=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
Hew | Bug 589198 I submitted 2 weeks ago is still waiting for a retrace. Does anyone know what's going on? | 05:30 |
---|---|---|
ubot2 | Hew: Bug 589198 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/589198 is private | 05:30 |
arcane | I created a crashreport from a Lucid Live USB, but I think that the bug may be a duplicate. | 06:11 |
arcane | Should I mark it as duplicate? | 06:11 |
arcane | It is currently a private bug report because of the coredump file. | 06:11 |
arcane | My bug looks like #527951. Mine is #596170 | 06:13 |
arcane | Also #551308 looks like mine | 06:15 |
=== arcane is now known as dlbike76 | ||
=== rackIT_AFK is now known as rackIT | ||
=== rackIT is now known as rackIT_AFK | ||
drew212 | ddecator: for bug 571035 should i ask the OP for a new set of log files since he is using FF 3.6 and lucid? | 07:07 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 571035 in firefox-3.5 (Ubuntu) "No sound in Flash videos after hibernate (affects: 2) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/571035 | 07:07 |
* ddecator looking | 07:08 | |
drew212 | he kindof got offended that i closed his bug, i thought he said he wasn't experiecing the problem anymore =X | 07:09 |
nigelb | bug 596170 | 07:09 |
ubot2 | nigelb: Bug 596170 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/596170 is private | 07:09 |
nigelb | oh, he quit. sigh. | 07:11 |
drew212 | im also going to ask him to try this in konqueror to narrow it down to wether it's actually a FF problem, or if it could be a alsa, kernel, or flash problem =X | 07:13 |
ddecator | drew212: it was a different user that said it, but it wasn't a bad call to close it since it seemed to be fixed. i'm trying to think of what the best thing would be to do for that report | 07:13 |
drew212 | check out comment #2 | 07:14 |
ddecator | oh, yah, that was just saying he didn't have time to test it, not that it was fixed (not really sure why he said that) | 07:14 |
drew212 | lol, i see that now =X | 07:14 |
drew212 | i'm going to apologize =X i feel like a jerk | 07:15 |
drew212 | ddecator: i think it would be best to get new logs, and have him test it in another browser | 07:16 |
ddecator | haha, that's not too bad, i've had people act far worse before. could you potentially test it yourself with different browsers? i usually try to avoid asking users to install new software just to test a bug (such as extra browsers to test it) especially if we can test the issue ourselves | 07:16 |
drew212 | my hibernate destroys my system afaik =D | 07:17 |
drew212 | it wont wake up, so i have to kill it | 07:17 |
ddecator | well that's not good o.o | 07:17 |
drew212 | lol, i know, i hate to report it and cause more bug reports, when i wouldn't know how to report it properly | 07:17 |
drew212 | ddecator: maybe i'm doing something wrong, how do you come out of hibernate? just move the mouse right? | 07:19 |
ddecator | hm, well you can ask if he happens to have any other browsers installed that he can test the issue with in order to try and narrow down the issue. i haven't tried hibernate so i'm not sure if it works for me, but i can test in a little while after i've tried to fix FF 3.7 if you want since i can test with flash and html5 video/audio | 07:19 |
ddecator | drew212: probably have to close the lid and open it again if you're using a laptop | 07:19 |
drew212 | desktop =D | 07:20 |
ddecator | then i'm not sure, i've never used it :p | 07:20 |
drew212 | desktop FTW =) | 07:20 |
drew212 | i'll try, brb | 07:20 |
drew212 | ddecator: yeah, epic fail, and i had a boot fail, so i had to use my old 9.04 disk to get it to boot, once i used that i could boot from the hard disc =P | 07:30 |
ddecator | drew212: whoops...sorry :p | 07:32 |
drew212 | ddecator: my computer has a bunch of issues, booting is not one of its favorite parts... | 07:41 |
drew212 | thats why my uptime is huge sometimes... | 07:41 |
ddecator | drew212: haha, i just don't turn my comp off so it can fold | 07:42 |
drew212 | ddecator: yeah, i'm getting up there folding... | 07:46 |
drew212 | i haven't checked kakko in a while | 07:46 |
ddecator | neither have i.. | 07:47 |
drew212 | you're 197 o | 07:47 |
drew212 | i'm 161 | 07:47 |
drew212 | how many cycles/sec can you run? and how many cores? | 07:48 |
ddecator | hm, my PPD has gone down since i've had to do restarts and such with my comp..we can talk specifics in ##folding if you want :p | 07:49 |
Kangarooo | im having this problem allways since first time tryd ubuntu but it actually a bug. i just 4 min ago closed tab with flash video and still sound is comming from that video.. to what to report this bug? to flash installer? | 10:22 |
tsimpson | Kangarooo: we can't do anything about (adobe) flash bugs, you'll need to report that to adobe and hope they care | 11:11 |
Kangarooo | ok tsimpson ill post to adobe page. but maybe its webkit related? couse maybe browser doesnt tell immidiatly that flash tab is closed? | 11:14 |
tsimpson | it's possible, but I sometimes get that in FF too | 11:14 |
tsimpson | it usually requires me to quite FF and start it again | 11:14 |
tsimpson | -e | 11:14 |
Kangarooo | FF is using webkit and chrome uses webkit so of course u get that in FF | 11:16 |
tsimpson | Kangarooo: no, FF uses gecko | 11:20 |
edakiri | Speaking of FF, I'm writing a bug on a SegFault with FF in combination with a java applet. Can someone remind me what command(s) run the applet independently, without FF, so I can see whether that also crashes? | 11:22 |
tsimpson | probably just "java -jar whatever_it_is.jar" (guess) | 11:23 |
edakiri | tsimpson: I am thinking of somthing that you feed the html page address. | 11:24 |
Kangarooo | tsimpson: oh ok. im getting this flash error i talked about in FF. and thought that ive read somewhere everybrowser uses webkit. ok dont know that. chechink now in chrome and also in chrome i get some delay of sound cutting of after removing flash tab but not so long as FF.. | 11:24 |
Kangarooo | yes to open jar file thats correct command | 11:25 |
tsimpson | chrome is the worst for it, because it runs flash as a separate process | 11:25 |
tsimpson | edakiri: javaws? | 11:26 |
edakiri | tsimpson: I think not, but I will double check. perhaps it has been absorbed into javaws | 11:26 |
edakiri | What is the new URL for filing a bug with the web interface? | 11:27 |
edakiri | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea6-plugin/+filebug?no-redirect Did not work. | 11:27 |
tsimpson | edakiri: it's openjdk-6, not icedtea6-plugin (it goes by source package, hence the +source) | 11:28 |
edakiri | tsimpson: Thanks. How can I see what the corresponding source package is for a given package? | 11:29 |
tsimpson | apt-cache showsrc <package>, look at the top line | 11:29 |
tsimpson | or apt-cache showsrc <package> | head -1, if you're lazy | 11:30 |
tsimpson | and if you have deb-src lines | 11:30 |
tsimpson | there's always http://packages.ubuntu.com/ if all else fails | 11:33 |
edakiri | the answer to previous Q: appletviewer | 11:52 |
edakiri | what is the URL or link to report bugs about launchpad itself? | 12:18 |
edakiri | aha. https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+filebug | 12:22 |
=== bdrung__ is now known as bdrung | ||
=== G is now known as Nigel | ||
zus | hello all | 15:44 |
bencrisford | zus: hello | 15:47 |
zus | hi bencrisford how are you today? | 15:48 |
bencrisford | zus: not bad thanks :) but not sure this is the right channel for chit chat :P #ubuntu-offtopic ? | 15:48 |
zus | i know. i was just saying hello being polite, not just loggin in | 15:49 |
bencrisford | zus: ok awesome :) sorry if I seemed rude | 15:52 |
zus | bencrisford, you weren't and no worries... | 15:53 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
DrKenobi | Hi! I think Bug #390372 status should be 'Won't Fix'. | 18:20 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 390372 in gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "default terminal does not have an effect (affects: 1) (heat: 7)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/390372 | 18:20 |
DrKenobi | I don't understand why they set the status to 'Confirmed' | 18:22 |
dgtombs | can i get a Won't Fix for bug 363326? thanks | 19:11 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 363326 in linux (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "Brightness control doesn't work on Amilo mini UI 3520 (affects: 5) (dups: 1) (heat: 40)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/363326 | 19:11 |
yofel | DrKenobi: ping pedro when he get's back here, I don't quite understand him either, but maybe he meant that we could still do that ourselves without upstream. | 20:28 |
DrKenobi | yofel: ok, i'll do it. thanks! | 20:29 |
=== easter_egg is now known as ayrton | ||
=== vish is now known as MrAcosta | ||
=== MrAcosta is now known as vish | ||
=== ayrton is now known as easter_egg | ||
drew212 | ddecator: are you around? | 22:58 |
drew212 | anyone around to help me debug a bit? | 23:02 |
yofel | drew212: debug what? | 23:31 |
drew212 | in firefox, it shows that i'm running flash 10.0, but in synaptic, it shows im running 10.1 | 23:33 |
drew212 | for bug 592658 i believe the user is experiencing the same problem(although it is unrelated to that specific bug report) | 23:34 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 592658 in firefox (Ubuntu) "Firefox crashed using java (I suppose...) (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/592658 | 23:34 |
yofel | hm, firefox shows flash as 10.1 here. (Using ffx 3.6.6~hg20100618r34325 from moz-daily-ppa and flash 10.1.53.64ubuntu1) | 23:36 |
drew212 | about:config shows differently for me =X | 23:36 |
yofel | let me check, I looked in about:plugins | 23:36 |
yofel | note: I'm running maverick currently | 23:37 |
drew212 | i'm running lucid =P | 23:37 |
drew212 | ill upload a screenshot, where is the easiest place to do that? | 23:37 |
yofel | !paste | 23:37 |
ubot2 | For posting multi-line texts into the channel, please use http://paste.ubuntu.com | To post !screenshots use http://tinyurl.com/imagebin | !pastebinit to paste directly from command line | Make sure you give us the URL for your paste - see also the channel topic. | 23:37 |
yofel | lucid does have flash 10.1.53.64ubuntu0.10.04.1 in lucid-updates, so it is there... | 23:39 |
drew212 | http://imagebin.org/101912 | 23:40 |
drew212 | you can see on the right that my flash player is 10.1.53.64 in synaptic, but right under it, it shows shockwave flash 10.0 r22 | 23:41 |
yofel | stupid question, but did you check if restarting firefox does anything? | 23:41 |
drew212 | sec | 23:41 |
drew212 | nope does nothing | 23:42 |
drew212 | it's not that important, but it makes debugging an issue if FF says it isn't running the latest version and the user has the latest version installed you know? | 23:44 |
penguin42 | when you just checked did you make sure that it really exited firefox? | 23:45 |
drew212 | i did a sudo killall firefox-bin | 23:45 |
drew212 | would that be a full exit? | 23:46 |
yofel | drew212: what does 'grep "10_1_53_64" /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so' give you? | 23:46 |
drew212 | matches | 23:46 |
penguin42 | what does locate libflashplayer.so say? | 23:46 |
yofel | erm, ok, then you do have 10.1 installed | 23:46 |
drew212 | so i do have a problem? lol | 23:47 |
yofel | do what penguin42 said | 23:48 |
yofel | it should find 3 files | 23:48 |
penguin42 | It wouldn't entirely surprise me if the rxx notation is just a different numbering scheme that overlaps with the 10.x.x.x numbering | 23:48 |
drew212 | it has 4 files | 23:49 |
yofel | drew212: do you have a plugin file in ~/.mozilla/plugins? | 23:49 |
drew212 | http://paste.ubuntu.com/452218/ | 23:49 |
yofel | flash shows as 10.1 r53 here | 23:49 |
yofel | did you copy the file once? | 23:50 |
yofel | you shouldn't have one in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins | 23:50 |
drew212 | not to my knowledge | 23:50 |
yofel | there should be a symlink called flashplugin-alternative.so instead | 23:51 |
drew212 | thats greek to me =P | 23:51 |
yofel | good: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so, bad: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so | 23:52 |
drew212 | so how do i fix it? | 23:52 |
penguin42 | just checking, are you 32 or 64 bit? | 23:53 |
drew212 | 64 | 23:53 |
yofel | drew212: first, what does 'locate flashplugin-alternative.so' give you? | 23:54 |
penguin42 | I seem to remember there is an nspluginwrapper -l or the like to list what it thought it's currently pointing to? (After you did the locate yofel asked for) | 23:54 |
yofel | just to make sure they didn't change the packaging between lucid and maverick | 23:54 |
yofel | oh, nice one, didn't know that | 23:55 |
yofel | nspluginwrapper -l says ' Original plugin: /usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so' here | 23:55 |
drew212 | http://paste.ubuntu.com/452220/ that is what the nsplugin command yeilds | 23:55 |
drew212 | although, i dont really undestand what we're doing here =P | 23:57 |
yofel | that looks right... | 23:57 |
yofel | drew212: trying to find out why ffx shows the wrong plugin version? | 23:57 |
penguin42 | drew212: Did you have a /usr/lib/mozilla/libflashplayer.so ? | 23:57 |
yofel | he did | 23:57 |
drew212 | yes | 23:57 |
penguin42 | if so then I think it's a question of whether it's using that one or the /usr/lib64/firefox/plugins/flashplugin-alternative.so | 23:58 |
yofel | what does 'ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so' give? | 23:58 |
drew212 | yofel: i know what we're trying to do, but idk what we're doing with these bash commands =P | 23:58 |
drew212 | http://paste.ubuntu.com/452224/ | 23:58 |
drew212 | yofel: i wish i knew what we were doing =P, i feel so incompetent. | 23:59 |
yofel | 2009-02-02 is oviously the old plugin | 23:59 |
yofel | well, ls -l gives you a long listing of a file, with permissions, dates etc. (see 'man ls') | 23:59 |
drew212 | yofel: didnt you say i shouldnt have that file in mozilla/plugins/*? | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!