[09:50] <Daviey> Hmm.. Is something up with cd image creation?  Not seeing a daily for maverick server?
[09:51] <Daviey> infact, not seeing any flavours :/
[09:52] <Daviey> sorry, am seeing some flavours
[10:29] <cjwatson> Daviey: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ show anything interesting?
[10:29] <cjwatson> Missing debootstrap-required gnupg-curl
[10:29] <cjwatson> CD1 missing some packages needed by debootstrap
[10:29] <cjwatson> make: *** [/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/scratch/ubuntu-server/daily/tmp/maverick-amd64/packages-stamp] Error 1
[10:29] <cjwatson> ERROR WHILE BUILDING OFFICIAL IMAGES !!
[10:29] <cjwatson> OK, so this is an archive problem, will fix
[10:30] <cjwatson> (this happens when packages are dropped out of the ubuntu-minimal set)
[10:31] <cjwatson> and I managed to drop a whole slew of packages out of ubuntu-minimal recently by a change to gnupg
[10:31] <cjwatson> fixed for next publisher run, next build after that should work
[10:32] <cjwatson> thanks
[11:03] <Riddell> when I do backports with mass-sync I get a big ********** FAILED SYNCS ********** back, can someone else try?
[11:04] <Riddell> backport 594608 qtgain
[12:50] <ScottL> should I be concerned that daily ISOs for ubuntu studio have not been built in two days?
[12:54] <cjwatson> ScottL: have you checked the build logs?
[12:55] <cjwatson> ScottL: it's probably the same breakage as other alternate/server CDs, though, and as such should be fixed for the next build
[12:55] <cjwatson> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntustudio/
[12:56] <cjwatson> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntustudio/maverick/daily-20100616.log, search for "ERROR WHILE" - yes, it's the same problem
[12:56] <cjwatson> but certainly worth reporting in general if you can't figure it out from the build logs
[13:06] <ScottL> cjwatson, thank you for the links, i shall look into the logs when i get to work :)
[13:07] <ScottL> i shall have to add those to my growing ubuntu studio related bookmarks ;)
[14:33] <Daviey> cjwatson: Sorry for the delayed reply.. thanks for looking into that