| bobby | Why isn't there a Public Key for the Maverick 3.7a6pre daily PPA? It won't let me update my system, because there isn't a Public Key, and it isn't authenticated on Maverick | 02:55 |
|---|---|---|
| ddecator | there isn't a key? | 02:56 |
| bobby | Nope | 02:56 |
| ddecator | should be this: http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB34505EA326FEAEA07E3618DEF4186FE247510BE&op=index | 02:56 |
| bobby | Nope | 02:56 |
| bobby | I used a terminal to update | 02:56 |
| bobby | Here, this is what I get in Update Manager | 02:57 |
| bobby | W:GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY EF4186FE247510BE, W:Failed to fetch http://linux.dropbox.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz 404 Not Found | 02:57 |
| bobby | , E:Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. | 02:57 |
| ddecator | did you use a terminal to add the ppa, or did you do it manually? | 02:57 |
| bobby | manually | 02:57 |
| bobby | Upgraded from Lucid, worked in Lucid | 02:57 |
| bobby | Removed and then re added the PPA, still nothing | 02:57 |
| ddecator | is the key still shown by the software sources? | 02:58 |
| bobby | Nothing comes up, it is just the PPA, so I'm not really sure | 02:58 |
| ddecator | it should be under "Authentication" | 02:58 |
| bobby | Nope, it isn't there... | 02:59 |
| ddecator | ok, then go here: http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEF4186FE247510BE | 02:59 |
| bobby | And just add that key? | 02:59 |
| ddecator | select the text, create a new text document somewhere on your comp, paste the text into the file, save, then import it in the Software Sources :) | 02:59 |
| ddecator | then it should work | 03:00 |
| bobby | The selected file may not be a GPG key file or it might be corrupt. | 03:00 |
| bobby | That is the error importing selected file | 03:00 |
| ddecator | alright, since you're on lucid, this will be easier. remove the PPA, then go to a terminal and run 'sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa' | 03:01 |
| bobby | I'm on Maverick | 03:02 |
| ddecator | well as long as you're on something on karmic or more recent | 03:02 |
| ddecator | that'll add the ppa and automatically get the key | 03:02 |
| bobby | Okay | 03:02 |
| bobby | Wait, after removing it, I get this: | 03:03 |
| bobby | Failed to fetch http://linux.dropbox.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz 404 Not Found | 03:03 |
| bobby | Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. | 03:03 |
| ddecator | why is it trying to pull something from dropbox.. | 03:03 |
| bobby | I have the Dropbox PPA installed too | 03:03 |
| bobby | Something messed up with the Sources manager? | 03:03 |
| ddecator | do you have the key added for the dropbox ppa? | 03:04 |
| bobby | No, now it isn't there... WTF? | 03:04 |
| ddecator | strange... | 03:04 |
| bobby | Wait, I opened it back up, now it is there again... | 03:04 |
| ddecator | the key is? | 03:05 |
| bobby | For Dropbox yeah | 03:05 |
| bobby | Weird... | 03:05 |
| ddecator | haha, weird. you can try importing the key for the mozilla daily ppa if you want, but running the command is usually easier | 03:05 |
| bobby | Yeah, I just did the command, lets see | 03:06 |
| bobby | Okay, it is there, lets update | 03:06 |
| bobby | Update manager gives me this now: | 03:06 |
| bobby | W:Failed to fetch http://linux.dropbox.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz 404 Not Found | 03:06 |
| bobby | , E:Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. | 03:06 |
| bobby | Is it the dropbox repos? | 03:07 |
| ddecator | might be.. | 03:07 |
| bobby | Not supporting Maverick? | 03:07 |
| bobby | Let me remove the dropbox PPA and key | 03:07 |
| ddecator | or they might be down atm | 03:07 |
| bobby | No, because I got the Lucid PPA and Key from the dropbox site | 03:07 |
| bobby | WAit... | 03:07 |
| bobby | It is the dropbox MAVERICK PPA | 03:07 |
| bobby | I don't think dropbox officially supports Maverick yet | 03:07 |
| bobby | I think I have to use the Lucid PPA, because when a source is added, it automatically changes to a Maverick key | 03:08 |
| bobby | What happened when I upgraded | 03:08 |
| ddecator | seems like they'd have it working in maverick.. | 03:08 |
| bobby | Well, I thought that too | 03:09 |
| ddecator | it could still be their server being down, i've run into that before with other PPAs | 03:09 |
| bobby | But there IS NO MAVERICK PPA for Dropbox, and when added to the sources, it automatically changes to a Dropbox repository | 03:09 |
| ddecator | strange.. | 03:09 |
| bobby | No, because I could get the Lucid repository | 03:09 |
| bobby | How can I remove dropbox? | 03:10 |
| bobby | The actual program? | 03:10 |
| bobby | I installed it using the .deb package from the Dropbox website | 03:10 |
| ddecator | you can find it in synaptic, or it may show up in the software center under installed software | 03:10 |
| bobby | No, it wasn't in Synaptic | 03:10 |
| bobby | I'll check the SC | 03:10 |
| bobby | Okay, got rid of dropbox, lets try and re-install it | 03:11 |
| bobby | Actually, let me reboot first, so it doesn't startup, brb | 03:12 |
| bobby | Okay, lets install dropbox again | 03:14 |
| ddecator | if there's a ppa, then can't you install from the ppa instead of the deb? | 03:15 |
| bobby | I r a genius | 03:16 |
| bobby | And, I couldn't find the PPA btw | 03:16 |
| bobby | All I did, was changide the dropbox PPA from Maverick to Luc | 03:16 |
| bobby | Lucid | 03:17 |
| ddecator | well, if it works | 03:17 |
| bobby | Well, I can't tell | 03:17 |
| bobby | The update manager is downloading 0 out of 0 bits, which means, I don't know if it is actually checking any repos for updates | 03:18 |
| bobby | Okay, because there isn't anything to update | 03:18 |
| bobby | sudo apt-get update | 03:18 |
| bobby | doesn't bring up any updates | 03:18 |
| bobby | BEAST | 03:18 |
| bobby | I love FOSS :) | 03:18 |
| bobby | Thanks for your help :) | 03:19 |
| bobby | Oh yeah, anyone know how the new JS engine is coming along? | 03:20 |
| ddecator | for FF? | 03:21 |
| bobby | Yeah | 03:21 |
| bobby | I haven't noticed a difference in the 3.7a6pre's engine over any previous ones | 03:22 |
| bobby | Takes a little while to load, but it runs pretty well, I'm still looking forward to the updated engine | 03:23 |
| ddecator | it probably won't be available for a while yet. the version should switch to 4.0 fairly soon, i'd expect them to allow testing of the engine in probably a month or so? that's just my guess | 03:24 |
| bobby | Yeah, hopefully in a few weeks, I think I read that they are changing to 4.0 when the updated JS engine is ready for beta | 03:25 |
| bobby | GTG, thanks for your help, see ya | 03:25 |
| ddecator | hey micahg | 03:47 |
| micahg | hi ddecator | 03:48 |
| ddecator | micahg: any chance you'll have time tonight to help me figure out how to fix the FF 3.7 patch? | 03:48 |
| micahg | ddecator: sorry, pidgin memory leak | 04:00 |
| micahg | actually, it's a kernel issue that'll be fixed in Maverick | 04:01 |
| ddecator | micahg: np | 04:03 |
| micahg | ddecator: ff37 should be similar to what you do w/songbird except you can use the .tar.gz from the daily PPA | 04:05 |
| micahg | ddecator: just saw your mail | 04:07 |
| ddecator | micahg: i was doing the same thing i had to do with sb, but for whatever reason whenever i tried to force the ubuntu_bookmarks patch to apply, it kept trying to force a different patch to apply, and i couldn't figure out why (although it was really late, so i might have been doing something wrong :p) | 04:07 |
| micahg | ddecator: so, quilt push -f, tries to push another patch even when it stops before on ubuntu_bookmarks? | 04:07 |
| ddecator | micahg: yup, firefox-profile patch or something | 04:07 |
| * micahg looks | 04:08 | |
| micahg | ddecator: which tarball are you using? | 04:08 |
| ddecator | micahg: i used get-orig-source | 04:08 |
| micahg | ddecator: k, then you might have a new patch to fix as well as the old issue | 04:08 |
| ddecator | micahg: the patch it was trying to apply worked when i tried to build, but then it would fail when quilt tried to force it (i'm guessing because it was already applied) | 04:09 |
| micahg | ddecator: k, do you have a patches dir in build-tree/mozilla? | 04:10 |
| ddecator | micahg: let me check.. | 04:10 |
| ddecator | micahg: no | 04:10 |
| micahg | ddecator: ln -s ../../debian/patches . | 04:11 |
| micahg | then try quilt pop -a | 04:11 |
| micahg | then quilt push -a | 04:11 |
| micahg | and see where it stops | 04:11 |
| ddecator | File series fully applied, ends at patch ubuntu_codes_amazon.patch | 04:13 |
| micahg | so maybe it's not broke anymore? | 04:13 |
| micahg | ddecator: try with a fresh build | 04:13 |
| ddecator | (from build-tree/mozilla) | 04:13 |
| ddecator | micahg: k | 04:13 |
| ddecator | should i be doing this from the firefox-<blah> dir or the mozilla dir? | 04:14 |
| micahg | ddecator: start from the firefox-3.7 dir with debuild -b | 04:14 |
| ddecator | micahg: k | 04:14 |
| micahg | ddecator: then when it fails, make the symlink in build-tree/mozilla and fix | 04:14 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, i'll give it a try | 04:15 |
| micahg | ddecator: k, if you get it fixed in the next 10 minutes, I'll try to merge it quickly :) | 04:15 |
| ddecator | micahg: sounds good :) | 04:15 |
| micahg | ddecator: don't worry, we'll get it fixed for tomorrow | 04:15 |
| ddecator | micahg: haha, ok | 04:15 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, ubuntu_bookmarks.patch failed, so create the symlink then use quilt push -f in the mozilla dir? | 04:16 |
| micahg | ddecator: right | 04:18 |
| ddecator | micahg: so doing that causes the series to fully apply.. | 04:18 |
| micahg | ddecator: that's weird | 04:18 |
| * micahg pulls down last nights tarball | 04:19 | |
| ddecator | sorry i know it's getting late, but i want to figure this out so i can start helping with the dailies :p | 04:19 |
| micahg | ddecator: that's ok, I'd like to get you helping too :) | 04:20 |
| * micahg can then work on other stuff :) | 04:20 | |
| ddecator | very true, haha | 04:20 |
| micahg | ddecator: wfm | 04:24 |
| ddecator | micahg: odd...let me try one more time | 04:24 |
| ddecator | micahg: didn't work again, i wonder if it's how i have quilt setup...here's what i'm doing: http://paste.ubuntu.com/452297/ | 04:31 |
| micahg | ddecator: idk | 04:32 |
| ddecator | micahg: this is what's in my .quiltrc file (doesn't seem like it should cause any issues) http://paste.ubuntu.com/452298/ | 04:33 |
| ddecator | micahg: the branch is firefox-3.7.head.daily right? | 04:33 |
| micahg | ddecator: ah, you might already have QUILT_PATCHES then... | 04:33 |
| micahg | ddecator: no, maybe that's your issue | 04:34 |
| micahg | firefox-3.7.head | 04:34 |
| ddecator | micahg: ah, thanks, i didn't see that on lp, i'll pull that and try it | 04:35 |
| micahg | ddecator: lp:firefox | 04:36 |
| ddecator | micahg: that's what i need to branch? | 04:36 |
| micahg | ddecator: it's firefox-3.7.head :) | 04:37 |
| ddecator | oh :) | 04:37 |
| ddecator | alright, i'm getting it now, i'll go through everything again afterward | 04:37 |
| micahg | ddecator: I try to keep lp:firefox as trunk | 04:41 |
| ddecator | micahg: good to know :) | 04:41 |
| * ddecator hopes this works | 04:41 | |
| ddecator | i was getting frustrated last night, haha | 04:41 |
| ddecator | micahg: i'm starting to hate my computer | 04:59 |
| ddecator | QUILT_PATCHES does point to the debian/patches dir.. | 05:01 |
| micahg | ddecator: k, so you should just be able to quilt push -f in build-tree-mozilla | 05:01 |
| ddecator | micahg: alright, let me try a sec | 05:02 |
| ddecator | micahg: still says it fully applied... | 05:06 |
| ddecator | but that patch definitely didn't apply... | 05:07 |
| micahg | ddecator: where's your .pc dir? | 05:11 |
| ddecator | micahg: where should it be? | 05:13 |
| micahg | ddecator: in build-tree/mozilla for FF/TB | 05:14 |
| ddecator | micahg: yup, it's there | 05:14 |
| ddecator | the ubuntu_bookmarks patch isn't in there.. | 05:15 |
| micahg | ddecator: that means it didn't apply | 05:15 |
| micahg | ddecator: is it in patches? | 05:15 |
| ddecator | micahg: yup | 05:15 |
| ddecator | i'm confused.. | 05:20 |
| * micahg is too | 05:20 | |
| ddecator | lets try... | 05:23 |
| ddecator | "No patches in series" wtf.. | 05:25 |
| micahg | ddecator: ah, so you do need the link | 05:25 |
| micahg | ddecator: so make the symlink and try quilt pop -a | 05:25 |
| ddecator | micahg: doesn't make a difference. i made the link and it still doesn't see the series file.. | 05:26 |
| micahg | ddecator: weird | 05:26 |
| micahg | ddecator: try moving your .quiltrc file out of the way | 05:27 |
| ddecator | micahg: k | 05:27 |
| micahg | ddecator: never worked right for me, so I gave up on it | 05:27 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, so i'll have to make the symlink then for sure, right? | 05:28 |
| micahg | ddecator: yep | 05:28 |
| ddecator | micahg: k | 05:28 |
| ddecator | micahg: ...that was it | 05:32 |
| micahg | ddecator: :) I had the same problem | 05:32 |
| ddecator | micahg: so did you already fix the patch, or should i fix it for practice and push to lp and request a merge? :) | 05:33 |
| micahg | ddecator: go for it | 05:34 |
| micahg | ddecator: BTW, I find it easier with the bookmarks patch to see if something around the code changed that's easily editable and edit the patch manually and try to reapply | 05:34 |
| micahg | ddecator: only because some of the lines are >500 char | 05:34 |
| ddecator | micahg: yah i saw that, wasn't really sure the best way to approach it. i'll take a look, thanks | 05:35 |
| ddecator | micahg: AHA! after a bit of trial and error, i got it fixed. i'll make sure it fully builds before i push to lp :) | 05:52 |
| micahg | ddecator: k, that one only takes a few minutes | 05:54 |
| ddecator | micahg: yup, just finished :) | 05:54 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, i'm pushing now, i'll request the merge in a few minutes. let me know if the formatting is wrong at all | 06:01 |
| micahg | ddecator: k, thanks | 06:02 |
| ddecator | heh, i changed the format of the "new upstream snapshot" a bit from what i do with sb, not sure if that really matters | 06:04 |
| ddecator | micahg: merge requested :) | 06:05 |
| micahg | ddecator: k, so here's the thing, we don't add a new changelog entry for each daily fix, so, just modify the current version in the changelog for the first commit, take a look at some previous commits for the commit entry, then, the second commit, you add your name to the existing entry with what you did, see other commits for formatting | 06:09 |
| ddecator | micahg: ah, ok, i kind of wondered about that. i'll do that now | 06:10 |
| micahg | ddecator: thanks | 06:11 |
| ddecator | micahg: should i still do one commit for the new snapshot and then a second commit for the fix, or should i just change the version of the package in the changelog, then add my fix and just commit the fix? | 06:13 |
| ddecator | micahg: looks like you do a commit with each update to the package version | 06:13 |
| ddecator | or revision* | 06:13 |
| ddecator | (i definitely didn't do this with songbird...) | 06:14 |
| micahg | ddecator: one commit to show the new version ,then one commit for each change | 06:14 |
| ddecator | micahg: k | 06:14 |
| micahg | ddecator: with songbird, we just need one new version commit, then one for each change (not file) | 06:14 |
| ddecator | micahg: so you want me to re-do the changelog for songbird so all of the changes are under the one entry? | 06:15 |
| micahg | ddecator: yes, so with songbird, you just need a changelog entry if you're adding a feature to the build, since it's not released yet, when there's a version in archive, then you need and entry for each packaging change | 06:17 |
| ddecator | micahg: so i don't need to add changelog entries for the build fixes? | 06:17 |
| micahg | ddecator: no, but you do need bzr commit entries | 06:19 |
| micahg | ddecator: it took me a while to get this down as well | 06:20 |
| ddecator | micahg: right. so should i just change the changelog or should i start over and re-commit the changes i made? (btw, i just re-pushed the firefox fix) | 06:20 |
| ddecator | except it didn't push... | 06:23 |
| micahg | ddecator: well, you can mv that dir and rebranch, then pull the changes in 1 by 1 and commit them with the proper messages | 06:23 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, i'll work on that after i get firefox figured out | 06:23 |
| micahg | ddecator: thanks | 06:24 |
| ddecator | it's giving me trouble because the branches diverged.. | 06:25 |
| micahg | ddecator: if it's yours, just push --overwrite | 06:25 |
| ddecator | i thought there was a way to do that, but i couldn't remember the flag. thanks :) | 06:26 |
| micahg | ddecator: bzr help push :) | 06:26 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, it updated. how does it look? | 06:28 |
| micahg | ddecator: almost got it :) 2 things...1. commit message should be 3.7 a6 not 3.7~a6, 2. for the first commit, make sure to pass debian/changelog to bzr commit so that it only commits the changelog file | 06:30 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok. how do i have it just commit that? | 06:31 |
| micahg | ddecator: bzr commit debian/changelog | 06:31 |
| ddecator | micahg: simple enough. here goes try #3 :) | 06:31 |
| micahg | ddecator: I don't remember how many times I had to redo the TB3 import | 06:31 |
| ddecator | micahg: is it ok for me to have "snapshot:" or should i remove the colon? | 06:33 |
| micahg | ddecator: I don't think you need the colon | 06:34 |
| ddecator | micahg: k | 06:34 |
| ddecator | alright, let's try this again | 06:38 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, it updated | 06:41 |
| micahg | ddecator: looks great | 06:42 |
| ddecator | micahg: i missed a space in the commit :p | 06:42 |
| micahg | ddecator: in the New upstream snapshot? | 06:43 |
| ddecator | micahg: yup. does that matter? | 06:43 |
| micahg | ddecator: I think it's ok this time | 06:43 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, i'll make sure to watch that next time, haha, i swear i hit space... | 06:44 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, so for songbird. just make one addition to the changelog for the new snapshot, then just do commits for all of the changes? | 06:44 |
| micahg | ddecator: although I wonder why the space is showing up different | 06:45 |
| ddecator | micahg: hm? | 06:45 |
| micahg | ddecator: nno, just modify the version in teh changelog | 06:45 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, and then just commits for the changes...i'll work on that next | 06:45 |
| micahg | ddecator: yep | 06:45 |
| * ddecator is learning :) | 06:46 | |
| micahg | ddecator: ah, they removed a space from that file, that's the diff | 06:48 |
| ddecator | micahg: oh, gotcha. i couldn't see a difference so i copy pasted the part before and after then respaced everything. a space might have gotten left out or added from that.. | 06:49 |
| ddecator | micahg: should i pass debian/changelog again, or was that just because i had updated the patch and that shouldn't have been in the commit? | 06:50 |
| micahg | ddecator: no, in the patch file | 06:50 |
| ddecator | micahg: i can fix the space if you want :p | 06:51 |
| * micahg goes to check upstream file | 06:51 | |
| ddecator | i think i changed it on accident.. | 06:51 |
| micahg | ddecator: no, it's correct | 06:52 |
| ddecator | :) | 06:52 |
| ddecator | micahg: so do i need to pass debian/changelog again? (i'm guessing not) | 06:53 |
| micahg | ddecator: no | 06:53 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, thanks | 06:54 |
| micahg | ddecator: k, I pushed it up | 06:55 |
| ddecator | micahg: and final question (for now). should i do the commit in the style you use for firefox, or the style fabien was using? | 06:55 |
| ddecator | micahg: thanks :) | 06:55 |
| micahg | ddecator: they should be the same | 06:55 |
| ddecator | micahg: k | 06:55 |
| micahg | ddecator: please tell me if I'm diverging | 06:55 |
| ddecator | micahg: well for songbird fabien was doing "* New upstream snapshot: 2.0.0~a SVN <blah>" which is how i was doing it | 06:56 |
| * micahg goes to check other commits | 06:56 | |
| ddecator | well it was 1.4.0 for him, but that format | 06:57 |
| micahg | ddecator: I think he's changed styles since then :-/ | 06:57 |
| micahg | ddecator: it's merged :) | 06:57 |
| ddecator | micahg: haha, so should i go with that, or the one you are using now? | 06:57 |
| ddecator | micahg: thanks :D | 06:57 |
| micahg | ddecator: thanks you | 06:58 |
| micahg | ddecator: use the current one | 06:58 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok | 06:58 |
| ddecator | micahg: the tarball doesn't say what alpha it is, it just says '2.0.0~a~svn<blah>' so should i do "2.0.0 a" or "2.0.0 a1"? | 06:59 |
| ddecator | it's nit-picky, but apparently i need to be :p | 06:59 |
| micahg | ddecator: 1st one | 07:00 |
| ddecator | micahg: alright, thanks. now i'll get started :p | 07:00 |
| nikolam | hi micahg, what could we/I do about debugging that seamonkey-closing bug, etc. Could it be upstream problem but not related to packaging? | 07:14 |
| micahg | nikolam: most likely due to the cairo changes in lucid, I'm supposed to prepare a patch for upstream, I just haven't gotten around to ityet | 07:14 |
| nikolam | so you think is distribution-related and that non-packaged variont of SM downloaded from Mozilla directly, most likely would not have such behavior? | 07:16 |
| micahg | nikolam: yes, it's because I used system cairo | 07:16 |
| nikolam | Aha. so it would require upstream changes to fix local behaviour.. | 07:17 |
| micahg | nikolam: well, it's patched in xulrunner-1.9.2, but not in xulrunner-1.9.1 which Seamonkey 2 is based on | 07:18 |
| nikolam | hm. I have xulrunner 1.9.2 on this lucid now | 07:19 |
| micahg | nikolam: yes, but Seamonkey 2.0 has its own copy of xulrunner | 07:20 |
| nikolam | so as i understand, it would have to wait 2.0.5 etc, or not? | 07:20 |
| nikolam | aha. or patching .1 with needed changes, I see. | 07:21 |
| micahg | nikolam: yeah, 2.0.5 is in the security PPA, but I don't have the fix yet, if I get it done before 2.0.5/FF3.5.10 is released, I'll have it reuploaded, otherwise, I'll need to SRU or wait until 2.0.6 (I'd be more inclined to SRU) | 07:22 |
| ddecator | micahg: ok, the songbird merge updated. i'm sure i need to fix a few things, just let me know what when you get a chance. (i'm not sure what's going on with the diff for the one patch, it has the contents and applies when i try to build, i think the diff shows everything being removed and then re-added but it gets cut-off?) | 07:23 |
| micahg | ddecator: I'll take a quick look, but I won't merge until morning as I'm afraid to do it when this tired | 07:23 |
| ddecator | micahg: no problem | 07:24 |
| ddecator | wait.. | 07:35 |
| ddecator | what the heck, with that patch i just made sure xulrunner was replaced with xulrunner-1.9.2, why is that huge block missing.. | 07:36 |
| micahg | ddecator: was it not committed originally? | 07:36 |
| ddecator | micahg: i'm not sure, i'm checking the patch that's in the untouched branch to see if a block is really missing | 07:37 |
| ddecator | yah, a huge chunk is missing, what the heck.. | 07:38 |
| ddecator | let me see if i can redo the change | 07:38 |
| ddecator | micahg: i'll fix that, make sure it still applies, then re-push so you can check tomorrow | 07:41 |
| micahg | ddecator: k | 07:41 |
| ddecator | micahg: should be good now | 08:34 |
| micahg | ddecator: k, thanks | 08:35 |
| ddecator | dang it, there's still one file it doesn't take care of. it'll be ready in a little bit... | 08:41 |
| ddecator | there... | 08:50 |
| gnomefreak | ddecator: are you around? | 17:45 |
| gnomefreak | im just guessing here but Songbird FTBFS again? | 17:45 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: he's working on it :) | 17:56 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: thanks just checking. i really really wan tto play with it | 17:57 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: he fixed FF37 last night | 17:57 |
| gnomefreak | oh yeah i forgot that was old/broken | 17:58 |
| gnomefreak | i took a quick look at gtkpod but it didnt look like it was a easy learning app. but when i get more time i will play with that as well | 17:59 |
| gnomefreak | i need a link | 18:11 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: to? | 18:11 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: any flash video. testing chromium as default browser and flash | 18:12 |
| fta | micahg, fixed the dh7 thingy in my dashboard: http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/ubuntu-mozilla-daily--ppa.html | 18:12 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4kT-K9eJ2k&feature=fvhl | 18:13 |
| gnomefreak | thanks | 18:13 |
| fta | micahg, dh7 is indeed in hardy, but in backports, so it's not really usable | 18:13 |
| gnomefreak | youtube wasnt being helpful but im trying your link now | 18:13 |
| micahg | fta: yep, I was saying that we probably don't need it in the PPA | 18:13 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: with Chromium, you can use HTML5 w/Youtube | 18:13 |
| gnomefreak | ah | 18:14 |
| gnomefreak | well this video works now test java on thier site :) | 18:14 |
| fta | micahg, just deleted ff3.5 from umd | 18:16 |
| gnomefreak | http://java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml fails in Chromium | 18:16 |
| gnomefreak | so i have to guess either java needs to be enabled or the versions i have dont work | 18:17 |
| micahg | fta: cool, can you delete thunderbird-3.0 please? | 18:17 |
| fta | micahg, done | 18:17 |
| micahg | fta: thanks | 18:18 |
| gnomefreak | fta: micahg ok what am i missing with java+chromium? | 18:21 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: I'm guessing the Java part ;) | 18:22 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: which java? | 18:22 |
| gnomefreak | yeah i was thinking that but i dont see anyway to enable it or even if it works with the versions im using | 18:22 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: which java? | 18:22 |
| fta | gnomefreak, i use sun-java6-plugin and it's fine. but iirc, there's a problem with openjdk-6 | 18:23 |
| gnomefreak | IIRC i am using free version but i do believe i have both installed. im going to play in update-alternatives to see what i have | 18:23 |
| micahg | bug 529242 | 18:23 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 529242 in chromium-browser (Mandriva) (and 3 other projects) "chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin (affects: 13) (dups: 1) (heat: 99)" [Unknown,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/529242 | 18:23 |
| gnomefreak | policy sun-java6-plugin | 18:24 |
| gnomefreak | W: Unable to locate package sun-java6-plugin | 18:24 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: partner? | 18:24 |
| gnomefreak | its wont fix | 18:24 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: for mandriva :) | 18:24 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: i thought i had it enabled but cheaking | 18:24 |
| fta | lucid/partner | 18:24 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: ah | 18:24 |
| fta | !info sun-java6-plugin | 18:25 |
| fta | zzZZzz.. | 18:25 |
| * gnomefreak doesnt like mandriva. im on 10.10 | 18:25 | |
| ubot2 | fta: Package sun-java6-plugin does not exist in lucid | 18:25 |
| fta | !info sun-java6-plugin partner | 18:25 |
| ubot2 | fta: 'partner' is not a valid distribution: hardy, jaunty, karmic, lucid | 18:25 |
| fta | pfff | 18:25 |
| gnomefreak | yep its enabled | 18:25 |
| micahg | http://pastebin.com/ngXwz51G | 18:26 |
| fta | remember it's partner/lucid, not maverick | 18:28 |
| gnomefreak | http://paste.ubuntu.com/452567/ | 18:29 |
| gnomefreak | i am enabling it for lucid | 18:29 |
| gnomefreak | once updates and my smoke is done | 18:30 |
| fta | smoking is bad for you | 18:31 |
| gnomefreak | sometimes :) | 18:31 |
| fta | and for anyone fwiw | 18:31 |
| fta | micahg, will hardy get ff3.6? | 18:49 |
| micahg | fta: yes, it's staged in the mozilla-security PPA | 18:53 |
| fta | micahg, why is it red in umd then? | 18:54 |
| micahg | fta: .head won't build, chrisccoulson or I need to modify the patch so that the dailies work, it's the kde patches | 18:55 |
| fta | oh | 18:55 |
| gnomefreak | ok set my alias' finally | 19:21 |
| gnomefreak | i need to find a song that i heard a week or 2 ago and other than "i hate$SOMETHING" in the song i have nothing :( | 19:33 |
| gnomefreak | i love i dont have to restart Chromium after installing extensions and stuff :) | 19:37 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: FF4 will have the same capabilities | 19:39 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: cool | 19:40 |
| JanC | the new extension famework can be installed in current FF too | 19:42 |
| JanC | search for the JetPack extension | 19:43 |
| micahg | JanC: I think the idea is even for non jetpack extensions to not require a restart in 4.0 | 19:43 |
| gnomefreak | what is smtp port other than 25 i was thinking its 465 or something like that? | 19:44 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: 465 or 587 | 19:44 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: thanks | 19:44 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: 465 is smtps and 587 is smtps or alternative smtp | 19:45 |
| JanC | I thought that wasn't possible with all current extensions, but one never knows... ;) | 19:45 |
| JanC | 587 is "submission" | 19:45 |
| gnomefreak | and that was the problem :) | 19:46 |
| JanC | intended to be used for an smtp-server to "submit" mail to from a mail client (and is using TLS in most cases because of that--you only want authenticated users to use your mailserver to send mail) | 19:47 |
| gnomefreak | Chromium is broken i think. i set it as default in the system>pref. menu i set as default in update-alternatives and it poped up saying its not default so i clicked the button on the prower that said "set as default" and yet it is still poping up when i open a new session | 19:49 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: alternative system isn't the main way to set defaults anymore | 19:52 |
| JanC | there are many ways to set a "default" browser in linux ;) | 19:52 |
| gnomefreak | i know but even still it is set everywhere and opens as default but says it isnt default | 19:53 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: what does xdg-open open? | 19:53 |
| gnomefreak | nothing | 19:54 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: xdg-open http://google.com opens nothing? | 19:54 |
| gnomefreak | i tried just "xdg-open" and i tried with a url but failed to open | 19:54 |
| JanC | use '' around the URL | 19:55 |
| gnomefreak | i didnt use the HTTP | 19:55 |
| gnomefreak | it opened chromium and still has the yellow bar at top saying it is not my default browser and gives me 2 buttons "set as default" and "dont ask me again" | 19:56 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: that's probably a bug | 19:57 |
| micahg | fta: ^^^ | 19:57 |
| gnomefreak | it is a bug :) | 19:57 |
| gnomefreak | il try the dont ask again and see what happens | 19:58 |
| fta | http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=45208 | 19:58 |
| ddecator | gnomefreak: i am now | 19:59 |
| micahg | bug 513133? | 19:59 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 513133 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "When chromium is the only browser installed, i'm still asked to make it the default (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 38)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/513133 | 19:59 |
| ddecator | gnomefreak: i have it building, now it's just a matter of getting the commits and everything right so it can be merged :) | 19:59 |
| fta | yep, it's xdg something | 19:59 |
| gnomefreak | ddecator: :) micahg answered | 19:59 |
| ddecator | gnomefreak: waiting on him to review :p | 19:59 |
| gnomefreak | ddecator: i was looking for your commits thinking that you did more than 1 and i was going to see what i could do but now the weekend is hectic for me | 20:00 |
| gnomefreak | fta: how do i get the updates? i click on the star but how does it know my email? | 20:03 |
| gnomefreak | i am signed in for google | 20:03 |
| gnomefreak | they havent finished tb3 tb31 and they are already talking about tb32 | 20:14 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: what do you mean? | 20:15 |
| gnomefreak | mozilla is talking about code name (not sure what else i havent finished reading) still have alot of updates for 3.0 that should be comming. tb31 has yet been released it might be beta i dont recall and now 32 is starting | 20:16 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: codenames are chosen early on | 20:16 |
| gnomefreak | i know but still 32 is a long ways away atm what maybe 1 year or so | 20:17 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: they're trying to get comm-central in shape for an alpha 1 release and they need the codename before | 20:17 |
| gnomefreak | oh | 20:18 |
| gnomefreak | ff37 is hitting beta1 soon or has already? | 20:19 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: soon | 20:20 |
| ddecator | and will hopefully labeled 4.0 :) | 20:21 |
| gnomefreak | well there are some blockers atm. i know of one for Windows atm | 20:21 |
| * gnomefreak wonders | 20:21 | |
| gnomefreak | mozilla 513162 | 20:21 |
| * gnomefreak waits | 20:21 | |
| gnomefreak | and waits | 20:21 |
| ubot2 | Mozilla bug 513162 in Widget: Win32 "[Windows] Drawing in the Title Bar for the New Firefox Theme" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513162 | 20:21 |
| gnomefreak | about time you shit | 20:22 |
| ddecator | ubot2 is hungover | 20:22 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'is hungover' not found | 20:22 |
| gnomefreak | ok they fixed server | 20:22 |
| gnomefreak | i miss the real bot, i am sick of these clones | 20:22 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: too much load for 1 bot | 20:22 |
| gnomefreak | cant use any admin commands | 20:22 |
| ddecator | gnomefreak: it was hit and miss last night when i tried it, didn't catch some of the bugs mentioned (in a diff channel) | 20:22 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: there are ~6 bots we are using to save ubottu from working in every channel | 20:23 |
| gnomefreak | if i get time i will beet with the IRCC and talk about this | 20:24 |
| gnomefreak | @whoami | 20:24 |
| ubot2 | gnomefreak: I don't recognize you. | 20:24 |
| gnomefreak | see | 20:24 |
| micahg | @whoami | 20:24 |
| ubot2 | micahg: I don't recognize you. | 20:24 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: file a bug or complain to the IRC admins | 20:24 |
| micahg | s/IRC admins/ubuntu-irc | 20:25 |
| gnomefreak | i am, bug isnt worth it since i have direct access to the council | 20:25 |
| gnomefreak | ill be back in a few | 20:25 |
| gnomefreak | ill be gone for a bit i need to get dinner started. | 20:34 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!