poolie> i'm not sure what happens to privacy across dupes
[07:19] <poolie> i guess you could ask on your bug whether anyone objects
[07:19] <MTecknology> poolie: 214349 is marked as a dupe of 193830
[07:19] <poolie> if you want to open 193830 you should do so
[07:19] <poolie> i would be very surprised if doing so makes public a bug you're not allowed to even read at the moment
[07:20] <poolie> if it does we can always change it back
[07:21] <MTecknology> poolie: ok, thanks
[07:21] <MTecknology> poolie: I'll try to grab input tomorrow when the team is awak otherwise i'll do it
[07:21] <poolie> andfile a bug :)
[07:22] <MTecknology> for?
[07:23] <poolie> against malone for causing it to open a private dupe when you open the private master
[07:24] <MTecknology> i think i filed a bug about something like that but i'm not sober enough to remember if it's exactly the same thing :P
[07:25] <MTecknology> in addition to being way too tired
[07:25] <MTecknology> poolie: thanks for the info and i'll make a note to make a bug report
[10:52] <bdrung_> hi, can someone hand over the ownership of https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/eclipse-ubuntu/debian to the eclipse-team and move it into the eclipse projects (to ~eclipse-team/eclipse/debian)?
[11:01] <ibuclaw> Hello. Can I add Ubuntu Maverick as a source dependency for my PPA?
[11:02] <bigjools> ibuclaw: if you're building a maverick source in your PPA that's automatic
[11:02] <ibuclaw> bigjools, mkay, might as well do that then =)
[16:07] <arand> Is there a cap of ~120KiB/s of dputting to PPAs
[16:14] <beuno> arand, I don't think there is
[20:06] <kirkland> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/450226/
[20:06] <kirkland> can anyone help me with that?
[20:06] <kirkland> bzr annoyances
[20:06] <kirkland> different rich root support monkey business
[20:06] <kirkland> trying to upgrade
[20:07] <kirkland> it poops
[20:13] <maxb> kirkland: Hi. The problem is simply that the branch has been upgraded before, and the backup from the previous try exists where bzr is trying to backup for this try
[20:14] <kirkland> maxb: can i kill the old backup?
[20:14] <maxb> Yes, you can, just with simple file operations
[20:15] <maxb> I have yet to find an sftp client that I actually like, so I usually mount the branch using sshfs, so I can just rm -rf backup.bzr
[20:17] <rockstar> maxb, lp:hitchhiker FTW.
[20:17] <rockstar> maxb, hitchhiker lp:<branch> rmtree backup.bzr
[21:37] <kirkland> is this a temporary error?
[21:37] <kirkland> bzr: ERROR: Cannot lock LockDir(lp-69727568:///~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/lucid/qemu-kvm/lucid/.bzr/branchlock): Transport operation not possible: readonly transport
[21:44] <maxb> kirkland: Sounds like "You don't have write access to this branch" to me
[21:46] <maxb> kirkland: have you slightly mangled that error in copy/paste?
[21:46] <maxb> I'd expect .bzr/branch/lock or .bzr/branch-lock not .bzr/branchlock
[21:47] <kirkland> maxb: no, it's not mangled
[21:47] <kirkland> maxb: that's what it says
[21:47] <kirkland> maxb: oh, well, i just dput the source package anyway
[21:47] <kirkland> maxb: maybe this is one of the auto-generated packaging branches?
[21:48] <kirkland> maxb: the ones that process uploads and import them automagically?
[21:48] <lifeless> kirkland: if you can upload to the package, the branch should let you write to is.
[21:49] <lifeless> kirkland: can you upload to qemu-kvm ?
[21:49] <lifeless> kirkland: and what was the url you pushed to ?
[21:50] <kirkland> lifeless: yes, i can upload qemu-kvm
[21:50] <kirkland> lifeless: maybe because it's a lucid branch?
[21:50] <kirkland> lifeless: and that's closed?
[21:50] <kirkland> lifeless: SRU-only?
[21:50] <kirkland> lifeless: this is an sru...
[21:51] <lifeless> kirkland: sounds like you want to be pushing to lucid-proposed.
[21:52] <kirkland> oh?
[21:52]  * kirkland tries that
[21:52] <lifeless> no?
[21:52] <lifeless> its what I would expect :)
[21:52] <kirkland> lifeless: $ bzr push lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/qemu-kvm
[21:52] <kirkland> bzr: ERROR: Invalid url supplied to transport: "lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/qemu-kvm": qemu-kvm in lucid-proposed has no default branch.
[21:52] <lifeless> please raise this on the udd list.
[21:53] <lifeless> And as a bug on the udd project.