| === flacoste is now known as flacoste_afk | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-dinner | ||
| === flacoste_afk is now known as flacoste | ||
| wgrant | spm: Users can deactivate their accounts, right..? | 03:14 |
|---|---|---|
| spm | wg-rant: deactivate yes; purge no | 03:14 |
| spm | if you appreciate the difference. we get very few requests for the latter, but enough. | 03:14 |
| wgrant | How do you purge? Merge them away? | 03:14 |
| spm | sql nullify the relevant bits in the appropriate tables | 03:15 |
| wgrant | Ah. | 03:15 |
| spm | not ... pretty, but. | 03:15 |
| spm | actually.. I think that's correct. verifying... | 03:15 |
| spm | bleh. it's not docco'd. but that'd be the likely way. | 03:17 |
| spm | wgrant: heh, ref the 'ssh codebounce' I'd typed that much and was starting to get frustrated at why ssh tab completion wasn't. then the light came on. whee. :-D | 03:18 |
| wgrant | Heh. | 03:19 |
| wgrant | It's not a DNS alias yet? :( | 03:19 |
| spm | that would be .. unwise :-) | 03:23 |
| spm | i know we have cocobanana as an alias for a rollout target. but generally we do limit our moments of ... public silliness :-) | 03:24 |
| wgrant | Pfft. | 03:25 |
| lifeless | thumper: hi | 05:45 |
| lifeless | thumper: Can we have a 5 minute pre-impl call ? | 05:45 |
| thumper | lifeless: sure | 05:48 |
| lifeless | when suits? now would be great for me | 05:49 |
| thumper | lifeless: now is fine | 05:49 |
| thumper | lifeless: you dropped | 05:51 |
| lifeless | can you hear me ? | 05:53 |
| lifeless | [120531.779865] iwlagn 0000:02:00.0: Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x2000000. | 05:53 |
| ajmitch | iwlagn isn't the most stable of wireless drivers, I've had problems with it at times that required rmmod & modprobe | 05:54 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| adeuring | good morning | 08:22 |
| mrevell_ | Morning | 08:58 |
| === mrevell_ is now known as mrevell | ||
| kb9vqf | wgrant: You around? | 09:23 |
| kb9vqf | Any idea why this might be happening? https://quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/builders/vidar | 09:23 |
| * kb9vqf wonders if it's unique to Debian | 09:25 | |
| wgrant | kb9vqf: Not sure. Maybe check Ubuntu's console-data diff? | 09:31 |
| kb9vqf | OK, just wondering if you guys had seen it before ;-) | 09:31 |
| kb9vqf | Those almost look like drawing commands for the text-based interactive mode | 09:31 |
| kb9vqf | Hmmm...why does the build farm ignore the remaining idle builders insead of assinging them chunks of the build queue? | 10:05 |
| kb9vqf | I have two active and two idle with a long build queue... | 10:06 |
| kb9vqf | https://quickbuild.pearsoncomputing.net/builders/ | 10:06 |
| kb9vqf | I don't see any errors anywhere | 10:06 |
| wgrant | Check the buildd-manager log for references to those builders. | 10:07 |
| kb9vqf | Nothing | 10:08 |
| kb9vqf | wgrant: The only thing in the log are references to the broken builders | 10:08 |
| wgrant | What if you edit lib/lp/buildmaster/manager.py, replace logging.INFO with logging.DEBUG, then restart buildd-manager? | 10:08 |
| kb9vqf | wgrant: Not much, just a bunch of | 10:12 |
| kb9vqf | 2010-06-17 04:11:32-0500 [-] Considering odin | 10:12 |
| kb9vqf | 2010-06-17 04:11:32-0500 [-] No build candidates available for builder. | 10:12 |
| kb9vqf | Strangely both builders work, just not simultaneously | 10:12 |
| wgrant | Ahh. | 10:12 |
| wgrant | I bet it's the 80% restriction. | 10:12 |
| kb9vqf | ? | 10:12 |
| wgrant | That is, no PPA is allowed to use more than 80% of the builders for any architecture. | 10:13 |
| kb9vqf | Makes sense | 10:13 |
| kb9vqf | Can I override it? | 10:13 |
| wgrant | No, but you can delete it. | 10:14 |
| wgrant | See the end of addCandidateSelectionCriteria in lp.soyuz.model.buildpackagejob | 10:14 |
| kb9vqf | OK, thanks (Each of my builders is a separate physical machine, so adding more builders isn't a very palatable solution) | 10:14 |
| wgrant | remove the num_arch_builders stuff and everything from there until the return. | 10:14 |
| kb9vqf | It looks like I could override it (sort of) by just changing the 80 to something else | 10:16 |
| kb9vqf | That way it's a small change from production Launchpad, not a big one ;-) | 10:16 |
| wgrant | Or just delete the bit that adds the clause. | 10:16 |
| kb9vqf | I assume a simple restart of the buildd manager will apply the change? | 10:17 |
| wgrant | Correct. | 10:18 |
| * kb9vqf needs to get to bed...it's way to early here | 10:19 | |
| kb9vqf | Thanks for your help! | 10:19 |
| wgrant | Night. | 10:19 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| deryck | Morning, all. | 11:10 |
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| === Ursinha-dinner is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === zyga is now known as zyga_away | ||
| leonardr | Chex, i filed an rt earlier this morning to ask for help running a performance test. it should only take a few minutes, so let me know when you can spare the time | 14:26 |
| leonardr | argh, where's my receipt? | 14:29 |
| sinzui | mars: I did not get an email from ec2 this morning. The instance finished, but not success or fail email | 15:05 |
| mars | sinzui, did it finish in a reasonable amount of time? Also, was it an 'ec2 land' mail? Those can take forever sometimes. | 15:30 |
| sinzui | How could I know it finished in a reasonable amount of time? | 15:30 |
| mars | (just noticed how ridiculous that sounds - if it took forever, how would I know when it finished?) | 15:30 |
| sinzui | I used ec2 test | 15:30 |
| mars | ok | 15:30 |
| mars | sinzui, ok, so there may still be problems, barring a few-hours delivery delay. I have a follow-up branch that should address that. | 15:31 |
| sinzui | I resubmitted the test. I hope it to be complete in 4 hours | 15:32 |
| mars | ok, please let me know what the result is. If it is a success, then we have an intermittent failure. If it eats it again, then I might have something I can reproduce. | 15:33 |
| Ursinha | sinzui, hi | 16:36 |
| sinzui | Hi Ursinha | 16:38 |
| * sinzui was lost and could not find the window that wanted his attention | 16:38 | |
| Ursinha | sinzui, :) | 16:39 |
| Ursinha | sinzui, about your email: the bugs marked as fix committed without qa tags weren't marked fix committed by my script, but manually | 16:39 |
| Ursinha | that's why they don't have the tags | 16:39 |
| Ursinha | when the script runs on them, it will mark them properly | 16:40 |
| * sinzui nods | 16:40 | |
| Ursinha | I've stopped the script for now, I'm putting newer code there, but it should happen rsn | 16:40 |
| sinzui | Ursinha, is it a concern that they are not being tracked? | 16:41 |
| * sinzui QAs every fix-committed in answers, blueprint and registry regardless of tags | 16:41 | |
| Ursinha | sinzui, I'll run the script and check if they will be properly tagged | 16:41 |
| Ursinha | sinzui, yes, I often monitor those | 16:42 |
| Ursinha | the fixed but untagged | 16:42 |
| sinzui | fab | 16:42 |
| sinzui | I will not worry then | 16:42 |
| Ursinha | same way I monitor the orphaned ones | 16:42 |
| Ursinha | :) | 16:42 |
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch | ||
| sinzui | mars, ec2 sent me emails this time. Both instances ran about 4 hours | 17:52 |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| mrevell | Night! | 18:10 |
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| cody-somerville | If anyone asks, it appears PPA publishing is broken at the moment. Working on fixing it. | 18:26 |
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| jml | g'night all. see you next week. | 18:47 |
| jml | cody-somerville, btw, if it's down for more than 15 minutes, it's an incident. Please find someone to manage it. | 18:48 |
| * jml flees the scene | 18:48 | |
| cody-somerville | jml, trying to. It seems all the Soyuz people have EODed | 18:48 |
| mars | flacoste, ^ ? | 18:49 |
| cody-somerville | It appears to have been broken now for four hours and 5 minutes now. | 18:53 |
| cody-somerville | * 10 minutes | 18:54 |
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| sinzui | It looks like the devel build will fail. I have a fix for the two failing tests that I know about | 22:26 |
| * sinzui waits for the official failure message | 22:26 | |
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| wgrant | U1 is very good at 'fixing' major security flaws but somehow managing to leave them wide open. | 23:33 |
| beuno | wgrant, that's not exactly useful | 23:35 |
| thumper | beuno: hi | 23:36 |
| beuno | wgrant, there is a roll-out to production that has been delayed 3 times already | 23:36 |
| beuno | wgrant, that contain the actual fixes | 23:36 |
| beuno | heya thumper! | 23:36 |
| wgrant | beuno: Ah. That makes more sense. | 23:36 |
| beuno | wgrant, hence, the fix-committed and not fix-released | 23:36 |
| wgrant | Just jdo said it was fixed... and it's not. Which reminds of last time someone said it was fixed, where the fourth fix finally worked. | 23:36 |
| wgrant | Mmm, no, the bug in question here is Fix Released. | 23:36 |
| beuno | wgrant, I would of expected you to know that by now ;) | 23:36 |
| beuno | oh? | 23:37 |
| beuno | it's wrong then | 23:37 |
| beuno | he probably thinks the roll-out happened | 23:37 |
| wgrant | Bug 590540 | 23:37 |
| beuno | wgrant, right, no deployed | 23:37 |
| beuno | tomorrow, hopefully | 23:37 |
| wgrant | Ahhh, good. Sorry about that. | 23:37 |
| beuno | I see where the confusion came up | 23:38 |
| beuno | if PQM behaves the roll out tomorow will include all fixes | 23:39 |
| beuno | the branch for #535651 is bouncing with an unrelated error | 23:39 |
| beuno | the rest are all landed | 23:39 |
| lifeless | beuno: 'if' :) | 23:40 |
| beuno | heh, yes | 23:40 |
| beuno | may be all of them minus one | 23:40 |
| wgrant | OK, great. Thanks. | 23:40 |
| beuno | wgrant, thanks for the reports | 23:40 |
| beuno | it was a bit of a shock to see those open | 23:40 |
| beuno | we did some db mangling to make sure they hadn't been exploited | 23:41 |
| beuno | they haven't | 23:41 |
| * thumper afk | 23:41 | |
| wgrant | beuno: It returned no results at all? | 23:42 |
| wgrant | Because I did try it. | 23:42 |
| beuno | wgrant, I didn't see the query, but it may of been "nobody except wgrant" ;) | 23:42 |
| lifeless | wgrant: now try % encoded path seperators | 23:43 |
| wgrant | sinzui: +participation 403s sometimes. | 23:46 |
| sinzui | ouch | 23:47 |
| wgrant | You, for example. | 23:47 |
| sinzui | me | 23:47 |
| sinzui | I will investigaste | 23:48 |
| wgrant | Thanks. | 23:48 |
| sinzui | ha ha, there are 17 deprecated private membership teams, and I appear to be a members of a few. and since the new page shows the path to membership, it breaks | 23:52 |
| sinzui | I will land a fix for this tomorrow. I wish I could remove the teams too | 23:53 |
| wgrant | Why can't you? | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!