/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/06/21/#ubuntu-motu.txt

keffie_jayxhey guys, I have a little issue with locales. upstream has moved locales to a new folder and now running the package sets it to the base langauge always.  however if I do LANG=EN  fr example I get the app in the correct language01:49
keffie_jayxhttp://pastebin.ubuntu.com/452710/01:55
ramirohi. where can I find the documentation of what variables I can expect to be set for debian/rules when dpkg-buildpackage is called?03:52
RAOFramiro: You can't really expect any environment variables to be set; debian/rules is not guaranteed to be called by dpkg-buildpackage (although it will be almost all the time).04:00
ramiroRAOF: ok, that's what I thought. I found some documentation at http://man.cx/dpkg-buildpackage%281%29 that lists a few env vars.04:06
ramiroand is there a non-hackish way (through the dpkg- tools) to determine what host system I'm building with and for (hackish being calling uname and gcc -dumpmachine).04:06
RAOFdpkg-architecture04:07
RAOFIt doesn't export the variables itself, but it provides all the host information you'll need.04:08
ramirothank you04:09
=== echidnaman is now known as JontheEchidna
kaushalhi06:34
kaushalis there a mailing lits for this channel ?06:37
kaushallist*06:37
micahgkaushal: there is a mailing list for MOTU06:37
kaushalI have a particular issue06:37
kaushalshall i post the thread ?06:38
micahgkaushal: what type of issue?06:38
kaushalhttps://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-server/2010-June/004345.html06:40
micahgkaushal: #ubuntu-server is probably the best place06:40
kaushalmicahg: i did that already06:41
micahgkaushal: this channel is for packaging related issues, not support, also you posted on the weekend, you might want to see if you get some results Monday morning06:42
micahgkaushal: I'd suggest trying the #ubuntu-server channel in about 9 hours06:43
kaushalmicahg: ok06:43
micahgkaushal: maybe 8 hours06:44
kaushalmicahg: can i findout the package maintainer06:46
micahgkaushal: In Ubuntu, we generally don't have maintainers06:46
micahgkaushal: it's in universe, so MOTU is responsible for packaging06:47
dholbachgood morning06:47
micahgkaushal: but aside from one upload for hardy, it's been sync'd from Debian06:50
micahgkaushal: BTW, there's an update in hardy-updates for your package06:51
kaushalmicahg: are you talking about ocsinventory-agent ?06:54
micahgkaushal: yes06:54
kaushalcan i know the details ?06:55
micahgkaushal: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ocsinventory-agent/1:0.0.8-1ubuntu0.106:55
kaushalmicahg: how do i install it06:57
kaushali did apt-get update and then apt-get install ocs.....06:58
micahgkaushal: you have to enable hardy-updates06:58
micahgsomeone in #ubuntu can help with that06:58
kaushalmicahg: Thanks it worked now07:07
micahgkaushal: good luck07:07
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
Rhondahttp://www.sinfest.net/archive_page.php?comicID=3574 - wtf?09:27
RhondaCan someone explain that one to me? :)09:27
directhexhttp://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bro09:28
RhondaI know the slang term bro for brother, but I still don't get it.09:30
RhondaThe ubuntu reference is what I'm puzzled about.09:31
didrockshyperair: hey, jcastro told me you have a branch for hal-free banshee, do you think it's in a state that can be integrated to maverick?09:45
hyperairdidrocks: i haven't actually tried it yet. it's still rather experimental, or so i have heard.09:45
didrockshyperair: the hal support is only for ipod or for all hw?09:46
hyperairdidrocks: all hw.09:46
hyperairdidrocks: if i'm not mistaken, that hal-free banshee branch will deprecate ipod-sharp and podsleuth, in favour of libgpod09:46
didrockshyperair: that would rock :) do you know who I should contact about it to see if we can integrated and leverage some tests? (unfortunately, I don't have enough upstream knowledge to hack on it there)09:47
hyperairdidrocks: lemme dig through my mail09:47
didrocks(also, I don't see the branch there: http://git.gnome.org/browse/banshee/refs/heads)09:48
didrocksthanks hyperair :)09:48
hyperair=)09:48
RAOFhyperair: Really?  I didn't think the hal-free banshee was particularly related to the libgpod transition?09:48
hyperairRAOF: it wasn't?09:48
hyperairRAOF: podsleuth isn't going to transition to hal-freedom anytime soon.09:48
RAOFBut there still aren't any C# bindings for libgpod, are there?09:49
Laneydidrocks: lamalex was working on it, its probably on gitorious09:49
RAOFAnd the udev-backed Banshee branch is available _now_ (and may even work)09:49
didrocksRAOF: do you have an url please? I want to put the crack on maverick now :)09:50
didrocksLaney: hum, don't find it in gitorious (should be there, I guess: http://gitorious.org/banshee/mainline)09:52
LaneyI suggest you have a word with lamalex first09:52
LaneyIt's probably this http://gitorious.org/~lamalex/banshee/lamalex-udev or one of the clones/branches09:52
didrocksLaney: yeah, google was just my friend :) not sure if that's what RAOF was talking about09:53
didrocksI'll email him now09:54
hyperairRAOF: the libgpod C# bindings are being worked on afaik09:55
Laneyhe hangs around in #banshee as well09:55
Laney(just not atm)09:55
didrocksLaney: ok, I'll try to ping him when he's there, I wasn't sure he was hanging on IRC09:56
didrockshyperair: Laney: thanks!09:56
Laneyno worries09:56
directhexhe's on yank time, so try again when yanks aren't sleeping09:57
hyperairdidrocks: http://old.nabble.com/iPhone-Support-in-Banshee-tt23116289.html#a2887320209:58
hyperairdidrocks: ping alan on #banshee as well10:02
hyperair(he's also not around currently)10:02
directhexhe's on ireland time, so should be about10:02
didrockshyperair: oh sweet, will do, thanks10:03
hyperairhttp://gitorious.org/~alanmcgovern/banshee/banshee-iphone <-- this looks like a clone of lamalex's branch though10:04
RAOFYeah, it is.10:04
directhexhe had it working10:04
RAOFSorry about that, X freeze.10:04
directhexhe was showing demos10:04
didrocksdirecthex: really? Hum, can be interesting to include it for alpha2 then10:14
hyperairthe e-mail mentioned it should be upstreamed in a week or two (from that date, that should be around now, or next week)10:26
directhexalan just materialized FYI10:32
directhex<alan> If he is, tell him to keep an eye on: http://gitorious.org/~alanmcgovern/banshee/banshee-iphone10:42
directhex<alan> i cloned yesterday and will start pushing my work to there this week10:42
directhex<alan> once everything is good to go, i'll push my changes to lamalexs branch10:42
directhex<alan> and once his changes are all good to go, they'll be pushed to banshee10:42
keffie_jayxhey all, I just addd a patch system to a package, after setting up the patch, is there something I should add to debian/rules for it to be applied during the build of the deb file?11:42
keffie_jayxI fund what I was looking for reading more carefully the docs11:56
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna
=== mathiaz_ is now known as mathiaz
sbasuitaWhat's the simplest/cleanest way to get cdbs to run autoreconf -fi (yes, I know it should be done upstream ;P)15:51
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
statikscottk: i will take a look at revu and delete anything i have left in there (and possibly move it to DPMT instead)17:34
ScottKstatik: Thanks.  DPMT would be good.17:35
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
dobeyhi fabrice_sp :)18:27
dobeyfabrice_sp: good news. mocker 1.0 was relased yesterday :P18:28
fabrice_spdobey, you was waiting for me :-D18:31
fabrice_spso the watch file should work, right?18:31
dobeyfabrice_sp: hehe. i just switched channels and saw you come in. the watch file does work now. i ran uscan and it downloaded the new tarball :P18:34
dobeyfabrice_sp: but the license changed, and lots of bugs were fixed. there's only 1 open on mocker now. so i'm making the deb for 1.018:35
fabrice_spdobey, cool18:35
fabrice_spping me when you get the package in a good shape, and I'll ave a look18:35
fabrice_spwhat is the new license?18:36
dobeyand i'm going to fix it to run tests during the build too18:36
dobeyBSD18:36
fabrice_spok18:36
fabrice_spgood18:36
fabrice_spby the way, it's python, riht?18:36
dobeyyes18:38
dobeyfabrice_sp: alright, just did the dput to revu for it :)18:41
fabrice_spdid you try to ocntact debian-python team?18:44
* fabrice_sp don't remember if he already tried to send you there .-)18:45
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: poke :)18:48
dobeyfabrice_sp: i haven't, because as i said, just trying to have it packaged in ubuntu, so we can rely on the package rather than copying mocker.py across all the ubuntu one projects where we use it (and the landscape/launchpad guys also want it), and in order to have it packaged, and to run tests in our package builds, it would need to be in ubuntu, rather than just a PPA18:50
NorthernLightsHi all18:50
dobeyand upstream would prefer not to have it packaged at all, but i bugged him enough to reach a compromise in that regard :)18:50
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: yes?18:51
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: ah yes,in this : http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=831918:51
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: do i add a debian/watch or modify debian/rules?18:51
tumbleweedwe might as well move this to PM18:52
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: sure18:52
dobeyhi NorthernLights18:52
NorthernLightsHola18:52
ScottKtumbleweed: It's better to keep technical discussions in the channel so bystanders can learn.18:53
NorthernLightsAny answer about the Original-Maintainer thingy?18:53
dobeyNorthernLights: i didn't ask, but my comment on revu was based on what the FAQ says on the wiki about it :)18:53
NorthernLightsoh18:53
tumbleweedScottK: ok, sure. but they can get long and noisy :)18:53
NorthernLightsi guess you're right18:53
* NorthernLights is still tickled...18:53
ScottKtumbleweed: I think it's fine.18:53
NorthernLightsHola MOTU!18:53
tumbleweedin that case, shadeslayer_: both. example: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/python-modules/packages/configobj/trunk/debian/rules?revision=12242&view=markup18:54
NorthernLightsMust new Ubuntu packages debian/control file have a XSBC-Original-Maintainer field?18:54
ScottKtumbleweed: Not that I particularly worry with you, but there have been problems in the past with bad advice given in PM.  If it's in public, QA can happen real time.18:54
ScottKNorthernLights: No, it's not absolutely required, but there will be warnings as a result, so generally it's better.18:55
tumbleweedScottK: yeah, agreed.18:55
NorthernLightsTx ScottK18:55
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: if you can walk me through those lines please :)18:55
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: ive understood the 3rd line of get-orig-source :P18:56
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: so, it's all executed as one sh command (that's why we set -e, to exit or errors)18:57
shadeslayer_bah.. ive understood all of it except line 1 and 218:57
tumbleweedVER uses dpkg-parsechangelog to find what the current version of the source package is and store it in VER18:57
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: is that a standard line used everywhere?18:57
shadeslayer_like suppose can i use it for my package?18:58
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: no I don't think there are any standards to this kind of thing, but it's a nice way to do it18:58
tumbleweedthis example actually gets us a zip file which then gets repacked as .tar.gz - let me see if I can find a simpler examlpe18:58
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: ok one more thing,where does it store the URL part? the actual URL it has to download?18:59
tumbleweedthat comes from debian/watch18:59
shadeslayer_ahh..18:59
tumbleweedwhich also has a little magic: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/python-modules/packages/configobj/trunk/debian/watch?revision=12242&view=markup18:59
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: ok, here's a simpler one: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/python-modules/packages/pyfiglet/trunk/debian/rules19:02
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: ah ok,i understand...19:04
shadeslayer_i need spend a little more time reading about sed tho :P19:04
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: and the watch file..19:04
shadeslayer_whats : opts=dversionmangle=s/\+ds// \19:04
tumbleweedso, our version has +ds at the end, but upstream doesn't19:05
tumbleweedthat says remove +ds from the version19:05
shadeslayer_ah...19:05
tumbleweedthe sed was also doing that, and stripping the "Version: " a the beginning19:06
tumbleweed[^+]+ means "everything until you reach a +"19:06
NorthernLights^.*\+19:07
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: so "Version: " is like the string or a number,like 1.0.0 ?19:08
tumbleweedNorthernLights: * is greedy, so it'll catch everything util the last +19:08
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: run dpkg-parsechangelog and you'll see19:08
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: on the dsc file?19:09
tumbleweedjust in your source19:09
shadeslayer_Ohhhh19:09
NorthernLightsright tumbleweed19:10
NorthernLightsbut are you sure ^+ means anything?19:10
tumbleweedNorthernLights: when a [] starts with a ^ it means anything except what's listed19:11
NorthernLightsoh i didn't know that, thanks19:12
* NorthernLights is taking advantage of a pause in the discussion19:27
NorthernLights*inhales... exhales...19:27
NorthernLightsHey MOTUs! Wanna review a great package? Easy and quick! Nice upstream software! http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/synergy-plus ! Yeah!19:28
shadeslayer_hehe :D19:29
shadeslayerok so i have this lintian warning : W: qipmsg source: dh-clean-k-is-deprecated19:43
shadeslayerbut when i replace dh_clean -k with [ ! -f Makefile ] || $(MAKE) distclean,the package fails to build19:44
sbasuitashadeslayer: you're meant to use dh_prep instead19:45
shadeslayerok wait... wth its building now :P19:45
shadeslayersbasuita: ok.. .so use dh_prep now?19:45
fabrice_spdobey, in case you're still here: you should run update-maintainer19:46
shadeslayersbasuita: ok thanks19:46
sbasuitashadeslayer: i just googled and found http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dh-clean-k-is-deprecated.html ;)19:46
fabrice_sp(It seems I missed it before)19:46
shadeslayerbtw to update my revu upload,what should i do? post debdiff?19:46
dobeyfabrice_sp: what does that do?19:46
shadeslayersbasuita: yes i found that too,but lintian says otherwise ;)19:46
sbasuitashadeslayer: what does it say?19:47
shadeslayersbasuita: http://shadeslayer.pastebin.com/HRWJWrAz19:48
fabrice_spdobey, update the maintainer field to the latest value, and put your name in XSBC-original-maintainer19:48
dobeyfabrice_sp: haha19:48
dobey[dobey@lunatari:mocker]: update-maintainer --help19:48
dobeyMaintainer email is set to an @ubuntu.com address - doing nothing.19:48
fabrice_spargh19:48
dobeyfabrice_sp: should it be something else for some reason? i will be maintaining it19:49
fabrice_spdobey, the correct value is "Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>"19:49
NorthernLightsdobey, :p19:50
fabrice_spput yourself as original-maintainer19:50
sbasuitashadeslayer: dh_clean and make distclean do two separate jobs19:50
dobeyfabrice_sp: fix the FAQ :)19:50
fabrice_spand after uploaded, subscribe to the bug reports19:50
fabrice_spwhich FAQ?19:50
dobeyhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/FAQ#What%20does%20XSBC-Original-Maintainer%20mean?19:50
sbasuitashadeslayer: you'll need both19:50
fabrice_spdobey, what should be fixed?19:51
fabrice_spSorry, but it seems correct with a quick read :-)19:52
dobeyfabrice_sp: that entry implies that Original-Maintainer should match the previous value of Maintainer, when a package is changed in Ubuntu. It doesn't say new packages directly in Ubuntu should have the maintainer set to Ubuntu Developers and Original-Maintainer set. it implies that is only for pre-existing package being changed in Ubuntu19:53
dobeyand there is no preexisting package being changed in ubuntu here19:53
fabrice_spdobey, well, I'm sure that there is some wiki page that says that the maintainer field sohuld be set to Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com> for ubuntu's package19:55
fabrice_sp:-)19:55
fabrice_spdobey, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField19:56
NorthernLightsHow about https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete#control ?19:56
NorthernLights"In Ubuntu we set the Maintainer field to a general address because anyone can change any package (this differs from Debian where changing packages is usually restricted to an individual or a team).19:57
NorthernLightsEdit control using the information above (making sure to provide your information for the XSBC-Original-Maintainer field)."19:57
dobeyrfabok, so it should be set to Ubuntu Developers, and Original-Maintainer not set at all19:58
dobeyerr19:58
dobeywtf19:58
dobeyi typed fab<tab> and got rfabok?19:59
* dobey pokes irssi with a stick19:59
dobeyfabrice_sp: ok, so it should be set to Ubuntu Developers, and Original-Maintainer not set at all19:59
dobeyno?19:59
fabrice_spdobey, you can put yourself as xsbc-original-maitainer19:59
dobeyall these pages seem to say something just slightly different :-/20:03
dobeyfabrice_sp: ok, just dput another upload with that change20:09
fabrice_spdobey, ok. I'll download it in a bit20:10
fabrice_spdobey, my point is that if you had uploaded it to Debian, your name would be there, so it follow the same. If you check dvdstyler, you'll se my name there :-)20:15
fabrice_sp(and it's a pure ubuntu package)20:15
dobeyfabrice_sp: if i had uploaded it to debian, and Maintainer includes @ubuntu.com, the wiki page states it shouldn't change, anyway :)20:16
fabrice_spwell, I would had updated it :-)20:16
fabrice_spas maintenance in Ubuntu is Team based20:17
gubatronHi, I'm a member of the FrostWire team, we've finished packing a frostwire source package as requested here for inclusion to Ubuntu repo https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+bug/94011 - They told me to come here for help to see what's needed to include FrostWire as part of the repo.20:19
ubottuLaunchpad bug 94011 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] Frostwire" [Wishlist,Confirmed]20:19
dobeyfabrice_sp: well, if i'd uploaded to debian, there would be no need to maintain it in ubuntu really. would just need it synced, and then approved for MIR later i guess20:19
fabrice_spdobey, right: in a sync, the maintainer won't be hcanged20:20
tumbleweedfabrice_sp: um, I thought it was, during build20:21
fabrice_sptumbleweed, let me check, but source isn't20:22
tumbleweedyeah, source isn't, binary is20:22
fabrice_sptumbleweed, right20:24
fabrice_spI've just with one package and source is still Debian maintainer, but binary is updated to Ubuntu Developers20:24
fabrice_spI didn't know that. Thanks tumbleweed !20:33
dobeyfabrice_sp: do you need to re-advoacate for the new upload?20:43
fabrice_spdobey, yep20:44
fabrice_spThat's what I was doing :-)20:44
fabrice_spdo you know if the BSD license file is copied in some place in the system? (like the GPL one)20:45
tumbleweedthe BSD license is almost always modified by the user20:45
dobeydon't think it is20:45
fabrice_spok20:45
tumbleweed/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD20:46
dobeyoh it is20:46
tumbleweedbut watch out, people change "the name of the University"20:46
dobeybut that's broken20:46
dobeybecause everyone doesn't assign copyright to the Regents of the University of Berkeley20:47
dobeyso linking to that would imply the uni owns the copyright20:47
tumbleweedsomething like that20:47
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: my new rules file : http://shadeslayer.pastebin.com/R5ZmbPzZ20:59
shadeslayer_still playing with it tho...20:59
shadeslayer_line 26 should be dh_prep... but its not working with that21:00
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: I doubt your package is called configobj :)21:01
shadeslayer_><21:01
shadeslayer_corrected :)21:01
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: ok what do you think of line 26? lintian complains of using dh_prep21:02
shadeslayer_but when i use it package FTBFS21:02
tumbleweedwhy would you clean inbetween build and install?21:02
dobeyfabrice_sp: hrmm. was that comment supposed to end immediately after "another" ? or did it get chopped off? (there's no period)21:03
tumbleweedoh -k21:03
shadeslayer_:)21:03
=== aganice_ is now known as aganice
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: so, what's the problem with dh_prep?21:12
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: http://shadeslayer.pastebin.com/4zEsfjBP21:13
shadeslayer_causes FTBFS cuz im not using it properly :P21:13
fabrice_spdobey, it was supposed to end with "sponsor."21:13
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: http://pastebin.com/Nwcrg0tu21:13
fabrice_sp:-)21:13
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: i moved dh_prep to the clean part21:14
dobeyfabrice_sp: ok21:14
dobeywho wants to sponsor my package and upload it to universe? :)21:14
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: why? why not replace dh_clean -k with dh_prep21:14
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: same issue21:14
shadeslayer_causes FTBFS21:15
tumbleweedwhat fails?21:15
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: make[1]: *** No rule to make target `packages/qipmsg-1.0.0.orig/debian/qipmsg'.  Stop.21:15
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: works fine for me, as long as you "[ ! -f src/Makefile ] || $(MAKE) clean"21:18
shadeslayer_aha!21:18
shadeslayer_lets see what happens now..21:19
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: how do i update my revu request with new changes?21:20
tumbleweedyou upload it again21:20
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: nuke earlier package?21:20
tumbleweedit'll replace it21:20
shadeslayer_ah ok21:20
shadeslayer_even if its the same version?21:20
tumbleweedyup21:21
shadeslayer_nice nice...21:21
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: what can i do about I: qipmsg: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/qipmsg Unkown Unknown21:22
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: still ftbfs :P21:23
shadeslayer_make[1]: *** No rule to make target `packages/qipmsg-1.0.0.orig/debian/qipmsg'.  Stop.21:23
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: can you pastebin your rules file? or is it the same?21:23
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: a single line like that doesn't help. Paste your rules file, the command you are excuting, and output21:23
shadeslayer_hold on ill pastebin the whole log :)21:24
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: http://pastebin.com/wGfPiZDU21:24
shadeslayer_thats the rules file21:24
tumbleweedI see it's still called configobj21:25
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: yeah i know :P21:25
tumbleweedand you try to unzip a .tar.bz221:25
shadeslayer_oh..  i need tar there21:25
BlackZ<shadeslayer_> tumbleweed: how do i update my revu request with new changes? <- However you need to use the option '-f' or delete the related *.upload file otherwise you can't upload it newly21:28
shadeslayer_BlackZ: yes know about that :)21:28
shadeslayer_dput -f :)21:28
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: http://pastebin.com/LtP8E9wZ21:30
shadeslayer_thats even worse than debuild :P21:31
ari-tczewBlackZ: new upstream xchat is available to merge21:31
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: http://pastebin.com/NSLtUiUG21:32
BlackZari-tczew: oh really? I will merge it then21:32
BlackZI didn't know, sorry21:32
ari-tczewBlackZ: ;)21:32
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: also after line 58,which dir is the script in? the untarred dir or the dir in which the packed sources are present?21:32
ari-tczewthis is an example, when MoM should send e-mail to last uploader with information about merge available21:33
shadeslayer_( probably later according to me )21:33
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: current directory - it never cds21:33
shadeslayer_brb21:35
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: ok21:39
shadeslayer_that means ill have to add some more to the get-orig-source part21:39
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: so, I see your problem. It only worked before because I'd been playing around21:39
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: I think just allow the make clean to fail21:40
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: unless someone who knows qmake better has a suggestion21:40
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: yeah, it looks like your get-orig-source needs testing :)21:40
shadeslayer_yep...21:40
shadeslayer_ok,so finally now,let clean fail,but wont that cause package to ftbfs?21:42
tumbleweedno, I mean say "- $(MAKE) clean"21:42
shadeslayer_ah ..21:42
shadeslayer_i was typing that :P21:42
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: also about dh_prep.. do i let it stay? or use dh_clean -k ?21:42
tumbleweeddon't use clean -k, it's deprecated21:43
shadeslayer_hmm21:43
shadeslayer_tumbleweed: http://shadeslayer.pastebin.com/AseHBtgr21:46
=== keffie_jayx is now known as effie_jayx
tumbleweedshadeslayer_: I simply don't get that. what am I doing wrong? http://shadeslayer.pastebin.com/rfA5EfS421:56
gesertumbleweed: you don't have an space in the directory where you try to build the package like shadeslayer_22:00
geserfrom shadeslayer_: DESTDIR=/home/shadeslayer/ninja/New packages/qipmsg-1.0.0.orig/debian/qipmsg22:00
tumbleweedgeser: :)22:00
geserthe " " in New packages isn't escaped or guarded22:00
tumbleweedwell spotted22:01
tumbleweedoh I suppose that'd have been obvious if I'd read the log properly. must be getting tired22:03
BlackZgeser: in the new xchat package we use dpatch but the maintainer of the package dropped dpatch and adopted quilt, now we have two possibilities: 1. reintroduce dpatch for our patches; 2. rename all patches. What's the best way for you?22:07
micahgBlackZ: why do you have to rename the patches?22:08
geserBlackZ: 3. convert the dpatches to quilt22:08
ari-tczewhow can I get buildlog from pbuilder-dist ?22:09
Laney~/pbuilder/blah_result/last_operation.log22:09
BlackZmicahg: in the currently debian package the patches are in the *.patch ext, for an "university" reason22:09
BlackZalso, the package uses quilt as well, now22:09
geserari-tczew: pbuilder-dist maverick build --logfile build.log a_package.dsc22:10
geseroh, pbuiler-dist logs by default?22:10
Laneyyep22:10
micahgBlackZ: right, but you're merging from debian, right?  so, just convert whatever patches we add like geser suggested22:11
BlackZyes, I missed that, thanks geser22:11
ari-tczewthanks Laney and geser22:12

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!