| === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
| ari-tczew | can someone take a look what happens with Debian Import? | 10:08 |
|---|---|---|
| geser | what you mean? | 10:31 |
| ari-tczew | geser: http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/multidistrotools/universe.html#outdatedinB | 10:32 |
| ari-tczew | packages from Debian are not coming | 10:32 |
| geser | ari-tczew: Debian Import is only semi-automatic. An archive admin has to run a script for it. | 10:33 |
| ari-tczew | geser: so who is responsible to this script? | 10:34 |
| ari-tczew | any archive admin? | 10:34 |
| geser | yes | 10:34 |
| geser | or more precisely the archive admin of the day | 10:34 |
| geser | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration has the rotation | 10:35 |
| ari-tczew | heh, not works on weekend | 10:37 |
| dupondje | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pygobject/2.21.2-0ubuntu1/+build/1787577 | 11:26 |
| dupondje | can somebody check this | 11:26 |
| dupondje | 'failed to upload' | 11:26 |
| jpds | Hmm, odd. wgrant ↑. | 11:29 |
| wgrant | jpds, dupondje: Ah, well, you see, this is what we call a rejection that makes absolutely no sense. | 11:32 |
| wgrant | I suggest retrying the build. | 11:33 |
| dupondje | I have no permission :) | 11:36 |
| geser | dupondje: find a core-dev of your choice and let him give the package back to the buildd | 11:37 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: we need to finish prepare a fix for asterisk | 11:38 |
| geser | or simply ignore the problem (as sparc is most likely to get abandoned for maverick) | 11:38 |
| dupondje | i'll note it to seb128 when he's online :) | 11:40 |
| dupondje | ari-tczew: ? | 11:40 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: do you forgot? you tried to fix security issue for asterisk in dapper | 11:40 |
| dupondje | err right :) | 11:42 |
| dupondje | had a buzzy week, my brain is in stand-by | 11:42 |
| dupondje | :) | 11:42 |
| dupondje | http://ubuntu.dupondje.be/asterisk3.debdiff this was the latest :p | 11:42 |
| ari-tczew | dupondje: I know, I have this patch on my disk | 11:43 |
| ari-tczew | we can continue review, but not now | 11:43 |
| shadeslayer_ | wow.. 14 hours of uptime and my mem is idling at a cool 1 GB.... go go maverick! | 11:43 |
| shadeslayer_ | most of it is xorg and quassel :P | 11:45 |
| ari-tczew | why DebianImportFreeze is always before FeatureFreeze? can't we set DebianImportFreeze and FeatureFreeze in one time? | 12:01 |
| === angelus85 is now known as angelus | ||
| === angelus is now known as angelus85 | ||
| Respawner | hello | 13:20 |
| Respawner | I'm currently working on a package to have it reviewed and uploaded. But I do have a question. When using debuild, do I have to sign the source package or not? | 13:23 |
| JontheEchidna | Respawner: Signing the source is required | 13:26 |
| JontheEchidna | (for security purposes) | 13:27 |
| Respawner | JontheEchidna: ok, thank you | 13:27 |
| === bdrung__ is now known as bdrung | ||
| === G is now known as Nigel | ||
| BlackZ | bdrung: it can be synced directly, see bug #596265 | 14:24 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 596265 in freemind (Ubuntu) "Please sync freemind 0.9.0~rc7+dfsg-1 (universe) from debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/596265 | 14:24 |
| bdrung | BlackZ: done and marked the other two bugs as duplicates | 14:33 |
| bdrung | BlackZ: you have my endorsement now | 15:28 |
| BlackZ | bdrung: thanks! | 15:29 |
| === highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage | ||
| ScottK | Respawner: It's required to upload it. If you are just using it locally, it doesn't need to be signed. | 16:29 |
| ScottK | lucas: This coming Thursday is Debian Import Freeze for Maverick. Doing a rebuild test next weekend would be a good time I think. Would this be possible? | 16:30 |
| ari-tczew | bdrung: thanks for very quick response! | 16:59 |
| ScottK | I'd be really interested if someone can figure out the reason for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsruby/1.47-1/+build/1764845 | 17:00 |
| ScottK | The build-deps are perfectly installable in a local Maverick chroot. | 17:00 |
| bdrung | ari-tczew: you're welcome. | 17:01 |
| geser | ScottK: I wonder how you could resolve this as I can reproduce it. Digging a little more shows: ruby: Conflicts: rdoc | 17:06 |
| ScottK | geser: Odd. I just apt-get build-dep and it installed. | 17:06 |
| geser | hmm | 17:07 |
| ScottK | rdoc didn't get pulled in for my test. | 17:07 |
| ScottK | So that would explain why it installed. | 17:07 |
| geser | ruby provides also rdoc | 17:07 |
| ScottK | Ah, so it's an install sequence issue. | 17:08 |
| geser | apt-get -s build-dep works for my too | 17:09 |
| geser | s/my/me/ | 17:09 |
| ScottK | Sounds like it's a matter of dropping the rdoc depends from pkg-ruby-tools. | 17:09 |
| geser | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/NBS/rdoc | 17:09 |
| geser | could perhaps also help | 17:09 |
| ScottK | No doubt. | 17:10 |
| * ScottK looks at lucas to find out if Debian is doing this transition too? | 17:11 | |
| geser | only rails, right-aws and right-http-connection have a versioned build-dependency. And rails is only an alternative | 17:12 |
| geser | once the real deb "rdoc" is gone it should work | 17:13 |
| ScottK | Nice. | 17:13 |
| geser | it's similar to the texlive 2009 transition in lucid where a stale deb blocked some packages to build | 17:13 |
| * ScottK wonders if there's an archive-admin with sufficient access around to kill it? | 17:14 | |
| ScottK | james_w maybe? | 17:14 |
| geser | ScottK: I just confirmed that this would fix it. I edit the Packages file inside my pbuilder and droped the rdoc package and apt-get install the build-dependencies works again | 17:16 |
| ScottK | Cool. | 17:16 |
| ScottK | I'm fixing right-aws | 17:21 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| ScottK | Looking at right-http-connection too. | 17:23 |
| ScottK | It makes sense then that the two problematic packages aren't in Debian. | 17:24 |
| geser | I guess dropping the version from rdoc (make the build dependency unversioned) is enough as even dapper has a newer rdoc | 17:29 |
| ScottK | Heh. I didn't look at it that closely. I just made them like rails. | 17:29 |
| ScottK | geser: I filed a bug to ask for rdoc to be removed. Thanks again for your analysis. | 17:40 |
| ari-tczew | geser: you aren't a core developer? | 17:42 |
| geser | ari-tczew: nope, only MOTU | 17:42 |
| ari-tczew | geser: heh, I'm amazed, because I think that you're in DMB and you've a large knowledge | 17:44 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: he is just too lazy to apply :P | 17:44 |
| * sebner waves at geser :) | 17:44 | |
| ari-tczew | sebner: I think that it would be nice if I'll block some requests on you | 17:45 |
| * ScottK notes to sebner that there is precedent for filing a core-dev application on behalf of someone else. | 17:45 | |
| sebner | ari-tczew: hmm? | 17:46 |
| sebner | ScottK: hahaha :D | 17:46 |
| ScottK | No. It's true. | 17:46 |
| sebner | ScottK: really? O_o | 17:46 |
| ScottK | Yes. That's how Hobbsee got core-dev. | 17:46 |
| * geser waves back at sebner | 17:47 | |
| sebner | ScottK: well, you can't do anything as long as the person in question is strictly against it though I think?! You can force anything over someone | 17:47 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: you've only 1 bug sponsored for me. I think that number should grow | 17:47 |
| ScottK | No, but you can solve the lack of motivation to fill out the application problem. | 17:48 |
| sebner | ScottK: ah, good point | 17:48 |
| sebner | geser: are you too lazy? :P | 17:48 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: ah, heh. maybe ;D | 17:48 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: one merge is remaining to universe. are you interested? | 17:49 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: hmm, why not. link | 17:49 |
| geser | ari-tczew: there is no requirement for being a core-dev for being in the DMB; and having a certain level of knowledge doesn't force you to core-dev | 17:50 |
| sebner | ScottK: speaking about motivation, remember the core-dev application of sistpoty? ;) | 17:50 |
| ScottK | Yes. | 17:51 |
| geser | sebner: no, it's just that I don't see the need for myself for being a core-dev. For the occasional uploads to main I do, sponsoring is enough. | 17:51 |
| sebner | heh | 17:51 |
| sebner | That's it, it seems :) | 17:52 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: can you wait 5 minutes? I have to update description in patch | 17:52 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: sure, I can't promise I'll look at it right now anyways | 17:52 |
| sebner | ScottK: speaking about Hobbsee, has she disappeared? :( | 17:53 |
| sebner | ScottK: wow, that was pretty bad englisch but you understand it anyways :P | 17:53 |
| ScottK | sebner: Consult the channel Nick list. | 17:54 |
| ari-tczew | her english wasn't good enough? | 17:54 |
| sebner | ScottK: well, haven't seen any activity/uploads from her and besides, [Hobbsee] idle 199:13:59 .. | 17:54 |
| ScottK | sebner: So she's around, just quiet. | 17:55 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: nah, I wrote "has she disappeared" instead of "did she disappear" | 17:55 |
| geser | sebner: do you miss the LPSOD™? | 17:55 |
| sebner | geser: definately :) | 17:55 |
| ScottK | ari-tczew: The comment was on the quality of sebner's own English. | 17:55 |
| ari-tczew | aha ok | 17:55 |
| sebner | ScottK: well, being around means something different /here imho | 17:55 |
| ScottK | She does speak every now and then. | 17:56 |
| sebner | ScottK: oh, Ic. thx for the info | 17:56 |
| ari-tczew | I ask of english level, because I want to know what about of my english level | 17:57 |
| ari-tczew | it's good or not good | 17:57 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: no problems so far imho | 17:57 |
| sebner | geser: was it you who wrote there is a lack of LPSOD some days ago? :) | 17:58 |
| geser | sebner: no, I didn't try to summon the LPSOD for a very long time | 17:59 |
| geser | ari-tczew: it's good enough that I don't have any problems to understand you | 18:00 |
| ari-tczew | hehe, well, I'm glad, because my comments on my application says, that I have more problems with english than packaging skill :P | 18:00 |
| sebner | hohohoho | 18:02 |
| sebner | Jun 15 14:01:52 *ScottK finds an insufficiency of longpointysticksofdoom lately. | 18:02 |
| sebner | logs ftw! :) | 18:02 |
| coolbhavi | hi after installing the latest perl I get the following output E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by held packages.' on sudo apt-get install -f | 18:05 |
| ari-tczew | hi coolbhavi, nice to meet you on IRC | 18:05 |
| coolbhavi | hi ari-tczew | 18:06 |
| coolbhavi | got it resolved through aptitude -f | 18:16 |
| ari-tczew | slangasek: why did you merge iputils, ignoring my patch? | 18:38 |
| ari-tczew | it's not fair | 18:38 |
| ari-tczew | 2010-06-07 core branches merge-lp-591029 iputils lp:~ari-tczew/ubuntu/maverick/iputils/merge-lp-591029 | 18:40 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: sorry, but now my patch now is useless ^^ | 18:40 |
| sebner | heh, kk | 18:41 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: I'm avoiding branches till maverick+1 anyways :P | 18:41 |
| ari-tczew | sebner: I don't understand, why? | 18:42 |
| sebner | ari-tczew: still not working 100%, besides I have to make changes, then push, then debuild and upload to ubuntu. Still too troublesome for me | 18:43 |
| * geser warns of opening the buildlog for https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mozart/1.4.0-5build1/+build/1776421 | 19:06 | |
| ScottK | geser: sparc is about to go away. Don't waste your time with it anyway. | 19:07 |
| geser | I just noticed earlier that artigas (sparc buildd) seemed to got stuck on this build. And wondered now about the build log as I saw that it's building an other package again. | 19:09 |
| sebner | geser: woo, firefox froze xD | 19:09 |
| geser | sebner: I warned you :D | 19:10 |
| sebner | geser: It would be the same if you told me: "no sweets before meal" :P | 19:10 |
| geser | sebner: it's a 278MB build log compressed to 309 kB | 19:11 |
| sebner | geser: that's a nice compression algorythm then :D | 19:11 |
| geser | gzip :) but highly redundant data | 19:11 |
| sebner | heh, true | 19:12 |
| geser | ScottK: I know, I wait on wgrant updating qa.ubuntuwire.org so he can merge my branch for the FTBFS page dropping sparc | 19:12 |
| ScottK | Oh, right. I forgot it was you that had done that. | 19:13 |
| t0bias | hi everybody. my name is tobias and i would like to upload one of my applications to ppa, but so far i didn't figure out the proper way to package a qt-application (that obviously comes without a "configure"-script and no "make install" target). is there any documentation on how to correctly package a qt-application for ubuntu? | 19:53 |
| ScottK | t0bias: PPA packaging is better discussed in #ubuntu-packaging | 19:55 |
| t0bias | oh, ok, thank you! | 19:55 |
| BlackZ | ScottK: if a comment in the debian/changelog file is broken (I can't find the changes in the ubuntu package merging) I should drop it, shouldn't I? | 20:17 |
| slangasek | ari-tczew: hrm, apparently because I failed to check the bug list for that package before working on it - sorry | 20:18 |
| slangasek | ari-tczew: for some reason the bug page also doesn't show me a link to your branch? | 20:19 |
| slangasek | er; because you've deleted the branch, I guess? | 20:19 |
| slangasek | ari-tczew: I would be happy to review and merge your branch in place of mine if you want to re-publish it | 20:20 |
| ari-tczew | slangasek: I've deleted the branch, because today I've updated the patch description | 20:21 |
| ari-tczew | slangasek: so do I need to reupload and you'll merge it? | 20:21 |
| slangasek | if you reupload it, I can merge it, yes | 20:21 |
| ari-tczew | ok | 20:22 |
| ari-tczew | wait 5 minur | 20:22 |
| ari-tczew | minutes | 20:22 |
| ari-tczew | slangasek: I prefer to use bzr as you saw, but what I can to do it, if you've uploaded your changes? | 20:24 |
| ari-tczew | use debdiff instead bzr? | 20:24 |
| slangasek | ari-tczew: I can uncommit the changes from bzr | 20:25 |
| ari-tczew | slangasek: so what we will deal with it? | 20:25 |
| ari-tczew | s/what/how | 20:25 |
| slangasek | bzr please | 20:25 |
| slangasek | just publish a branch based on revision 14 of the package branch | 20:26 |
| slangasek | or 15, if you're satisfied with the upstream merge and don't want to redo it :) | 20:26 |
| ari-tczew | slangasek: hmm, what do you think if I'll use my debian/changelog and patch for typo based on 18 revision? | 20:29 |
| slangasek | ari-tczew: that's also ok | 20:29 |
| ari-tczew | nice! then uploading | 20:29 |
| ari-tczew | slangasek: done | 20:36 |
| slangasek | ari-tczew: and package uploaded - thanks! | 20:44 |
| ari-tczew | slangasek: thanks also! | 20:45 |
| * slangasek goes back to ripping dpatch out of aptitude | 20:46 | |
| === vish is now known as MrAcosta | ||
| === MrAcosta is now known as vish | ||
| ali1234 | does anyone know what prevents nspluginwrapper 1.2 from being backported to hardy? (it has been backported everywhere else) | 20:59 |
| mmc | let's say there is a standard package P, and I have a patched version of it, with added features. And then I have a package B which uses some added feature of that P. Is there any way to express this dependency, using suitable versions. I want to avoid binding B to exact version of P. I would like to be able to upgrade (my patched) P without releasing B just to change the = dependency. | 22:16 |
| Bachstelze | mmc: maybe make a P-patched package instead of changing P's version number? | 22:20 |
| Bachstelze | and make P-patched Replace P, so that it will (I think) be automatically installed instead of P when someone wants to install B | 22:21 |
| shadeslayer | quick question,can we rename upstream tarballs? | 22:21 |
| Bachstelze | shadeslayer: yes, but only if you really can't do otherwise | 22:21 |
| Bachstelze | actually | 22:21 |
| Bachstelze | you *have* to rename it to add orig.tar.gz anyway | 22:21 |
| Bachstelze | so more specifics, maybe? | 22:22 |
| rehan | Dear all how 2 install yahoo messanger | 22:24 |
| Bachstelze | rehan: this is not really the place to ask this, try #ubuntu :) | 22:25 |
| shadeslayer | Bachstelze: also upstream ships the source with their own debian/ can i safely delete it and start over as this will be a new package in the archives? | 22:37 |
| === rehan is now known as MianRehan | ||
| Bachstelze | shadeslayer: in this case it's recommended to first talk to upstream and see if they could remove the debian/ dir from their tarball | 22:52 |
| Bachstelze | ptherwise you can move it away with get-orig-source I think, no need to repack it | 22:52 |
| shadeslayer | is there a procedure of sorts to get new packages into ubuntu universe? | 23:14 |
| arand | !newpackage | shadeslayer I guess here | 23:23 |
| ubottu | shadeslayer I guess here: The packaging guide is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide - See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages for information on getting a package integrated into Ubuntu - Other developer resources are at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment - See also !backports | 23:23 |
| shadeslayer | ok found it via google ;) | 23:23 |
| * shadeslayer wonders if someone is in the mood to advocate a revu package | 23:34 | |
| shadeslayer | http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=8319 | 23:34 |
| shadeslayer | apparle: \o | 23:35 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!