[00:00] ddecator: ok [00:00] !info seamonkey lucid [00:00] !test [00:00] gnomefreak: seamonkey (source: seamonkey): The Seamonkey Internet Suite. In component universe, is optional. Version 2.0.4+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (lucid), package size 24 kB, installed size 84 kB [00:00] hrm? [00:01] ubot2: thanks [00:01] You're welcome! But keep in mind I'm just a bot ;-) [00:01] not very often i see someone thank the bot :p [00:01] * chrisccoulson punches ubot2 in the face ;) [00:01] heh [00:02] oh, it didn't like that [00:02] sorry ubot2 [00:03] haha [00:03] * gnomefreak still waiting for server update since we lost ubottu in most channels an ops rework of bot usage) to accept a few commands like mozilla bugs [00:03] mozilla 21 [00:04] still :( [00:04] :( [00:04] i didn't know that wasn't working.. [00:04] ddecator: yea i found out today and asked one of the ops that handles bots to update server but seems its not in the works as thought. this was <7 hours ago [00:05] bug 1 [00:05] Launchpad bug 1 in tilix (and 18 other projects) "Microsoft has a majority market share (affects: 448) (heat: 2410)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1 [00:05] sorry >7 hours ago [00:05] it works only for ubuntu bugs atm [00:05] at least lp bugs are working [00:05] * gnomefreak pings again before i go [00:06] chrisccoulson: ddecator can either of you decline nomminations on bug reports? [00:07] gnomefreak, for packages in universe, yes [00:07] i don't think i can. i'm in BC but not sure what rights are needed [00:07] chrisccoulson: can you please decline the nominations on bug 356274 for me [00:07] Launchpad bug 356274 in seamonkey (Ubuntu Jaunty) (and 1 other project) "[MASTER] Please update seamonkey to version 2.0* (affects: 3) (dups: 2) (heat: 40)" [High,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/356274 [00:08] * gnomefreak never really applied for motu and since i lost all sorts of time i ggave up on thinking of it [00:08] i'm wondering whether we should accept them actually. we packaged seamonkey for the older releases already, and were considering rolling it out with the 2.0.5 updat [00:09] **update [00:10] anyway, declined for now [00:10] chrisccoulson: as planned seamonkey will follow firefox/thunderbird releases so nominating them isnt needed the way i see it. we will push them all to everything under maverick wether its 2.0.5 or 2.0.10 [00:10] chrisccoulson: thanks [00:11] checking update and gone for night i hope [00:11] gnomefreak: at this rate you'll never leave [00:12] :) [00:12] im waiting for phone to ring but since she isnt calling no need to hang out [00:14] finally, it's putting the tar.gz together.. [00:14] and it's a revision after my patch was added, so it should be good :) [00:21] and all looks good [00:21] ok now im gone for the night. see everyone most likely monday but we will see how board i get this weekend [00:21] or not damnit [00:22] libavcodec-extra-52 libavutil-extra-50 still broken [00:22] poppler-utils == fixed [00:23] gnomefreak: alright, cya. and i just pushed the branch [00:24] gnomefreak: have a good weekend [00:24] ddecator: you too [00:25] i like Chromium inport option :) [00:28] wait what.. [00:28] Chromium is not slow like FF3.6 and 3.7 [00:28] gah, one of the patches didn't update right... [00:28] ddecator: when you open chromium it asks if you want to import settings/ect.. from fireofx [00:29] oh thought you meant me [00:32] oh, sorry, haha, the diff shows a huge block of code as being removed and i'm not sure why.. [00:33] could be it's just not showing where it's added after being updated.. [00:35] that must be it, the patch is displaying right.. [00:37] well, i'll double-check later, i have to get to a friends house for his birthday. cya === jlebar_ is now known as jlebar [07:24] ah good, FF 3.7 just had a patch fail to apply, i should be able to fix that.. === bdrung__ is now known as bdrung [15:47] hey folks [15:48] can anyone tell me if thunderbird 3.1 will be coming to the thunderbird-stable ppa (for lucid)? === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [16:38] jdstrand, mdeslaur, (asac): any reason why chromium 5.0.375.70 is still in lucid-proposed after 8+ days? http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/chromium-daily.html [17:16] because the process has flaws and its one of the first iterations. [17:16] just push for it === yofel_ is now known as yofel [17:33] asac, btw, another improvement for the dashboard, you can now easily see what you have in proposed/updates/security [17:33] even backports === vish is now known as MrAcosta === MrAcosta is now known as vish === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away [22:43] fta: re 8 days> according to http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html, there are two bugs that need to be verified. Ie 587664 584959 [22:50] fta: those two bugs have been adjusted for the SRU process [22:51] jdstrand, thanks [22:52] i look forward my dashboard moving from P to SU :) [22:53] i find it weird that we keep the old/initial release in the archive though [22:54] fta: if you are able to verify those bugs are fixed, feel free to add a comment [22:54] well, once the archive is released, it is frozen forever [22:54] and the other pockets 'overlay' it if you will [22:57] i know that, but keeping the security flawed binaries available for download is.. well, you know [22:59] true. I wasn't around when that decision was made. I would guess it had something to do with CDs/DVDs and stable/repeatable installations [23:00] it also gives people the opportunity to back out a regressed update