[00:00] <gnomefreak> ddecator: ok
[00:00] <gnomefreak> !info seamonkey lucid
[00:00] <gnomefreak> !test
[00:00] <ubot2> gnomefreak: seamonkey (source: seamonkey): The Seamonkey Internet Suite. In component universe, is optional. Version 2.0.4+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (lucid), package size 24 kB, installed size 84 kB
[00:00] <ubot2> hrm?
[00:01] <gnomefreak> ubot2: thanks
[00:01] <ubot2> You're welcome! But keep in mind I'm just a bot ;-)
[00:01] <ddecator> not very often i see someone thank the bot :p
[00:01]  * chrisccoulson punches ubot2 in the face ;)
[00:01] <chrisccoulson> heh
[00:02] <chrisccoulson> oh, it didn't like that
[00:02] <chrisccoulson> sorry ubot2
[00:03] <ddecator> haha
[00:03]  * gnomefreak still waiting for server update since we lost ubottu in most channels an ops rework of bot usage) to accept a few commands like mozilla bugs
[00:03] <gnomefreak> mozilla 21
[00:04] <gnomefreak> still :(
[00:04] <ddecator> :(
[00:04] <ddecator> i didn't know that wasn't working..
[00:04] <gnomefreak> ddecator: yea i found out today and asked one of the ops that handles bots to update server but seems its not in the works as thought. this was <7 hours ago
[00:05] <gnomefreak> bug 1
[00:05] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1 in tilix (and 18 other projects) "Microsoft has a majority market share (affects: 448) (heat: 2410)" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1
[00:05] <gnomefreak> sorry >7 hours ago
[00:05] <gnomefreak> it works only for ubuntu bugs atm
[00:05] <ddecator> at least lp bugs are working
[00:05]  * gnomefreak pings again before i go
[00:06] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: ddecator can either of you decline nomminations on bug reports?
[00:07] <chrisccoulson> gnomefreak, for packages in universe, yes
[00:07] <ddecator> i don't think i can. i'm in BC but not sure what rights are needed
[00:07] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: can you please decline the nominations on bug 356274 for me
[00:07] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 356274 in seamonkey (Ubuntu Jaunty) (and 1 other project) "[MASTER] Please update seamonkey to version 2.0* (affects: 3) (dups: 2) (heat: 40)" [High,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/356274
[00:08]  * gnomefreak never really applied for motu and since i lost all sorts of time i ggave up on thinking of it
[00:08] <chrisccoulson> i'm wondering whether we should accept them actually. we packaged seamonkey for the older releases already, and were considering rolling it out with the 2.0.5 updat
[00:09] <chrisccoulson> **update
[00:10] <chrisccoulson> anyway, declined for now
[00:10] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: as planned seamonkey will follow firefox/thunderbird releases so nominating them isnt needed the way i see it. we will push them all to everything under maverick wether its 2.0.5 or 2.0.10
[00:10] <gnomefreak> chrisccoulson: thanks
[00:11] <gnomefreak> checking update and gone for night i hope
[00:11] <ddecator> gnomefreak: at this rate you'll never leave
[00:12] <gnomefreak> :)
[00:12] <gnomefreak> im waiting for phone to ring but since she isnt calling no need to hang out
[00:14] <ddecator> finally, it's putting the tar.gz together..
[00:14] <ddecator> and it's a revision after my patch was added, so it should be good :)
[00:21] <ddecator> and all looks good
[00:21] <gnomefreak> ok now im gone for the night. see everyone most likely monday but we will see how board i get this weekend
[00:21] <gnomefreak> or not damnit
[00:22] <gnomefreak> libavcodec-extra-52 libavutil-extra-50 still broken
[00:22] <gnomefreak> poppler-utils == fixed
[00:23] <ddecator> gnomefreak: alright, cya. and i just pushed the branch
[00:24] <ddecator> gnomefreak: have a good weekend
[00:24] <gnomefreak> ddecator: you too
[00:25] <gnomefreak> i like Chromium inport option :)
[00:28] <ddecator> wait what..
[00:28] <gnomefreak> Chromium is not slow like FF3.6 and 3.7
[00:28] <ddecator> gah, one of the patches didn't update right...
[00:28] <gnomefreak> ddecator: when you open chromium it asks if you want to import settings/ect.. from fireofx
[00:29] <gnomefreak> oh thought you meant me
[00:32] <ddecator> oh, sorry, haha, the diff shows a huge block of code as being removed and i'm not sure why..
[00:33] <ddecator> could be it's just not showing where it's added after being updated..
[00:35] <ddecator> that must be it, the patch is displaying right..
[00:37] <ddecator> well, i'll double-check later, i have to get to a friends house for his birthday. cya
[07:24] <ddecator> ah good, FF 3.7 just had a patch fail to apply, i should be able to fix that..
[15:47] <DazWorrall> hey folks
[15:48] <DazWorrall> can anyone tell me if thunderbird 3.1 will be coming to the thunderbird-stable ppa (for lucid)?
[16:38] <fta> jdstrand, mdeslaur, (asac): any reason why chromium 5.0.375.70 is still in lucid-proposed after 8+ days? http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/chromium-daily.html
[17:16] <asac> because the process has flaws and its one of the first iterations.
[17:16] <asac> just push for it
[17:33] <fta> asac, btw, another improvement for the dashboard, you can now easily see what you have in proposed/updates/security
[17:33] <fta> even backports
[22:43] <jdstrand> fta: re 8 days> according to http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html, there are two bugs that need to be verified. Ie 587664 584959
[22:50] <jdstrand> fta: those two bugs have been adjusted for the SRU process
[22:51] <fta> jdstrand, thanks
[22:52] <fta> i look forward my dashboard moving from P to SU :)
[22:53] <fta> i find it weird that we keep the old/initial release in the archive though
[22:54] <jdstrand> fta: if you are able to verify those bugs are fixed, feel free to add a comment
[22:54] <jdstrand> well, once the archive is released, it is frozen forever
[22:54] <jdstrand> and the other pockets 'overlay' it if you will
[22:57] <fta> i know that, but keeping the security flawed binaries available for download is.. well, you know
[22:59] <jdstrand> true. I wasn't around when that decision was made. I would guess it had something to do with CDs/DVDs and stable/repeatable installations
[23:00] <jdstrand> it also gives people the opportunity to back out a regressed update